Have You Ever Done

Something – One Thing

That Totally Changed
Your Life Forever?
Interview with Hohepa Mapiria Joseph (“Joe”) Murphy Royal Regent, 7 July
2003.

The Application of Maori Sovereignty in Aotearoa - New Zealand.

On the fisheries issue, the Native title covers all land, natural and physical resources
under Te

Tiriti o Waitangi (Treaty of Waitangi) 1840 (TOW).

Basically, the fisheries issue covers Customary Law and the Native Title, where it has
not been

extinguished.

(DOI) is still alive to

He Whakaputanga o Te Rangatira o Nga Uri o Nu Tireni (Declaration of

Independence) 1835

day, where? It currently exists Under Part XIII of Te Ture Whenua Maori,

Maori Land Act 1993.

The DOI was included in statute under Part 4 of the Maori Affairs Amendment Act
1967 however

the New South Wales settlers Parliament (NZ Settlers Parliament), utilising the then
Maori

Affairs department made amendments to it to suit themselves rather than Maori.

Now, the DOI is protected by the TOW, all those rights that existed before the TOW
are

protected.

The first recorded document of the rights of Maori was the DOI. In the TOW they say
Maori have

ceded cession to the British Crown. Now, the DOI is protected by the TOW. There are
two (2)

documents of the Common Law between the DOI and the TOW.

The first document is the feudal title of the Crown. The feudal title meaning the
Crown is bound

by their status in a hierarchy of reciprocal obligations of service and defence to Maori

under the

TOW. In simple terms the Crown have under the TOW, guaranteed Maori protection
and justice

if our rights are threatened here in Aotearoa, NZ. This came about by the standing
orders of Lord

Glenelg to Major General Bourke to protect the Maori people by military might in
saying that,

His Majesty King William will not fail to avail to the chiefs such protection, that’s
military

protection.

The second document is the fiducial title of the Crown. The fiducial title meaning,
the Crown

owes to Maori under the TOW, the duties of good faith, trust and confidence and must
exercise

a very high standard of care in managing our Mãori lands, resources, estates and
funds. This

came about by the Letters Patent issued by Lord Normanby to Lieutenant Consul
William Hobson
in 1839. That gives you a clearer understanding as to the purpose of the TOW 1840
and the

recognition given to the DOI 1835 by the Crown and his Majesty King William.

And so the TOW was put together to protect us against the evil consequences being
the settlers

who have escaped from their penitentiary (at the Prison colony in Australia) and were
coming

here, and who are still coming here to live on these lands, and so it was necessary
under the

preamble of the TOW that Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II protected the Maori
peoples rights

against those evil consequences of the immigrant settlers.

So the purpose of the TOW was to protect the Maori people against those evil
consequences by

setting up under Article I of the TOW. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II is the legal
owner and

Trustee of all the Maori people’s lands and natural and physical resources in
Aotearoa, NZ

forever. And so she became, as a matter of inheritance under the TOW, the legal
Trustee and the

legal owner of all land in NZ which is Maori Customary land deemed Crown Land.

Under Article 2 of the TOW the Maori people retained their Sovereignty by the
Queen granting

to them the unqualified rights of possession of their lands, forests and fisheries and
other

taonga, which made the Maori people the legal beneficial and equitable owners, of all
land in

Page 2
Aotearoa, NZ. Therefore, it created a Trust where the Maori people, under the TOW
had

sovereignty over all people living within its domain.

On the 6 February 1840 prior to the signing of the TOW, nga Rangatira (the chiefs),
exercising

their powers under Article 2 of the DOI, gave to the Crown, these people, they ceded
sovereignty

over the British subjects to the Queen. Nothing else.

The Maori people gave to the Queen the pre-emptive right or first right to purchase
lands before

all others, or the first right to refuse, to the sale of any Maori land in Aotearoa, NZ
however,

Maori have not done that to date, and the Queen has not purchased one inch of soil in
New

Zealand .

Article 3 of the TOW gives the same right to the Maori people, to hold something
similar, in

equal measure to the Queen which of course is sovereignty.

Therefore, the purchase of any land in New Zealand has to be conducted with the
Queen

directly.

All other lands that are recorded in New Zealand, which Mãori have sold to any
individual

person, is an illegal sale. Any Maori who has sold to a European/immigrant or any

European/immigrant who has brought from a Maori, it is not a legal sale. In law the
beneficiary

cannot sign any document, it is up to the Trustee, and that Trustee is the Queen.

If a Maori signs his name to any land, forest, fisheries or other taonga, it is an
improper sale. It is
to be done through the British Crown. So any person who has purchased land directly
from a

Maori hasn’t purchased anything at all, that person was to apply to the British Crown
to

purchase land that the British Crown had already purchased from Maori, which has
been

nothing.

The Queen as our Trustee knows what is happening socially, economically and
politically here in

NZ. She has eyes her ears in NZ here through members of her counsel who inform her
of the

social, economic and political matters affecting NZ and the way in which the Maori
people have

been treated and are currently being treated.

The Introduction of Constitutional Law in New Zealand.

After the TOW, there was the 1846 NZ Constitution Act. In that Act there was
Section 9 and

Section 10 which provided that Maori Customary laws were to be made by Maori self

Government, Governments in their own native districts, and if they wanted their laws
recognised

internationally, they could do this through the Queen who issued letters patent more
or less

acknowledging receipt of those laws, and she placed them into the law of England
right around

the Common Wealth of the United Kingdom (UK) and enforces them back into
Aotearoa, NZ.

Now a similar thing happened in 1852 under the 1852 NZ Constitution Act of the
United Kingdom

(UK), Section 71 stated the same thing that Maori customary laws were to be made by
Maori self
Government. So the 1846 New Zealand Constitution Act was created to restrain the
Governor

from governing over Maori which preserved Article 2 of the TOW 1840, Maori
Govern over

themselves, Tino Rangatiratanga, which preserved the DOI 1835 before that.

Now the settlers were granted their right by warrant to govern themselves under the
1852 NZ

Constitution Act. Section 71 of that Act told the European Government lay off! Maori
Govern

themselves under their own laws in their own districts, and were entitled to
International

recognition by Letters Patent through the British Queen, who issued those Letters
Patent under

the Great Seal of the United Kingdom, enforcing them into the law of England and
into the law of

New Zealand, that was in 1852.

Page 3

The next Act, Native Districts Regulations Act 1858. Where lands were
unextinguished of the

Native Title, the Government, Maori Government, would appoint justices of the peace
or native

assessors, to create jurisdiction in summary proceedings and, in that same year (1858)
the

Native Circuit Courts Act came into play, which provided for one Magistrate, and one
Native

assessor.

So all Courts in NZ, were, since 1858, and are currently today, suppose to have one
Native
assessor (Maori) and one Magistrate (European) sitting up on the bench before any
decision was

or is lawful or legal. Today and of yesterday there has only been one judge, a
European

magistrate. Why? Because this and other successive governments have been acting

insubordinate of the laws set down by the Queen through the Crown, the Privy
Council and the

Common Wealth of the UK. In other words, this action has been, and still is, an act of
treason by

the NZ Settlers Parliament and successive Settlers Parliaments and the penalty for
treason is

death!

So Maori should have equal representation in all courts in New Zealand under the
Queens law,

the Queen who has the rightful ownership, the legal ownership of New Zealand and
who is,

along with Maori, the legal sovereign’s of all British subjects living in Aotearoa, New
Zealand.

There are quite a few Maori out there who believe they have lost their land. In fact,
they have

not lost any land; they have been tricked and deceived into believing they have by this
New

Zealand Settler Parliament’s conspiracy which has been ongoing for the past 157
years.

I have placed the lands of our ancestors in Aotearoa, New Zealand, back in the hands
of their

descendants as kaitiaki/owners, which is of course the whole of the country, te Ika

(the

fish/North Is) me te Waka (the canoe/South Is) a Maui (of Maui).

Many Maori people today are angry, upset and frustrated about the way in which their
lands

have been and are being forcefully taken and abused, the way in which their natural
resources

are being raped and depleted and the way in which their people are being treated
socially,

economically and politically. When all this stress mounts up they are compelled to
take matters

into their own hands with actions such as protests and occupations and when their
point is not

being heard, recognised or acknowledged by the assumed authorities they turn violent
and

vengeful and take their frustrations out on either their own whanau or the general
public.

Of course, one would understand their anger and frustration but violence and
vengeance is not

the way to go. It is simply a matter of pitching the law against the law. The courts in
NZ here are

the proper place to challenge the law but you must know the law first before you can
challenge

the law.

To be radical attracts radicalness. Those are the words of the most radical of Justices
of the Privy

Council, Lord Denning.

Whilst minding my own business, acting for myself in court, I didn’t go saying I’m
the legal

sovereign, and I didn’t jump up and down, I wrote it on a piece of paper and handed
that paper

to the presiding judge, that is my gun.

Put all those acts together, NZ Constitution Act 1846 Section’s 9 and 10 and the
Royal Charter

which stated, I quote, “on the British Crowns Royal Charter, in cases arising
between the

aboriginal inhabitants of NZ alone, the courts and magistrates shall uphold, (the
words “shall

uphold”) Maori customary laws and usage’s as aforesaid” unquote.

That is what is stated in the Royal Charter (Magna Carta) of the Parliament of
Westminster

concerning NZ, who enacted Section’s 9 and 10 of the NZ Constitution Act 1846,
which is a

Page 4

common law doctrine and statute, Internationally recognised. That statute and that
common law

doctrine used together, forms the common law under statute of Maori Customary law.

Then in 1901 in the judgement of the Privy Council where Lord Phillimore was
presiding, he

stated in his decision in the case “Hineiti Rirerire Arani versus The Public Trustee of
NZ”, he

stated that, I quote “Maori customary law enjoyed legal status in European Colonial
courts in

NZ, in the absence of any statute indicating otherwise, that statute being enacted by
the

Native inhabitants themselves.” Unquote.

Now what that decision did, was it entrenched that Maori customary law is to be
legally

recognised in every court in NZ, and the same to the decision of Lord Davey in 1900 -
1901
where he made a decision in “Nihara Tamaki versus Baker”, where the Crown
refused, in fact

they were devoid actually, they refused to accept, that the issue of a Crown grant
amounted to

this extinguishment of the Native title. He stated numerous statutes in the common
law which

are referring to the Native title or such like, of tenure of land under custom and usage
which was

neither known to lawyers nor discoverable by them by evidence.

When he made that statement, he said that the lawyers in NZ were just too plum lazy
to look in

the statutes, he defined that the Native title had not been extinguished. Once it reached
that

point, the Privy Council heard it, and under investigation, they found that the Crown
has not

purchased one inch of soil in NZ. That is what they found and therefore, the Crown
lacked

unreviewable prerogative power in relation to the Native title. That shook the NZ
Settlers

Parliament, then they changed their voting system and they went on the populist
sovereignty

model because they owned no land. No land, no kingdom, no sovereignty.

We have served an affidavit on the NZ Settlers Parliament stating the facts about
Maori

sovereignty and self Governance under the DOI, TOW and the Te Ture Whenua
Maori, Maori

Land Act 1993, and we have found that when we are looking at the Government of
today, after

all those documents have been served on them and the Governor General, we find that
they are
chasing their tails and jumping up and down, you’ll see them jumping around in
parliament, and

it makes you laugh, because you know what you’ve done. The problem is, they (New
Zealand

Settlers Parliament) can not find it in themselves to completely admit that they have
made a big

mistake, an error in judgement.

I was putting it too them in this way, giving them the opportunity to change, and they
are trying

to bring about change, but as quietly and as softly as they can. That is what they are
doing right

now. But the moment you start or they start getting violent, is the time for Maori to
exert their

right and recall for the standing orders of Lord Glenelg to Major General Bourke and
the Letters

Patent from Lord Normanby, the Secretary of Colonies and war, to Lieutenant Consul
William

Hobson (latter Governor of NZ), their judgements, their directions, to be enforced.

Once those standing orders are called for, then the Maori people don’t exercise the
fear or need

to get angry or argue, we just leave it to the British Crown to solve under their feudal
and

fiducial titles for protection of the Maori people. We let them do the pointing of the
gun, which

is what the TOW is all about. Now today, we leave things as they are, in the hope that
these

people, in Wellington, will exercise fairness. If we don’t get any satisfaction from the
NZ Settlers

Parliament, then its time to call for those standing orders.

A time limit has been set for the NZ Settlers Parliament to comply.
Maori must have control of their lands and resources by the year 2005. This was the
three

regent’s determination of how long it is going to take.

Page 5

From 1986 to the year 2005 Maori should be in control as it states in Section 2 of Te
Ture

Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993 which is, and shall, bind the Crown under the
Te Ture

Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993.

In 1993 comes in an Act called Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act. This Act
was an Act that

was brought into existence by the Parliament of Westminster, whom appointed three
(3)

Regents namely Cliff Whiting, David Singh and Joseph Hohepa Mapiria Murphy to
draft up laws

for the sovereign right here in Aotearoa, NZ.

A Regent as defined in legal terms is, quote “a person who exercises the ruling
power in a

kingdom during the minority, absence, or other disability of the sovereign.”

Unquote. Maori are

the sovereigns, are a minority and are - under a disability at this present time.

This was a directive upon all ministers of the Crown and all judges and Departments
of the

Crown. They are to do so in a way that reaffirms the Rangatiratanga (Sovereignty) of

Maori as

stated in Article 2 of Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993, (TTWMML Act).

Sovereign Law.

Within the Act the key words to listen to are these, “Shall!” in each sub section you
will hear the

word “Shall”, the missing words are “The Parliament of Westminster.” So you
listen to the word

“Parliament” which means “the Parliament of Westminster” has made an Act

through three

regents who are members of the Privy Council in the House of the Spiritual Temple in
the

Common House of Lords of the Parliament of Westminster who reside personally

here, right here

in Aotearoa, New Zealand.

Now the key words are “shall” and “control” and “the power” in Part XIII of the
TTWMML Act

1993, which allows a Maori incorporation to alter, add too or replace any parts of
their

constitution under any provision of the Act, or any regulations made under the Act, or
any other

enactment and the general law. They can change their fulfil rights, powers and
privileges in full

capacity to exercise. Now listen to this.

The Act reads; “Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993, Section 2.

Interpretation of Act generally— (1) it is the intention of Parliament that the

provisions of this

Act shall be interpreted in a manner that best furthers the principals set out in the
preamble to

this Act.”.

What is in the preamble of this Act, Te Tiriti 0 Waitangi, Kawanatanga

(governorship) for the
protection of Rangatiratanga (sovereignty), and to have a court to assist it in the
necessary

mechanisms to create any law, statute, regulation or limitation they choose to; that’s
in the

preamble to this Act.

Now subsection (2) of Section 2, - Without limiting the generality of subsection (1) of
this

section, it is the intention of Parliament that powers, duties, and discretion’s

conferred by this

Act shall be exercised, as far as possible, in a manner that facilitates and promotes the

retention, use, development, and control of Maori land as taonga tuku iho (forests,
fisheries and

other taonga) by Maori owners, their whanau, their hapu, and their descendants.

So, when you take a look at the common law you see the decision made by Lord
Davey, that the

Crown lacked un-review-able prerogative power in relation to the Native Title, who
were

unwilling to accept that a Crown grant amounted to the extinguishment of that Native
Title and

so, there is no land in NZ that is not Maori customary land, it is only deemed Crown
land for

certain purposes.

Page 6

(3) In the event of any conflict in meaning between the Maori and the English
versions of the

Preamble, the Maori version shall prevail.

So in the Maori version of the preamble the key word in the preamble is “Tika”.
Now, when you
look at the word deemed, in the eyes of a Maori arguing a word saying deemed and
that is “to

be” you would read Section 144 of the Act “Maori Customary Land deemed (to be)
Crown Land

for certain purposes, or you can read it as, “Maori Customary Land for the time being
Crown

Land”. .

Subsection (3) of Section 2 states” In any conflict between the Maori and the English
version of

the preamble, the Maori version shall prevail. Alright, now I go to Section 17 of Te
Ture Whenua

Maori Amendment Act 1994, sub Section (3) states that” A Maori incorporation made
by special

resolution of the owners may alter, add to or replace its constitution in accordance
with any

provision of this Act or any regulations made under this Act.

Such provisions are, under Section 144, if it says Maori Customary Land deemed
Crown Land, it

could be added to, altered or replaced, the word “deemed”.

You take the English words out and you say it as you really want it, but as the Maori
people

really wanted it. Moreover, they say it is Maori Customary Land for the time being,
Crown Land.

Maori Financial Position Today.

The Trustee of the biggest Bank in the whole entire World, are the King and Queen of
Spain and

Prince Andrew.

They are the Trustees to the biggest Bank in the World. That is where all these Banks,
multi
national corporations and other financial institutions loan money from. They get their
money

from this Bank held by those three Trustees.

They go to the Beehive in Wellington, borrow their funds, and lend to other nations
from that

one Bank.

I KNOW THIS!!!

Have you seen one of those unclaimed dividends? Let us go down to basics. If you
walked into

the Maori Land Court or the office of the Maori Trustee and picked up the ledger
containing

unclaimed dividends of the Maori Trustee.

Now ever since 1846 right up until today there has been lease money. A lease to the

Government, who leased lands to the European settlers and the Company’s all over
the motu. .

(except Maori native drib drabs – some ones hand writing).

In 1852 the same, the Parliament was subject to the same thing. They paid taxes and
rent to the

British Crown. That fund is collected by the British Crown held in the Bank of New
Zealand

annually, the interest added on top of that, just think here, just the interest to the
Reserved

Bank of New Zealand, but really the British Crown has been transferring that fund to
a Bank

called Akaroa, this is the truth of the matter.

The Bank of NZ based in England has been depositing into the Bank of Akaroa,
which is now

being over “umbrellaed” under the Reserve Bank of NZ. The interest has been
deposited into
that Akaroa Bank; the principal sum has been paid into the Trust account held by the
King and

Queen of Spain and This is the html version of the file

http://www.homerescue.org.nz/pdf/Interview%20with%20Hohepa.pdf.
Google automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web.
Page 1
Interview with Hohepa Mapiria Joseph (“Joe”) Murphy Royal Regent, 7 July
2003.
The Application of Maori Sovereignty in Aotearoa - New Zealand.
On the fisheries issue, the Native title covers all land, natural and physical resources
under Te
Tiriti o Waitangi (Treaty of Waitangi) 1840 (TOW).
Basically, the fisheries issue covers Customary Law and the Native Title, where it has
not been
extinguished.
He Whakaputanga o Te Rangatira o Nga Uri o Nu Tireni (Declaration of
Independence) 1835
(DOI) is still alive today, where? It currently exists Under Part XIII of Te Ture
Whenua Maori,
Maori Land Act 1993.
The DOI was included in statute under Part 4 of the Maori Affairs Amendment Act
1967 however
the New South Wales settlers Parliament (NZ Settlers Parliament), utilising the then
Maori
Affairs department made amendments to it to suit themselves rather than Maori.
Now, the DOI is protected by the TOW, all those rights that existed before the TOW
are
protected.
The first recorded document of the rights of Maori was the DOI. In the TOW they say
Maori have
ceded cession to the British Crown. Now, the DOI is protected by the TOW. There are
two (2)
documents of the Common Law between the DOI and the TOW.
The first document is the feudal title of the Crown. The feudal title meaning the
Crown is bound
by their status in a hierarchy of reciprocal obligations of service and defence to Maori
under the
TOW. In simple terms the Crown have under the TOW, guaranteed Maori protection
and justice
if our rights are threatened here in Aotearoa, NZ. This came about by the standing
orders of Lord
Glenelg to Major General Bourke to protect the Maori people by military might in
saying that,
His Majesty King William will not fail to avail to the chiefs such protection, that’s
military
protection.
The second document is the fiducial title of the Crown. The fiducial title meaning,
the Crown
owes to Maori under the TOW, the duties of good faith, trust and confidence and must
exercise
a very high standard of care in managing our Mãori lands, resources, estates and
funds. This
came about by the Letters Patent issued by Lord Normanby to Lieutenant Consul
William Hobson
in 1839. That gives you a clearer understanding as to the purpose of the TOW 1840
and the
recognition given to the DOI 1835 by the Crown and his Majesty King William.
And so the TOW was put together to protect us against the evil consequences being
the settlers
who have escaped from their penitentiary (at the Prison colony in Australia) and were
coming
here, and who are still coming here to live on these lands, and so it was necessary
under the
preamble of the TOW that Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II protected the Maori
peoples rights
against those evil consequences of the immigrant settlers.
So the purpose of the TOW was to protect the Maori people against those evil
consequences by
setting up under Article I of the TOW. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II is the legal
owner and
Trustee of all the Maori people’s lands and natural and physical resources in
Aotearoa, NZ
forever. And so she became, as a matter of inheritance under the TOW, the legal
Trustee and the
legal owner of all land in NZ which is Maori Customary land deemed Crown Land.
Under Article 2 of the TOW the Maori people retained their Sovereignty by the
Queen granting
to them the unqualified rights of possession of their lands, forests and fisheries and
other
taonga, which made the Maori people the legal beneficial and equitable owners, of all
land in

Page 2
Aotearoa, NZ. Therefore, it created a Trust where the Maori people, under the TOW
had
sovereignty over all people living within its domain.
On the 6 February 1840 prior to the signing of the TOW, nga Rangatira (the chiefs),
exercising
their powers under Article 2 of the DOI, gave to the Crown, these people, they ceded
sovereignty
over the British subjects to the Queen. Nothing else.
The Maori people gave to the Queen the pre-emptive right or first right to purchase
lands before
all others, or the first right to refuse, to the sale of any Maori land in Aotearoa, NZ
however,
Maori have not done that to date, and the Queen has not purchased one inch of soil in
New
Zealand .
Article 3 of the TOW gives the same right to the Maori people, to hold something
similar, in
equal measure to the Queen which of course is sovereignty.
Therefore, the purchase of any land in New Zealand has to be conducted with the
Queen
directly.
All other lands that are recorded in New Zealand, which Mãori have sold to any
individual
person, is an illegal sale. Any Maori who has sold to a European/immigrant or any
European/immigrant who has brought from a Maori, it is not a legal sale. In law the
beneficiary
cannot sign any document, it is up to the Trustee, and that Trustee is the Queen.
If a Maori signs his name to any land, forest, fisheries or other taonga, it is an
improper sale. It is
to be done through the British Crown. So any person who has purchased land directly
from a
Maori hasn’t purchased anything at all, that person was to apply to the British Crown
to
purchase land that the British Crown had already purchased from Maori, which has
been
nothing.
The Queen as our Trustee knows what is happening socially, economically and
politically here in
NZ. She has eyes her ears in NZ here through members of her counsel who inform her
of the
social, economic and political matters affecting NZ and the way in which the Maori
people have
been treated and are currently being treated.
The Introduction of Constitutional Law in New Zealand.
After the TOW, there was the 1846 NZ Constitution Act. In that Act there was
Section 9 and
Section 10 which provided that Maori Customary laws were to be made by Maori self
Government, Governments in their own native districts, and if they wanted their laws
recognised
internationally, they could do this through the Queen who issued letters patent more
or less
acknowledging receipt of those laws, and she placed them into the law of England
right around
the Common Wealth of the United Kingdom (UK) and enforces them back into
Aotearoa, NZ.
Now a similar thing happened in 1852 under the 1852 NZ Constitution Act of the
United Kingdom
(UK), Section 71 stated the same thing that Maori customary laws were to be made by
Maori self
Government. So the 1846 New Zealand Constitution Act was created to restrain the
Governor
from governing over Maori which preserved Article 2 of the TOW 1840, Maori
Govern over
themselves, Tino Rangatiratanga, which preserved the DOI 1835 before that.
Now the settlers were granted their right by warrant to govern themselves under the
1852 NZ
Constitution Act. Section 71 of that Act told the European Government lay off! Maori
Govern
themselves under their own laws in their own districts, and were entitled to
International
recognition by Letters Patent through the British Queen, who issued those Letters
Patent under
the Great Seal of the United Kingdom, enforcing them into the law of England and
into the law of
New Zealand, that was in 1852.

Page 3
The next Act, Native Districts Regulations Act 1858. Where lands were
unextinguished of the
Native Title, the Government, Maori Government, would appoint justices of the peace
or native
assessors, to create jurisdiction in summary proceedings and, in that same year (1858)
the
Native Circuit Courts Act came into play, which provided for one Magistrate, and one
Native
assessor.
So all Courts in NZ, were, since 1858, and are currently today, suppose to have one
Native
assessor (Maori) and one Magistrate (European) sitting up on the bench before any
decision was
or is lawful or legal. Today and of yesterday there has only been one judge, a
European
magistrate. Why? Because this and other successive governments have been acting
insubordinate of the laws set down by the Queen through the Crown, the Privy
Council and the
Common Wealth of the UK. In other words, this action has been, and still is, an act of
treason by
the NZ Settlers Parliament and successive Settlers Parliaments and the penalty for
treason is
death!
So Maori should have equal representation in all courts in New Zealand under the
Queens law,
the Queen who has the rightful ownership, the legal ownership of New Zealand and
who is,
along with Maori, the legal sovereign’s of all British subjects living in Aotearoa, New
Zealand.
There are quite a few Maori out there who believe they have lost their land. In fact,
they have
not lost any land; they have been tricked and deceived into believing they have by this
New
Zealand Settler Parliament’s conspiracy which has been ongoing for the past 157
years.
I have placed the lands of our ancestors in Aotearoa, New Zealand, back in the hands
of their
descendants as kaitiaki/owners, which is of course the whole of the country, te Ika
(the
fish/North Is) me te Waka (the canoe/South Is) a Maui (of Maui).
Many Maori people today are angry, upset and frustrated about the way in which their
lands
have been and are being forcefully taken and abused, the way in which their natural
resources
are being raped and depleted and the way in which their people are being treated
socially,
economically and politically. When all this stress mounts up they are compelled to
take matters
into their own hands with actions such as protests and occupations and when their
point is not
being heard, recognised or acknowledged by the assumed authorities they turn violent
and
vengeful and take their frustrations out on either their own whanau or the general
public.
Of course, one would understand their anger and frustration but violence and
vengeance is not
the way to go. It is simply a matter of pitching the law against the law. The courts in
NZ here are
the proper place to challenge the law but you must know the law first before you can
challenge
the law.
To be radical attracts radicalness. Those are the words of the most radical of Justices
of the Privy
Council, Lord Denning.
Whilst minding my own business, acting for myself in court, I didn’t go saying I’m
the legal
sovereign, and I didn’t jump up and down, I wrote it on a piece of paper and handed
that paper
to the presiding judge, that is my gun.
Put all those acts together, NZ Constitution Act 1846 Section’s 9 and 10 and the
Royal Charter
which stated, I quote, “on the British Crowns Royal Charter, in cases arising
between the
aboriginal inhabitants of NZ alone, the courts and magistrates shall uphold, (the
words “shall
uphold”) Maori customary laws and usage’s as aforesaid” unquote.
That is what is stated in the Royal Charter (Magna Carta) of the Parliament of
Westminster
concerning NZ, who enacted Section’s 9 and 10 of the NZ Constitution Act 1846,
which is a

Page 4
common law doctrine and statute, Internationally recognised. That statute and that
common law
doctrine used together, forms the common law under statute of Maori Customary law.
Then in 1901 in the judgement of the Privy Council where Lord Phillimore was
presiding, he
stated in his decision in the case “Hineiti Rirerire Arani versus The Public Trustee of
NZ”, he
stated that, I quote “Maori customary law enjoyed legal status in European Colonial
courts in
NZ, in the absence of any statute indicating otherwise, that statute being enacted by
the
Native inhabitants themselves.” Unquote.
Now what that decision did, was it entrenched that Maori customary law is to be
legally
recognised in every court in NZ, and the same to the decision of Lord Davey in 1900 -
1901
where he made a decision in “Nihara Tamaki versus Baker”, where the Crown
refused, in fact
they were devoid actually, they refused to accept, that the issue of a Crown grant
amounted to
this extinguishment of the Native title. He stated numerous statutes in the common
law which
are referring to the Native title or such like, of tenure of land under custom and usage
which was
neither known to lawyers nor discoverable by them by evidence.
When he made that statement, he said that the lawyers in NZ were just too plum lazy
to look in
the statutes, he defined that the Native title had not been extinguished. Once it reached
that
point, the Privy Council heard it, and under investigation, they found that the Crown
has not
purchased one inch of soil in NZ. That is what they found and therefore, the Crown
lacked
unreviewable prerogative power in relation to the Native title. That shook the NZ
Settlers
Parliament, then they changed their voting system and they went on the populist
sovereignty
model because they owned no land. No land, no kingdom, no sovereignty.
We have served an affidavit on the NZ Settlers Parliament stating the facts about
Maori
sovereignty and self Governance under the DOI, TOW and the Te Ture Whenua
Maori, Maori
Land Act 1993, and we have found that when we are looking at the Government of
today, after
all those documents have been served on them and the Governor General, we find that
they are
chasing their tails and jumping up and down, you’ll see them jumping around in
parliament, and
it makes you laugh, because you know what you’ve done. The problem is, they (New
Zealand
Settlers Parliament) can not find it in themselves to completely admit that they have
made a big
mistake, an error in judgement.
I was putting it too them in this way, giving them the opportunity to change, and they
are trying
to bring about change, but as quietly and as softly as they can. That is what they are
doing right
now. But the moment you start or they start getting violent, is the time for Maori to
exert their
right and recall for the standing orders of Lord Glenelg to Major General Bourke and
the Letters
Patent from Lord Normanby, the Secretary of Colonies and war, to Lieutenant Consul
William
Hobson (latter Governor of NZ), their judgements, their directions, to be enforced.
Once those standing orders are called for, then the Maori people don’t exercise the
fear or need
to get angry or argue, we just leave it to the British Crown to solve under their feudal
and
fiducial titles for protection of the Maori people. We let them do the pointing of the
gun, which
is what the TOW is all about. Now today, we leave things as they are, in the hope that
these
people, in Wellington, will exercise fairness. If we don’t get any satisfaction from the
NZ Settlers
Parliament, then its time to call for those standing orders.
A time limit has been set for the NZ Settlers Parliament to comply.
Maori must have control of their lands and resources by the year 2005. This was the
three
regent’s determination of how long it is going to take.

Page 5
From 1986 to the year 2005 Maori should be in control as it states in Section 2 of Te
Ture
Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993 which is, and shall, bind the Crown under the
Te Ture
Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993.
In 1993 comes in an Act called Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act. This Act
was an Act that
was brought into existence by the Parliament of Westminster, whom appointed three
(3)
Regents namely Cliff Whiting, David Singh and Joseph Hohepa Mapiria Murphy to
draft up laws
for the sovereign right here in Aotearoa, NZ.
A Regent as defined in legal terms is, quote “a person who exercises the ruling
power in a
kingdom during the minority, absence, or other disability of the sovereign.”
Unquote. Maori are
the sovereigns, are a minority and are - under a disability at this present time.
This was a directive upon all ministers of the Crown and all judges and Departments
of the
Crown. They are to do so in a way that reaffirms the Rangatiratanga (Sovereignty) of
Maori as
stated in Article 2 of Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993, (TTWMML Act).
Sovereign Law.
Within the Act the key words to listen to are these, “Shall!” in each sub section you
will hear the
word “Shall”, the missing words are “The Parliament of Westminster.” So you
listen to the word
“Parliament” which means “the Parliament of Westminster” has made an Act
through three
regents who are members of the Privy Council in the House of the Spiritual Temple in
the
Common House of Lords of the Parliament of Westminster who reside personally
here, right here
in Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Now the key words are “shall” and “control” and “the power” in Part XIII of the
TTWMML Act
1993, which allows a Maori incorporation to alter, add too or replace any parts of
their
constitution under any provision of the Act, or any regulations made under the Act, or
any other
enactment and the general law. They can change their fulfil rights, powers and
privileges in full
capacity to exercise. Now listen to this.
The Act reads; “Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993, Section 2.
Interpretation of Act generally— (1) it is the intention of Parliament that the
provisions of this
Act shall be interpreted in a manner that best furthers the principals set out in the
preamble to
this Act.”.
What is in the preamble of this Act, Te Tiriti 0 Waitangi, Kawanatanga
(governorship) for the
protection of Rangatiratanga (sovereignty), and to have a court to assist it in the
necessary
mechanisms to create any law, statute, regulation or limitation they choose to; that’s
in the
preamble to this Act.
Now subsection (2) of Section 2, - Without limiting the generality of subsection (1) of
this
section, it is the intention of Parliament that powers, duties, and discretion’s
conferred by this
Act shall be exercised, as far as possible, in a manner that facilitates and promotes the
retention, use, development, and control of Maori land as taonga tuku iho (forests,
fisheries and
other taonga) by Maori owners, their whanau, their hapu, and their descendants.
So, when you take a look at the common law you see the decision made by Lord
Davey, that the
Crown lacked un-review-able prerogative power in relation to the Native Title, who
were
unwilling to accept that a Crown grant amounted to the extinguishment of that Native
Title and
so, there is no land in NZ that is not Maori customary land, it is only deemed Crown
land for
certain purposes.
 Page 6
(3) In the event of any conflict in meaning between the Maori and the English
versions of the
Preamble, the Maori version shall prevail.
So in the Maori version of the preamble the key word in the preamble is “Tika”.
Now, when you
look at the word deemed, in the eyes of a Maori arguing a word saying deemed and
that is “to
be” you would read Section 144 of the Act “Maori Customary Land deemed (to be)
Crown Land
for certain purposes, or you can read it as, “Maori Customary Land for the time being
Crown
Land”. .
Subsection (3) of Section 2 states” In any conflict between the Maori and the English
version of
the preamble, the Maori version shall prevail. Alright, now I go to Section 17 of Te
Ture Whenua
Maori Amendment Act 1994, sub Section (3) states that” A Maori incorporation made
by special
resolution of the owners may alter, add to or replace its constitution in accordance
with any
provision of this Act or any regulations made under this Act.
Such provisions are, under Section 144, if it says Maori Customary Land deemed
Crown Land, it
could be added to, altered or replaced, the word “deemed”.
You take the English words out and you say it as you really want it, but as the Maori
people
really wanted it. Moreover, they say it is Maori Customary Land for the time being,
Crown Land.
Maori Financial Position Today.
The Trustee of the biggest Bank in the whole entire World, are the King and Queen of
Spain and
Prince Andrew.
They are the Trustees to the biggest Bank in the World. That is where all these Banks,
multi
national corporations and other financial institutions loan money from. They get their
money
from this Bank held by those three Trustees.
They go to the Beehive in Wellington, borrow their funds, and lend to other nations
from that
one Bank.
I KNOW THIS!!!
Have you seen one of those unclaimed dividends? Let us go down to basics. If you
walked into
the Maori Land Court or the office of the Maori Trustee and picked up the ledger
containing
unclaimed dividends of the Maori Trustee.
Now ever since 1846 right up until today there has been lease money. A lease to the
Government, who leased lands to the European settlers and the Company’s all over
the motu. .
(except Maori native drib drabs – some ones hand writing).
In 1852 the same, the Parliament was subject to the same thing. They paid taxes and
rent to the
British Crown. That fund is collected by the British Crown held in the Bank of New
Zealand
annually, the interest added on top of that, just think here, just the interest to the
Reserved
Bank of New Zealand, but really the British Crown has been transferring that fund to
a Bank
called Akaroa, this is the truth of the matter.
The Bank of NZ based in England has been depositing into the Bank of Akaroa,
which is now
being over “umbrellaed” under the Reserve Bank of NZ. The interest has been
deposited into
that Akaroa Bank; the principal sum has been paid into the Trust account held by the
King and
Queen of Spain and Prince Andrew right now.
Every year the funds go in that fashion. The funds that have been expended in NZ by
the NZ
Settlers Parliament for their administration and all of that is merely the interest.
Therefore, it is

Page 7
Maori money that is keeping this country going. Now, the principal sum is being held
by the
United Nations the principal sum of that amount.
The Trustees appointed for that fund are the King and Queen of Spain and Prince
Andrew at the
moment. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) borrows funds from there, and all
the other
World Banks, Banks through out the World borrow their funds from that one fund,
from that
principal sum. The Account held by the King and Queen of Spain and Prince Andrew,
is the
biggest fund in the whole entire World. Lease Money and other Funds from the 74
nations of the
Commonwealth are held in Trust in this bank. Now that fund, the principal sum is
owned by the
Maori people right here in Aotearoa, NZ, entirely.
The key issue is that the British Crown is a Sovereign. Has a Sovereign interest
through out the
Pacific Ocean. Now listen to this Act concerning half castes and other persons living
in the Pacific
region, Section II Native Districts Regulations Act 1858, quote, “Half- castes and
other persons of
mixed race living as members of any Native tribe, and all aboriginal natives of any of
the islands
of the Pacific Ocean, shall for the purposes of this Act be deemed to be persons of the
Native
race” unquote.
What that is more or less saying is that a European, French, Spaniard, Chinese, or
other settler,
whilst living in Aotearoa, NZ, are classed as a person of the native race.
All indigenous people of the-Pacific Ocean region come under Maori Sovereignty.
And as far as
the Treaty of Waitangi is concerned, it is a 50/50 partnership between the Crown &
Maori
concerning Sovereignty over the Pacific Ocean region, so Maori people and all the
indigenous
people of the Pacific Ocean region are the Sovereigns in their own right.
Now, until the Maori people wake up and start taking their place in the great society
of nations,
then and only then would the wars against the Americans and people like Saddam
Hussein cease.
The Maori people are the only ones who can fix the problems that the nations of the
Pacific
Ocean region are currently having, as expressed in the recent Pacific Nations
conference 2003.
The Banks, multi national corporations and other financial institutions will still be in
control of
the financial world; however that is no concern of ours. What does concern us as
sovereigns, is
the estimated time where Maori should be in control of Aotearoa, NZ, this should be
by the year
2005. From then on Maori will free the rest of the indigenous people of the Pacific
Ocean region
thereafter. I think all other issues are just issues of confusion.
Douglas Meyers was the president of the business round table in NZ, living in
Matauri Bay. We
have a daughter of Matauri Bay right here in our midst. Douglas Meyers has now
resigned from
the business round table; and most if not all of these corporates have moved offshore,
moved
their businesses offshore, but are holding offshore until this matter with the TOW is
settled.
They had previously made investments in NZ and found them to be of no worth to
them
investing in NZ until that TOW is properly settled!!!!!!!!
Challenging Jurisdiction of High Court or District Court Judges.
This is what you say to the judge, (to the presiding Judge)...
Sir, being a Native Indigenous Aborigine and therefore a sovereign of Aotearoa, NZ, I
reckon I’m
suppose to have a Native assessor up there by you to make sure that me and my
people get a
fair deal. If you’re going to sit there by yourself, then that’s not fair, that’s a total
injustice.
 Page 8
As your sovereign, her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, under whom you swore your
judicial oath,
which is as follows;.
Quote “I swear to uphold the laws of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II her heirs and
successors
according to law, without fear nor favour or ill will towards all men, so help me God”
unquote.
This book here, the Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993 states, that this Act
shall bind
the Crown and so, if you deny me the use of this book and the laws within it and say
to me, no I
do not accept that, then you are saying to your sovereign that you are over stepping
her, then
you are in breach of your judicial oath and you are not exercising the law that binds
the Crown,
you are misbehaving by not upholding the laws of Her Majesty’ Queen Elizabeth II
her heirs and
successors according to law, and therefore, you are acting with misconduct as a judge.
By the power vested in me under Section 12 of Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land
Act 1993, I
will personally see to it that ‘your position as judge, be removed from you, so help
you God.
The penalty under the Crimes Act of your own Government for treason is death, and
by/for any
member of the judiciary it is imprisonment for life so help you God, and when you get
there to
prison you will meet the people who you put in there, yourself, other sovereigns like
myself.
Under the Native Circuit Courts Act 1858, number5, under section 32 of that Act.
Such provisions
come under Section 32 of the Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993.
Section 33 TTWM, ML Act 1993. Additional members in relation to matters of
representation -
(1) where a request is made to the Maori Land Court under section 30 (1) of this Act,
the Chief
Judge shall appoint two or more additional members (not being Judges of the Maori
Land Court)
to the Maori Land Court.
(2) Each person appointed under subsection (1) of this section shall possess
knowledge and
experience relevant to the subject matter of the request.
(3) The chief judge shall, before appointing any persons under subsection (1) of this
section for
the purposes of any request, consult, as the case may require, with the parties to the
proceedings or with persons involved in the negotiations, consultations, allocations, or
other
matter about the knowledge and experience that any such person should possess.
Section 62. Additional members with knowledge and experience in Tikanga Maori -
(1)
Notwithstanding anything in any other provisions of this Act, or any cases stated
under Section
61(1) (b) of this Act, for the opinion of the Maori Appellate Court, the Chief Judge
may, if any
party to the proceedings so requests, direct that, for the purposes of the hearing of that
case,
the Maori Appellate court shall consist of—.
(a) Three judges of the Maori Land Court; and.
(b) One or two other members (not being judges of the Maori Land Court) to be
appointed by
the chief judge.
(2) Each person appointed tinder subsection (1) (b) Of this section shall possess
knowledge and
experience of Tikanga Maori.
(3) The Chief Judge shall, before appointing any person under subsection (I) (b) of
this section
for the purposes of any hearing, consult with the parties to the proceedings about the
knowledge and experience of Tikanga Maori that any such person should possess.
Interpretation of “Tikanga Maori” means “Maori Customary values and practices.”
Where do you
go and practice what is in accordance with Tikanga Maori? Back to your Marae.
Where is the law
that defines this, in the He Whakaputanga o te Rangatira o Nu Tirene (Declaration of

Page 9
Independence) 1835 and Te Tiriti o Waitangi (Treat)’ of Waitangi) 1840, and at what
place are
the creation and dispensation of laws to be made for Maori by Maori? At Waitangi
Marae,
Waitangi.
Therefore, the court proceedings under Tikanga Maori shall be conducted by persons
with the
knowledge of Tikanga Maori, back at the Marae are Maori customary values and
practices, and
on sitting on that Marae, additional members and the judges of the Maori Land Court
become a
witness of the kawa of the Marae, hurinoa to tatou whare, those are the people within
the
house who are the judges.
There are problems on our Marae today with entities such as Trust Boards created and
constituted under the Maori Trust Boards Act 1955, Incorporated Societies and the
sort whom
are constituted under the New Zealand Settlers Parliament. They are however,
artificial people
or creatures and therefore, they do not settle between Maori and European, they are
only
settling a deal with themselves, not with Maori.
Maori are a natural flesh and blood body, the NZ Parliament and all departments and
people
within those departments operating under them are artificial bodies, corporately
coloured
entities or non living breathing flesh and blood creatures/animals.
Maori Incorporations under Part XIII of Te Ture Whenua Maori. Maori Land Act
1993 (TTWM,ML
Act 1993).
When you come up against a Maori Incorporation under Statute of Law, it has the
same powers
as Parliament. When you’re dealing with Parliament your dealing with an animal,
when you’re
dealing with a Maori Incorporation your dealing with a natural person and a natural
body.
Section 35 of TTWM, ML Act 1993 will indicate for you what a Maori Land Court is;
it has the
same powers as the High Court, for example;
Section 35. Fees and allowances —There shall be paid to any additional member of
the Maori
Land Court or Maori Appellate Court appointed under Section 28(1) or Section 31(1)
or Section
33(1) of this Act or by an order in council made under section 27(1) of this Act, out of
Public
money, remuneration by way of fees, salary, or allowances and travelling allowances
and
expenses in accordance with the Fees and Travelling Allowances Act 1951, and the
provisions of
that Act shall apply accordingly as if the Maori Land Court or the Maori Appellate
Court, as the
case may require, were a statutory board within the meaning of that Act. As if, in
which they are
not a statutory board.
The Jurisdiction of the Maori Land Court is this.
Section 237 Jurisdiction of Court generally — (1). Subject to express provisions of
this Part of
this Act, in respect of any trust to which this section applies, the Maori Land Court
shall have
and may exercise all the same powers and authorities as the High Court has (whether
by statute
or by any rule of law or by virtue of its inherent jurisdiction) in respect of trusts
generally.
(2) Nothing in subsection (1) of this section shall limit or affect the jurisdiction of the
High Court.
So therefore the MLC has the same jurisdiction as the High Court, but the High
Court’s
jurisdiction is still retained for the benefit of the settlers and not Maori and so when
you talk of
the High Court the Maori Land Court and any other court for that matter, it is not a
statutory
body, but a Maori incorporation is a statutory body independent, stands alone by
Section 150,
under the provisions of Section 150, the Maori Land Court has no jurisdiction over a
Maori
incorporation.

Page 10
Section 150 TTWM Act 1993 — Manner of alienation of undivided interests — (1)
No undivided
interest in any Maori freehold land may be alienated otherwise than by vesting order
made by
the court under Part VIII of this Act, unless the court is of the opinion that the
arrangement or
agreement of the parties should be given affect to by memorandum of transfer, and so
orders.
(2) Nothing in subsection (1) of this section applies in relation to the alienation of -
(a) Shares in a Maori incorporation:
(b) Interests in shares in a Maori incorporation:
(c) Beneficial interests in land that, by virtue of Section 250 (2) of this Act, remain
vested in the
several owners of that land despite the vesting of the legal estate in fee simple in that
land in a
Maori incorporation.
(3) No other interests in any Maori freehold land may be alienated otherwise than by;.
(a) An instrument of alienation, executed and attested in accordance with the rules of
the court,
and con firmed by the court under Part VIII of this Act; or;.
(b) a vesting order made by the Court under that Part:.
(4) Nothing in subsection (3) of this section applies in relation to the alienation of any
interest in
Maori freehold land that —.
(a) is effected — (i) by a Maori incorporation; or -
(ii) by the trustees of any trust constituted under Part X of this Act; and.
(b) Is not an alienation by way of sale or gift?
This means that a Maori incorporation is totally independent from any other court. No
other
court has jurisdiction over a Maori incorporation, and so when you walk into the
District court or
the magistrate’s court you say, my jurisdiction, I challenge your jurisdiction over me
because I
am a beneficiary of a Maori incorporation, I am tangata whenua.
You can go through a process if you like, or you can go through by your own will. As
the
whakatauaki says, “A lone tree in the forest is easy to bend and to break”.
If you go in an incorporated way under a Maori incorporation nothing can break you,
because it
is like a big animal, there are many tentacles to a Maori incorporation. It can suck the
life out of
you if you oppose it or it can suck the life out of your adversary, this is a Maori
incorporation,
this is a sovereign. What is sovereignty; I will give you an understanding of what
sovereignty is.
Sovereignty in the legal term when you’re using it against the settlers in a court of law
you must
be describing what sovereignty is, and according to Vattel, an old English writer on
international
law, sovereignty is vested in the ruler of the land. It is a society of people who have
united
together to procure their safety and welfare. They govern themselves under their own
laws, this
is sovereignty.
I will describe to-you what the common law is.
The common law is a judgement made by the Privy Council. The common law of the
UK is made
by the Privilege Council of the monarch; in this case Her Majesty Queen-Elizabeth-
the-Second.
When a decision is made from there it becomes a common law. The common law of
the UK in
relation to NZ preserves the Maori customary law in a judgement of Lord Phillimore
in 1901.
Case, Hineiti Rirerire Arani versus the Public Trustee, on the customary law, based
on the
statute, the 1846 New Zealand Constitution Act and 1852 NZ Constitution Act; those
are the

Page 11
statutes of the common law being upheld by the Privy Council in their judgement that
forms the
common law.
As to the extinguishment of our customary rights in our lands, forests, fisheries and
other taonga
which includes human resources.
Lord Davey in a case, Nireaha Tamaki vs Baker, and in the United States, Johnstone
vs
Macintosh. Lord Davey stated that the issue of a Crown grant does not amount to
extinguishment of the Native Title and now that the case has been up before the Privy
Council,
the highest court in the land, the Crown lacked unreviewable prerogative power in
relation to
the Native Title.
The Native Title being, all the rights, powers and privileges existing prior to the
Treaty of
Waitangi. Government after that decision, a year following created a statute, trying to
over rule
the common law of the UK and they did it again here (New Zealand) in a case called
Willis vs the
Attorney General, in the case where it affected the Bishop of Wellington to a title of
land and an
agreement between the tribes in Wellington, that the bishop of Wellington might be
able to
build a school.
The government issued a Crown grant to the Bishop of Wellington and was held in
the High
Court of Appeal that the Crown grant gave the Bishop of Wellington full title to the
land. The
appeal went to the Privy Council via Willis vs The Attorney General.
Presiding on the Privy Council was Lord Mac-Naughten who stated, “We will have
none of that.”
The court was not an instrument of executive dictate, it was up to the court to
determine what a
breach of trust was and Lord Mac-Naughten squashed the Crown grant issued to the
Bishop of
Wellington because it was insufficient.
Reason being, because the Crown had not purchased one inch of soil in New Zealand
and I state
an italic by way of first right of pre-emption and the first right of refusal. Now when
that
decision went to the Privy Council Lord Mac-Naughten stated that, “it was rather late
in the day
for the Colonial bench to deny the Native title legal status” and so in 1947 the
Government
adopting the Statutes of Westminster Act which gave them full power to make laws
for
themselves it was subject to Section 8 which stated this, quote “Nothing in this Act
shall give any
power to repeal the Constitution Act of the Colony of Australia or the Constitution
Act of the
Dominion of NZ” unquote.
Again, years go by and in 1986 the NZ Settlers Parliament breached the Statutes of
Westminster
Adoption Act 1947 and repealed the NZ Constitution Act 1852 and on repealing the
Constitution
Act of New Zealand they gave it full power and chopped off their own neck because
by the
Constitution Act 1852 it was by that Statute that they obtained from the British Crown
a warrant
to Govern themselves and they gave themselves full power to chop off their own
heads by
repealing the NZ Constitution Act 1852.
New Zealand now stands in limbo. The NZ Settlers Parliament has no legal nor
lawful
Constitution.
Three Regents of Her Majesty’s put together an Act called Te Ture Whenua Maori
Act, Maori Bill,
and in doing so, the Government enacted the Conservation Act 1987. The Regents put
on hold
by the Common law that private land under the Conservation Act means land referred
to in the
Maori Land Act 1993 or Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993. That was to come into
force some
years later.
In the mean time in the year 1987, those three Regents put into force the Imperial
Laws
Application Act 1988. Section 5 of that Act states that the common law of the United
Kingdom

Page 12
shall form part of the law of NZ, reference behind that was the Privy Council decision
in 1947
concerning the Statutes of Westminster Adoption Act.
Following that came into place in 1991 the Resource Management Act; resource
management
was for the managers to act as interim managers of the resources. That meant that the
Local
Governments and the Minister of Conservation, had to manage the resources and the
conservation of those resources until the Maori Land Act could be put into place and
enacted
into NZ. That Act took place in 1993 being the Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land
Act 1993.
Three Regents of Her Majesty’s put together an Act called Te Ture Whenua Maori
Act, Maori Bill,
and in doing so, the Government enacted the Conservation Act 1987. The Regents put
on hold
by the Common law that private land under the Conservation Act means land referred
to in the
Maori Land Act 1993 or Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993. That was to come into
force some
years later.
In 1995 the land was conquered by International Law, it was taken under the law of
conquest of
International Law. This occurred when the flags on the 6 of February 1995, the flags
of the NSW
and NZ Company hit the ground, the Governor Generals flag as the representative of
the Crown
came down and hit the ground.
The NZ “rag” (or flag) was trampled into the ground. The declaration of war was
placed to the
Governor-General against the New Zealand Parliament by Maori, and when all the
flags hit the
ground at the Treaty grounds in Waitangi in 1995 the Maori flag went up and hit the
top of the
mast, the Maori people had conquered back Aotearoa, NZ.
In 1996 the Fisheries Act was put into place, was enacted and now it is up to Maori
under the
provisions of Section 17, amending Section 268 Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land
Act 1993
subsection (3) stating that, a Maori incorporation by special resolution of the owners
or
shareholders may alter, add to or replace its constitution in accordance with any
provision of
this Act or any regulations made under this Act. This includes the provisions of
Section 253
which states that, subject to this Act, Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act and
any other
enactment and the General Law made by Parliament or any statute.
Subject to this Act the Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act and any other
enactment both
International and National, and the general law made by parliament, subject to this
Act and any
other enactment and the general law, every Maori incorporation made by Special
Resolution
including in its constitution or any restrictions imposed by the court shall have both
within and
outside NZ, full capacity in the discharge of its obligation of the trust in the best
interests of the
shareholders, to carry on or undertake any business or activity, do any act, or enter
into any
transaction and, for the purposes of paragraph 3(a) of this section, full rights, powers,
and
privileges.
What it says is that, a Maori incorporation by the blink of an eye in front of a court of
law in any
court in NZ or in any international court, Maori by special resolution says, meet my
eye, hold on
judge, we are just going outside and we are going to pass a resolution changing the
law, we think
its about time we passed a resolution, we’re going to change that law under Section
253 of
TTWM,ML Act 1993, subject to this Act and any other enactment and the general law
made by
Parliament.
You can change the law in an instant, bang! In Section 5 of TTWM,ML Act, it says,
“This Act shall
bind the Crown”, so the Crown has said, we can change it, we can change any law.
You can add
to it, alter it or replace it and we have full rights, powers and privileges to do that.

Page 13
In all the cases that I have been involved with myself personally, before this
Corporation
business started up I was exercising the same thing, my rights as a sovereign. The
people were
asking me, how come you’re getting away with a lot of things that we don’t get away
with. And I
said “well I’m just doing my own thing, minding my own business, applying the
law, and I’m
getting away with it, that’s all.” At the end of the day, it is the quality of your lawful
and/or
legal argument. When other people try it out and fail, they fail because they have not
learnt the
law properly.
I have heard Judges running out of the court room, they say ah, we’ll adjourn, they
read the
affidavit and then they adjourn and they say we’ll adjourn till 1 o’clock and then you
look out
the window on your side and you see the judge still in his robe he’s running out to the
car, hops
in and takes off. In an hours time your sitting and waiting for him and the registrar
comes up and
says the judge wont be back today, because of this and that and so and so whilst
putting on a
brave face.
MAUI.
The Maui Report.
I am the Chief Registrar of Maori Law Society, Nga Tikanga Maori Society.
Mr Mapiria Matua who is the Crown?
The British Crown of England.
Where do Maori derive their authority from?
Maori derive their authority from the
Declaration of Independence 1835.
Where does the British Crown derive their authority from in New Zealand?
Article 2 of the
Declaration of Independence the Chiefs exercise their powers in that Article 2 of the
Declaration
in appointing the British Crown of England in the Te Tiriti of Waitangi.1840.
Now where does the Settlers and Immigrants Parliament derive their authority from?
They
derive their authority from the New Zealand Constitution Act 1852 no relationship to
the Te
Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 nor the Declaration, of Independence 1835.
What is the British Crown Protectorate Laws for Maori in the Dominion of New
Zealand? The
Dominion of New Zealand is the Maori nation under that Dominion. It is independent
and the
Protectorate Laws that have been put into place by the British Crown starts from the
New
Zealand Constitution Act 1846 s10 of that enactment states that in cases arising
between the
Aboriginal inhabitants of New Zealand alone... The Courts and Magistrates of the
same
province.., shall enforce such native [Maori tangata whenua] laws, customs and
usages as
aforesaid. The other Protectorate mechanism is the New Zealand Constitution Act
1852 in which
constitutes to Settlers and immigrants Parliament and Government of themselves and
s7i of
that, Act continues Article 2 of the te Tiriti o Waitangi.
Following that enactment was the
Native District Regulations Act 1858 no [41]. Under this particular statute all the laws
of were
assented to by the native inhabitants Maori as well as British crown In the same year
the Native
Circuit Courts Act 1858 no [5] under s32 of that enactment Maori had their own
Assessors Court
which had the civil and criminal jurisdiction and a constabulary to enforce their lores.
In 1894
enactment was the Native Land Courts Act [part 11] which formed the basis of
present day Maori
Incorporations, which put into place provisions of Article 3 of the Te Tiriti of
Waitangi. Where it
was Maori shall have the same in equal measure as: that under her constitution she
has for her
subjects. For the arrangement therefore and for the agreement concerning the
Government of
the Queen all the Maori people of New Zealand will be protected by the Queen of
England and
will give to them all the rights and duties in Equal Measure that apply under Her
Constitution to

Page 14
people of England. And in relation to the Treaty of Waitangi there was also the
Statutes of
Westminster Act adopted by the New Zealand Settler Government on 11 November
1947. S8 of
that enactment provides that nothing in that Act gives any authority to alter or repeal
the
constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia and the Dominion of New Zealand.
However that
Act provided that the Settler Parliament could make full laws for themselves without
assistance
from the Parliament of Westminster. However in 1986 the Settlers Parliament upon
presumption
repealed the New Zealand Constitution Act 1852, which in fact removed the ability to
govern
themselves!!!!
In 1988 the Imperial Laws Applications Act 1988 was enacted and reverted back to
the Common
Law of England. Now enacted as protection statute in New Zealand is Te Ture
Whenua Maori
Act. Part 13 of that enactment refers to Maori Incorporations or Te Whakaminenga.
That part of
the Act still portrays the Declaration of Independence 1835. However in more
clarified form it is
the magnetism for Maori to establish their Government, Court structures and
institutions. They
have a mandatory and statutory, an autonomous right to legislate on Maori customary
law,
Clearly defined the Declaration of Independence 1835 Article 1 expresses this nation
is
independent under the Dominion of New Zealand. Article 2 declares the sovereignty
of all who
were living within or within its territories Article 3 expresses that when the
Whakaminenga
assembles at Waitangi in the autumn months of February so it has been, they will
enact their
laws. Article 4 indicates the flag adopted by the Chiefs and accepted by King William
IV the
preamble of the Treaty of Waitangi indicates the intention of the British crown and
the
protection of all the rights and the property rights belong to Maori prior to the Treaty
of
Waitangi. And the continuance of the protection of those property rights. In the
preamble also
contains the concession that Maori made to the Crown in the statement that in the
English
translation of the Maori version “The Chiefs for the Government of the Queen to be
upon all the
places of this land and Islands because this is the cessation because also there are
many of her
people many other people of her tribe who live and will live on these lands and that is
to say
that Maori conceded their sovereignty over the European settler back to the British
Crown. None
other.
What is the statutory body that regulates and legislates customary law for Maori
nationally and
internationally Maori Incorporations are that body in exercise of their powers under
s253, s253A
and s268(3).
Where there is a Maori incorporation where is the Maori Land Courts jurisdiction?
The Maori
Land court has no jurisdiction in a Maori Incorporation’s affairs. That was determined
in 1986 by
the Maori Appellate Court on 26 October 1988 at Rotorua, from minute book 32,
folios 342-350
where the 3 Judges of the Appellate Court found that shareholders in the Maori
Incorporation
have no interest at law or at equity in land vested in the body corporate and therefore
the Court
has no power to make orders respect of such lands in terms of s31(a of the Maori
Affairs Act
1953 They found that the Court s jurisdiction was defeated by part 4 of the Maori
Affairs
Amendment Act 1967 which is now part 13 of the Te Ture Whenua Maori Act and in
relation to
the case there exists a Maori incorporation in the Whangaroa District, namely Matauri
X
Incorporation who are affiliated members of the Nga Tikanga Maori Incorporation
and in relation
to the whole of the North there are 17 other Maori Incorporations within the North
from the
Cape to Tamaki Makaurau, There are 2021 Maori Incorporations throughout New
Zealand or
Aotearoa. All independent in their own right as statutory and mandatory bodies. The
representative of ManaTangata and Manawhenua.

Page 15
What effect would the Land Court hearing by Judge Spencer and his determination
have on the
members of the Matauri Bay X Incorporation? None what so ever as he himself was
one of those
judges on the Maori Appellate Court who found they had no power and no authority.
Is Te Ture Whenua Maori Land Act binding on the Crown? S5 of it states this Act
shall emphasise
the word “shall’, bind the Crown.
S2 of the Act requires all Ministers of the Crown or Judges and the Department of
Court Officials
to uphold the preamble to the Act and reaffirm that on the Tikanga of Maori.

right now.

Every year the funds go in that fashion. The funds that have been expended in NZ by
the NZ

Settlers Parliament for their administration and all of that is merely the interest.
Therefore, it is

Page 7

Maori money that is keeping this country going. Now, the principal sum is being held
by the

United Nations the principal sum of that amount.

The Trustees appointed for that fund are the King and Queen of Spain and Prince
Andrew at the

moment. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) borrows funds from there, and all
the other

World Banks, Banks through out the World borrow their funds from that one fund,
from that

principal sum. The Account held by the King and Queen of Spain and Prince Andrew,
is the
biggest fund in the whole entire World. Lease Money and other Funds from the 74
nations of the

Commonwealth are held in Trust in this bank. Now that fund, the principal sum is
owned by the

Maori people right here in Aotearoa, NZ, entirely.

The key issue is that the British Crown is a Sovereign. Has a Sovereign interest
through out the

Pacific Ocean. Now listen to this Act concerning half castes and other persons living
in the Pacific

region, Section II Native Districts Regulations Act 1858, quote, “Half- castes and
other persons of

mixed race living as members of any Native tribe, and all aboriginal natives of any of
the islands

of the Pacific Ocean, shall for the purposes of this Act be deemed to be persons of the
Native

race” unquote.

What that is more or less saying is that a European, French, Spaniard, Chinese, or
other settler,

whilst living in Aotearoa, NZ, are classed as a person of the native race.

All indigenous people of the-Pacific Ocean region come under Maori Sovereignty.
And as far as

the Treaty of Waitangi is concerned, it is a 50/50 partnership between the Crown &
Maori

concerning Sovereignty over the Pacific Ocean region, so Maori people and all the
indigenous

people of the Pacific Ocean region are the Sovereigns in their own right.

Now, until the Maori people wake up and start taking their place in the great society
of nations,

then and only then would the wars against the Americans and people like Saddam
Hussein cease.
The Maori people are the only ones who can fix the problems that the nations of the
Pacific

Ocean region are currently having, as expressed in the recent Pacific Nations
conference 2003.

The Banks, multi national corporations and other financial institutions will still be in
control of

the financial world; however that is no concern of ours. What does concern us as
sovereigns, is

the estimated time where Maori should be in control of Aotearoa, NZ, this should be
by the year

2005. From then on Maori will free the rest of the indigenous people of the Pacific
Ocean region

thereafter. I think all other issues are just issues of confusion.

Douglas Meyers was the president of the business round table in NZ, living in
Matauri Bay. We

have a daughter of Matauri Bay right here in our midst. Douglas Meyers has now
resigned from

the business round table; and most if not all of these corporates have moved offshore,
moved

their businesses offshore, but are holding offshore until this matter with the TOW is
settled.

They had previously made investments in NZ and found them to be of no worth to

them

investing in NZ until that TOW is properly settled!!!!!!!!

Challenging Jurisdiction of High Court or District Court Judges.

This is what you say to the judge, (to the presiding Judge)...

Sir, being a Native Indigenous Aborigine and therefore a sovereign of Aotearoa, NZ, I
reckon I’m

suppose to have a Native assessor up there by you to make sure that me and my
people get a
fair deal. If you’re going to sit there by yourself, then that’s not fair, that’s a total
injustice.

Page 8

As your sovereign, her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, under whom you swore your
judicial oath,

which is as follows;.

Quote “I swear to uphold the laws of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II her heirs and
successors

according to law, without fear nor favour or ill will towards all men, so help me God”
unquote.

This book here, the Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993 states, that this Act
shall bind

the Crown and so, if you deny me the use of this book and the laws within it and say
to me, no I

do not accept that, then you are saying to your sovereign that you are over stepping
her, then

you are in breach of your judicial oath and you are not exercising the law that binds
the Crown,

you are misbehaving by not upholding the laws of Her Majesty’ Queen Elizabeth II
her heirs and

successors according to law, and therefore, you are acting with misconduct as a judge.

By the power vested in me under Section 12 of Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land
Act 1993, I

will personally see to it that ‘your position as judge, be removed from you, so help
you God.

The penalty under the Crimes Act of your own Government for treason is death, and
by/for any

member of the judiciary it is imprisonment for life so help you God, and when you get
there to
prison you will meet the people who you put in there, yourself, other sovereigns like
myself.

Under the Native Circuit Courts Act 1858, number5, under section 32 of that Act.
Such provisions

come under Section 32 of the Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act 1993.

Section 33 TTWM, ML Act 1993. Additional members in relation to matters of

representation -

(1) where a request is made to the Maori Land Court under section 30 (1) of this Act,
the Chief

Judge shall appoint two or more additional members (not being Judges of the Maori
Land Court)

to the Maori Land Court.

(2) Each person appointed under subsection (1) of this section shall possess
knowledge and

experience relevant to the subject matter of the request.

(3) The chief judge shall, before appointing any persons under subsection (1) of this
section for

the purposes of any request, consult, as the case may require, with the parties to the

proceedings or with persons involved in the negotiations, consultations, allocations, or

other

matter about the knowledge and experience that any such person should possess.

Section 62. Additional members with knowledge and experience in Tikanga Maori -
(1)

Notwithstanding anything in any other provisions of this Act, or any cases stated
under Section

61(1) (b) of this Act, for the opinion of the Maori Appellate Court, the Chief Judge
may, if any

party to the proceedings so requests, direct that, for the purposes of the hearing of that
case,
the Maori Appellate court shall consist of—.

(a) Three judges of the Maori Land Court; and.

(b) One or two other members (not being judges of the Maori Land Court) to be
appointed by

the chief judge.

(2) Each person appointed tinder subsection (1) (b) Of this section shall possess
knowledge and

experience of Tikanga Maori.

(3) The Chief Judge shall, before appointing any person under subsection (I) (b) of
this section

for the purposes of any hearing, consult with the parties to the proceedings about the

knowledge and experience of Tikanga Maori that any such person should possess.

Interpretation of “Tikanga Maori” means “Maori Customary values and practices.”

Where do you

go and practice what is in accordance with Tikanga Maori? Back to your Marae.
Where is the law

that defines this, in the He Whakaputanga o te Rangatira o Nu Tirene (Declaration of

Page 9

Independence) 1835 and Te Tiriti o Waitangi (Treat)’ of Waitangi) 1840, and at what
place are

the creation and dispensation of laws to be made for Maori by Maori? At Waitangi
Marae,

Waitangi.

Therefore, the court proceedings under Tikanga Maori shall be conducted by persons
with the

knowledge of Tikanga Maori, back at the Marae are Maori customary values and
practices, and
on sitting on that Marae, additional members and the judges of the Maori Land Court
become a

witness of the kawa of the Marae, hurinoa to tatou whare, those are the people within
the

house who are the judges.

There are problems on our Marae today with entities such as Trust Boards created and

constituted under the Maori Trust Boards Act 1955, Incorporated Societies and the
sort whom

are constituted under the New Zealand Settlers Parliament. They are however,
artificial people

or creatures and therefore, they do not settle between Maori and European, they are
only

settling a deal with themselves, not with Maori.

Maori are a natural flesh and blood body, the NZ Parliament and all departments and
people

within those departments operating under them are artificial bodies, corporately
coloured

entities or non living breathing flesh and blood creatures/animals.

Maori Incorporations under Part XIII of Te Ture Whenua Maori. Maori Land Act
1993 (TTWM,ML

Act 1993).

When you come up against a Maori Incorporation under Statute of Law, it has the
same powers

as Parliament. When you’re dealing with Parliament your dealing with an animal,
when you’re

dealing with a Maori Incorporation your dealing with a natural person and a natural
body.

Section 35 of TTWM, ML Act 1993 will indicate for you what a Maori Land Court is;
it has the
same powers as the High Court, for example;

Section 35. Fees and allowances —There shall be paid to any additional member of
the Maori

Land Court or Maori Appellate Court appointed under Section 28(1) or Section 31(1)
or Section

33(1) of this Act or by an order in council made under section 27(1) of this Act, out of
Public

money, remuneration by way of fees, salary, or allowances and travelling allowances

and

expenses in accordance with the Fees and Travelling Allowances Act 1951, and the
provisions of

that Act shall apply accordingly as if the Maori Land Court or the Maori Appellate
Court, as the

case may require, were a statutory board within the meaning of that Act. As if, in
which they are

not a statutory board.

The Jurisdiction of the Maori Land Court is this.

Section 237 Jurisdiction of Court generally — (1). Subject to express provisions of

this Part of

this Act, in respect of any trust to which this section applies, the Maori Land Court
shall have

and may exercise all the same powers and authorities as the High Court has (whether
by statute

or by any rule of law or by virtue of its inherent jurisdiction) in respect of trusts

generally.

(2) Nothing in subsection (1) of this section shall limit or affect the jurisdiction of the
High Court.

So therefore the MLC has the same jurisdiction as the High Court, but the High
Court’s
jurisdiction is still retained for the benefit of the settlers and not Maori and so when
you talk of

the High Court the Maori Land Court and any other court for that matter, it is not a
statutory

body, but a Maori incorporation is a statutory body independent, stands alone by

Section 150,

under the provisions of Section 150, the Maori Land Court has no jurisdiction over a
Maori

incorporation.

Page 10

Section 150 TTWM Act 1993 — Manner of alienation of undivided interests — (1)
No undivided

interest in any Maori freehold land may be alienated otherwise than by vesting order
made by

the court under Part VIII of this Act, unless the court is of the opinion that the
arrangement or

agreement of the parties should be given affect to by memorandum of transfer, and so

orders.

(2) Nothing in subsection (1) of this section applies in relation to the alienation of -

(a) Shares in a Maori incorporation:

(b) Interests in shares in a Maori incorporation:

(c) Beneficial interests in land that, by virtue of Section 250 (2) of this Act, remain
vested in the

several owners of that land despite the vesting of the legal estate in fee simple in that
land in a

Maori incorporation.

(3) No other interests in any Maori freehold land may be alienated otherwise than by;.
(a) An instrument of alienation, executed and attested in accordance with the rules of
the court,

and con firmed by the court under Part VIII of this Act; or;.

(b) a vesting order made by the Court under that Part:.

(4) Nothing in subsection (3) of this section applies in relation to the alienation of any
interest in

Maori freehold land that —.

(a) is effected — (i) by a Maori incorporation; or -

(ii) by the trustees of any trust constituted under Part X of this Act; and.

(b) Is not an alienation by way of sale or gift?

This means that a Maori incorporation is totally independent from any other court. No
other

court has jurisdiction over a Maori incorporation, and so when you walk into the
District court or

the magistrate’s court you say, my jurisdiction, I challenge your jurisdiction over me
because I

am a beneficiary of a Maori incorporation, I am tangata whenua.

You can go through a process if you like, or you can go through by your own will. As
the

whakatauaki says, “A lone tree in the forest is easy to bend and to break”.

If you go in an incorporated way under a Maori incorporation nothing can break you,
because it

is like a big animal, there are many tentacles to a Maori incorporation. It can suck the
life out of

you if you oppose it or it can suck the life out of your adversary, this is a Maori
incorporation,

this is a sovereign. What is sovereignty; I will give you an understanding of what

sovereignty is.
Sovereignty in the legal term when you’re using it against the settlers in a court of law
you must

be describing what sovereignty is, and according to Vattel, an old English writer on
international

law, sovereignty is vested in the ruler of the land. It is a society of people who have
united

together to procure their safety and welfare. They govern themselves under their own
laws, this

is sovereignty.

I will describe to-you what the common law is.

The common law is a judgement made by the Privy Council. The common law of the
UK is made

by the Privilege Council of the monarch; in this case Her Majesty Queen-Elizabeth-
the-Second.

When a decision is made from there it becomes a common law. The common law of
the UK in

relation to NZ preserves the Maori customary law in a judgement of Lord Phillimore

in 1901.

Case, Hineiti Rirerire Arani versus the Public Trustee, on the customary law, based
on the

statute, the 1846 New Zealand Constitution Act and 1852 NZ Constitution Act; those
are the

Page 11

statutes of the common law being upheld by the Privy Council in their judgement that
forms the

common law.

As to the extinguishment of our customary rights in our lands, forests, fisheries and
other taonga
which includes human resources.

Lord Davey in a case, Nireaha Tamaki vs Baker, and in the United States, Johnstone
vs

Macintosh. Lord Davey stated that the issue of a Crown grant does not amount to

extinguishment of the Native Title and now that the case has been up before the Privy
Council,

the highest court in the land, the Crown lacked unreviewable prerogative power in
relation to

the Native Title.

The Native Title being, all the rights, powers and privileges existing prior to the
Treaty of

Waitangi. Government after that decision, a year following created a statute, trying to
over rule

the common law of the UK and they did it again here (New Zealand) in a case called
Willis vs the

Attorney General, in the case where it affected the Bishop of Wellington to a title of
land and an

agreement between the tribes in Wellington, that the bishop of Wellington might be
able to

build a school.

The government issued a Crown grant to the Bishop of Wellington and was held in
the High

Court of Appeal that the Crown grant gave the Bishop of Wellington full title to the
land. The

appeal went to the Privy Council via Willis vs The Attorney General.

Presiding on the Privy Council was Lord Mac-Naughten who stated, “We will have
none of that.”

The court was not an instrument of executive dictate, it was up to the court to
determine what a
breach of trust was and Lord Mac-Naughten squashed the Crown grant issued to the
Bishop of

Wellington because it was insufficient.

Reason being, because the Crown had not purchased one inch of soil in New Zealand
and I state

an italic by way of first right of pre-emption and the first right of refusal. Now when
that

decision went to the Privy Council Lord Mac-Naughten stated that, “it was rather late
in the day

for the Colonial bench to deny the Native title legal status” and so in 1947 the
Government

adopting the Statutes of Westminster Act which gave them full power to make laws
for

themselves it was subject to Section 8 which stated this, quote “Nothing in this Act
shall give any

power to repeal the Constitution Act of the Colony of Australia or the Constitution
Act of the

Dominion of NZ” unquote.

Again, years go by and in 1986 the NZ Settlers Parliament breached the Statutes of
Westminster

Adoption Act 1947 and repealed the NZ Constitution Act 1852 and on repealing the
Constitution

Act of New Zealand they gave it full power and chopped off their own neck because
by the

Constitution Act 1852 it was by that Statute that they obtained from the British Crown
a warrant

to Govern themselves and they gave themselves full power to chop off their own
heads by

repealing the NZ Constitution Act 1852.

New Zealand now stands in limbo. The NZ Settlers Parliament has no legal nor
lawful

Constitution.

Three Regents of Her Majesty’s put together an Act called Te Ture Whenua Maori
Act, Maori Bill,

and in doing so, the Government enacted the Conservation Act 1987. The Regents put
on hold

by the Common law that private land under the Conservation Act means land referred
to in the

Maori Land Act 1993 or Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993. That was to come into
force some

years later.

In the mean time in the year 1987, those three Regents put into force the Imperial
Laws

Application Act 1988. Section 5 of that Act states that the common law of the United
Kingdom

Page 12

shall form part of the law of NZ, reference behind that was the Privy Council decision
in 1947

concerning the Statutes of Westminster Adoption Act.

Following that came into place in 1991 the Resource Management Act; resource
management

was for the managers to act as interim managers of the resources. That meant that the
Local

Governments and the Minister of Conservation, had to manage the resources and the

conservation of those resources until the Maori Land Act could be put into place and
enacted
into NZ. That Act took place in 1993 being the Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land
Act 1993.

Three Regents of Her Majesty’s put together an Act called Te Ture Whenua Maori
Act, Maori Bill,

and in doing so, the Government enacted the Conservation Act 1987. The Regents put
on hold

by the Common law that private land under the Conservation Act means land referred
to in the

Maori Land Act 1993 or Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993. That was to come into
force some

years later.

In 1995 the land was conquered by International Law, it was taken under the law of
conquest of

International Law. This occurred when the flags on the 6 of February 1995, the flags
of the NSW

and NZ Company hit the ground, the Governor Generals flag as the representative of
the Crown

came down and hit the ground.

The NZ “rag” (or flag) was trampled into the ground. The declaration of war was
placed to the

Governor-General against the New Zealand Parliament by Maori, and when all the
flags hit the

ground at the Treaty grounds in Waitangi in 1995 the Maori flag went up and hit the
top of the

mast, the Maori people had conquered back Aotearoa, NZ.

In 1996 the Fisheries Act was put into place, was enacted and now it is up to Maori
under the

provisions of Section 17, amending Section 268 Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land
Act 1993
subsection (3) stating that, a Maori incorporation by special resolution of the owners
or

shareholders may alter, add to or replace its constitution in accordance with any
provision of

this Act or any regulations made under this Act. This includes the provisions of
Section 253

which states that, subject to this Act, Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act and
any other

enactment and the General Law made by Parliament or any statute.

Subject to this Act the Te Ture Whenua Maori, Maori Land Act and any other
enactment both

International and National, and the general law made by parliament, subject to this
Act and any

other enactment and the general law, every Maori incorporation made by Special
Resolution

including in its constitution or any restrictions imposed by the court shall have both
within and

outside NZ, full capacity in the discharge of its obligation of the trust in the best
interests of the

shareholders, to carry on or undertake any business or activity, do any act, or enter

into any

transaction and, for the purposes of paragraph 3(a) of this section, full rights, powers,
and

privileges.

What it says is that, a Maori incorporation by the blink of an eye in front of a court of
law in any

court in NZ or in any international court, Maori by special resolution says, meet my

eye, hold on

judge, we are just going outside and we are going to pass a resolution changing the
law, we think
its about time we passed a resolution, we’re going to change that law under Section
253 of

TTWM,ML Act 1993, subject to this Act and any other enactment and the general law
made by

Parliament.

You can change the law in an instant, bang! In Section 5 of TTWM,ML Act, it says,
“This Act shall

bind the Crown”, so the Crown has said, we can change it, we can change any law.
You can add

to it, alter it or replace it and we have full rights, powers and privileges to do that.

Page 13

In all the cases that I have been involved with myself personally, before this
Corporation

business started up I was exercising the same thing, my rights as a sovereign. The
people were

asking me, how come you’re getting away with a lot of things that we don’t get away
with. And I

said “well I’m just doing my own thing, minding my own business, applying the
law, and I’m

getting away with it, that’s all.” At the end of the day, it is the quality of your lawful
and/or

legal argument. When other people try it out and fail, they fail because they have not
learnt the

law properly.

I have heard Judges running out of the court room, they say ah, we’ll adjourn, they
read the

affidavit and then they adjourn and they say we’ll adjourn till 1 o’clock and then you
look out
the window on your side and you see the judge still in his robe he’s running out to the
car, hops

in and takes off. In an hours time your sitting and waiting for him and the registrar
comes up and

says the judge wont be back today, because of this and that and so and so whilst
putting on a

brave face.

MAUI.

The Maui Report.

I am the Chief Registrar of Maori Law Society, Nga Tikanga Maori Society.

Mr Mapiria Matua who is the Crown?

The British Crown of England.

Where do Maori derive their authority from?

Maori derive their authority from the

Declaration of Independence 1835.

Where does the British Crown derive their authority from in New Zealand?

Article 2 of the

Declaration of Independence the Chiefs exercise their powers in that Article 2 of the
Declaration

in appointing the British Crown of England in the Te Tiriti of Waitangi.1840.

Now where does the Settlers and Immigrants Parliament derive their authority from?

They

derive their authority from the New Zealand Constitution Act 1852 no relationship to
the Te

Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 nor the Declaration, of Independence 1835.

What is the British Crown Protectorate Laws for Maori in the Dominion of New
Zealand? The

Dominion of New Zealand is the Maori nation under that Dominion. It is independent
and the

Protectorate Laws that have been put into place by the British Crown starts from the
New

Zealand Constitution Act 1846 s10 of that enactment states that in cases arising
between the

Aboriginal inhabitants of New Zealand alone... The Courts and Magistrates of the
same

province.., shall enforce such native [Maori tangata whenua] laws, customs and
usages as

aforesaid. The other Protectorate mechanism is the New Zealand Constitution Act
1852 in which

constitutes to Settlers and immigrants Parliament and Government of themselves and

s7i of

that, Act continues Article 2 of the te Tiriti o Waitangi.

Following that enactment was the

Native District Regulations Act 1858 no [41]. Under this particular statute all the laws
of were

assented to by the native inhabitants Maori as well as British crown In the same year
the Native

Circuit Courts Act 1858 no [5] under s32 of that enactment Maori had their own
Assessors Court

which had the civil and criminal jurisdiction and a constabulary to enforce their lores.
In 1894

enactment was the Native Land Courts Act [part 11] which formed the basis of
present day Maori

Incorporations, which put into place provisions of Article 3 of the Te Tiriti of

Waitangi. Where it
was Maori shall have the same in equal measure as: that under her constitution she
has for her

subjects. For the arrangement therefore and for the agreement concerning the
Government of

the Queen all the Maori people of New Zealand will be protected by the Queen of
England and

will give to them all the rights and duties in Equal Measure that apply under Her
Constitution to

Page 14

people of England. And in relation to the Treaty of Waitangi there was also the
Statutes of

Westminster Act adopted by the New Zealand Settler Government on 11 November

1947. S8 of

that enactment provides that nothing in that Act gives any authority to alter or repeal
the

constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia and the Dominion of New Zealand.

However that

Act provided that the Settler Parliament could make full laws for themselves without
assistance

from the Parliament of Westminster. However in 1986 the Settlers Parliament upon
presumption

repealed the New Zealand Constitution Act 1852, which in fact removed the ability to
govern

themselves!!!!

In 1988 the Imperial Laws Applications Act 1988 was enacted and reverted back to
the Common

Law of England. Now enacted as protection statute in New Zealand is Te Ture

Whenua Maori
Act. Part 13 of that enactment refers to Maori Incorporations or Te Whakaminenga.
That part of

the Act still portrays the Declaration of Independence 1835. However in more
clarified form it is

the magnetism for Maori to establish their Government, Court structures and
institutions. They

have a mandatory and statutory, an autonomous right to legislate on Maori customary

law,

Clearly defined the Declaration of Independence 1835 Article 1 expresses this nation
is

independent under the Dominion of New Zealand. Article 2 declares the sovereignty
of all who

were living within or within its territories Article 3 expresses that when the
Whakaminenga

assembles at Waitangi in the autumn months of February so it has been, they will
enact their

laws. Article 4 indicates the flag adopted by the Chiefs and accepted by King William
IV the

preamble of the Treaty of Waitangi indicates the intention of the British crown and
the

protection of all the rights and the property rights belong to Maori prior to the Treaty
of

Waitangi. And the continuance of the protection of those property rights. In the
preamble also

contains the concession that Maori made to the Crown in the statement that in the
English

translation of the Maori version “The Chiefs for the Government of the Queen to be
upon all the

places of this land and Islands because this is the cessation because also there are
many of her
people many other people of her tribe who live and will live on these lands and that is
to say

that Maori conceded their sovereignty over the European settler back to the British
Crown. None

other.

What is the statutory body that regulates and legislates customary law for Maori
nationally and

internationally Maori Incorporations are that body in exercise of their powers under
s253, s253A

and s268(3).

Where there is a Maori incorporation where is the Maori Land Courts jurisdiction?
The Maori

Land court has no jurisdiction in a Maori Incorporation’s affairs. That was determined
in 1986 by

the Maori Appellate Court on 26 October 1988 at Rotorua, from minute book 32,
folios 342-350

where the 3 Judges of the Appellate Court found that shareholders in the Maori
Incorporation

have no interest at law or at equity in land vested in the body corporate and therefore
the Court

has no power to make orders respect of such lands in terms of s31(a of the Maori
Affairs Act

1953 They found that the Court s jurisdiction was defeated by part 4 of the Maori
Affairs

Amendment Act 1967 which is now part 13 of the Te Ture Whenua Maori Act and in
relation to

the case there exists a Maori incorporation in the Whangaroa District, namely Matauri
X

Incorporation who are affiliated members of the Nga Tikanga Maori Incorporation
and in relation
to the whole of the North there are 17 other Maori Incorporations within the North
from the

Cape to Tamaki Makaurau, There are 2021 Maori Incorporations throughout New
Zealand or

Aotearoa. All independent in their own right as statutory and mandatory bodies. The

representative of ManaTangata and Manawhenua.

Page 15

What effect would the Land Court hearing by Judge Spencer and his determination
have on the

members of the Matauri Bay X Incorporation? None what so ever as he himself was
one of those

judges on the Maori Appellate Court who found they had no power and no authority.

Is Te Ture Whenua Maori Land Act binding on the Crown? S5 of it states this Act
shall emphasise

the word “shall’, bind the Crown.

S2 of the Act requires all Ministers of the Crown or Judges and the Department of
Court Officials

to uphold the preamble to the Act and reaffirm that on the Tikanga of Maori.