Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
MONITORING REPORT
Ver. 01, 11 Jan 2010
[The Monitoring period is chosen from 27 May 2008 to 30 Sep 2009 both days included]
Registered Office
Pioneer Genco Limited
P.O. Box# 156, Golf Link Road,
Amarajyoti Layout, Koramangala Road,
Domulr ,
Bangalore - 560071
Telephone:+91-80-41300550
Project Site
Someshwara Small Hydro Power
Project
Panchayath : Hosahalli
Village : Shivasamudram,
Taluk : Malavalli
District : Mandya
Karnataka, India
Monitoring Report
CONTENTS
Page No
1.
2.
Reference
3.
Monitoring Period
4.
Abbreviations
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
12
13
15
15
Page No. 2
Monitoring Report
List of Tables:
Table - 1
Detail of Plant Major Equipments of the Project and Suppliers of a project activity
Table - 2
Table - 3
Details of Electricity exported to grid, electricity imported from grid and net electricity
displaced for the Reported period.
Table - 4
Table - 5
Monitoring Team
List of Annexures:
Annex 1
Annex 2
Justification for Excess Net Electricity Generation during the Reported Period
Page No. 3
1.
Monitoring Report
The purpose of this Monitoring Report (MR) is to calculate the Green House Gas (GHG) emission
reductions occurred for the net electricity exported to grid. During the reported period the plant
displaced 162.65 GWh of net electricity to the KPTCL.
2.
Reference
The project has registered with UNFCCC on 27 May 2008 and the crediting period from 27 May 2008 to
26 May 2018 (fixed). For more details on the project, please refer to the following links on the UNFCCC
web site:
Project.1273: Someshwara small hydropower project (24.75 MW) in Karnataka, India
http://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/DB/DNV-CUK1185945016.76/view
3.
Monitoring Period
The Monitoring period is chosen from 27 May 2008 to 30 Sep 2009.
4.
Abbreviations
CEA
GHG
: Greenhouse Gases
IPCC
KPTCL
PGL
PP
: Project Proponent
SSHPP
SR Grid
Page No. 4
5.
Monitoring Report
Page No. 5
Monitoring Report
Page No. 6
6.
Monitoring Report
Details of Major Equipment of the Project & Plant shut downs for the Reported
Period.
The details of major equipment of the project and suppliers are presented below:
Table 1 Details of Major Equipment of the Project and Suppliers of a project activity
Name of the
Equipment
Turbine
Generator
Power Transformer
S.No
Specifications
Make: Boving Fouress Ltd.
Model: K305
Type: Vertical Full Kaplan Turbine
Rated discharge per Unit : 56 cumecs
Rated Head : 17.5 m
Rated Power : 8500 KW
No. of Units: 3 Nos.
Serial Nos.: 190/1, 190/2 & 190/3
Make: UCM RECITA,
Type: HVS 450/72-78
Rated Power : 8250 KW, Rated Speed : 214.3 RPM,
P.F. 0.85, No. of Units : 3 Nos.
Make : Kirlosker,
S.No: 032XJ-003/1 and 032XJ-003/2
7.
The details of forced shut down periods, planned shut down periods and reasons for shut down are
mentioned in the Annex-1.
The Details of Running & Non-Running Hrs of Each unit is tabulated in the given below
Table 2: Running & Non Running Hours of Each Unit
27 May 08 to 31 Mar 09
S.No.
1
Description
Total No. of Hours
available (Hrs:Min)
Unit-I
Unit-II
Unit-III
Unit-I
Unit-II
Unit-III
7416:00
7416:00
7416:00
4392:00
4392:00
4392:00
Page No. 7
8.
Non-availability of
water (Hrs:Min)
Planned Shut downs
(Hrs:Min)
Forced Shut downs
(Hrs:Min)
Total Non Running
hours (Hrs:Min)
Total Running hours
(Hrs:Min)
Monitoring Report
2112:45
3105:25
2276:10
1743:35
1503:40
2181:00
90:50
58:25
91:20
61:50
72:35
92:10
131:30
101:45
70:40
99:45
107:05
107:40
2335:05
3264:55
2438:10
1905:10
1683:20
2380:50
5080:55
4151:05
4977:50
2486:50
2708:40
2011:10
9.
Alleviation of poverty by generating direct and indirect employment in the area. The project generated
indirect employment during the construction of the project activity and also permanent employment
during operation of the project.
The power generation from the project activity stabilizes the local grid and helped in providing
uninterrupted power for farmers.
The project activity contributed to the development of infrastructure in and around the project like
roads, buildings and communication systems in the rural area.
The project activity reduced the migration of the rural populace to urban areas, as the project activity
generated employment opportunities.
The project does not lead to any GHG emissions. So, the project doesnt have its influence on the
microclimate of the region by non-polluting, entails no wastes or production of toxic gases;
environmentally benign and reduce global warming impacts.
Page No. 8
Monitoring Report
Any comment:
EGy
GWh
Net electricity export to the grid by the project
On-site measurements
2.
Key information/data
Source of data/information
used for baseline
Net Electricity Exported to Monthly Meter Readings recorded and certified by
grid
KPTCL & plant personnel.
Baseline Emission Factor
Page No. 9
Monitoring Report
Technical details of monitoring instruments like type, make, accuracy class, etc.
Description
Type
Make
Accuracy class
MF
Multiplying Constant
Connected CTR
Connected PTR
Serial No.
Year of Manufacturing
Calibration Tests
Main meter
Trivector Meter
L&T
0.2
1
240000
400/1A
66kV/110V
S.No 04249044
2004
23.09.2008 &
20.11.2009
Check meter
Trivector Meter
L&T
0.2
1
240000
400/1A
66kV/110V
S.No. 04249047
2004
23.09.2008 &
20.11.2009
Table 3:
S.No.
1
2
3
4
Details of Electricity exported to grid, Electricity imported from grid and net
electricity displaced for the Reported period
Monitored
Period
27 to 31 May
See Note:1
June
July
August
Electricity
Exported to
Grid
Electricity
Imported
from Grid
(kWh)
(kWh)
(kWh)
(GWh)
2008
1276800
1276800
1.277
2008
2008
2008
6036000
8983200
17558400
2400
0
2400
6033600
8983200
17556000
6.034
8.983
17.556
Year
Page No. 10
Total Electricity
Displaced
Monitoring Report
September
2008
October
2008
November
2008
December
2008
January
2009
February
2009
March
2009
Sub-Total for 2008-09
April
2009
May
2009
June
2009
July
2009
August
2009
September
2009
Sub-Total
17911200
18470400
16608000
11016000
2863200
2904000
3612000
107239200
3026400
3782400
1867200
10437600
18513600
17844000
55471200
2400
0
0
0
7200
2400
2400
19200
7200
4800
14400
12000
2400
0
40800
17908800
18470400
16608000
11016000
2856000
2901600
3609600
107220000
3019200
3777600
1852800
10425600
18511200
17844000
55430400
17.909
18.470
16.608
11.016
2.856
2.902
3.610
107.220
3.019
3.778
1.853
10.426
18.511
17.844
55.430
Grand Total
162710400
60000
162650400
162.650
Note-1: As the crediting period started from the date of project registration with UNFCCC i.e. 27 May
2008, we have considered the figures of electricity exported to grid from the log sheets maintained at
project site for the period from 27 to 31 May 2008. Copies of log sheets are being provided to the DOE
for verification.
The plant has been operated with excess electricity generation on rated capacity for the following
months to utilize the available water flows for electricity generation. The details are furnished below:
Monitored
Period
Sep-08
Oct-08
Aug-09
Sep-09
Installed
Rated
Capacity,
kWh
17820000
18414000
18414000
17820000
Gross
Electricity
Generation,
kWh
Excess
Generation
on Rated
Cap.
Recorded by
KPTCL
Personnel
Recorded at
Project site
18212110
18777250
18807230
18096670
Net
Excess
Electricity
Net Elec.
Generation,
Gen on
kWh Rated Cap.
2.2%
2.0%
2.1%
1.6%
17911200
18470400
18513600
17844000
0.5%
0.3%
0.5%
0.1%
The project activity has utilized the available water flows for electricity generation by utilizing the TG
inbuilt capacity which has capable to generate power 8500 KW at generator terminals. A copy of
Page No. 11
Monitoring Report
Technical specification of Turbo generator Purchase Order placed on M/s Boving Fouress Limited is
being provided to DOE for verification. As there is no restriction on the monthly plant load factor from
the state electricity board authorities, the excess electricity generation is deemed acceptable.
10.
GHG Calculations
The following formula is adopted for calculating emission reductions generated by the project activity:
The emission reductions for a given year are baseline emissions minus the project emissions and
leakage.
ERy = BEy -
PEy -
Ly
Where
ERy
BEy
PEy
Ly
Baseline Emissions
The baseline emissions are calculated as follows:
BE y = EG y EFy
Where EGy
= Net electricity export to grid in a given year (GWh)
EFy is = Emission factor for a given year (tCO2/GWh)
As mentioned under sec. B.2 of registered PDD (UNFCCC Project Activity Ref. No.1273), the project has
considered the ex-ante emission factor for the combined margin of the Southern regional grid and the
details are furnished below:
Operating Margin (OM) in t CO2 / GWh
1003.76
717.98
860.87
Page No. 12
11.
Monitoring Report
Monitored
Period
27 to 31 May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
January
February
March
Year
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2009
2009
2009
Sub Total
April
May
June
July
August
September
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
Sub Total
Total
Total
Electricity
Displaced
Emission
Factor
Baseline
Emissions
Project
Emissions
Net
Emission
Reductions
(GWh)
tCO2/GWh
tCO2e
tCO2e
tCO2e
1.277
6.034
8.983
17.556
17.909
18.470
16.608
11.016
2.856
2.902
3.610
107.220
860.87
860.87
860.87
860.87
860.87
860.87
860.87
860.87
860.87
860.87
860.87
1099.2
5194.1
7733.4
15113.4
15417.1
15900.6
14297.3
9483.3
2458.6
2497.9
3107.4
92302.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1099.2
5194.1
7733.4
15113.4
15417.1
15900.6
14297.3
9483.3
2458.6
2497.9
3107.4
92302
2599.1
3252.0
1595.0
8975.1
15935.7
15361.4
47718.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
47718
47718.4
47718
140020.8
0.0
140020.8
140020
140020
3.019
3.778
1.853
10.426
18.511
17.844
55.430
860.87
860.87
860.87
860.87
860.87
860.87
162.650
Project Considered
92302.5
92302
2599.1
3252.0
1595.0
8975.1
15935.7
15361.4
The net emission reductions occurred during the reported period are more than the estimated net
emission reductions in the registered PDD and the details are furnished below:
Parameters
Units
27 May 08 to 31 Mar 09
Page No. 13
01 Apr 09 to 30 Sep 09
Monitoring Report
As per
Regd. PDD
Actual
As per
Regd. PDD
Actual
GWh
83.500
109.195
43.300
56.435
GWh
2.505
1.956
1.299
1.005
GWh
80.995
107.239
42.001
55.430
GWh
0.019
0.0001
GWh
80.995
107.220
42.001
55.430
tCO2e/GWh
860.87
860.870
860.87
860.870
Baseline emissions
tCO2e
69726
92302
36157
47718
Project emissions
tCO2e
tCO2e
69726
92302
36157
47718
Variation
32.4%
32.0%
Net emission reductions for the reported period = (140020 105883) x 100 / 105883
= 32.24%
The net emission reductions for the reported period is + 32.24% more than the estimated in the
registered PDD due to more net electricity generation (exported to grid).
The reasons for the excess net electricity generations are
Excess rainfall in the catchments area of river
Power generation during the lean / off season
Reduction in the Losses
The uncertainty relating to water discharges was in fact one of the key risk factors affecting the project.
Most of the above factors keep changing on year to year basis. Due to favorable discharges from the
above-mentioned factors and availability of plant, which could not be relied upon at the time of PDD
writing, actual water flows during the monitored period were higher and thereby the power generations
are higher than the estimated power generations. Justification for excess net electricity generations is
furnished as Annex-2.
Page No. 14
12.
Monitoring Report
The calibration of monitoring equipment is being maintained as per the requirement of Electricity Board
and the same is being done regularly. Power generation, export, and energy import are being recorded
daily and the same is being verified by the respective officials. Both meters are of same specifications &
frequency and approved by KPTCL. The accuracy clause of these meters is 0.2.
13.
Designation
Managing Director
Mr. D.Raghunath
General Manager
Mr. S.S.Hussain
Shift Incharge
Mr. S.Jagadeesh
Shift Incharge
Shift Incharge
Page No. 15
Monitoring Report
General Manager
General Manager is assisting and reporting to Managing Director for completing the task discussed
above. The General Manager is responsible for the electricity generations at their individual locations.
He will cross check, sign the log book regularly, and report to Managing Director for any abnormality.
The calibration of the meters installed will be taken care by him as per the monitoring plan.
The responsibility of storage and archiving of information in good condition also lies with the General
Manager. He also generate internal audit reports as per the monitoring plan and when ever necessary,
and will be submitted to the Managing Director.
Shift Incharges
Shift Incharges are responsible for recording the total electricity generation, auxiliary consumption,
electricity export, electricity import, plant shut down times, diesel consumption, if any etc. The monthly
reports will be generated and submitted to the General Manager for verification and emission reduction
calculations.
Page No. 16
Monitoring Report
Annex-1
Line Maintenance
379:35
454:55
490:00
63:10
2112:45
2335:05
146:10
384:00
408:00
75:35
629:10
100:40
1743:35
1905:10
35:25
55:25
454.55
Reason
54:45
90:50
131:30
89:55
53:40
8:10
9:50
61:50
99:45
Page No. 17
Monitoring Report
Reason
202:40
358:55
384:00
528:00
144:00
744:00
Line Maintenance
Insufficient water inflow
Insufficient water inflow
Plant Stopped due Low
Head
Unit Maintenance
Unit Maintenance
Insufficient water inflow
Insufficient water inflow
Insufficient water inflow
Insufficient water inflow
Insufficient water inflow
Insufficient water inflow
3105:25
3264:55
354:45
383:55
490:50
274:10
1503:40
1683:20
42:15
30:55
27:30
25:00
58:25
101:05
98:25
40:10
32:25
8:40
72:35
107:05
Page No. 18
Monitoring Report
70:40
Reason
Insufficient water inflow
Insufficient water inflow
Insufficient water inflow
Plant Stopped due Low Head
Unit Maintenance
Unit Maintenance
Insufficient water inflow
Insufficient water inflow
Insufficient water inflow
Insufficient water inflow
2276:10
2438:10
264:00
349:10
659:10
635:10
273:30
2181:00
2380:50
72:55
59:50
32:20
34:45
92:10
107:40
Page No. 19
Monitoring Report
Annex-2
Justification for Excess Net Electricity Generation during the Reported Period
The projected power generation (in GWh) in the Detailed Project Report (DPR), as reflected in the
registered PDD and the actual generations during the reported period are furnished below:
27 May 08 to 31 Mar 09
01 Apr 09 to 30 Sep 09
As per
Regd. PDD
Actual
As per
Regd. PDD
Actual
109.195
43.300 a
56.435
GWh
2.505
1.956
1.299
1.005
GWh
80.995 b
107.239 c
42.001 b
55.430 c
GWh
0.019 c
0.0001 c
GWh
80.995
107.220
42.001
55.430
Parameters
Units
GWh
83.500
Variation
+ 32.4%
+ 32.0%
Net emission reductions for the reported period = (140020 105883) x 100 / 105883
= 32.24%
a
b
c
As per Hydrology study carried out which forms part of the DPR.
Adjusted by taking 3% as Aux. consumption & other losses as projected in the PDD.
Computed based on Monthly electricity readings recorded & certified by KPTCL personnel.
The first reason for the excess electricity generation compared to the projection in the PDD is that the
rainfall in the catchment area of rivers Cauvery and Kabini was above normal for the region and also
due to consecutive depressions in the ocean of Bay of Bengal and Arabian sea which resulted in heavy
rain fall during monsoon (June to September).
As per Annual climate summary 20081 published by India Meteorological Department, Govt. of India
and the Seasonal rainfall2 published by India Meteorological Department, Pune, the cumulative rainfall
Monitoring Report
in the catchments area of Cauvery river for the reported period are above of its Long Period Average
(LPA). The details of rain fall in South Interior Karnataka (Covered Cauvery river catchments area)
are presented below:
Year 2008
Period
Normal
5.4
19.6
%
Excess
260
Pre-Monsoon (Mar-May)
150.4
219.2
46
May
97.3
659.3
721.7
199.7
145.2
-27
Actual
Year 2009
Actual
%
Excess
109.53
13
855.3
30
Apart from the above, the pp also reviewed the discharge data was recorded for the period of 10 years
i.e. from 1985-86 to 1995-96 at Dhanagere anicut by Central Water Commission (CWC) at time of
Detailed project report (DPR) and in the absence of relevant data for the following are not accounted in
the estimated average annual export power to grid of 81.48 MW.
No corrections to the recorded data for the additional catchment area made at Dhanagere anicut.
The releases into Dhanagere irrigation canal
The uncertainty relating to water discharges was in fact one of the key risk factors affecting the project.
The investment decision, and hence the projected power generation in the PDD, were based on a
conservative average water discharge level of 56.0 cubic meters per second (cumec) as reflected in
PDD, corresponding to an average plant load factor of 38.7%.
The Second reason for net electricity generation is that the Actual losses recorded during the reported
period and the projected losses in the registered PDD are 1.8% against 3% which was projected in the
registered PDD.
Table 1: Meteorological subdivision wise rainfall statistics for the month of may 2009 based on operational
data vide web link http://www.imdpune.gov.in/research/ncc/climatebulletin/may09.pdf
Page No. 21
Monitoring Report
In light of higher water flows in the river from the above-mentioned factors which could not be relied
upon at the time of PDD writing and reduction in auxiliary power including losses, the net electricity
generations are about +32.24% higher than the estimated electricity generations in the registered PDD.
As there is no restriction on the plant load factor (PLF) from the state electricity board authorities
(Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited), the project activity has utilized the available
water flows and generated excess electricity generation is deemed acceptable.
Page No. 22
Monitoring Report
Enclosure -1
Page No. 22: Rainfall Statistics Table-1 vide web link http://www.imdpune.gov.in/research/ncc/climatebulletin/annual%20summary%202008.pdf
TABLE 1
METROLOGICAL SUB-DIVISION WISE SEASONAL AND ANNUAL RAINFALL STATISTICS FOR THE YEAR 2008 BASED ON OPERATIONAL DATA
Page No. 23
Monitoring Report
Page No. 24
Monitoring Report
Page No. 25
Monitoring Report
Source: http://www.imdpune.gov.in/mons_monitor/mm_index.html
Page No. 26
Monitoring Report
Table 1: Meteorological subdivision wise rainfall statistics for the month of may 2009 based on
operational data vide web link http://www.imdpune.gov.in/research/ncc/climatebulletin/may09.pdf
Page No. 27
Monitoring Report
Page No. 28