Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
rotor dynamics
A traditional practice in the rotor dynamics analysis is to use beam
models for both the lateral and the torsion analysis. Such an analysis
limits the capabilities for the modern day design of high-speed
machinery.
Veeresh Vastrad
QuEST Global
contents
1.0
Abstract
03
2.0
03
3.0
04
4.0
04
5.0
The Challenge
04
6.0
Method
04-05
7.0
Results
05-07
8.0
07
9.0
Conclusion
07
10
Author Profile
08
11
09
Abstract
A traditional practice in the rotor dynamics analysis is to
use beam models for both the lateral and the torsion
analysis. Such an analysis limits the capabilities for the
modern day design of high-speed machinery. The beam
type one-dimensional models require good modeling
techniques to approximate the three dimensional rotors.
An analysis of this type is usually followed for most of the
steam turbine and compressor rotors. The accuracy of
the beam modeling analysis is limited to how best the
mass and stiffness terms in the system are captured. For
a complex geometry such as that of the rotor, it is difficult
to accurately capture these terms in the rotor dynamics
beam model. Solid model rotor dynamics provides an
accurate solution for such problems.
Solid model rotor dynamics analysis is demonstrated
within QuEST through the uses of the ANSYS finite
element code. The solid models allow significant
advantages by eliminating tedious, time-consuming,
equivalent beam modeling procedures.
The Challenge
The conventional beam elements are incapable of
simulating the spin softening and stress stiffening
effects. For a complex geometry such as that of the rotor
(for example, the rotor of a cryogenic turbo pump with
Method
To demonstrate the advantages of the solid model rotor
dynamics, a study was undertaken at QuEST by
considering a dual rotor system (Ref 2). A dual rotor
system is generally employed in the aircraft engines to
save space and keep the weight to a minimum by having
26.2795E6 N/m
17.519E6 N/m
17.519E6 N/m
8.7598E6 N/m
ROTOR 1
1.52 cm r
Distances:
Masses
Inertials IP
ID = IP/2
E = 206.9 GPa;
= 1.5
Rotor 1
Rotor 2
Y
Z
Combin 14 elements
Beam 44 elements
Rad = 10.626 cm
Length = 1.7 cm
Rad = 9.7344 cm
Length = 1.38 cm
Rad = 9.682 cm
Length = 0.978 cm
Rad = 9.9954 cm
Length = 1.66 cm
Results
For the beam model of Figure 2, a vibration analysis was
carried out including the Gyroscopic effects, and the
Campbell diagram was generated. The analysis results
3000
Mode 1B
2500
Mode 1F
Mode 2B
Mode 2F
2000
Mode 3B
Mode 3F
1500
Tmode 1B
Tmode 1F
Tmode 2B
1000
Tmode 2F
Tmode 3B
Tmode 3F
500
1 *REV (omega1)
1 *REV (omega2)
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Figure 4: Campbell diagram for the beam model with gyroscopic effects
Solid lines in the diagram are from the beam analysis
results and the dotted lines are from the theoretical work.
The split of the forward and the backward whirl modes is
clearly observed.
Now for the solid model of the same rotor as shown in
Figure 3, a vibration analysis was carried out including
the effects of gyroscopes and spin softening. The
Campbell diagram was constructed from the results and
3000
Mode 1B
2500
Mode 1F
Mode 2B
Mode 2F
2000
Mode 3B
Mode 3F
1500
Tmode 1B
Tmode 1F
Tmode 2B
1000
Tmode 2F
Tmode 3B
Tmode 3F
500
1 *REV (omega1)
1 *REV (omega2)
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Figure 5: Campbell diagram for the solid model with gyroscopic and spin softening effects
One more analysis was carried out with the solid model
of Figure 3, considering the combined effect of stress
stiffening and spin softening. The Campbell diagram was
3000
Mode 1B
2500
Mode 1F
Mode 2B
Mode 2F
2000
Mode 3B
Mode 3F
1500
Tmode 1B
Tmode 1F
Tmode 2B
1000
Tmode 2F
Tmode 3B
Tmode 3F
500
1 *REV (omega1)
1 *REV (omega2)
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Figure 6: Campbell diagram for the solid model with gyroscopic, spin softening and stress stiffening effects
From the above Campbell diagram results it can be
observed that because of the stress stiffening effects,
the frequency of the forward whirl modes increases with
the speed, however, the backward whirl modes continue
to decrease in frequency with the increase in speed and
Conclusion
A specific advantage of the solid models is the inclusion
of stress stiffening and spin softening effects in the rotor
dynamics analysis which are not considered in the beam
models. The spin softening effect has significant
influence on the backward whirl modes and the stress
stiffening effect on the forward whirl modes. Another
significant advantage of solid models lies in the fact that
all the coupled modes of shafts, disks, and other
mounted parts can be accounted in one analysis which
otherwise cannot be handled by the beam models. The
study was carried out with a simple dual rotor system
with the simplified mass and inertia representation of the
rotors. The simulation of a real-life complex geometry of
the rotor by the beam model is a tedious, error prone,
Author Profile
Veeresh Vastrad
http://quest-global.com
2012, QuEST Global Services