Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Thisarticleisbroughttoyouwiththesupportof
SingaporeConcreteInstitute
www.scinst.org.sg
AllRightsreservedforCIPremierPTELTD
YouarenotAllowedtoredistributeorresalethearticleinanyformatwithoutwrittenapprovalof
CIPremierPTELTD
VisitOurWebsiteformoreinformation
www.cipremier.com
34th Conference on OUR WORLD IN CONCRETE & STRUCTURES: 16 18 August 2009, Singapore
Abstract
This research work is aimed to derive a satisfactory method for determination of
cement content in hardened mortars. This test procedure is derived from
ANSI/ASTM C 85 66 (Reapproved 1973) Cement Content of Hardened Portland
Cement Concrete. Basically this procedure is for analyzing the hardened concrete,
but it can be used for analyzing the hardened mortar with slightly modifications. It
can be carried out to determine the cement content in any cement sand mortar;
either it is used in masonry, plaster and other applications etc. To check the
accuracy of this test some known mix ratios samples reported in percent by dry
weight have been taken and chemical analysis of these samples has done. After
chemical analysis, it has been observed that the experimental values of cement
content and sand were differing from the actual amount of cement and sand (which
were used in the preparation of samples). To compensate the values of cement
content and sand, a constant named as Zulfis Constant (Z) was introduced in the
calculations, whose detail is given in discussion part. After applying the Zulfis
Constant (Z), the experimental values were closed to the actual values. The word
Zulfi is the nick name of the author.
For the purpose of preparation of samples, sand was taken from different sand
quarries available in Pakistan.
Keywords: Hardened Mortar; Kibla Bandi Quarry (K.B); Lawrence Pur Quarry (L.P); Chenab River
Sand (C.R); Zulfis Constant (Z).
1. INTRODUCTION.
People are regularly asked to determine the amount of cement content in hardened concrete and
mortar. The request is normally made for one of the two reasons:-
[1]. Something has gone wrong and the cause for the problem is thought to be related to cement
content.
[2]. The other is that an older structure is being repaired or expanded and it is desired to match the
existing materials.
In order to achieve the above objects, chemical analysis of various samples has done. For this
purpose some known mix ratios samples reported in percent by dry weight (Ref. ASTM C 1324) have
been prepared in the laboratory. After chemical analysis it has been observed that, the amount of
cement and sand was approximately close to the actual amount, which was used in preparation of
samples.
The objectives which can be achieved are, to check the actual proportions used in the hardened
cement sand mortar as well as quantitative analysis of mortar to determine composition and
proportions of constituents. It can also use to determine condition and composition of historic mortar.
Quality of construction work can be improved at site and also easy to catch contractor at site violating
the project specifications in the absence of any consultant engineer.
Cement is a generic term meaning glue. Portland cement is a grey powder that when mixed with
water forms a paste that hardens and gains strength with time. This is the glue that holds mortar and
concrete together, when sand or fine aggregate is added to paste the mixture is known as mortar,
which is suitable for thin crossections. Grouts, plaster and stuccos are generally special mortars and
contain much the same raw materials. The cement most often used in construction is known as
Portland cement. There are other types of construction cements, some used in masonry construction
and other special cements used for repairs or high temperature applications.
The predominant chemical compounds in Portland cement are based upon oxides of calcium (lime),
silicon (silica), aluminium (alumina) and iron. There are other compounds present in smaller quantities
such as magnesium and carbon dioxide and a number of trace elements. The principal chemical
compounds that combine with water to provide strength are calcium silicates.
Modern Portland cements, by definition all tend to contain these compounds in a tight range of values
even if they come from different manufacturing facilities, hydrated Portland cement has the unusual
and desirable property that it will continue to gain strength in the presence of water. This complicates
chemical analysis because the system is continually changing from the time of first mixing to the time
of test.
A source of further complication is when historic materials are being tested because the composition
and fineness of cement made in 1920 is not the same as that made in 2000.masonary cements are
normally a blend of Portland cement, crushed limestone and some polymeric additives. The
manufacturers do not publicize the relative amount of Portland cement and limestone but ASTM
standards do set out ranges into which the blends should fall. It is these blends that tend to cause the
most complicated analyses and the broadest range of assumptions in the method.
2. EXPERIMENTAL WORK.
2.1. PROCEDURE.
1. Take a sample of hardened mortar of about 500 grams.
2. Sample is grind in such a manner, so that the maximum size of particles should not be
more than 1/8. During the grinding process, material should not be lost.
3. The sample is dehydrated at 1055 C for 24 hours. Weigh the sample and it is denoted
by (Ws).
4. Dehydrated sample is placed on sieve No. 200 and shake it well.
5. Weigh the retained material on sieve No. 200 and wash it with HCL (1+9). The amount of
HCL has been taken 150ml and 1350ml of water in this experiment.
6. Stir it thoroughly with wooden stick until the reaction has to be finished.
7. After acid wash, it is again wash with tap water. Dry it and reweigh.
8. Determine the decimal fraction of fine aggregates (Af) by dividing the weight of sand after
acid wash to the dehydrated weight of sample (Ws). Then find out the decimal fraction of
cement (Cf) by using the following equation.
Cf + Af = 1.0
Cf = 1 Af
9. Multiply the value of (Cf) with 100, this will give the value of cement content in percentage
(%).
Cement Content (%) =Ct = Cf x 100
Ratio
Cement
Sand
1:1
250 gms
1:2
Theoretical values
Cement (%)
Sand (%)
250 gms
50.0
50.0
200 gms
400 gms
33.33
66.67
1:3
150 gms
450 gms
25.0
75.0
1:4
100 gms
400 gms
20.0
80.0
1:5
100 gms
500 gms
16.67
83.33
Only Ordinary Portland Cement is used for the preparation of samples. No admixture has been used.
In cement sand mix ratios, sand has been taken from different raw sand sources available in Punjab
and NWFP provinces of Pakistan.
i.e.
Lawrence Pur Quarry (NWFP)
Kibla Bandi Quarry (NWFP)
Chenab River Sand (Punjab)
The sand of Lawrence Pur Quarry is extensively used in Punjab & NWFP provinces, while the sand of
Kibla Bandi Quarry is used in NWFP regions and Chenab River Sand is used in central Punjab
regions.
3. RESULTS
3.1. THEORETICAL VALUES.
If the samples are prepared according to the table 1, then the values of cement content and
sand should be given as follow in the table 2. These values are known as theoretical values of cement
content and sand.
Wt. of
Mix Ratio
dehydrated
sample(Ws)
1: 3
391.06 gms
1: 4
389.26 gms
1: 5
389.46 gms
Wt.
Wt. of
retained
sample
on # 200
after acid
sieve
wash
344.32
276.60
13.803
289.863
gms
gms
gms
gms
344.26
292.35
14.618
306.968
gms
gms
gms
gms
349.59
310.422
15.521
325.943
gms
gms
gms
gms
Zulfis
Constant
(Z)
Net wt. of
sand
(Ct)
(Af)
(Cf)
0.741
0.259
25.90%
0.789
0.211
21.14%
0.837
0.163
16.30%
%age
MiX Ratio
Wt. of
retained
dehydrated
on #
sample(Ws)
200
sieve
1: 3
419.50 gms
1: 4
500.0 gms
1: 5
500.0 gms
Wt. of
sample
after acid
wash
Zulfis
Constant
(Z)
Net wt.
of sand
371.00
302.05
15.103
317.153
gms
gms
gms
gms
460.50
385.58
19.279
404.859
gms
gms
gms
gms
455.40
392.86
19.643
412.503
gms
gms
gms
gms
(Ct)
(Af)
(Cf)
0.756
0.244
24.40%
0.810
0.190
19.0%
0.825
0.175
17.50%
%age
Mix Ratio
Wt. of
retained
dehydrated
on #
sample(Ws)
200
sieve
1: 3
500.0 gms
1: 4
500.0 gms
1: 5
500.0 gms
Wt. of
sample
after acid
wash
Zulfis
Constant
(Z)
Net wt.
of sand
450.53
358.82
17.941
376.761
gms
gms
gms
gms
355.25
381.39
119.07
400.46
gms
gms
gms
gms
464.93
402.57
20.129
422.70
gms
gms
gms
gms
(Ct)
(Af)
(Cf)
0.754
0.246
24.60%
0.801
0.199
19.90%
0.845
0.155
15.50%
%age
4. DISCUSSION.
After chemical reaction, it has been observed that the experimental values were not close to the
theoretical values. This was due to the reduction in weight of sand due to chemical reaction between
acid and sand. To overcome this loss of weight in sand a constant named as Zulfis Constant (Z) was
introduced in the calculations. By introducing the Zulfis Constant (Z), the experimental values were
close to the theoretical values. For the purpose of determining Zulfis Constant (Z), various sand
samples were taken and chemical reaction with acid was done whose detail is given in next article.
The above results are shown graphically as below.
Cement Content %
26.5
26
25.5
25
24.5
24
23.5
Sand Sources
TH. VALUES
L. P QUARRY
K. B QUARRY
C. RIVER
Cement Content %
Figure 1. Comparison B/W Theoretical & Experimental Values for 1:3 Mix
22
21
20
19
18
17
Sand Sources
TH. VALUES
L. P QUARRY
K. B QUARRY
C. RIVER
Cement Content %
Figure 2. Comparison B/W Theoretical & Experimental Values for 1:4 Mix
1800.00%
1750.00%
1700.00%
1650.00%
1600.00%
1550.00%
1500.00%
1450.00%
Sand Sources
TH.VALUES
L.P QUARRY
K. B QUARRY
C. RIVER
Figure 3. Comparison B/W Theoretical & Experimental Values for 1:5 Mix
Source
Sr. No.
Wt. of sample
Wt. reduced
%age
(gms)
wash (gms)
(gms)
reduction
(%)
Kibla Bandi
Quarry
Chenab River
Lawrence Pur
Quarry
488.0
464.0
24.0
5.17
490.0
467.0
23.0
4.93
491.0
468.0
23.0
4.91
300.0
287.56
12.44
4.33
300.0
285.64
14.36
5.03
300.0
285.19
14.81
5.19
491.0
467.25
23.75
5.08
491.0
466.50
24.50
5.25
489.0
464.25
24.75
5.33
Say 5%
Mean
(%)
5.0
4.85
5.25
100
80
60
40
20
0
C.R 95.15
% Residual Sand
K.B 95
L.P 94.75
Figure 4. Proof of Zulfis Constant (Z) For Field Condition Sand By Graphical Method
Definitely question would be raised that because of sand from the field (pure sand plus clay), it may
be possible that the weight of sand is not reduced due to water present in HCL solution and after
chemical reaction sand is washed with tap water; it is also possible that only clay particles are
removed from sand sample.
For this purpose sand samples have been taken as ideal condition (pure sand with no clay particles)
by washing the sand with tap water and clay particles are removed. Then it is observed the reaction
between acid and sand, again the weight of sand is reduced. But the rate of reduction is smaller than
the unwashed sand.
Because of ideal conditions sand does not exist at construction projects, therefore considering only
field conditions sand reduction factor as Zulfis constant (Z).
5.1.2. Ideal Conditions (washed sand)
Wt. reduced
%age
Mean
(gms)
wash (gms)
(gms)
reduction (%)
(%)
300.0
290.70
9.30
3.20
Bandi
300.0
290.80
9.20
3.16
Quarry
300.0
290.65
9.35
3.22
300.0
291.39
8.61
2.95
300.0
292.14
7.86
2.69
300.0
289.52
10.48
3.62
300.0
288.15
11.85
4.11
300.0
289.70
10.30
3.56
300.0
289.10
10.90
3.77
Source
Sr. No.
Kibla
Chenab
River
Lawrence
Pur Quarry
say 3.50%
3.19
3.09
3.81
100
80
60
40
20
0
K.B 96.81
C.R 96.91
% Residual Sand
L.P 96.19
Figure 5. Proof of Zulfis Constant (Z) For Ideal Condition Sand By Graphical Method
Masonry Mortar
C1324-96 Standard Test Method for Examination and Analysis of Hardened
Masonry Mortar
ASTM C-1324-03 Standard Test Method for Examination & Analysis of Hardened
Masonry Mortar
ASTM C 1324 Standard Test Method for Examination and Analysis of
Hardened Masonry Mortar
C1324-05 Standard Test Method for Examination and Analysis of Hardened
Masonry Mortar