Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
4(1), 9~17(1981)
analytical techniques.
Ampicillin
and
ultraviolet
and
cloxaciUin
to
the
quantitative analysis of
magnetic
resonance
(NMR)
spectrometry.
Application
of NMR
spectrometry to
EXPERIMENTAL
Reagents
10
~ample
spectroscopy (Merck)
: Amp.Na
& Clox 500mg
injections
and
A m p . 3H20
mg Amp= IAmp
W.A~p/1
IMp1 M.W.~al/2
various
Mal
from Amp
commercial
sources
from Clox
Apparatus
were
probe
scanned
at
temperature
of 35~
Micro-balance : Matfler type M-5
UV spectrophotometer: Pye Unicam SP
1750
Procedure
weight
of
maleic acid
RvR
= Relative
proton
ratio
mixture
was
weighed
same
amount - as
was obtained.
11
The concentration
of Clox was
on the
absorbance
of
mixture.
cloxaciUin mixture.
19
As shown
could
be
determined
easly without
a n y interference.
In the N M R
spectrum
of A m p - 3 H 2 0 ,
Amp 9 3H20
1.47
1.58
3.98
4.50
5.46
7.37
8.70
Clox
h 1.40
i 1.50
j 4.08
k 4.90
1 4.96
m 5.40
n 6.95
o 7.41
p,~9
q
r
s
t
u
1.46
2.70
3.52
3.95
5.46
5.52
v 7.59
w 8.16
overlapped.
The chemical shifts of A m p . Na, A m p . 3H20
a n d Clox were appeared as Table I.
standard.
Standard
Adding 10 mg of maleic acid in the mixture,
On
this experiment,
~H 2 ~
_
the
amount
(g)
H
(e)
I N
H
_ N~ _ _ _ _ ~ s
..~.
{b)
CH~
%" *
'
(c)
So in this experiment,
(P) ~m)
j H
!/
14
N
0
(i)
-3Ho 0
--"~"""'
O0 OH
[
(j}
t.
~ /
cH3 H[W)
~'
[v~
Cloxac-iilin
of
(u)
"f-- " ~
L___ ,14
'
amount
f;cj
ArT~icil] J n t r ~hydr~te
(r)
N/O~
the
'
T".,, (~)
13
peak,
A m p . 3H20
was
14
Amp 9 Na
found
recovery
mg
~o
--added
mg
25.195
Clox
found
mg
added
mg
recovery
~o
Amp 9 3H O
found
recovery
mg
Yo
--added
mg
40.320
40.493
100.43
25.260
40.000
39.699
99.25
.
.
25.630
40.460
41.244
101.94
25.115
--
--
--
40.755
41.319
102.35
--
--
25.300
--
--
41.230
42.698
103.56
--
25.025
--
--
--
39.360
40.974
104.10
--
--
25.170
40.335
41.752
--103.51
25.035
39.960
41.247
103.22
25.030
41.445
42.668
102.95
24.970
39.575
39.738
100.41
40.755
41.829
102.64
--
--
--
25.350
40.820
40.160
98.38
39.910
40.064
100.39
--
--
--
25.160
40.100
39.740
99.10
25.085
--
41.600
41.235
99.12
--
--
39.825
40.460
101.59
39.880
39.893
100.03
--
25.310
--
--
--
39.945
40.913
102.42
40.125
40.300
100.44
25.330
--
--
--
40.320
40.601
100.70
40.120
39.721
99.00
M.V.=99.92
M.V.= 101.87
M . V . - - 101.53
c. v.= 1.16%
C.V.=1.47~o
C.V.=1.74~
M . V. = m e a n v a l u e
C. V. = coefficent of variation
impossible
(Fig.
Calibration
Amp
and
respectively
Fig.
9).
Curve
Clox
by
standard
NMR
method
were
in
calibrated
the
range
12: S t a b i l i t y o f a m p i c i l l i n N a 9 a n d c l o x a c i l l i n .
mixture.
Fig.
13. S t a b i l i t y o f a m p i c i l l i n 9 3 H 2 0 a n d C l o x a c i l l i n
mixture.
Amp
15
UV.
Clox
added mg
found mg
recovery%
added mg
found mg
recovery %
9.97
9.96
9.98
9.96
9.98
9.82
9.91
9.82
98.50
98.60
99.30
98.59
----98.50
98.59
99.30
99.89
----10.03
10.01
10.07
10.00
10.03
10.01
10.07
10.00
----10.08
9.97
10.00
9.92
10.08
9.97
10.00
9.92
---
--
---
9.97
9.96
9.98
9.96
---9.82
9.82
9.91
9.82
M.V.---98.75 C.V.-~0.33~
M. V. =mean value
C.V. =coefficent of variation
M.V.=99.66
100.53
99.60
99,30
99.20
100.53
99.60
99.30
99.20
C.V. =0.53~
A m p . Na,
Amp 9 3H20,
Clox
standard
Ill).
as follows.
found by N M R
CSA mg=Clox sample
method
Asr ~ g = A m p standard a m o u n t
amount
found by N M R
method
amount
found by N M R
method
16
Maleic
acid
mg
25.090
25.700
25.070
25.535
25.165
25.535
25.025
25.610
25.415
25.375
25.275
25.130
25.225
26.015
25.245
Sarnaplefilled
in vial or cap.
nag
582.080
576.740
573.500
565.510
555.250
571.785
591.825
604.720
616.475
610.750
608.610
603.760
299.890
310.905
301.580
Taken
sample Amp 9 Na
nag
80.740
46.429
80.082
42.019
80.095 41.528
79.855 39.433
80.265 41.588
80.310
40.203
80.035
-80.500
-80.485
-79.990
-80.565
-80.295
-80.230
-80.595
-80,760
--
Amp 9 3H20
------40.445
40.640
40.479
39.074
39.663
38.960
40.033
38.598
40.591
recovery .%o
Clox
Amp 9 Na
40.394
40.853
40.046
42.645
40.695
42.341
40.432
40.511
37.956
40.334
40.649
39.713
40.871
40.035
39.142
Amp 9 3H~O
M.V.=101.21
C. V.= 1.55y,
found by NMR
The
101.92
102.96
100.36
105.70
98.53
102.52
104.29
106.51
101.75
107.78
107.48
104.51
106.94
108.11
103.02
--
-----100.40
102.85
104.45
100.51
100.94
98.69
100.82
100.32
101.95
Clox
104.16
2.69~
method
b e i m p o s s i b l e to d e t e r m i n e because C H p e a k
TA
= strength o f A m p s t a n d a r d
a n d w a t e r p e a k o f A m p . 3 H 2 0 were o v e r l a p p e d
TC
= s t r e n g t h o f Clox s t a n d a r d
But
DT
= d e c l a r e d strength
result a p p e a r e d
as T a b l e t/
N a c o u l d n o t be
maleic a c i d i n t e r a c t e d with w a t e r o f
s e p a r a t e the
CH
p e a k.
Therefore,
it was
p o s s i b l e to d e t e r m i n e the A m p . 3 H 2 0 mixture.
d e t e r m i n e d b e c a u s e it was dit~cult to o b t a i n
3.
t h e s t a n d a r d o f A m p 9 N a in this experiment.
amount by NMR
CONCLUSION
m e t h o d was p r o p o r t i o n a l
t o the s t a n d a r d a m o u n t .
T h e relative p r o t o n r a t i o o f A m p 9 3H20
t.
In NMR
s p e c t r u m o f A m p . N a & Clox
4.
C l o x a n d t h a t at 4.57 p p m represented A m p
:specifically.
whole NMR
The
p r o c e d u r e h a d to be finished
within 2 hrs.
5.
T h e coefficients o f variation o f A m p . 3 H 2 0
as
the i n t e r n a l s t a n d a r d .
a n d Clox in v a r i o u s c o m m e r c i a l p r e p a r a t i o n s
2.
:na0nitorring
in biological material.
LITERATURE CITED
17
7) Davidson, A. G., and Stenlake, J. B., The specto-photometric determination of ampicillin and
cloxacillin in combined preparations. J. Pharm.
PharmacoL, 25 (suppl.), 156 (1973).
8) De Leo, S., and Pitrolo, G., Iodometric determination of ampicillin and cloxacillin in a mixture.
Bull. Chim. Farm., 112, 487 (1973).