Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
I.
Topic
Measurement of Length
II.
Materials
1 Meter stick and metric ruler calibrated in centimeters and in inches
1 roll of String
Objects with regular shapes:
2 pcs. small rectangular blocks
1 pc. cylinder (specifically graduated cylinder)
1 pc. ball
1 pc. disk
III.
Method
A. The meter and the foot
Using a meter-stick and a metric ruler, the length of the
laboratory table were measured in both meters and feet in which
measurements were obtained up to the nearest millimeter (mm) (1 mm
1
16
of an inch (in) (
1
16
in. =
IV.
Trial
LENGTH
meter (m)
feet (ft)
1
2
Average
3.000
3.015
(a) 3.008
9.750
9.812
(b) 9.781
Trial
1
2
Average
LENGTH
(cm)
(in)
12.50
4.875
12.40
4.813
12.45
4.844
WIDTH
(cm)
3.8
3.8
3.8
(in)
1.50
1.56
1.53
THICKNESS
(cm)
(in)
3.80
1.50
3.90
1.56
3.85
1.53
Trial
1
2
Average
C/d
CYLINDER
d (cm)
C (cm)
5.7
17.9
5.8
17.8
5.75
17.85
3.10
SPHERE
d (cm)
C (cm)
3
10.1
3.1
9.9
3.05
10
3
DISK
d (cm)
1.9
1.8
1.85
C (cm)
6
6.1
6.05
3.27
V.
`
Conclusion
Measurement plays a vital role in the comparison of an object with a
standard. Through measurement, we are able to express objects in numbers,
therefore, increasing our knowledge about the object.
Furthermore, there are two ways that made measuring possible;
directly with the use of measuring devices or indirectly by means of
calculation using a known equation or formula. However, based on the results
of the activity conducted which makes use of direct measurement, it was
found out that there was a slight difference in measurement reading. It could
be that the slight differences are due to the disagreement of the conductors
reading (e.g. human errors) or due to the measuring device that was used. This
suggests that measurements typically have an uncertainty, in this case, in their
hundredths place.
Nevertheless, the computed experimental Metric-English equivalent
was not that far from the accepted Metric-English equivalents and that the
percentage of error for the experimental was very minimal and almost
negligible (0.64%). With this, it could be concluded that if more trials were
made, the lesser difference there is between the experimental value and
accepted value so is the percentage of error for .