Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
4PS Challenge
PHASE II
Characteristics
Gender
Age
Profession
Family income
Home region
Category
Choice of drinks
Primary Research
Qualitative
Research
In-depth
interview
Focus Group
Discussions
Observing
consumers
Quantitative
Research
Online
Survey
Consumption frequency
(Per day)
Place of consumption
43 surveyed
Age: 15-45
(Pan India)
Classification
Frequency Percent
Male
29
69%
Female
13
31%
<20
3
7.14%
20-25
33
78.57%
>25
6
14.29%
Student
31
74%
Housewife
0
0%
Service/jobs
7
17%
Business
2
5%
Other
2
5%
Up to 20000
5
12%
20000-40000
4
10%
40000-60000
10
24%
60000-80000
4
10%
More than 80000
19
45%
North
34
81%
South
2
5%
East
2
5%
West
4
10%
Consumption patterns
Classification
Hot coffee
Cold coffee
Hot tea
Ice tea
1-2 cups
2-4 cups
4-6 cups
More than 6 cups
At work
At home
During commute
At coffee shop
Responses Percentage
11
26%
28
67%
14
33%
12
29%
29
69%
8
19%
4
10%
1
2%
14
33%
15
36%
1
2%
12
29%
Segment
Time
Attributes ( acc.
to ranking)
Perceived
Benefits
Light
Drinkers
Evening
snacks
Taste, Flavor,
Aroma, Brand
Awake,
Prefer Tea,
Freshen up
Medium
Drinkers
Breakfast
and Nights
Flavor, Taste,
Aroma,
Availability
Freshen up,
Awake
Heavy
Drinkers
Breakfast
Flavor, Aroma,
Taste, Impact on
health
Freshen up,
Socialize
Cluster Analysis
ANOVA
KEY HYPOTHESIS
A/R
20%
30%
Fashionable (29.9%)
Follow latest fashion
Love to socialize and hang out with friends
Do not hesitate to try new products
50%
51%
28%
26%
27%
47%
Light Drinkers
Heavy Drinkers
Medium Drinkers
portfolio
Brand Proposition
Key Insights
Tea is a customary beverage. Preferred by all family
members and it is economical.
People who prefer Tea said that Coffee lacks the variety.
People preference of coffee based on seasons. Teenagers
preferred cold coffee.
People perceived benefits from coffee are it tastes good,
it is easy to make, it boost your energy and it is a great
way to socialize.
Milk is a key ingredient of coffee. While milk has a
perceived benefit of health coffee does not have any
synergy with it.
12 consumer interviews
Age: 20-50 Years
7 Males, 5 females
Location: Lucknow
When I want to
hangout with my
friends, I always
prefer coffee
I need coffee to start
my day, it gives me
freshness and energy for
the entire day
Voice of Customer
Attribute Analysis
Nescafe is premium
to me so I buy it for
my special guests
I tried Bru but
Nescafe has a
better taste and
love it
Attributes
Nescafe
Bru
Narasu
Energizing
Taste
Evidence
Promisor
Freshness
Aroma
Compelling
Differentiator
Taste
Smell should be
stimulating and
similar to fresh cocoa
beans
Perceptual Map
Aroma(smell)
Strong Aroma
5.5
Flavor
nescafe
bru
Price
tata caf
4.5
Availability
narasu
Nescafe
Bru
Mean value
Advertisement
creativity
Freshness
Natural( free from
preservatives)
Ease of preparation
3.5
High Price
3
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
5.5
2.5
Low Price
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak Aroma
Provide suggestions for new product offering. Including 1)Target segment 2)Product information 3)Format
4)Pricing strategy
Why NOT Repositioning?
Pricing
Product
Emphasis on taste as it is the most important attribute for Price is not a demotivating factor for coffee consumption
consumers but there is no differentiation within the
Nescafe cold coffee must follow high value strategy
brand
( product is high on quality and medium on price)
Premium product which has rich quality
This should help penetrate the market
Focused on cold coffee offering
New products benefits- energizing and have a caffeine
level which is beneficial for health
GAP
Need Gap Analysis
Promotion
Nescafe cold coffee variant should be promoted
as an alternative other cold beverages
Youth icon especially sportsmen promoting Nescafe
cold coffee as energizing and rejuvenating drinks
Advertisements that establish coffee ingredients
causes no health concerns
Packaging should be sleek and accompanied with
shaker.
Brand mantra for every man who doesnt like to
race blindly and likes his drinks cold
Sponsor talk shows or music shows on youth
channels(MTV,BINDASS)
Packaging
Nescafe
Bright
Place
Intensive distribution strategy
Covering convenience stores, super/hyper markets and
departmental stores in metropolitan cities and Tier 1 and Tier 2
Since similar category product thus follow the current
distribution channel
Conducted IDI and asked about their buying behavior for Nescafe and Bru gold
I am a price sensitive consumer and Bru is much attracted then nescafe so I will go for Bru
Limitations
of the study
Majorly data is from north
India (almost 90%)
No direct competitors of
Nescafe apart from Bru
Sample size of in-depth
interview and focused group
discussions are small and
limited to Lucknow
Media Strategy | Budget Allocation of Rs. 34,35,96,960 | BookMark Campaign for Increased Brand Recall | Product Placement In Movies
Budget Allocation
TV
68.18
81.82
1.00
38.46
36.0%
43.2%
0.5%
20.3%
123.62 148.35
1.81
69.74
0.018
0.016 189.50
0.0095
0.0037%
% 0.0084% 100.0%
0.0288 343.60
Communication Objective
Youth
Males
Young adults
Large audience
Elder people
displayed in office/school
canteens and near cafs
Communication strategy
Non integrated
explicit
product
placement
Target audience
CINEMA
3 It will be displayed in
0.007
0.0127 0.0326
Banner
TV
Reinforce the TV
commercial with similar
theme but will not be
detailed
4 Focused on
school/University and
office commuters
General banners
will be displayed
in major cities
like Delhi,
Gurgaon,
Mumbai,
Kolkata
Chennai
Press
2 Target audience: :
Place ad on front
page of
newspaper for
larger audience
Place ad on journal
on last cover page
as it will be more
visual
4
Back page Idea: Nescafe
Bookmarks
Rationale:
Book reading during
free time &
preference to drinks
during that time
Focus on Spring &
Collection of
Magazines
Media: Newspaper &
Travel, Food Magazines
4 For youth
Follow your passion, try something
new today, but first have your cup
of Nescaf
Current rating
Replacement rate
High
Gross margin
Low
Adjustment
Low
Time of consumption
Low
5 minutes
Searching time
low
Nescafe Bright
Dept. store/Supermarket/hypermarket
A new product launch will need a separate
floor stand which will have only Nescafe
SKUs to increase brand recall
A counter display should be around cash
counter with small SKUs for impulsive buyers
6
4 Display of products in
community retailer on
the cash counter
B2C
Margins
Nescafe
Sale price
C&F Agent
4%
Regional distributor
Retailer
7%
Consumer
Market
price
Margins
Nescafe
Sale price
C&F Agent
4%
Businesses/ organization
5%
At the P.O.S during scanning of The billing will add 2 sachet packs of
product for billing
Nescafe bright free of cost that can be
If the product in basket had any
taken from Nescafe counter display
of the following product of any This will lead to trail of our product
brand : tea packets, bags or
Basic requirement- integration
competitor coffee brands
with billing system
That sachet will have discount Basic premise-consumers would
codes that can be redeemed in like to try a product thats for free
next purchase for a higher
given at the P.O.S billing counter
weighing S.K.U
Target channel supermarket
B2B
5%
Timeline
Channel structure
Channel structure
Point of sale
Community retailer
community retailer &
department store
Dept.store/Supermarket/
hypermarket/online
grocery store
Roadmap for sampling | Total Sampling Budget 1,32,08,000 (4% of 350) | Target Cities: Delhi, Gurgaon, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Bangalore, Hyderabad and Pune
Phase 3: Colleges & universities
Cost of 8
cities
5000
5000
50000
4,00,000
Coffee vending
machine
12000*2
24000
240000
1,920,000
Sales personnel
500*2
3000
30000
2,40,000
300
7*300
2100
21000
1,68,000
27,28,000
Kiosk
Cost head
Cost
for 3
days
Cost of 5
touch
point
Cost of 8
cities
1000*2
2000
10000
80,000
Coffee vending
machine
Sales personnel
500*2
3000
15000
1,20,000
Service cost
5000
15000
75000
6,00,000
7*500
3500
17500
1,40,000
Standee
Cost
unit
Press
Cost of
10
touch
point
Photograph To Autograph
Cost of 8
cities
Cost
for 3
days
Total Cost
Cost unit
Cost of
10 touch
point
10,08,000
No.
Cost for
3 days
Total Cost
Cost
unit
Cost head
Cost unit
Cost at 10
touch points
Total
cost at 8
cities
Ad
Banner
Photograph to
autograph
6000
60000
4,80,000
Round Table
4000
40000
3,20,000
1,67,040
6960/(33*25cm)half
page
20,800
Kiosk
Advertisement in (3)
newspaper
5000
50000
4,00,000
7*500
35000
2,80,000
2*500
10000
80,000
Result Analysis
Cost head