Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Julimarfield,Apache.www.apachecorp.com
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
Subsea development
B=5m,L=10m
d=1m
V~500 600kN
Ideallysmallandlightenoughto
beinstalledbypipelayingvessel
Pazfloor,Angola.ImagecourtesyofSubsea7
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
Subsea structure
Subseamudmatssubjectedtoloadingin6dof
Selfweight,biaxialhorizontalloads(fromthermalexpansionof
pipelines)
Verticalandhorizontaleccentricityofloads=biaxialmomentsand
torsion
Jumper
Hx
Hy
Pipeline
V
Mudmat
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
Classicalbearingcapacitytheory
qult =( +2)suxlotsofreductionfactors,e.g.sc,dc,ic,B,L,F,
VHM,notorsion,andHMpoorlypredicted
Output=singleallowableverticalloadorbearingpressure
Noindicationofeffectofdifferentloadcomponentsonproximitytofailure.
Conventionaldesignmethod
Toolargeforpipelaying
vesseltoinstall.
Requiresecondvesselon
site=$$$
Optimizeddesignmethod
Smallenoughfor
pipelayingvesseltoinstall.
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
Failureenvelopedesignmethod
Explicitlyaccountforeffectofappliedloads,V,Hx,Hy,Mx,My,T
Explicitlyaccountforeffectofgeometry,B/L,d/B
Explicitlyaccountforshearstrengthprofile,kB/su0 ,surfacecrust
Determinehowindividualvariablesaffectthedesignoutcome.
Indicatedisplacementsatfailure.
Fengetal.,2014,Gotechnique
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
Be wary of oversimplification.
Choice of appropriate su is central to calculation
affected by various conditions, inc. cyclic loading.
Assumptions of undrained load response.
But
Neat tool for preliminary sizing.
Indicates influence of design input independent variables.
Augment with more detailed analysis for detailed design.
Tool demonstrates how improved site investigation data
can have significant impact on design.
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
Caveats
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
Industry impact
Mudmatwithcornerpinpiles
Increasein6dofloadcapacityovermatalone,inparticularlateraland
torsionalresistance.
Smallerfootprintsizes.
Gaudinetal.,2011,SUTLondon
Dimmocketal.,2013,ASCEJGGE
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
Mudmat withcornerpinpiles
Gaudinetal.,2011,SUTLondon
Dimmocketal.,2013,ASCEJGGE
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
Optimalspacingofinternalshearkeys
Preventshearingwithintheconfinedsoilplug.
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
2
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Moment, M y(x)/ABsu0
B0L0,
B1L1, B2L2,#
B4L4,
B5L5, Solid
Increasing
skirts
6, &
solid
3
2
M/HB
0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
08
8 10
10 20
20 100
> 100
VH2M2T
V/Vu 0.5
=kB/su0
orkL/su0
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
Feng&Gourvenec,OMAE,2013
Manaetal.,ASCEJGGGE,2012
0.05
0.1
0.15
Equivalent embedment ratio d/B or d/L
0.2
Gain:
Vu,cons/Vu
Fully
consolidated
gain
Increaseininsitushearstrengthunderfoundationandstructureself
weightpriortoinserviceloading.
2.2
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Preload: V
Preload,
vpp/V
/vuu
0.5
0.6
0.7
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
Proportion of fully
consolidated gain
Gaincanbescaledlinearlyasafunctionofthedegreeofconsolidation
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
Federalfundingfora3yearprojecttodevelopageotechnicaldesign
frameworkformobilefoundations.
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
5. Mobile foundations
1.
6dof failureenvelopedesignmethodologyandcalculationspreadsheet
2.
Pinpiles hybridsubseafoundation
3.
Skirtspacing
4.
Consolidatedshearstrength
5.
Mobilefoundations
Susan.Gourvenec@uwa.edu.au www.cofs.uwa.edu.au
Acknowledgements:
ColleaguesatCOFS,inparticularMarkRandolph,Christophe
Gaudin,XiaoweiFeng,DivyaMana,CristinaVulpeand
MichaelCocjin
AustralianResearchCouncil
Ourindustrypartners,inparticularSubsea7
EMIforsponsoringthisevening
SUTfortheinvitationtotalk