Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
THESIS
PRE-REQUISITE TITTLE
APPROVAL SHEET
1
Approved By
Advisor I
Advisor II
APPROVAL SHEET
2
This thesis has been examined and assessed by the examiner committee of
English Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education,
Mahasaraswati Denpasar University in the oral examination on 17th February
2014.
Chef Examiner
Examiner I
Examiner II
Approved by
STATEMENT OF AUTHENTICITY
The researcher hereby declares that this thesis is her own writing, and it is
true and correct that there is no others work or statement, except the work or
statement that is referred in the references. All cited works were quoted in
accordance with the ethical code of academic writing.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all, the researcher would like to express her great-sincere gratitude
to the Almighty God, Ida Sang Hyang Widhi Wasa, for His everlasting blessing
and mercies so that this thesis could finally be completed on the due date.
Her trementedous gratitude further goes to her first and second advisor,
Drs. I Nengah Astawa, M.Hum. and IGA Putri Wirastuti, S.S.,M.Hum. who have
already guided her and shared their briliant ideas for the improvement of the
thesis. In addition, she would like to thank their helpful guidance and correction
during the writing of the thesis.
In addition, she also wishes to share out her gratefulness to the
Headmaster of SMP Negeri 3 Tampaksiring, Drs. Anak Agung Gede Suryatmaja,
M.Pd.H for his permission and of course the eighth grade students of SMP Negeri
3 Tampaksiring for their kind assistance during the process of gathering the data
needed for the present study.
Next, she is also deeply indebted to her parents, beloved brothers, sisters,
grandfathers, grandmothers, uncles, aunties and friends for their love and support
so that she is able to complete her study successfully. They furthermore share
their moral support during the process of writing the thesis.
Finally, she would like to dedicate this thesis to the love of her parents I
Ketut Pastika and Ni Putu Juniasih also her beloved brother, I Made Bagus
Widnyana Putra, who have given their prayer, love, affection, fidelity, devotion,
and tremendous support during the process of writing the thesis.
ABSTRACT
TABLE OF CONTENT
COVER .......................................................................................................
i
INSIDE COVER .........................................................................................
..................................................................................................................... ii
PRE-REQUISIRE TITLE ...........................................................................
..................................................................................................................... iii
APPROVAL SHEET 1 ...............................................................................
..................................................................................................................... iv
APPROVAL SHEET 2 ...............................................................................
v
STATEMENT OF AUTHENTICITY ........................................................
..................................................................................................................... vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT .............................................................................
..................................................................................................................... vii
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................... viii
TABLE OF CONTENT ..............................................................................
..................................................................................................................... ix
LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................
..................................................................................................................... xi
LIST OF APPENDICES .............................................................................
..................................................................................................................... xii
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION ..........................................................
1
1.1 Background of the Study ..........................................
1
1.2 Research Problem .....................................................
3
LIST OF TABLE
Table 4.1 Tabulation of Data Showing Subjects Score in Pre-test and Post-Test
in Writing after Giving Treatment .............................................
.................................................................................................... 28
Table 4.4 Tabulation of Total Data Showing Students Changing Behaviour and
Attitudes in Learning Writing by Creating Storyboard .............
.................................................................................................... 34
Table 4.5 Tabulation of Data Showing of Students Different Pre-test and Posttest scores....................................................................................
.................................................................................................... 36
Table 4.7 The Result of Students Changing Behaviour and Attitudes in Learning
Writing by Creating Storyboard ................................................
.................................................................................................... 40
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Pre-Test................................................................................ 48
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
Post-Test .............................................................................. 56
Appendix 5
Questionnaire ....................................................................... 58
Appendix 6
Appendix 7
Appendix 8
Appendix 9
Biography ............................................................................ 62
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background Of The Study
Writing is a complex process that involves thinking and composing, the
consideration of audience and purpose, the use of standard written forms, and the
use of conventions of written language.
opportunities to write in a variety of modes with relevant and varied purposes for
real audiences and occasionally for themselves alone. ( Department Of Education
Educational Programs and Services, 2007: iii). The ability to communicate
through writing is an essential skill for success in the educational environment and
the workplace, and for participation in a democratic society. Unfortunately, theory
of learning, high expectation or education system can not solve the real current
problem of writing mastery. It is actually caused by the people involved in its
process. In fact, learners have many problems dealing with writing mastery. The
problems are also found in SMP Negeri 3 Tampaksiring, where the students are
able to speak, listen and read but if they are required to write, they mostly still
confuse about what to write. It is caused by the teaching learning process is not
fun and interesting, the methods used in teaching and learning are monotones, and
the teaching materials are not related to their real life. For the reason, teaching and
learning process are hoped to be conducted using a topic directly related to the
daily life of the learners. As Setiyadi (2006: 19) states that, when a language
teacher is very dominant, language learners will be less dominant in learning
teaching interaction. Therefore, the teacher should make the learners more active
script. Their writing ability in the storyboard can show the participation of the
students in teaching and learning process. Creating storyboard also offerss a new
experience of teaching learning process, by creating storyboard the students are
able to vizualize their story through drawing and finally construct the text. The
participation of the creating storyboard will directly extend their knowledge and
awareness to the social and cultural environment especially related to Subak since
the topic is taken from a text book entitled Subak Cultural Landscape as the
teaching and learning media.
Theoretically
The findings of the present investigation are really expected to contribute
and strengthen the existing similar research findings with more empirical
Practically
The findings of the present study are intended as valuable informative
operational definitions. There are some terms that used to operational definition,
such as:
1. Writing Ability
It is a complex process that involves thinking and composing, the
consideration of audience and purpose, the use of standard written forms, and the
use of conventions of written language.
opportunities to write in a variety of modes with relevant and varied purposes for
real audiences and occasionally for themselves alone. ( Department Of Education
Educational Programs and Services, 2007:iii)
2. Storyboard
At this point, storyoboard is as mean of communication and graphic
organization challenges students to put down on paper the specic visual
ideas they want to show in their story, by individually storyboarding their
shots to create the tension required by the script. They then share these with
their group, deciding together on the series of shots that tell the best story.
3. Subak Cultural Landscape Textbook
It is a textbook book which was written by Prof. Dr. Sang Putu Kaler
Surata, MS in 2013. This book consists of four chapters which describes the
history of Subak, Subak as world cultural heritage, the biodiversity of Subak and
the relation between Subak and social life.
4. SMPN 3 Tampaksiring
This is one of the junior high schools which is located in Jalan Raya
Pejeng, Gianyar-Bali where the present study is conducted.
CHAPTER II
THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL REVIEW
and layout and punctuation. Harmer (2004:3) states that being able to write is a
vital skill for speakers of a foreign language as much as for everyone using their
own first language. It is also worth mentioning that many exams are taken in
written form and consequently students are evaluated according their written
performance.
The conclusion based on statements above that writing is a process of
expressing the idea into a written form, and it needs specialized skills that not
every students can develop it naturally, it needs the teacher who is able to
motivate and encourage the students to develop their writing skills, and they are
expected to be able to develop their writing skills and make a good composition.
2.1.2.2 Genre
A lot of writing within a discourse community is a very genre-bound. In
othe words, writers frequently construct their writing so that people within that
discourse community will isntantly understand what kind of writing it is. We
know what an advertisement is when we see it, we recognise poetry formats and
we know what a formal letter should look like. Genre represents the norms of
different kinds of writing. When concentrating on genre, students study texts in
genre in which they are going to be writing before they embark on their own
work. A genre approach is especially appropriate for students of English for
Specific Purposes. However, it is also highly useful for general English students,
even at low levels. Students who are writing within a certain genre need to be
consider a number of different factors. They need to have knowledge of the topic,
the conventions and style of the genre, and the context in which their writing will
be read, as well as by whom. Many of our students writing tasks do not have an
audience other than the teacher, of course, but that does not stop us and them
working as if they did.
imaginative writing tasks so that their students are thoroughly engaged, those
students frequently strive harder than usual to produce a greater variety of correct
and appropriate language than they might for more routine assignment. This, for
some , provides powerful motivation to find the right words to express such
experience. In order to bolster the product pride that students may feel when
they have written creatively, we need to provide an appropriate reader audience.
In addition to ourselves as teachers, the audience can be the whole class. We can
put students writing up on a class notice board or copy it and include it in class
magize.
including as it does , not only writing, but research, discussion, peer evaluation
and group pride in accomplishment
At this point it is
as
means
of
which many
objective-type tests fail to provide. In the composition test the students should be
presented with a clearly defined problem which motivates them to write. The
writing task should be such that it ensures they have a clear concept of something
to say and the purpose for saying it.
Third, the research that has been done by Etnita Yeni (2012) entittled
Improving Students Recount Text Writing By Using Picture Series. Generally
the result of her study shows that the students progress in writing has improved in
ecah cycle. The first cycle is 61,5 (not achieved), the second cycle is 66,0
(achieved) since the minimum score is 65. Based on the research, it is concluded
that the use of picture series improve the students achievement in writing.
From the researches above, generally, picture series, story mapping and
storyboard have the same concept which similarly give the visual depiction and
give some advantages as the teaching and learning media. One of the advantage
is, picture can provide a stimulus for using the language at the reproduction and
manipulation stages to speak, to read and to write. Picture is two-dimensional
visual representation of person, place or things. It can be painted or drawn. The
previous researches implemented picture series and story mapping upon the same
skill, writing. In this present study, the researcher intended to use different
technique, that is storyboard upon writing ability.
2.3 Hypothesis
Ary et al. explain that hypothesis is tentative answer for the research that
directs the researchers thought process toward the solution of the research
problem. It also presents researchers expectations about the relationship between
variables within questions. The hypothesis is formulated after stating research
question and before doing a research.
The previous researches proved that the teaching and learning media
through visual depiction ( picture series and story mapping ) gave positive change
on students' writing ability. Based on the result of the previous research and some
theories, the hypothesis can be formulated as follows.
H1 : There is statistically significant influence of creating storyboard based on
Subak Cultural Landscape on the writing ability of the eighth grade students of
SMPN 3 Tampaksiring in academic year 2013/2014.
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHOD
X
(Treatment by using storyboard)
O2
(Post- test)
1.
Test
The test mostly used for the several research instruments. The test given
for the students were divided into two tests. The first was pre test that was used to
measure the students initial ability in writing a paragraph. The instrument
constructed in the form of the text construction so the students made their text
according the topic. The topic that was given using some topic and rubric was
used to score the students work. The second was post test, it were administered at
the end of teaching session after they were taught writing by creating storyboard.
The instrument being developed was constructed in the form text construction so
the students made their text according the topic and then it was checked by the
rubric. Moreover, the scoring system was done by giving five points for format,
five points for punctuation and mechanics, twenty point for content, forty points
for organization and thirty points for grammar and sentences structure.
2.
Questionnaire
The questionnaire was administered to find out the students respond when
treatment. The score of the post-test show the students progress achievement in
writing descriptive paragraph.
Questionnaire was conducted to assess the students respond after creating
storyboard was implemented in teaching learning process from the score gathered.
1. Analyzing the students individual score of pre-test and post-test. The students
individual score has obtained from the total number of each items to be evaluated.
The data obtained was analyzed using paragraph scoring rubric, adopted from
Oshima and Hogue ( 2007: 196), the paragraph scoring rubric as follows:
Table 3.1
Descriptive Paragraph Scoric Rubric
No. Contents
1.
Max. Score
Format 5 Points
There is a tittle.
1
Total
2.
2
Total
3.
4.
Content 20 Points
The paragraph fits the assignment.
The paragraph shows that the writer used care and thought.
10
Total
20
Organization 35 Points
Orientation
15
Description
20
Total
5.
35
35
100
To obtain the interpretation of the result of the pre-test and post-test, the writer
used criteria proposed by Harris (1974):
Table 3.2
Range Of Qualification
Score
Criteria
80-100
Good to Excellent
60-79
Average to Good
50-59
Poor to Average
0-49
Poor
The mean score is also called the average score can be formulated as
follows:
=
100%
( )
( 1)
Dx
: the difference between the scores of one person (or matched pair)
D2
D2
CHAPTER IV
FINDING AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Finding
In this research, the findings were concerned with the result of the pre-test,
post-test and questionnaire. The data gathered were analyzed though two sets of
statistics, namely descriptive and inferential statistic analysis. Pre-test was
adminestered to the subjects under study to obtain their pre-exciting ability in
writing. Post-test was conducted after giving the treatment to the students. In
addition, questionnaire was given to find out the students respond. According to
the data gathered, below is the result of subjects score in pre-test and post-test.
Table 4.1
Tabulation of Data Showing Students Score in Pre-test and Post-test
NO
Students Name
Pre-test
Post-test
(X0)
(X1)
69
75
66
70
I Wayan Karnipa
57
62
68
72
65
71
65
70
I Kadek Dwipayana
60
68
69
73
65
70
10
67
70
11
70
77
12
62
70
13
55
65
14
78
82
15
68
74
16
66
72
17
Ni Made Nuriadi
69
75
18
64
64
19
68
68
20
63
70
21
69
78
22
69
77
23
62
60
24
63
76
25
68
73
26
66
74
27
Iwayan Suardana
54
70
28
55
60
29
Ni Putu Desriyanti
71
78
30
70
79
31
65
76
32
69
73
33
65
68
34
68
72
35
60
69
36
50
60
2338
2561
Total
The additional data required for the present study were collected through
administering to the subject under study at the end of post-test was intended to
know and figure out the students respond in learning writing by creating
storyboard. As mention below, the writer administered the questionnaire once
time. Furthermore, the questionnaire consisted of ten questions. Each questions
had five options, which were: Strongly Disagree (1 points), Disagree (2 points),
Undevided (3 points), Agree (4 points), Strongly Agree (5 points). In analyzing
the questionnaire, the writer used rating scale sum. Each answer of questionnaire
which was chosen by the student was multiplied by its rating scale.
Table 4.2
Tabulation of Data Showing Students Respond in Learning Writing by
Creating Storyboard
NO
Students Name
SS
RG
TS
STS
10
10
I Wayan Karnipa
I Kadek Dwipayana
10
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
10
17
Ni Made Nuriadi
10
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Iwayan Suardana
28
10
29
Ni Putu Desriyanti
30
10
31
32
33
34
35
36
10
248
92
14
Total
Table 4.3
Tabulation of Data Showing the Frequency Distribution of Pre-test and Posttest Score
XO
FO
X1
F1
50
60
54
62
55
64
57
65
60
68
62
69
63
70
64
71
65
72
66
73
67
74
68
75
69
76
70
77
71
78
78
79
82
Total F1
36
Total F0
36
Where :
X0 X1 = Students score in Pre-test and Post-test
F0 F1 = Amount of students scores in Pre-test and Post-test.
From the table above, it can be found that in the X0 column presented the
lowest score of the students in pre-test was 50, thus the highest score was 78. In
addition, the column X1 showed that the lowest score of the students in post-test
was 60, and the highest score was 82. Considering the above table, the scores of
students in doing post-test were higher than the scores of students in doing pretests. This indicated that the students had a better performance in doing post-test
after giving the treatment rather than in doing pre-test. These data were also
analyzed descriptively in terms of mode and mean.
4.1.1.1 Mode
The mode is the score that occurs the most in a distribution of data. The
data showed that the mode of pre-test score was 69 and the mode of post-test
score was 70.
4.1.1.2 Mean
The mean score is gained by dividing the total score by the total number of
students taking the test. From the computation, the mean score of the pre-test was
64,94 and the mean score of the post-test after the treatment was 71,14. The
computation can be seen as follows:
Mean X1 (Pre-test) =
Mean X2 (Post-test) =
= 64,94
= 71,14
4.1.1.3 Questionnaire
In addition, the result of the questionnaire were intended to comparatively
figure out the respond of the students under study in creating storyboard could be
computed and then discussed. The amount of criterion score ( if each item gets
the highest score) = 36x10x5 = 1800. In this case the highest score of each test =
5, and the test item = 10 and the total students = 36. The total score of gathering
Rating Score
Questionnaires
Amount of
Subjects Answer
Data Gathered
Answer
SS
248
1240
92
368
RG
14
42
TS
10
STS
Total
1661
Where:
SS
: Setuju ( Agree )
RG
: Ragu-ragu ( Undevided )
TS
STS
was 1661. Regarding to find the percentage of the techniques whether it is useful
or not and the students respond through the treatment, the data gathered from
questionnaire can be formulate as follows:
%=
%=
1661
100% = 92,27
1800
100%
720(TS)
1080(RG)
1440(ST)
1661
1800 (SS)
It can be stated that students are mostly agree that creating storyboard was useful
and appropriate technique in teaching writing.
Students Name
Pre-test
Post-test
D2
69
75
-6
36
66
70
-4
16
I Wayan Karnipa
57
62
-5
25
68
72
-4
16
65
71
-6
36
65
70
-5
25
I Kadek Dwipayana
60
68
-8
64
69
73
-4
16
65
70
-5
25
10
67
70
-3
11
70
77
-7
49
12
62
70
-8
64
13
55
65
-10
100
14
78
82
-4
16
15
68
74
-6
36
16
66
72
-6
36
17
Ni Made Nuriadi
69
75
-6
36
18
64
64
-0
19
68
68
-0
20
63
70
-7
49
21
69
78
-9
81
22
69
77
-8
64
23
62
60
-2
24
63
76
-13
169
25
68
73
-5
25
26
66
74
-8
64
27
Iwayan Suardana
54
70
-16
256
28
55
60
-5
25
29
Ni Putu Desriyanti
71
78
-7
49
30
70
79
-9
81
31
65
76
-11
121
32
69
73
-4
16
33
65
68
-3
34
68
72
-4
16
35
60
69
-9
81
36
50
60
-10
100
2338
2561
-223
1815
= X0- X1
= 71,14-64,94
= 6,2
( )
Where :
t
Dx
: the difference between the scores of one person (or matched pair)
D2
D2
6,2
(223)
1815
36
36 (35)
6,2
1815 1381,36
1260
6,2
433,64
1260
6,2
0,344
6,2
0,6
= 10,33
Based on the calculation of t-test above, the the t-observed was 10,33. It
can be stated that t-observed exceeded the t-value of 2,030 with alpha level 0,05.
Thus the proposed hypotesis that stated There is statistically significant influence
of creating storyboard based on Subak Cultural Landscape on the writing ability
of the eight grade students of SMPN 3 Tampaksiring in academic year
2013/2014 was accepted
4.2 Discussion
After gathering all of the data, the result of data obtained were discussed
as follows:
4.2.1 The Result of Descriptive Statistical Analysis
Looking at the descriptive statistical analysis, it was purposed to find the
studentss achievement in writing ability after giving the treatment and to find the
percentage of the students changing behaviour and attitudes toward the
technique. Thus, it can be found that the studentss achievement in writing ability
after giving the treatment (post-test) was better than before the treatment (pretest). Below is the result of the descriptive statistical analysis.
Table 4.6
The Result of Mode and Mean Score
N
Pre-test
Post-test
36
36
Valid N
36
Minimum Maximum
50,00
78,00
60,00
82,00
Mode
69,00
70,00
Mean
64,94
71,14
Table 4.7
The Result of Students Respond in Learning Writing by Creating
Storyboard
Students Total Score
Maximum Score
Percentage
1661
1800
92,27%
From the table above, it can be seen that the total score of obtaining
questionnaire of all subjects was 1661. And the percentage was 92,27%, it can be
concluded that the subjects were agree with the treatment which was appropriate
in teaching writing and the students gave a positive respond in learning
storyboard by creating storyboard related to the topic Subak Cultural Landscape.
t-observed
2,030
10,58
From the table above, it can be seen that the t-observed is higher than tvalue. In line with the null hypothesis which stated that There is no significance
influence of creating storyboard on students writing ability, the result of the
paired sample T showed that the t- observed was higher that t-table, it obviously
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
5.1 Conclusion
This research is purposed at examining whether there is or not significance
influence of creating storyboard in students writing ability. According to the data
analysis which has been discussed in the previous chapter, there was a
significance influence of creating storyboard on the writing ability of the eight
grade students of SMPN 3 Tampaksiring. The first research question has been
answered by descriptive statistical analysis, which showed the subjects score in
doing post-test had better or higher achievement than the score in doing pre-test. It
can be stated that that the students achievement changed positively after giving
the treatment. In line with the second research question, it was answered by
inferential statistical analysis. This can been seen from the result of the
inteferential statistic which t-observed was higher than t-value. The result showed
that there was a significance influence of creating storyboard on the writing ability
of the eight grade students if SMPN 3 Tampaksiring. Regarding to both result, it
can be concluded that the proposed hypothesis was accepted.
Thus, the additonal data from questionnaire also showed that the students
positive respond in teaching and learning writing by creating storyboard regarding
to the topic Subak Cultural landscape. It can be showed from the percentage of the
questionnaire that the students were agree with the treatment which was
appropriate and useful in teaching writing. It indicated that they were involved in
teaching and learning writing by creating storyboard.
5.2 Suggestion
There are several suggestions put forward for prospective implementation
of the technique and also for further research.
1. For The English Teacher
In line with writing is the most complex skill, the teacher has to be aware
in teaching writing. Teacher also offer a different way in teaching writing
so that make the students interested in. There are lots of techinique in
teaching writing that can be applied in the classroom. Creating storyboard
is one of learning media that can be used, also if the teacher can expand it
into the learning media digital, that would be better considering that
nowdays, all people live in digital technology. And the teacher can use the
topic related to daily life or environment in teaching writing espcially or
teaching English generally. The teacher can use the Subak Cultural
Landscape textbook as one of teaching and learning media in classroom.
So if the new techique is combined with the topic related to daily life or
environment, the result is the teaching and learning process become fun
and interesting.
2. For the students
Regarding to the students participation in learning writing by creating
storyboard was very high, it indicated that creating storyboard in writing
ability was a useful technique. Creating storyboard challenged students to
put down on paper the specic visual ideas they want to show in
their story. The students can start to create the simplest storyboard with
the simplest topic around them especially Subak in order to keep the
existance of Subak and to learn the Balinese cultural heritage.
3. For the institution
SMPN 3 Tampaksiring is suggested to develop a variety of teaching and
learning process since it can be fun and interesting with a new learning
media and technique. Therefore the students are pushed to develop their
ideas in writing English.
4. For the other researchers
Due to the limitation of time, it is suggested for the other researchers to
conduct similar research using storyboard based on Subak Cultural
Landscape or another autenthic study with longer time allotment. In
addition, it is suggested to conduct the same study or further study by
developing other research variables, thus, they can develop a new learning
innovation in education.
REFERENCES
Ary, Donald, Jacobs, Lucy Cheser, Sorensen, Chris, and Razavieh, Asghar.
(2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Eighth Edition. USA:
Wadsworth Cengange Learning.
Brown, H. Douglas. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom
Practices. Longman: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Cameron, Lynne. (2001). Teaching Language to Young Learners. United
Kingdom : Cambridge Unversity Press .
Chaintsain, Kenneth. N.D. Developing Second-Language Skills: Theory To
Practice. Chicago. University of Virginia
Cohen, Louis; Manion, Lawrence; and Morrison, Keith. (2000). Research
Methods in Education. Fifth Edition: London Routledge Falmer.
Crowl, K.T. (1996). Fundamental of Educational Reseacrh. Brown and Benmarck
Publisher.
Green, Martha Robinson. (2011). Teaching Writing Process Through Digital
Storytelling in Pre-Service Education. Dissertation: University of Texas.
Harmer, Jeremy. (2008). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Fourth
Edition: Longman.
Heaton, J.B. (1991). Writing English Language Tests. London: Longman Group
UK Limited.
Hermanto. (2013). Improving The Students Writing Ability in Writing Narrative
Using Picture Series. Jurnal Pendidikan Unisma, 1(13), 148-154
Hinkel, Eli. (2004). Teaching Academic ESL Writing : Practical Techniques in
Vocabulary and Grammar. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
Publishers
Ibnian, S.S. Khalaf. (2010). The Effect of Using Story Mapping Technique on
Developing Tenth Grade Students Short Story Writing Skills in ESL.
Canadian Centre of Science and Education, 3(4), 183-194
Kaler Surata, Sang Putu. (2013). Lanskap Budaya Subak. First Edition: UNMAS
PRESS
APPENDICES
Appendix 1
LIST OF STUDENTS
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Name of Students
Gusti Ayu Erma Yunita Dewi
Desak Nym. Ayu Dwi Wulandari
I Wayan Karnipa
Kadek Ayu Dwita Rosaliana
I Komang Edi Juniarta
Ni Kadek Indah Lestari Dewi
I Kadek Dwipayana
Ni Luh Koming Triani
I Made Angga Widana Putra
Dewa Putu Arik Saputra
Ni Kadek Dian Sapitri
I Made Nanda Wahyudi
Kadek Surya Adnyana
Ni Wayan Eka Antari
Ni Kadek Ayu Novita Dewi
Ni Kadek Ayu Nusantini
Ni Made Nuriadi
Gusti Ngurah Arta Yoga
I Kadek Adi Oka Adnyana
I Komang Krisnayasa Adi Palguna
Kadek Arista Dewi
I Gusti Ngurah Angga Dwiki S.
I Putu Eka Peryawan
Ni NyomanSri Wedarini
I Gusti Ayu Apriani
Putu Cintia Anggareta
I Wayan Suardana
Dewa Ayu Krisna Wati
Ni Putu Desriyanti
Ni Komang Evi Juliari
Kadek Yoka Desy Domayu
Gst Ayu Nia Legi Saputri
Gst Ngurah Bagus Raditya
Desak Made Ewik Wiartati
Gusti Ngurah Arya Hartana
I Putu Yogi Semadi
Appendix 2
PRE-TEST
School
Class/ Semester
: VIII/ 2
Text
: Monologue (Descriptive)
Theme
: Rice Field
Skill
: Writing
Time Allocation
: 1 x 20 minute
Date &Time
: 2 Jan 2014
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Appendix 3
LEARNING ACTION PLAN
School
Class/Semester
: VIII/II
Subject
: English
Language Skill
: Speaking, Writing
Genre
: Descriptive Text
Time Allocation
: 4 x 40 minutes
Meeting
: II
A. Standard Competence
Speaking
1. Expressing the meaning of short functional text and simple monologue
in form of descriptive, recount, and narrative in context of daily life to
access knowledge.
Writing
2. Expressing the meaning of short functional text and simple essay in
form of descriptive, recount, and narrative in context of daily life to
access knowledge.
B. Basic Competence
Speaking
1. Expressing the meaning of simple monologue text that uses of spoken
language varieties accurately, fluently and appreciate in the context of
daily life in form : descriptive text.
Writing
2. Expressing the meaning and rethoric steps of simple essay accurately,
fluently and appreciatein context of daily life to access knowledge in
form of : descriptive text.
C. Indicators
1. Expressing the spoken descriptive monologue text.
2. Demonstrating the spoken descriptive monologue text.
3. Identifying the generic structure of descriptive text.
4. Making a simple descriptive text related to the topic.
D. Learning Objectives
At the end of teaching learning process, the students are expected to be
able to :
1. Express the spoken descriptive monologue text
2. Demonstrate the spoken descriptive monologue text
3. Identify the generic structure of descriptive text
4. Make a simple descriptive text related to the topic
E. Learning Material
An example of descriptive text with a topic which is taken from a textbook
entitled Subak Cultural Landscape.
F. Character Building
1. Innovative
2. Communicative
G. Method/Technique
-
Self inquiry
Group discussion
Teacher
- Greeting
Pre Activities
Time Allocation
Students
-Respond the greeting
10 minutes
While Activities
(Exploration)
(Elaboration)
-Respond
the
questions based on
their knowledge
and
-Practice to illustrate
the story in the
descriptive paragraph
given into some
pictures
-Make groups
consisted of 9
members of each
group.
-Work in group to
make illustration of
the dialouge about in
a sequenced picture
(storyboard)
60 minutes
descriptive paragraph
and record their own
video.
together
-Discusses together about the -Discuss
with the teacher
materials have been given
-Discusses together about the
treatment/ exercise.
-Gives the feedback by
encountering reinforcement in -Listen and respond
teachers
spoken that they have done the
explanation
and
give
their exercise.
the positive responses
-Gives motivation to the for the teacher
students that less and are not
able to follow up the material
about descripive text.
Post Activities
-Making
the
summary
of
the
material about a
simple
descriptive
paragraph.
-Write
a
simple
descriptive
parargraph related to
the topic
-Practice orally a
simple monolouge in
form of descriptive
paragraph in front of
the class
-Give greeting to the
teacher
70 minutes
I. Sources/Material/Media
- Laptop/LCD
- Oxford dictionary
- Subak Cultural Landscape textbook
- https://www.google.co.id/
J. Instrument of Assessment
Max. Score
Format 5 Points
There is a tittle.
1
Total
2.
2
Total
3.
Content 20 Points
The paragraph fits the assignment.
4.
The paragraph shows that the writer used care and thought.
10
Total
20
Organization 35 Points
Orientation
15
Description
20
Total
5.
35
35
Grand Total
100
Range Of Qualification
Score
Criteria
80-100
Good to Excellent
60-79
Average to Good
50-59
Poor to Average
0-49
Poor
Appendix 4
POST-TEST
School
Class/ Semester
: VIII/ 2
Text
: Monologue (Descriptive)
Theme
: Rice Field
Skill
: Writing
Time Allocation
: 1 x 20 minute
Date &Time
: 20 Jan 2014
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Appendix 5
Questionnaire
Berikan tanda silang pada kolom dibawah berdasarkan pendapat kalian mengenai
pembelajaran writing menggunakan storyboard.
No.
Statement
sts
ts
writing.
3
10
Points
Statements
Sangat
Tidak
Tidak
Setuju
Setuju
3
Ragu-ragu
Setuju
Sangat
Setuju
rg s
ss
Appendix 6
Appendix 7
BIOGRAPHY