KCI Terminal Update Dec 10, 2015 City Council Presentation

PRESENTATION | December 10, 2015
KCI Terminal Development Program Process Update
CITY COUNCIL SESSION
BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015
Existing Kansas City International (KCI) Airport
Current
Terminal
Complex
Facilities
Existing KCI Terminal Facilities

Closed
Facility
YearBuilt
Age
STRUCTURE
Terminals
A,B,&C
1972
Refurbish
2004
Parking
GarageA
1987
28YearsOld
Parking
GarageB
1989
26YearsOld
Parking
GarageC
1997
18YearsOld
Apron
1995to
2000
15to20
YearsOld
Underground
Utilities
1972
43to48
YearsOld
43Years
INTERIOR
11 Years
Apprehension to Move to KCI in 1972

The first impression may be of a modern-day
Stonehenge
The words lean-to and outhouse were
applied to Municipal and some wag will call
K.C.I. a three ring circus. Likely, however, the
words will be expletives
Therell be stories, too:
I parked at gate five and my return flight came
in at gate 21 (or terminal B or C)
Source: K.C.I. Special, The Kansas

City Star, Sunday, October 15, 1972
Security Paradigm Shift | Nov. 12, 1972
U.S. Airport Terminal Designs

Since DFW was opened in 1974, no other U.S. peer airport has replicated KCIs configuration
Kansas City Intl
Indianapolis Intl
Nashville Intl
Raleigh-Durham Intl
Dallas Love Field
Detroit Metropolitan
General Mitchell Intl (Milwaukee)
John Wayne-Orange County
Lambert-St Louis Intl
Louis Armstrong New Orleans Intl
Metropolitan Oakland Intl
Norman Y. Mineta San Jose Intl
Pittsburgh Intl
Port Columbus Intl
Portland Intl
Sacramento Intl
San Antonio Intl
Southwest Florida Intl
Austin-Bergstrom Intl
William P Hobby (Houston)
Taxpayers Do Not Pay Airport Costs!
City tax revenues do NOT, and

will NOT, pay for airport
operations or capital projects
Airport Finance is a Closed System

Under Federal Law
KCI Improvements are Funded by Airlines & Travelers
Airport Fees & Charges Stay at KCI
Federal law prohibits spending airport fees for other city purposes
Airport Revenue Bonds

Bonds are secured based only on airport fees & charges, passenger facility
charges & federal grants not with city or state taxes
Each of the three major rating agencies have taken positive rating actions on
KCI within the last three years
Theratingalsoincorporatesthepotentialforthelargescaleairportredevelopmentplan.
Moody'srevisestopositivetheoutlookonKansasCityAirportEnterprise,MoodysInvestorService,20Jun2015
Airport Terminal Timeline
Exhibit K & Project Goals

Customer
Convenience
Affordability
Construct
-ability
Efficiency
Advanced
Planning
Airport
Terminal
Advisory
Group
Public
Input
Council
Resolution:
Exhibit K
Improving
KCI
Use & Lease

Negotiations
Flexibility
Technology
RightSized
The Airlines say doing nothing is not an option

Customer convenience and affordability are top City and Airline priorities
Requires Airport and Airline collaboration in evaluating airport and airline data
Evaluates alternatives for Major Renovations & New Terminal Developments
Recommendation of a Preferred Terminal Development by May 1, 2016
10
Airport Terminal Gate Comparison

176
180
160
144
140
Gates
120
105
KCI Peer Airports 7 to 13 million pax
100
80
63
60
40
40
20
20
30
34
33
35
32
0
IND
DAL
Indianapolis DallasLove
Field
11
MSY
New
Orleans
SMF
Sacramento
SJC
SanJose
AUS
Austin
STL
St.Louis
KCI
Kansas
City/2025
DEN
DFW
ORD
Denver
DallasFort Chicago
(53million Worth(64 (70million
pax)
millionpax)
pax)
Existing Space/Terminal Requirements

FUNCTION
Existing* Requirements
35
29
Gates
Ticketing/Checkin
SecurityCheckpoint
p
g
PostSecurityDepartureCorridor
PostSecurityRestrooms
AirlineClub
InternationalArrivals
Concessions
PreSecurityCirculation,Restrooms,andSeating
BagClaim
BaggageMakeup
AirlineOperations/ATO/BSO
NonPublicSpaces
TerminalFunctions(HVAC,MEP)
TerminalFunctions(HVAC,MEP)
TotalArea (Square Feet)

TotalArea
20,879
29,951
0
4,949
0
21,001
60,097
156,283
17,745
72,761
96,591
91,955
101,357
101,357
32,000
18,640
95,540
11,200
2,500
31,460
70,660
58,200
45,710
82,080
56,720
49,450
117,200
117,200
773,850
773,850
752,960
752,960
*36 Existing Gates, 29 leased

12
Post-Security
Space Undersized
by Nearly OneHalf
Pre-Security
Space Nearly 3x
Amount Needed
Bag Claim Space
is 1/3 of Required
Space
Non Public Space
Oversized by
Nearly 2x Amount
Needed
Whats good about the existing Terminals

Local passengers are familiar with configuration and timing
to process
Departure Process
Curb
Check-in
Gate
Depart
Arrival Process
Curb
13
Bag Claim
Gate
Arrive

Short walking distances
MCI has to be the easiest airport ever. Easy

drop off right in front of check in which is right
next to the gates. Every couple gates has it's
own security.
Almost as easy as a private airport.
Cheri A- Yelp
14

Variety of Parking Options at Various Price Points
Circle E1
Parking
To Economy Lots
B, C, and
Off Airport Parking
Circle E4
Parking
Circle E3
Parking
Garage B
15
ValetParking
ShortTerm
CurbService
Terminal Garages
ShortTerm
B&C
Circle E2
Parking
Valet
Parking
TYPE OFPARKING
Garage C
CircleParking
E1 E4
Short/Long
TermSurface
Economy Lots
BandC
LongTerm
ParkAirExpress
&TheParking
Spot
Offairport
LongTerm

Meeter/Greeter Advantages
Seats to sit and wait
Non-secure concessions available
Ample pre-secure restrooms
KCI is old school in the fact that

your loved ones can wait in the
unsecured area, but close to your
gate - so they can greet you when
you arrive.
Tim K.- Yelp
16

Security Screening Checkpoint
Individual checkpoints at multiple
locations
Congestion localized to individual
checkpoints
This is the fastest security of any

airport! They are friendly and check-in is
right at your gate! Amazing! This makes
air travel super easy!
Kim S.- Yelp
Processing time is convenient

at non-peak periods
ValetParking
Terminal B
Terminal C
Security Checkpoint
Departure Lounge
17
Whats not good about the existing Terminals

Security Screening
Checkpoints
Insufficient capacity at
certain locations
TSA Pre cannot be
offered at all
checkpoints
Dear @KCIAirport
please get it together.
Lots of grumpy
Monday morning
travelers. Such a
terrible experience.
Amy Konrath
Twitter, 4:06 AM - 8
Sep 2015
Scattered checkpoint locations complicate

security control and staffing
No equipment backup if screening devices
fail
Passenger delays at checkpoint
can result in missed flights
18

Security Screening Building Geometry - 72-foot concourse width
Precludes normal orientation of security lanes from curb to gate
Cannot easily accommodate current TSA lane requirements or new
screening layouts (60 x 150)
Any renovations must follow the current TSA guidelines
Inadequate space for passenger queuing
Insufficient lanes for TSA Pre at several locations
19

Departure Lounge Geometry
Small departure lounges cannot be expanded
Outdated layout does not allow for group
seating
Crowded conditions limit loading and
unloading processes
Combining separate departure lounges
requires narrow backside corridor
Departure Lounge &

Circulation Area
20
Yes this airport may be easy to get

in and out of but if you suffer from
claustrophobia or don't like a lot of
people crammed into one area -
AVOID AVOID AVOID MCI.

Anastasia U.-Yelp

Departure Lounge Size/Amenities
Insufficient seating and power outlets
Restrooms are too few and too small
Peer terminals offer sit-down restaurants, bars,
airline clubs, retail accessible to everyone
Lack of departure lounge workstations
21
@KCIAirport inexplicably has a

single mens RR stall for 8
gates. Designers must have
been Barbarians.
CW_Humphreys - Twitter

Curbside
Passenger congestion and confusion for

pickup/drop-off
Competition for curbside space among

shuttles, buses, vans, limos, taxis, and private
vehicles
Parking often unavailable at Terminal B
Limited shelter for commercial curb

Once again all parking lots
near Terminal B are full.
Remind me again how
convenient #kci supposedly
is??
Jennifer Peters via Twitter
22

Baggage Screening
Baggage screening is a 2-step process for
more than 50% of KCIs passengers
We've got nothing against Kansas City.

It would be a lovely place to visit if
they ever replace that toy airport
with a real one.
Potential for lost baggage

No backup if individual system goes down
Sports Illustrated July 20, 2015

MICHAEL ROSENBERG
Senior Writer, Sports Illustrated
You've got baggage issues, @KCIAirport John Bryan -- Twitter 8:22 PM - 19 Dec 2014.
23

Structural Constraints
Concrete walls limit
potential for interior
expansion or
accommodating other
uses
Large columns restrict
expansion potential
We had a lousy crystal ball, . . .

We couldnt read the future.
Kivett and Myers
(Architects of Existing Terminals)
Rainn Wilson Tweet
(Actor from
television comedy The Office)
Concrete
Columns
24
Kansas City, I love your teams,

BBQ & people. But your airport
looks like it was designed by a 87
year old, color-blind prison guard.
9:29 AM - 25 Sep 2015

I don't think
people appreciate
the fact that it's
falling apart
(underneath).
Dan Cranshaw
ATAG member in
ATAG presentation,
lawyer, and frequent
traveler
Aging Infrastructure underground

utilities, apron, & terminal roadways
Increases potential for critical failure of
mechanical systems (electric, plumbing,
fueling, HVAC)
Increases need for ongoing maintenance
that translates into higher operating costs
Energy efficiency upgrades are limited
25
At more than 40 years

old, the underground
distribution network
providing chilled water
to and from each of
MCI's three terminals
had a long history of
line breaks that caused
costly disruptions to
airport operations.
Robert Nordstrom
Journalist for
AirportImprovement.com

Peak time delays due to aircraft push back from gates into
taxiways at Terminals A, B, & C
This condition cannot be changed when using existing terminals
Aircraft push back from gates into a single taxilane between terminals
Distance between terminal and taxiways limits expansion potential

Terminal
Closed
A
Terminal
B
Taxiway Conflict Area

Pushback Conflict Area
Building Restriction
Line
26
Terminal
C

Bus Operations
Multiple stops
Buses often fill before last stop, forcing passengers
to wait for another bus
Affects curbside congestion and wayfinding
Higher operating costs due to complexity of multi-stop routes
No Taxi Stand
Passengers must call and wait for taxis
Terminal B
Terminal C
Bus Stop
27

Top 10 Least Pleasant Airports by Frequent Travelers in
North America as of September 2014
Average score*
Security
New York LaGuardia (LGA)

Los Angeles International (LAX)
6.1
New York John F. Kennedy (JFK)

Chicago O'Hare (ORD)
Philadelphia International (PHL)
Kansas City International (MCI)
12
5.6
6.1
5.6
4.8
6.3
5.9
5.1
5.4
6.2
6.2
5.8
6.3
7.5
18
4.9
5.8
6.1
16
4.6
5.6
5.2
Shopping
3.8
Source: Bloomberg Businessweek.

Note: United States; Canada; September to November 2014; 3,000+; travelers who have taken at least
one round-trip in the past year.
28
14
5.3
5.9
Ft. Lauderdale - Hollywood (FLL)

Washington Dulles (IAD)
10
4.7
5.6
Newark Liberty International (EWR)

Miami International (MIA)
Restrooms
6.1
6.7
4.4
20
Facts,IndustryData+PublicInput
Advanced
Planning
Airport
Terminal
Advisory
Group
Public
Input
Council
Resolution:
ExhibitK
Airport Terminal Advisory Group Briefings and Town Hall Meetings.

Image Source: Austin Alonzo Reporter- Kansas City Business Journal.
29
Use&Lease
Negotiations
ExhibitKOrganizationalStructure/Experts
CityofKansasCity
Mayor/CityCouncil
AirlineTechnical
Rep
AvAirPros
Airport&Airline
AffairsCommittee
(AAAC)
AAAC
Chairperson
orDesignee
KansasCity
InternationalAirport
DirectorofAviation
DeputyDirector
Finance
DeputyDirector
Engineering
ProgramDirector
TERMINALPLANNINGTEAM
L&B
LANDSIDE
HNTB
UTILITIES&CUP
SKDesign
HNTB
MEPFP
Ross&Baruzzini
PGAL/WA
TERMINAL
PROGRAMMING
L&B
CONCEPTUALDESIGN
MAJOR
RENOVATION
PGAL
WA
NEWTERMINAL
PGAL
BagHandlingSystems
VTC
30
KCADAdvisor
LeighFisher
DeputyDirector
Commercial
Development
Leadership
Committee
TerminalPlanning
Team
AIRSIDE
L&B
FUELING
HNTB
DEICING
L&B
HNTB
CONCESSIONS
AirProjects Inc.
COSTESTIMATING
Connico
Overview of Terminal Planning Approach

Major Renovation | MR
New Terminal | NT
MR | OPTION A NT | OPTION A
MR | OPTION B NT | OPTION B
31
Two-Track Terminal Evaluation Process

Initial
Screening
Charrette
Design team started with 27 concepts

Major Renovation
MR
5 Concepts
12 DIFFERENT CONCEPTS
Site Plans
Floor plans
Space requirements
Terminal section diagrams
Construction phasing
New Terminal
NT
7 Concepts
Design team instructed to improve and blend best elements of preferred concepts
Charrette
Major Renovation
MR
2 Concepts
5 DIFFERENT CONCEPTS
Refine/improve prior
concepts
Identify level of finishes
and building systems
New Terminal
NT
3 Concepts
Design team instructed to further refine/improve and develop comparative cost

4 estimates
DIFFERENT CONCEPTS
Charrette Major Renovation
New Terminal
Continue refining and
3
32
MR
2 Concepts
improving concepts
High level comparative
cost estimating
NT
2 Concepts
Proposed Conceptual Site Plans

Major Renovation | MR
MRA
NTA
MRB
NTB
LEGEND
Renovated Space
New Terminal
Garage
33
New Terminal | NT

COST: $1.191 Billion
Major Renovation | MR A
(2015 dollars)
Reuses existing
Terminal A & B
concourses
Builds a new, two level
central processor at
both Terminals A & B
Provides separate
arrivals and departures
roadways, curbs and
parking garages for
each terminal
Added square footage
increases cost
LEGEND
Renovated Space
New Terminal
Garage
34
Major Renovation A - $1.191 Billion (2015 dollars)

$1.191 Billion in 2015 dollars
GOALS
Customer
Convenience
Affordability
Constructability
Technology
PROS
Shortwalkingdistances Noabilitytoincorporate
tooriginanddestination movingwalkwaysin
gates
curvedconcourses
Mostexpensive
alternative
Verydifficulttoconstruct
during ongoing
operationsandrequires
multipleairlinemoves
Newsystem
technologies
Flexibility
Someflexibilityto
expandintoend
concoursegates
Efficiency
Improvedbutsplit
checkinandsecurity
screening
Arrivals
35
Sometechnologies willbe
morecostlytoinstall
withinexistingstructure
Terminalsignificantly
exceedsnecessarysquare
footage
RightSized
Departures
CONS
Limitedexpansion
capabilitiesbeyondend
gateswouldresultinneed
toactivate3rdterminal
Aircraftpushbackconflicts
withTaxiwayDand
culdesacarenotfixable.
Difficultbaggagetugand
cartoperations

COST: $1.046 Billion
Major Renovation | MR B
(2015 dollars)
Reuses existing
Terminal A & B
concourses
Builds a new, two level
central processor
between Concourses A
&B
Provides separate
roadways and curbs
LEGEND
Renovated Space
New Terminal
Garage
36
Builds a new central

parking garage and
reuses portions of
existing A & B Garages
Major Renovation B - $1.046 Billion (2015 dollars)

$1.046 Billion in 2015 dollars
GOALS
Customer
Convenience
PROS
Possessespassenger
convenience
improvementsover
existing
Affordability
Constructability
Technology
Newsystem
technologies
RightSized
Departures
Flexibility
Someflexibilityto
expandtotheweston
thecenter concourse
Efficiency
Improvedconsolidated
checkinandsecurity
screening
Arrivals
37
CONS
Long walkingdistances
tofarthestgateswith
noabilitytoincorporate
movingwalkways
More expensivethan
bothNTsbutless
expensivethanMRA
Difficulttophasewith
ongoingoperationsat
TerminalB
Sometechnologies willbe
morecostlytoinstall
withinexistingstructure
Terminalsignificantly
exceedsnecessarysquare
footage
Limited flexibilityto
expandbeyondthecenter
concourseduetoreusing
existingterminals
Aircraftpushbackconflicts
withTaxiwayDnot
fixable.Difficultbaggage
tugandcartoperations

COST: $964 Million
New Terminal | NT A
(2015 dollars)
Builds a new
centralized terminal
at the Terminal A site
Provides separate
roadways and curbs
parking garage
Reuses B garage
LEGEND
New Terminal
Garage
38
New Terminal A - $964 Million (2015 dollars)

$964 Million in 2015 dollars
GOALS
Customer
Convenience
Affordability
Constructability
39
Arrivals
Leastexpensive
alternative
Phases moreeasilyand
quicklythaneitherMR
orNTBalternatives
Allnewsystem
technologies
RightSized
New terminalexactly
meetsrequirements
Efficiency
CONS
Possessesall passenger
conveniencefeatures
Technology
Flexibility
Departures
PROS
Able toincrementally
expandto southontwo
concourses,reusesB
Garage
Efficientconsolidated
checkin,security
screening,baggage
operations
Afewgateshavesingle
taxilaneaccessonthe
northernconcourse

COST: $972 Million
New Terminal | NT B
(2015 dollars)
Builds a new
centralized terminal
at the Terminal A site
Provides separate
curbs
parking garage
Reuses B garage
LEGEND
New Terminal
Garage
40
New Terminal B - $972 Million (2015 dollars)

$972 Million in 2015 dollars
GOALS
PROS
Customer
Convenience
Possessesall passenger
conveniencefeatures
Affordability
LessexpensivethanMRs
Phases moreeasily
Constructability thaneitherMR
Technology
RightSized
Departures
Flexibility
Efficiency
Slightly moreexpensive
thanNTA
Requiresan additional
phasingstepthanNTA
Allnewsystem
technologies
New terminalexactly
meetsrequirements
Able toincrementally
expandto southon
oneconcourse,reusesB
Garage
Efficientconsolidated
checkin, security
screening,spiltbaggage
operations
Arrivals
41
CONS
Lessexpansionflexibility
thanNTA
Afewgateshavesingle
taxilaneaccessanda
blindcorneronthe
northernconcourse
Conceptual Cost Estimates

Major Renovation
MR A
Facilities
MR B
NT A
NT B
Terminal
$803,176,000
$730,913,000
$593,255,000
$579,427,000
Parking & Roads
$264,232,000
$196,779,000
$217,321,000
$218,021,000
$81,062,000
$76,233,000
$104,772,000
$126,666,000
$30,913,000
$30,483,000
$27,695,000
$27,695,000
$10,294,000
$10,393,000
$18,885,000
$18,885,000
$1,565,000
$1,608,000
$1,619,000
$1,634,000
Aprons & Taxiways

Mechanical, Electrical
& Plumbing
Aircraft Fueling
System
Deicing System
Total Cost
$1.191 B
$1.046 B
Note: Values in 2015 dollars.

42
New Terminal
$964 M
$972 M
MR and NT Alternatives Evaluation

GOALS
MAJORRENOVATION(MR)
NEWTERMINAL(NT)
Customer
Convenience
BetterthantodaysterminalsbutlessthanNT
More passengerconveniencesforall
passengers
Affordability
Highercapitalandoperatingcostthan NT
Lowercapitalandoperatingcostthan MR
Construct
ability
Moredifficultandlongertimetoconstruct
thanNTs withfarmorepassengerdisruptions
duringconstruction
Isolated siteallowseasierandshorter
constructiontimethanMRwithless
passengerdisruptions
Technology
Some limitationsonabilitytoincludeallnew
technologies
Allnewtechnologiesforallfunctions
RightSized
Requiresmorespacethanrequireddueto
itsinefficientconfigurationandduplication
offunctions
Avoidsduplicatecentralprocessors,
bagsystems,concessions,moving
walkways,parkinggarages
Flexibility
Existingconcretestructureandcircular
configurationlimitstheflexibilityof
functionalusesandexpansionoptions
Newstructureandlayoutprovides
betterflexibilityof spatialusesand
moreexpansionpotential
Efficiency
LessoperationallyefficientthanNTdueto
airside,terminal,andlandsideoperational
constraints
Moreefficientairside, terminaland
landsideoperationsthanMR
43
Facility Requirements: MR / NT
FUNCTION
Gates
Ticketing/Checkin
SecurityCheckpoint
DepartureLounges
PublicSpace/DepartureCorridor
AirlineClub
InternationalArrivals
Concessions
BagClaim
BaggageMakeup
AirlineOperations/ATO/BSO
NonPublicSpaces
TerminalFunctions
TotalAreainUse(SquareFeet)
UnassignedSpace
UnbuiltTugDriveThrough
UndevelopedSpace
TotalGrossArea(SquareFeet)
44
Major
Renovation
35
35
Requirements
New
Terminal
35
32,000
18,640
81,600
164,940
2,500
31,460
70,660
45,710
82,080
56,720
49,450
117,200
49,344
21,693
92,859
211,518
4,163
40,003
73,245
50,641
127,494
66,814
49,766
120,038
34,901
18,654
82,395
170,048
2,546
34,106
68,633
45,401
79,882
52,961
44,818
117,663
752,960
907,578
752,008
143,165
29,056
21,542
24,889
12,929
752,960 1,079,799
811,368
MR Oversized by 21%
NT Right-Sized
To Provide Future
Expansion Capability:
MR Oversized by 43%
NT Oversized by 8%
Airline Recommendations:
Airlines and KCAD concluded that Major Renovation (MR)
alternatives presented significant shortfalls:
Limited options to meet the goal of improved customer convenience
Higher capital cost
Higher ongoing operating and life cycle cost
Substandard operational performance
More difficult phasing and lengthy construction
The Airline-Airport Affairs Committee unanimously proposed

tabling further study of MR options
The Airline-Airport Affairs Committee will continue to review
and refine New Terminal (NT) options
45
Next Steps: Exhibit K Process
Refine
New Terminal
Options
Recommendations
to City Council
Design & Layout

Cost Estimations
Airline Agreement
Terms of New Business

Arrangement with
Airlines
46
QUESTION & ANSWER
47

KCI Terminal Update Dec 10, 2015 City Council Presentation

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

KCI Terminal Update Dec 10, 2015 City Council Presentation

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

PRESENTATION | December 10, 2015

KCI Terminal Development Program Process Update

CITY COUNCIL SESSION

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Existing Kansas City International (KCI) Airport

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Existing KCI Terminal Facilities

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Apprehension to Move to KCI in 1972

Source: K.C.I. Special, The Kansas

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Security Paradigm Shift | Nov. 12, 1972

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

U.S. Airport Terminal Designs

Kansas City Intl

Dallas Love Field

General Mitchell Intl (Milwaukee)

John Wayne-Orange County

Lambert-St Louis Intl

Louis Armstrong New Orleans Intl

Metropolitan Oakland Intl

Norman Y. Mineta San Jose Intl

Port Columbus Intl

San Antonio Intl

Southwest Florida Intl

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

William P Hobby (Houston)

Taxpayers Do Not Pay Airport Costs!

City tax revenues do NOT, and

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Airport Finance is a Closed System

Airport Revenue Bonds

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Airport Terminal Timeline

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Exhibit K & Project Goals

Use & Lease

The Airlines say doing nothing is not an option

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Airport Terminal Gate Comparison

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Existing Space/Terminal Requirements

TotalArea (Square Feet)

*36 Existing Gates, 29 leased

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Whats good about the existing Terminals

Whats good about the existing Terminals

MCI has to be the easiest airport ever. Easy

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Whats good about the existing Terminals

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Whats good about the existing Terminals

KCI is old school in the fact that

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Whats good about the existing Terminals

This is the fastest security of any

Processing time is convenient

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Whats not good about the existing Terminals

Scattered checkpoint locations complicate

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015

Whats not good about the existing Terminals

BUSINESS SESSION PRESENTATION 12/10/2015