May 2014 

US$7.00

E X P E R T

S E R I E S

How MPLS VPNs

Support SIP Trunks
By Joan Engebretson

CLOUD & COMMUNICATIONS

How MPLS VPNs

Support SIP Trunks
By Joan Engebretson
SIP trunks are an important element of enterprise IP-based voice and video
communications. Offered by numerous communications service providers, SIP trunks
are communications links that support session initiation protocol (SIP), which provides
an alternative to traditional telecom network signaling and call routing for IP networks,
thereby supporting VoIP phone and unified communications systems and cloudbased alternatives.
As more and more enterprises adopt IP-based communications, SIP trunks are
experiencing high adoption rates. An April 2013 report from research firm Infonetics
noted that SIP trunk adoption jumped 83 percent globally between 2011 and 2012 and
the firm expects to see continued strong growth.
A February 2014 report from Frost & Sullivan calculated a 25.9 percent growth rate
of SIP trunks in North America between 2011 and 2012 measured by installed users,
and a 26.1 percent growth rate in terms of revenue. Those numbers suggest a slower
growth rate than Infonetics found, perhaps because growth is greater outside North
America. Nevertheless, a 26 percent growth rate is a strong one, suggesting a substantial
opportunity for channel partners.
Enterprises have several technology options for the communications service underlying
SIP trunks. MPLS connections, for example, offer several important advantages in
carrying SIP traffic. This Expert Series Report reviews these advantages and how MPLS
VPNs compare with other communications service options. It also discusses when to
recommend MPLS VPNs for SIP trunks and how to advise customers on the merits of
using a centralized or distributed SIP architecture.

THE SHIFT TO SIP

There are many reasons for enterprises to move to VoIP communications, including
the ability to reduce voice communications costs and to gain new IP-based capabilities,
such as unified communications, that can help enterprises operate more efficiently and
increase productivity.
According to an October 2013 report from New York City-based research and consulting
firm Eastern Management Group, the vast majority of recently acquired phone systems
(88 percent) now support SIP.
As an alternative to acquiring a VoIP phone system, some enterprises may want to
use a cloud-based VoIP offering, also known as hosted VoIP or IP Centrex. With these
offerings, VoIP phone system functionality is delivered from a data center operated by
the cloud service provider, to which enterprises connect using wide area network (WAN)

Channel Partners Expert Series

channelpartnersonline.com

connections. Rather than purchasing their own VoIP phone systems, enterprises pay for
VoIP capability on a monthly basis. This approach does require the enterprise to invest
in IP phones, however.
Whether an enterprise operates its own VoIP phone system or purchases a hosted
VoIP service, calls between individual locations on the enterprise network can be carried
in IP format end-to-end. This bypasses the traditional telecom network and eliminating
the costs associated with those calls, including per-minute access charges, typically
measured in a few cents or fractions of a cent. But enterprises also need the ability to
deliver calls to and receive calls from people outside the enterprise.
There are two ways to achieve this. One way is to hand calls to the traditional public
switched telephone network (PSTN) at the customer premises. This requires
the company to have traditional TDM voice trunks for calls destined for
or received from people or businesses outside the company. The ability
to hand calls to the PSTN at the customer premises is sometimes referred
to as gateway functionality.
SIP trunks essentially provide an alternative to exchanging PSTN traffic
An enterprise can
at the customer premises. Instead, all calls are delivered to and received
cut transport costs
from the communications service provider in IP format, and the service
by 25-40 percent
provider takes responsibility for converting traffic to and from the PSTN.
Access charges are only incurred at the far end of the call rather than at
by using SIP trunks
both ends of the call. (In either case, and depending on the customers
rather than using
long-distance provider, these charges may not appear on the customers
bill; instead the provider may build them into the cost of service.)
traditional TDM
VoIP and SIP also save money because IP connections are less costly
voice connectivity.
on a per-bit basis than traditional voice communications over the PSTN
Eastern Management
using time division multiplexing (TDM). Customers typically pay for SIP
Groups John Malone
connections on a per-trunk basis, but depending on the service provider
and how the network is configured, fewer trunks may be needed than
when traditional TDM trunks are used. (How that occurs will be discussed later in the
section on SIP architectures.)
SIP trunks also can save money because they give enterprises the option of running
the VoIP traffic over the same physical connection used for the companys data
communications. John Malone, CEO of Eastern Management Group, estimated an
enterprise can cut transport costs by 25-40 percent by using SIP trunks rather than by
using traditional TDM voice connectivity.
Despite these savings, Eastern Management Group estimated just 13 percent of
businesses use SIP for 100 percent of their toll traffic today. But thats changing fast,
the firm reported. By 2018, the firm predicted 42 percent of businesses will send all of
their toll traffic over SIP trunks. Eastern Management Groups findings were based on
a survey of enterprises in seven world regions and 22 vertical industries.
Infonetics Research also sees a big shift toward SIP trunks. More than a third (38 percent)
of North American companies in a March 2013 Infonetics survey said they use SIP
trunking for at least some of their PBX traffic, and Infonetics expects that number to

Channel Partners Expert Series

channelpartnersonline.com

increase to 55 percent in 2015. Between now and 2015, the research firm forecasts T1
connectivity for PBX traffic declining from 71 percent to 55 percent.

PBX Trunking Services Enterprises

Will Use By 2015
SIP trunking
T1 lines
Standard analog/
digitial phone lines
ISDN BRI
ISDN PRI
0%

20%

40%

60%

Source: Infonetics Research, March 2013

SIP CONNECTIVITY OPTIONS

A SIP trunk can be implemented over several different connection options as follows:
Dedicated Lines. Dedicated lines provide a dedicated path across the WAN for the
customers exclusive use, thereby isolating the customers traffic from other network
users and supporting predictable real-time delivery with low latency. But dedicated lines
are also the most costly option. Channel partners likely will want to recommend this
option only for customers who indicate a strong preference for this type of connection.
Internet VPN. The least costly connectivity option is to use the Internet and to use
VPNs based on IPSec, SSLs or a similar technology to encrypt traffic, thereby securing it
from other Internet users. The downside of using Internet VPNs is that there is no way
to prioritize voice or video traffic end to end, which means performance can suffer when
data traffic levels are high, explained Ron Dunworth, CEO of channel partner Advoda.
For this reason, channel partners should strongly consider not using this approach,
particularly if voice communications are mission-critical for the customer.
Despite their limitations, however, Internet VPNs may be appropriate to support a
companys mobile workers or telecommuters, as enterprises likely will not to incur
the expense of a dedicated line or MPLS connection for these workers. Another
consideration is that such employees typically have the option of falling back on alternative
communication methods if voice service should fail.
IP MPLS VPNs. Layer 3 IP MPLS VPNs (typically referred to simply as MPLS) fall
between the dedicated line and Internet options in terms of cost and several service
providers and channel partners interviewed for this article see MPLS as offering the
optimal balance of cost and performance.
MPLS saves costs by eliminating the need to create a dedicated path for the exclusive
use of the customer. Instead, communications are broken into packets containing

Channel Partners Expert Series

channelpartnersonline.com

addressing and other information such as the priority of specific packets. Within the
service provider network, customers traffic is isolated from that of other customers
by establishing VPNs, which direct the customers traffic across pre-established paths,
essentially preventing individual network users from seeing another users VPN traffic.
Another way MPLS can save costs is when customer buys SIP trunks from the same
service provider that provides the companys data connectivity, and can combine both
types of traffic on the same connection. (If this option is chosen, it will be important to
set up the equipment to give priority to the voice and/or video traffic.)
Jeff Betteker, chief strategy officer for service provider One Source Networks, advised
channel partners to steer enterprise customers toward MPLS for their SIP needs in most
situations. MPLS, he said, provides a level of deterministic performance
across the network. In comparison with an Internet-based solution, he
said,when you look at a location you dont have to worry about the time
of day or peering point.
Jim LaBrec, vice president of channel partner Converging Technologies,
offered a similar take. MPLS is more cost-effective than a dedicated line
MPLS is more
and more reliable and secure than the public Internet, he said.
cost-effective than
Ethernet. Another approach for SIP trunk communications is to use a
a dedicated line
Layer 2 multipoint network based on the E-LAN standard created by the
Metro Ethernet Forum. This also encompasses VPLS connectivity Layer 2
and more reliable
multipoint Ethernet connectivity delivered over an MPLS network. E-LAN
and secure than the
services operate like an extension of a customers premises-based LAN and
are popular with enterprises that like to have a high level of control over
public Internet.
their network, including managing their own routing tables.
Converging Technologies
In contrast, Layer 3 MPLS services hand off routing table management ito
Jim LaBrec
the communications service provider a feature that appeals to customers
that do not have extensive IT resources or who simply want to use those
resources for other purposes.
Andrea LaPointe, account manager for channel partner NetSource Group, noted that
metro Ethernet services often are available only at relatively high data rates that may
provide more capacity than customers need simply for SIP trunking. Metro Ethernet
services are seeing strong growth rates, however, and as more enterprises move data
traffic to these networks, they also may want to move SIP traffic to Ethernet as well.

SIP ARCHITECTURE APPROACHES

The recommended connection option also will have a lot to do with the SIP trunking
deployment architecture selected distributed, centralized or hybrid.

Channel Partners Expert Series

channelpartnersonline.com

 Distributed uses SIP trunks at all locations, giving enterprises the ability to
hand off PSTN traffic at the closest service provider point of presence.

Distributed SIP Trunk Deployment

IP PSTN

Enterprise
IP WAN

SESSION BORDER CONTROLLERS

P PBX/UC SYSTEMS

DOWNLOAD
THIS INFOGRAPHIC
toolbox.channelpartnersonline.com

UC SERVER CLUSTER

Source: Cisco Systems Inc.

Centralized uses a SIP trunk only at a central location, typically the

headquarters location or, in the case of a hosted service, the cloud provider.
Intra-company traffic is carried among corporate sites over the private WAN, and
all connections to the PSTN are made through the central location.

Centralized SIP Trunk Deployment

IP PSTN

Enterprise
IP WAN

SESSION BORDER CONTROLLERS

P PBX/UC SYSTEMS

DOWNLOAD
THIS INFOGRAPHIC
toolbox.channelpartnersonline.com

Channel Partners Expert Series

UC SERVER CLUSTER

Source: Cisco Systems Inc.

channelpartnersonline.com

 Hybrid uses SIP trunks at some enterprise locations but not others.

Hybrid SIP Trunk Deployment

IP PSTN

Enterprise
IP WAN

SESSION BORDER CONTROLLERS

P PBX/UC SYSTEMS

DOWNLOAD
THIS INFOGRAPHIC
toolbox.channelpartnersonline.com

UC SERVER CLUSTER

Source: Cisco Systems Inc.

A centralized architecture requires WAN connections, such as IP MPLS VPNs, as noted

in the previous section.
Steve LaClair, director of portfolio management for service provider tw telecom,
argued a centralized architecture is one of the biggest drivers of SIP trunks. It cant
be done with traditional voice without overbuilding and paying for services youre not
going to use, he said. He cited the example of a company headquartered in Seattle
with offices in other parts of the country. If Im sitting in Denver, my SIP trunk to the
PSTN is in Seattle, he said. If I want local calling, the call would connect through
local trunking in Denver.
A key advantage of centralization is that companies can share call paths into and out
of the central site across all of their locations, minimizing the total number of trunks
needed, LaClair explained. Its important to note, though, that some service providers
give customers the ability to pool SIP trunks across all of the customers locations even
if customers use a distributed architecture.
With this approach, if one network was at capacity, the sessions could be used
from a different pool if the sessions were not being used at the second location, said
NetSource Groups LaPointe.
For companies that manage their own equipment, an IP communications system based
on a centralized architecture also should be easier for IT to oversee.
The downside to a centralized approach is that it adds to overall bandwidth requirements
because some calls from branch locations must go into and come back out of the
headquarters location. If SIP is used only for voice, and remote locations have relatively
low call volumes, this may not be a concern and even with relatively high voice call

Channel Partners Expert Series

channelpartnersonline.com

volumes, this approach may not add substantially to communications costs. But if an
enterprise uses or plans to use SIP to support video communications, the impact could
be substantially greater as video consumes about 10 times the bandwidth of voice
communications, according to a Cisco estimate.
Another drawback to the centralized approach is that latency is increased when voice
or video calls go into and back out of the headquarters location, Cisco said.
A hybrid model shares the advantages and disadvantages of both the centralized and
distributed approach but may be the preferred strategy if an enterprise has
several key locations with high call volumes.

SIP SALES PROCESS

Decisions about SIP trunks typically are made at the time a customer

Using MPLS to

makes the move to an IP phone system, hosted VoIP service, or IP

provide WAN
videoconferencing system.
connections can
Converging Technologies LaBrec said most channel partners specialize in
either hardware or connectivity but not both. By establishing relationships
help customers
with companies that sell IP phone and video systems, channel partners who
maximize SIP trunk
sell connectivity can gain a valuable source for pre-qualified leads, he said.
When meeting with a sales prospect to discuss SIP trunking, One Source
savings, while also
Networks Betteker advised channel partners to look at the customers phone
maintaining the call
bill. You need to understand their local and long-distance usage, he said.
quality customers
Specific items to look at include whether customers have toll-free
numbers; whether they have rerouting capability; and whether they have
require.
call forwarding turned on, use advanced call routing or are buying service
as part of a bundle. Then you can have the same dialog on the data
side, said Betteker.
When the channel partner tallies up the customers current communications requirements
and compares them to what the costs are in a SIP environment customers get excited
when they realize the savings they can get from this kind of architecture, Betteker said.
Using MPLS to provide WAN connections can help customers maximize SIP trunk
savings, while also maintaining the call quality customers require.
Joan Engebretson is a freelance writer who has been covering the telecommunications
industry since 1992. She is a former editor for Americas Network and Telephony magazines.
linkedin.com/pub/joan-engebretson/4/71a/492

Copyright 2014 VIRGO Publishing, LLC,. All rights reserved. The publisher reserves the right to accept or reject any advertising or editorial material. Advertisers,
and/or their agents, assume the responsibility for all content of published advertisements and assume responsibility for any claims against the publisher based on
the advertisement. Editorial contributors assume responsibility for their published works and assume responsibility for any claims against the publisher based on the
published work. Editorial content may not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. Materials contained on this site may not be reproduced, modified, distributed,
republished or hosted (either directly or by linking) without our prior written permission. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from
copies of content. You may, however, download material from the site (one machine readable copy and one print copy per page) for your personal, noncommercial
use only. We reserve all rights in and title to all material downloaded.

Channel Partners Expert Series

channelpartnersonline.com