Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
134
Abstract This paper present some detailed information about reduced beam section used in moment resisting frame.
Guidelines about the cut, that is to be introduced in the flange of the beam section ,are obtained from FEMA 350.Time
history analysis and dynamic analysis are carried out in this paper. A G+15 storey steel building is modeled using RBS
as a component in one building and regular beam section as a component of the other in STAAD PRO V8i.
Displacement, storey drift , time period and base shear of both the buildings are compared as the result.
Keywords- Reduced beam section, Time history analysis, FEMA 350, Staad pro. v8i ,SMRF
I.
INTRODUCTION
During the 1994 Northridge earthquake, the bolted web-welded ange moment connections in steel moment-resisting
frames suffered unexpected brittle failures in and near the heat-affected zones[1] .A lot of damage of lives and property
was observed during this earthquake. Many industrial steel buildings were severely damaged during this havoc. Many
modications have been proposed for post Northridge earthquake new construction and retrot of steel moment frames
[1]
. Many of the recommendations in [9] have since found their way into the Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel
Buildings published by the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC)[2]. The most commonly observed damage
occurred in or near the welded joint of the bottom flange of a girder to the supporting flange of column. However the
typology and technology of the RBS beam to column connection, as well as its behavior under cyclic loading conditions
were investigated in USA after the Northridge earthquake. The Reduced Beam Section (RBS) is one of the ways to
weaken the beam framing to the column. Reduced beam section connections provide similar benets to reinforced
connections, but are more efcient and economical because they do not require the extra eld welding and material
associated with reinforced connections. RBS connections also have a number of advantages in design practice. Compared
to reinforced connections, their use leads to reduced demands for continuity plates, panel zone reinforcement, and strong
columnweak-beam requirements [2]. All of the connections approved in for Steel Moment Resisting Frames combined
improvements in welding along with detailing that induce the beam plastic hinge to form a short distance away from the
beam-to-column interface. The type of detailing that shifts the plastic hinges away from the connection region generally
falls into two main categories, reinforcement detailing and reduced beam section detailing.
II.
LITERATURE REVIEW
214
215
216
Figure 5. The effect of the lateral load pattern on the pushover response.
Comparisons between pushover analyses using code and uniform lateral load patterns and the median of the transient
analyses indicate that the pushover procedure as specied in FEMA-350 can substantially overestimate demands and can
thus adversely affect performance evaluations for the three buildings. However, favorable comparisons were achieved
between pushover using the code pattern and the median dynamic data for the 16-story building in particular,which
217
218
219
DISCUSSION
For Based on various literature review, it is observed that with the use of reduced beam section plastic hinge formed is
away from the beam-column junction. Also by using RBS there is a considerable decrease in residual drift of each storey
of the building. This special section uses less amount of steel than the conventional one making the structure lighter.
Guidelines about the RBS can be taken from FEMA 350 and AISC.
IV.
CONCLUSION
J.shen, T. Kitjasateanphun, W. Srivanich,Seismic performance of steel moment frames with reduced beam
sections, Engineering Structures 22, pp 968-983,2000
Jun Jin, Sherif El-Tawil,Seismic Performance of Steel Frames with reduced beam section connections , Journal of
Constructional Steel Research 61,pp 452-471 ,2005
Swati Ajay Kulkarni, Gaurang Vesmala, Study of Steel Moment connection with and without reduced beam
section, Case Studies in Structural Engineering 1, 26-31,2014
Scott M.ADAN, Lawrence D. Reaveley,The Reduced Beam Section Moment Connection without Continuity
Plates, 13th World Conference on Earthquake
Brandon Chi ,Chia-Ming Uang ,Cyclic Response and Design Recommendations of Reduced Beam Section Moment
Connections with Deep Columns, Journal of Structural Engineering, 0733-9445 , 464-472,2002
Scott L jones, Gary T fry,Reduced beam section welded steel moment frames,13th World Conference on
Earthquake,pp 1671, 2000
K.Kildashti,R.Mirghaderi, I.M.Kani ,The efficiency of reduced beam section connections for reducing residual
drifts in MR Frames, Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 2,pp 68-72, 2012
C.E.Sofias,C.N.Kalfas, D.T.Pachoumis,Experimental and FEM analysis of reduced beam section moment endplate
connections under cyclic loading, Engineering Structures, 59, 320-329,2014
FEMA 350, Recommenced Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment Frame Buildings
220