Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
9-86
e x
where = [0(24) + 1(30) + 2(31) + 3(11) + 4( 4)] / 100 = 1.41
P ( X = x) =
x!
Value
Observed Frequency
Expected Frequency
0
24
30.12
1
30
36.14
2
31
21.69
3
11
8.67
4
4
2.60
Since value 4 has an expected frequency less than 3, combine this category with the previous category:
Value
Observed Frequency
Expected Frequency
0
24
30.12
1
30
36.14
2
31
21.69
3-4
15
11.67
(Oi Ei )2
i =1
Ei
02 =
6) Reject H0 if
7)
2o
>
20.05,3
= 7.81
2
2
2
2
(
24 30.12) (30 36.14) (31 21.69) (1511.67)
=
+
+
+
= 7.23
2
0
30.12
36.14
21.69
11.67
8) Since 7.23 < 7.81 do not reject H0. We are unable to reject the null hypothesis that the distribution of
X is Poisson.
b) The P-value is between 0.05 and 0.1 using Table IV. From Minitab the P-value = 0.0649.
9-40
9-87
e x
where = [1(1) + 2(11) + + 7(10) + 8(9)] / 75 = 4.907
P ( X = x) =
x!
Estimated mean = 4.907
Value
Observed Frequency
Expected Frequency
1
1
2.7214
2
11
6.6770
3
8
10.9213
4
13
13.3977
5
11
13.1485
6
12
10.7533
7
10
7.5381
8
9
4.6237
Since the first category has an expected frequency less than 3, combine it with the next category:
Value
Observed Frequency
Expected Frequency
1-2
12
9.3984
3
8
10.9213
4
13
13.3977
5
11
13.1485
6
12
10.7533
7
10
7.5381
8
9
4.6237
6) Reject H0 if
2o
>
20.01,5
( O i E i )2
i =1
Ei
= 15.09
7)
20 =
(12 9.3984) 2 +
( 9 4.6237) 2
= 6.955
9.3984
4.6237
8) Since 6.955 < 15.09 do not reject H0. We are unable to reject the null hypothesis that the distribution
of the number of flaws is Poisson.
9-41
9-88
Value
Rel. Freq
Observed
(Days)
Expected
(Days)
5
0.067
2
6
0.067
2
8
0.100
3
9
0.133
4
10
0.200
6
11
0.133
4
12
0.133
4
13
0.067
2
14
0.033
1
15
0.067
2
1.0626
1.7942
3.2884
3.7016
3.7501
3.4538
2.9159
2.2724
1.6444
1.1106
Since there are several cells with expected frequencies less than 3, the revised table would be:
Value
Observed
(Days)
Expected
(Days)
5-8
7
9
4
10
6
11
4
12-15
9
6.1452
3.7016
3.7501
3.4538
7.9433
( O i E i )2
i =1
Ei
02
7)
(7 6 . 1452 )2 + (4 3 . 7016 )2 + (6 3 . 7501 )2 + (4 3 . 4538 )2 + (9 7 . 9433 )2 = 1.72
=
6 . 1452
3 . 7016
3 . 7501
3 . 4538
7 . 9433
8) Since 1.72 < 7.81 do not reject H0. We are unable to reject the null hypothesis that the distribution
for the number of calls is Poisson.
b) The P-value is between 0.9 and 0.5 using Table IV. P-value = 0.6325 (found using Minitab)
9-42
9-89
Use the binomial distribution to get the expected frequencies with the mean = np = 6(0.25) = 1.5
Value
Observed
Expected
0
4
8.8989
1
21
17.7979
2
10
14.8315
3
13
6.5918
4
2
1.6479
The expected frequency for value 4 is less than 3. Combine this cell with value 3:
Value
Observed
Expected
0
4
8.8989
1
21
17.7979
2
10
14.8315
3-4
15
8.2397
6) Reject H0 if
2o
>
20.05,3
( O i E i )2
i =1
Ei
= 7.81
7)
20 =
( 4 8.8989) 2 +
8.8989
(15 8.2397) 2
8.2397
= 10.39
8) Since 10.39 > 7.81 reject H0. We can conclude that the distribution is not binomial with n = 6 and p =
0.25 at = 0.05.
b) P-value = 0.0155 (from Minitab)
9-90
p sample =
0
39
38.1426
1
23
26.1571
2
12
8.5952
3
1
1.8010
Since value 3 has an expected frequency less than 3, combine this category with that of value 2:
Value
Observed
Expected
0
39
38.1426
1
23
26.1571
2-3
13
10.3962
9-43
20 =
6) Reject H0 if
2o
>
20.05,1
20 =
( O i E i )2
i =1
Ei
= 384
.
.
( 39 381426
) 2 + (23 26.1571)2 + (13 10.3962) 2
= 1.053
38.1426
26.1571
10.39
8) Since 1.053 < 3.84 do not reject H0. We are unable to reject the null hypothesis that the distribution
of the number of underfilled cartons is binomial at = 0.05.
7)
b) The P-value is between 0.5 and 0.1 using Table IV. From Minitab the P-value = 0.3048.
9-91
6) Reject H0 if
2o
>
20.05,24
( O i E i )2
i =1
Ei
= 36.42
8) Since 769.57 >>> 36.42, reject H0. We can conclude that the distribution is not Poisson at = 0.05.
b) P-value = 0 (found using Minitab)
9-92
P ( X = x) =
e x
where = [6(1) + 7(1) + + 39(1) + 41(1)] / 105 = 19.514
x!
Observed
Frequency
Expected
Frequency
0.03
0.08
0.18
10
0.78
11
1.38
12
2.24
13
3.36
14
4.69
15
11
6.10
16
7.43
17
8.53
18
9.25
19
9.50
20
9.27
9-44
21
8.62
22
7.64
23
6.48
24
5.27
25
4.12
26
3.09
27
2.23
28
1.56
29
1.05
30
0.68
31
0.43
32
0.26
34
0.09
35
36
39
41
1
2
1
1
0.05
0.03
0.00
0.00
After combining categories with frequencies less than 3, we get the following table:
Number of
Earthquake
s
Observed
Frequenc
y
6-7-8-10-1112
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27-28-2930-31-3234-35-3639-41
Expected
Frequenc
y
13.00
6
5
11
7
3
8
4
4
7
8
4
3
2
4
4.68
3.36
4.69
6.10
7.43
8.53
9.25
9.50
9.27
8.62
7.64
6.48
5.27
4.12
3.09
16
6.38
9-45
a)
1) The variable of interest is the form of the distribution for the number of earthquakes per year
of magnitude 7.0 and greater..
2) H0: The form of the distribution is Poisson
3) H1: The form of the distribution is not Poisson
4) = 0.05
5) The test statistic is
20 =
6) Reject H0 if
7)
>
2
o
2
0.05 ,14
( O i E i )2
i =1
Ei
= 23.68
2
(
13 4.86)
=
2
0
4.86
2
(
16 6.38)
+
= 48.89
6.38
8) Since 48.89 > 23.68 reject H0. The form of the distribution of the number of earthquakes is
not Poisson.
b) P-value < 0.005
Section 9-8
9-93
=
2
0
(O
ij
Eij )
Eij
i =1 j =1
= 12.592
2
The calculated test statistic is 0 = 11.65
2
7.
8. 20 >/ 20.05,6 , do not reject H0 and conclude that the data provide insufficient evidence to claim that
machine breakdown and shift are dependent at = 0.05.
P-value = 0.070 (using Minitab)
9-94
=
2
0
i =1 j =1
(O
ij
Eij )
Eij
= 6.637
2
7. The calculated test statistic is 0 = 0.033
2
8.
02 >/ 02.01,1
, do not reject H0 and conclude that the evidence is not sufficient to claim that surgical-
9-46