Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
In short, I am NOT trying to get a house for free, the house was paid for through other entities of
which I am a lawful beneficiary of and/or party to; in actuality the adverse party is unlawfully
defrauding this Court, the IRS, the SEC and insurance companies and investor groups to get a house
for free and be paid numerous times on a "bad" investment the adverse party caused to be bad.
5. "Did you stop making payments"? And I am going to swear you in.
A. Are you going to swear in opposing counsel?
B. Let the record reflect that the only admissible evidence will be coming from me, today.
C. NO, I stopped being defrauded by the misrepresentation of alleged loan payments
D. I never received any loan and there has been no proof offered to the court to prove that I did receive one.
E. NO. Based on the fact I never made any "loan" payments because I never received a loan. So I'm not sure
what to call them, extortion payments, fraud payments, whatever they were, they were not payments on a
loan.
F. I was making payments towards a mortgage on a loan that I never received. And now I'm just waiting on
the loan.
G. Show me the loan. The wire transfer, a cancelled check, an ACH a cashiers cancelled check. A receipt.
H. 'That's a really good question, your honor. I've been trying to find out how much is owed, by whom, and
to whom for nearly four years." (insert 'if any' and 'if anyone') if you like.
I. It's a rhetorical trick used by politicians and public officials.. answer their question with 'good question'
and then answer the question you wanted them to ask.
J. Who was I supposed to be paying, your honor? My opponent is an interloper trying to steal my property.
They are not the party entitled to enforce my note and no evidence has been presented by my opponent to
prove they are the party entitled to enforce my PN.
K. Dont let the Judge swear you in. It is a trick as this is not a trial, nor is this an evidentiary hearing. These
questions are inappropriate at this time. And, your Honor are you trying to prosecute my opponents case
from the bench?
L. If the Judge says; Did you stop making payments? Answer yes or no! I cannot answer yes or no as I
am not willing to commit perjury and for you (the judge, counsel, etc.) to instruct me to answer so is not only
tampering with a witness, but also suborning perjury.
As in the proverbial Answer yes or no have you stopped beating your wife? question, either answer
produces the same admittance that you have beaten your wife as the question has that presumption if you do
not rebut it as well as the presumption that you even have a wife. As we know in the law, if you do not rebut
a statement, through your silence, you acquiesce/confirm it as true.
So I cannot simply answer the question yes or no as it would be perjury. The real question is, have I stopped
making payments to whom and for what debt. The question has the presumptions that a lawful debt exists,
that consideration was given for it, and that opposing counsels client is a person entitled to enforce it. Not
addressing those presumptions by simply answering yes or no admits the presumptions to be true. The
mortgage was executed through fraud as there was never anything loaned. Furthermore, full payment was
made at closing and any monies tendered since were misrepresented as loan payments and suborned through
extortion and fraud.
6. Judge asks, then why is your note not reflecting these transactions, and why is the mortgage improperly
assigned?
All it means is that the Note was stripped of it's value and THAT is what they securitized... not the note.
A. Alternate answer: Ask the court: where's the signed documents, where's the schedule of loans showing
homeowner's loan in trust, and where's the MLPA (Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement)