Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUES
A Paper
Submitted to the Graduate Faculty
of the
North Dakota State University
of Agriculture and Applied sciences
By
Varinder Pal Singh
In Partial Fulfillment
for the Degree of
MASTER OF SCIENCE
Major Program:
Electrical & Computer Engineering
May 2012
By
Varinder Pal Singh
The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State
Universitys regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of
MASTER OF SCIENCE
SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE:
Dr. Hongxiang Li
Co-chair
Dr. Bei Gou
Co-chair
Approved:
03/19/2013
Date
ABSTRACT
With the advent of technology, human dependency on power (electricity) and
communication has grown beyond leaps and bounds. Many efforts have been made to
continuously improve and increase the efficiency in both areas. Power Line Communication
(PLC) is a technology where power lines or transmission lines are being used for communication
purposes along with transmitting electrical energy. Because the power grid is already in place,
the PLC has the obvious advantage of reducing communication infrastructure cost. However, the
power grid is designed optimally for power delivery (not the data). The power transmission line
generally appears as a harsh environment for the low-power high-frequency communication
signals. In order to evaluate the performance of PLC, this paper simulates a practical multipath
power line communication channel model and provides the Bit Error Rate (BER) vs signal-tonoise ratio (SNR) curves for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing.
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I take this opportunity to express my utmost gratitude to Dr. Hongxiang Li, for allowing
me to work under his expert supervision, for his guidance and help throughout my course of
graduate studies. I highly appreciate his continuous motivation and direction which kept me
focused towards my goal. I extend my sincere thanks to Dr. Bei Gou (Co-advisor), Dr. Chao
You, Dr. O.P. Yadav, for serving on the committee.
In addition to the supervisory committee I would like to acknowledge sincere efforts of
faculty and staff of the Electrical & Computer Engineering (ECE) Department for sharing
knowledge and making things smooth. I am thankful to the graduate school and Cathy Marks in
particular for providing quick response to my queries and keeping me updated with dates and
deadlines.
I am particularly thankful to my family for their emotional, moral and financial support. I
would like to thanks my friends for making me feel better even when I was doing real bad,
cooking food for me during my exams and making me laugh when I was stressed.
Finally I would like to thanks to Google, Wikipedia and MS word for being very
resourceful to me, without these tools I would not have been able to succeed in academics.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .........................................................................................................iv
LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................vii
LIST OF FIGURES .....................................................................................................................viii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................x
1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................1
2. BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW .................................................................3
2.1. Smart Grid.................................................................................................................3
2.2. Traditional Grid to Smart Grid .................................................................................4
3. PLC (POWER LINE COMMUNICATION)...........................................................................8
3.1. Noise in PLC .............................................................................................................9
3.2. Multipath Channel Model .........................................................................................11
3.3. Existing PLC Implementations .................................................................................14
3.4. PLC Channel Model Simulations, N = 4 .................................................................15
3.5. PLC Channel Model Simulations, N = 15 ...............................................................18
4. BINARY PHASE SHIFT KEYING ........................................................................................20
v
vi
LIST OF TABLES
Table
Page
1. Attenuation and path parameters for PLC channel model, N=4 ...................................17
2. Attenuation and path parameters for PLC channel model, N=15 ..................................19
3. Parameters used in simulation model for generating BER curves .................................35
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
Page
ix
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AMI ...................................................... Advanced Metering Infrastructure
AWGN ................................................. Additive Gaussian Noise
BER ...................................................... Bit Error Rate
BPSK.................................................... Binary Phase Shift Keying
BPL ...................................................... Broadband over Power Line
BW ....................................................... Band Width
CP......................................................... Cyclic Prefix
CENELEC............................................ European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization
DG ........................................................ Distributive Generation
Rx ......................................................... Receiver
DTL ...................................................... Digital Transmission Line
DS ........................................................ Distribution Substation
FFT ....................................................... Fast Fourier Transform
FDM ..................................................... Frequency Division Multiplexing
HV ........................................................ High Voltage
xi
1. INTRODUCTION
Power grid [6] or Electrical grid is an interconnected network of wires and other
components, delivering power from the point of generation to the end user. Major operations
concerned with the aforementioned are:
-
Power generation
Power transmission
Power distribution
Power control
It is evident from the 2003 blackout [1] that existing power grids have severe drawbacks,
which cannot be ignored. These drawback arent the only concerns in themselves, they present a
national security threat as well. The central power generation and distribution system, first
designed by Nicole Tesla, is based on a cascading design and has not been updated ever since its
inception. Failure in one part of the grid leads to failure of other parts due to its cascade design.
Other major reasons which demand the upgrading of the grid is the transmission and distribution
loss of power while transferring it to the end user. As of today, one cannot afford such losses,
seeing as the demand of power supply is consistently increasing.
Another way to cope with the high power consumption rate is to implement the Variable
demand and supply [2] method. An end user - domestic, commercial or industrial - can request
an increase or decrease in the power supply depending upon their current or future load
requirements. Variable demand and supply allows the power distribution system to efficiently
1
channel the power to areas with lower requirements as well as those with higher requirements.
Inclusion of alternative sources of energy contributes to clean energy and plays a vital role in
energy management. As more and more renewable sources are included, power grids not only
have to deal with bidirectional flow of current, but also variable power supply in the region.
Complexity of the existing grid is increased by manifolds when alternative sources of energy like
solar and wind energy are added to the power grid. Effective implementation of the power grid
with additional functionalities, improved reliability and enhanced security requires a systematic
and well established communication system.
The said communication network can be set in two ways. The first approach is to install a
communication network parallel to the grid using a wired/wireless medium. The second
approach uses existing power cables for data transmission, which serves a dual purpose of
controlling the network as well as internet access through power lines. The biggest advantage in
pursuing power line communication is to utilize the existing power grid network, which can
significantly reduce the cost of adding a new infrastructure to the system. Additionally, PLC can
provide internet access for rural areas. However, as power grid cables were designed for
electrical current, the power transmission line acts as a harsh environment for data signals, which
may yield lower throughput or higher error rate at the receivers end.
Grid comes up with option of joining all transmission interfaces directly to the sources or can be
controlled by central grid. The key concept is that all interactions between transmission
interfaces and consumers are multi-directional i.e. uncommon to traditional grid now that users
can also participate in reverse direction. Communication infrastructure is laid over physical
infrastructure of existing grid; doing so achieves automation, robustness and efficient power grid.
By designing communication architecture to support Smart Grid, one can choose from
currently available communication technologies; among wireless, wired/cable, cellular, or power
line itself. Each has different advantages and disadvantages even hybrid combination of them
could be used.
transmission cable connecting substations to domestic houses. The source of noise at LV can be
internal (inside the power network) or external (outside the power network). A detailed
classification of the power line noise is listed as follows [12]:
-
Narrow band noise, mostly amplitude modulated sinusoidal signals caused by ingress of
radio broadcasting stations.
Periodic impulsive noise asynchronous to the main frequency, which is mostly caused
by switched-mode power supplies.
Periodic impulsive noise synchronous to the mains frequency, components like rectifier
diodes, transistors whose cut off voltage and threshold voltage leads to switching actions
in synchronous to frequency of mains power.
Collective noise [13] is the sum of all the noise types mentioned above. Colored
Background Noise and Narrow Band Noise are considered as background noise which
uniformly spread throughout the spectrum, as their rate of change of magnitude is very slow. On
the contrary, the last three are termed as impulsive noise since their amplitude changes rapidly.
Background noise is considered to be Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) for
PLC analysis [14]. The impulsive noise is given by:
=
(1)
where, is the Poisson process which is the arrival of the impulsive noise, is the white
Gaussian process with mean zero and variance 22 . That is Gaussian noise of magnitude
varying up to 35 dB and is distributed among data bits complying Poisson distribution. is the
probability of getting hit by noise and is the random variable denoting the varying amplitude
of noise. The total noise is given by:
= +
(2)
= +
(3)
Arrival of the impulsive noise follows the Poisson process with a rate of R units per
second, so that the event of k arrivals in t seconds has the probability distribution as:
= /!
Let be the received signal, and then the transmitted signal is given by:
10
(4)
= +
(5)
In case if the modulation technique used is OFDM with BPSK as bit modulation,
received signal could be characterized with the expression;
+ +
= 0,1,2,3 . , 1
(6)
=0
11
=
0
(7)
is the length of path, 0 is speed of light and is dielectric constant of insulating material.
. , . 2
(8)
=1
is frequency response of channel between two points. When the grid network grows
big and complex it could be separated into sub-channels for individual study. A(f,di) are cable
losses which could be in the form of heat or signal leakage etc. f is the frequency of operation,
is weight factor which is directly proportional to number of reflections and path followed:
1
(9)
The values of and A(f,di) are determined experimentally. Based upon above given
factors a mathematical model of multipath PLC is proposed in [14]:
. , . 2
(10)
=1
13
(11)
, =
0 + 1. .
(12)
Using A(f,di) in gives the channel model for PLC transmission line:
0 + 1 . .
. 2 (
(13)
=1
0 + 1 . .
2 (
weighing factor
Attenuation portion
Delay portion
14
Details of operation in different bands such as type of modulation, data rate, symbol size
and encoding-decoding technique are enlisted in [16]. CENELEC the controlling body of PLC
mechanism in Europe, follows the Stds EN 50065 (CENELEC), IEC 61000.In China PLC
operates at a single Frequency band of 3 to 500 Khz. The frequency band in USA for PLC
purpose is FCC band 10 kHz 490 kHz. There is only single band with no subdivisions.
Standard IEEE P1901 [17] regulating the operations of PLC, outlined two different techniques to
be followed for PLC based upon modulation method to be implemented PHY layer:
-
FFT OFDM: It uses Forward error correction (FEC) scheme with Convolutional Turbo
Code (CTC) as underlying coding technique.
vp=1.5e8;
ff=1:0.01:20;
f=100:2000;
for m=1:N
%f=1:20000;
%f=transpose(f);
% f0=10*f
H(f,m)=g(m).*exp(-(a0+a1.*((ff.*1e6).^k)).*d(m)).*exp(-2i.*pi.*(ff.*1e6).*(d(m)./vp));
end
H0(f)=H(f,1)+H(f,2)+H(f,3)+H(f,4);
magH(f)=10*log10(abs(H0(f)));
angH(f)=angle(H(f,1)+H(f,2)+H(f,3)+H(f,4));
subplot(2,2,1),plot(ff,magH(f))
title('N=4');xlabel('frequency in MHz'); ylabel('H(f)in dB')
grid on
subplot(2,2,2), plot(ff,angH(f))
xlabel('frequency in MHz'); ylabel('Phase')
grid on
16
1 = 7.8 1010 /
0 = 0
Path Parameters
0.64
200
-0.15
244.8
0.38
222.4
0.05
267.5
17
18
Attenuation Parameters
=1
1 = 7.8 1010 /
0 = 0
Path Parameters
0.029
90
-0.071
411
0.0430
102
10
-0.035
490
0.0103
113
11
0.065
567
-0.058
143
12
-0.055
740
-0.045
148
13
0.042
960
-0.040
200
14
-0.059
1130
0.038
260
15
0.049
1250
-0.038
322
19
(14)
()2 .
(15)
/2
= 2 /2
(16)
= 2
(17)
Now, when the symbol is changed, the phase of carrier changes by 1800.
Symbol for 1is given by;
1 =
2cos
(2fc t)
20
(18)
2 =
2cos
(2fc t + )
2 = 2cos
(2fc t)
(19)
(20)
= () 2cos(2fc t)
Where, = + 1, for binary 1 and 1, for binary 0
21
(21)
22
2cos(2fc t)
(22)
Rearranging (22):
2
cos
(2fc t)
Tb
= ( Tb )(
= ( Tb ) 1
Where, 1 =
2
Tb
(23)
(24)
23
(25)
(26)
24
5. INTRODUCTION TO OFDM
Orthogonal Frequency division multiplexing, OFDM [20] due to its flexibility and
computational efficiency, is one of the most promising techniques available. It involves a
combination of both modulation and multiplexing. As discussed in the previous section:
-
Modulation is a change in the parameters (frequency, phase and amplitude) of the carrier
signal according to the message signal.
Multiplexing is the method of sending multiple signals on the same channel; also
maintaining their integrity at the receiver end.
OFDM converts a given high-bit-rate data stream into several parallel lower-bit-rate
streams and modulates each stream on separate carriers, often called subcarriers, or tones. It is an
extension or a special case of FDM (Frequency Division Multiplexing), in which a given
bandwidth is divided into narrow channels to send multiple data streams at the same time. Here
total bandwidth (BW) is divided in to n (n=5) channels.
25
(27)
In FDM neighboring channels interfere with each other hence require guard bands to
separate them. Introduction of guard bands reduces the individual sub-channel bandwidth.
1 . 2 . = 0
0
26
(28)
-1
-1
-1
N=length(X);
27
-1
1 -1
1 -1 -1
1 -1]
Sub_carrier=reshape (x,4,5)
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
Sub_Carrier(1:4) =
2 / ,
0 1
(29)
=0
Each x[n] represents a sum of modulated symbols with frequency modulated by 2 / factor.
29
6. SIMULATION RESULTS
Following steps have been used:
1. Random bits generated are modulated to BPSK signal
2. Out of the 64 total number of subcarriers only 52 are occupied, over which data is
transmitted. The rest of the 14 subcarriers remain empty. Modulated BPSK symbols are
assigned to 52 subcarriers from -26 to -1 and +1 to +26. Unoccupied subcarriers are
padded with zeros. It is at this step where serial to parallel conversion takes place.
3. IFFT is performed to generate OFDM signal, and CP (Cyclic Prefix) is added to reduce
Inter Symbol Interference.
Length of CP should be no less than the delay spread of PLC channel.
%%%%%%%% Length of CP %%%%%%%%%%%%
vp = 1.5e8;
di = [200,222.4,244.8,267.5];
davg = mean(di);
tau =davg/vp;
L_CP = ceil(tau*20e6);
L_CP = 32;
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30
Length of CP =32
Total length of OFDM symbol = 64+32= 96
4. PLC channel model is generated
0 + 1 . .
. 2 (
(30)
=1
31
Monte Carlo
Number of subcarriers
64
128
52
Length of CP
32
Number of bits
52x10^6
Number of runs
40
Figure 17. BER curve for PLC channel, N=4 and N=14
32
7. CONCLUSION
This paper provides the review of Smart Grid and its emergence from existing power grid
while enlisting some of its advantages and forth coming challenges. Certain industry standards
claim promising data throughputs over last mile of power line communication. Homeplug
Powerline Alliance Standards is one of leading group which specializes in home PLC products
and services [25]. Home plug releases series of standards named Homeplug 1.0, turbo, AV,
offering physical layer data throughput of 14, 85 and 200 Mbps respectively within a home
network. . Comparing to MoCA technology over coaxial cables with data throughput upto 270
Mbps and Ethernet (Cat 5 UTP) maxing up to 1 Gbps, PLC does not fare well [26]. Following
are some major problems which need to be addressed:
-
Analytical Modeling
Bandwidth (to accommodate high data rate demanding services like voice and video
communication)
33
Experimental
Analytical
Experimental setup could be constrained to the level of lab for generating impulsive noise
[22][23][24] and study its characteristics with different modulation techniques in real time.
Another major outcome is the study of multipath propagation under different techniques and
environment. These setups have given mathematical models for noise involved and PLC
transmission channel. Based upon these models most of the analytic work is done by simulating
for various different approaches involved. Most of the analytic work is performance evaluation
of combination of different modulation techniques like BPSK,8PSK,QAM +FFT, cosine,
Wavelet transform +OFDM,COFDM +Error detection code (CRC, RS code, CTC, ARQ, parity
check) +different receiver structures. These combinations try to addresses one or more issues
enumerated under major problems. With most of the information discussed briefly in this review
paper MATLAB simulations could be done and different results can be compared.
34
8. REFERENCES
[1] J. W. Bialek, "Why Has it Happened Again? Comparison Between the UCTE Blackout in
2006 and The Blackouts of 2003," IEEE Lausanne Power Tech, 2007, pp. 51-56, July, 2007.
[2] S. T. Mak, "Knowledge Based Architecture Serving as a Rigid Framework for Smart Grid
Applications," Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), pp. 1-8, Jan, 2010.
[3] J. Taneja, R. Katz, D. Culler, "Defining CPS Challenges in a Sustainable Electricity
Grid," Int. Conference Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS), pp.119-128, April, 2012.
[4] D. Rua, D. Issicaba, F. J. Soares, P. M. R. Almeida, R. J. Rei and J. A. P. Lopes, "Advanced
Metering Infrastructure Functionalities for Electric Mobility," Innovative Smart Grid
Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT Europe), pp. 1-7, Oct, 2010.
[5] A. Moreno-Munoz and J. J. G De La Rosa, "Integrating Power Quality to Automated meter
Reading," IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag., vol.2, pp. 10-18, June, 2008.
[6] S. Ritter, H. Ruttinger, S. Ritter, P. Bretschneider and D. Westermann, "New Approaches for
Smart Grid Requirements: Grid Protection and Optimization of Distribution Grid
Operation," IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, pp. 1-7, July, 2011.
[7] K. Sedghisigarchi, "Residential Solar Systems: Technology, Net-metering, and Financial
Payback," Elect. Power & Energy Conference (EPEC), pp. 1-6, Oct, 2009.
[8] A. Aggarwal, S. Kunta and P. K. Verma, "A Proposed Communications Infrastructure for the
Smart Grid," Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), pp.1-5, Jan, 2010.
35
[9] M. Gotz and K. Dostert, "A Universal High Speed Powerline Channel Emulation
System," Int. Zurich Seminar Broadband Commun., Access, Transmission, Networkin,. pp.24.124.6, 2002.
[10] J. Bausch, T. Kistner, M. Babic and K. Dostert, Characteristics of Indoor Power Line
Channels in the Frequency Range 50-500 khz, Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Power Line Commun.
and its Applications, 2006.
[11] M. Bauer, W. Plappert, W. Chong and K. Dostert, "Packet-oriented Communication
Protocols for Smart Grid Services Over Low-speed PLC," IEEE ISPLC, pp. 89-94, April, 2009.
[12] H. Meng, Y.Ll. Guan and S. Chen, "Modeling and Analysis of Noise Effects on Broadband
Power-line Communications," IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol.20, pp. 630- 637, April, 2005.
[13] M. Zimmermann and K. Dostert, Analysis and Modeling of Impulsive Noise in Broadband
Powerline Communications, EEE Trans. Elecfromugn. Compat., vol. 44, pp. 249-258, 2002.
[14] Y. H. Ma, P. L. So, E. Gunawan and Y. L. Guan, Analysis of Impulsive Noise and
Multipath Efects on Broadband Power Line Communcations Int. conf. Power System
Technology-POWERCON, Nov, 2004.
[15] M. Zimmermann and K. Dostert, "A Multipath Model for the Powerline Channel," IEEE
Trans.Commun., vol.50, pp. 553-559, April, 2002.
[16] Supplement to PLC G3 physical layer specification for operation in CENELEC
B/C/BC/D/BCD/BD frequency bands.
36
[17] Y. P. Jae, S. H. Choong, L. Sungwon, "An efficient MAC scheme with modified RTS/CTS
of IEEE P1901," Int. Conference Information Networking (ICOIN), pp. 230-234, Jan, 2011.
[18] A. B. Carlson, P. B. Crilly and J. C. Rutledge, Communication Systems, An Introduction to
Signals and Noise in Electrical Communications, McGraw Hill, 2002, pp. 618-620.
[19] B. Sklar, Digital Communications, Fundamental and Applications, Prentice Hall P T R,
2001, pp. 173-174.
[20] J. S. Chitode, Principles of Communication, Tech. Publications, Pune, India, pp. 6.5-6.14,
2008.
[21] A. Goldsmith, Wireless Communication Cambridge University Press, 2009. pp. 359-362.
[22] R. M. Rodriguez-Osorio, L. D. H. Ariet, A. D. C. Urbina and M. C. Ramon , "A DSP-Based
Impulsive Noise Generator for Test Applications," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.,vol.54, pp. 33973401, Dec, 2007.
[23] M. Tlich, H. Chaouche, A. Zeddam and P. Pagani, "Novel Approach for PLC Impulsive
Noise Modelling," IEEE Int. Symp. Power Line Commun. and Its Applications, pp. 20-25, April,
2009.
[24] M. Katayama, T. Yamazato and H. Okada, "A Mathematical Model of Noise in Narrowband
Power Line Communication Systems," IEEE J. Selected Areas in Commun., vol.24, pp. 12671276, July, 2006.
37
[25] M. Yan,Y. Gao, G. Qin and L. Kang, "Research and Design on MAC Architecture of
Digital Home Network," IFCSTA Int. Forum Comput. Sci.-Technology and Applications, vol.2,
pp.203-206, Dec, 2009.
[26] M. S. Yousuf, S. Z. Rizvi and M. El-Shafei, "Power Line Communications: An Overview Part II," ICTTA Int. Conference Inform. and Commun. Technologies: From Theory to
Applications, pp.1-6, April, 2008.
38