Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Page 28
5.
5.1
Synthesis
Page 29
7.
Conclusion
Acknowledgement
Supplementary data
Page 30
Table 1
Crystal data and Refinement details for Complex(1)
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature ( K )
Wavelength ( )
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a()
b()
c()
()
()
()
Volume ( A3 )
Z
Density cal ( Mg m-3 )
Absorption coefficient ( mm-1 )
F ( 000 )
Range ( ) for data collection
Index ranges
Goodness-of-fit on F2
Completeness to theta
Independent reflections ( Rint )
Refinement method
Reflections collected
Final R indices [I
2( I )]
Largest difference peak and hole ( eA-3)
C20H20Cl4Cu2N4
609.59
293(2)
0.71073
Monoclinic
P21 / n
3.8742(7)
8.6325(17)
17.096(3)
90.00
91.974(10)
90.00
571.42(18)
1
1.771
2.373
306
25.50
-4h4
-10k9
-19l20
1.230
0.994
0.0544(835)
Full-matrix least squares on F2
1067
R1=0.0840, R2=0.2175
1.771
Table 2
Selected some bond distances ( ) and angles ( ) for complex (1)
Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR)
Page 31
Selected angles
N1-Cu1-Cl1
N1-Cu1-N1
N1-Cu1-Cl1
Cl1-Cu1-N1
Cl1-Cu1-Cl1
Cu1-N1-C1
Cu1-N1-C5
Table 3
Selected some Copper square planar complexes (Cu-N) Bond distances ( ) and
Bond angle() values.
Complexes
Cu-N()
0-Cu-N()
C28H28CuN6O4
2.014
91.4
2( C30H26CuN2O2 ),
C2H3N
1.956
1.942
93.42
171.48
171.23
93.11
86.40
17
C14H18ClCuN3O5
1.903
1.935
2.020
1.920
1.956
1.925
1.953
1.952
1.962
1.978
97.6
176.8
97.5
173.43
83.8
164.8
81.1
176.92
18
92.01
164.80
163.20
92.49
92.03
170.96
91.67
96.71
97.24
20
C9H9CuN5O5
C36H32CdCu2N6O4S2
N-Cu-N ( )
Ref
16
19
Page 32
1.9739
1.9887
1.9740
1.9760
92.11
167.31
169.26
92.61
91.83
165.
96.62
96.63
21
Table 4
Experimental and calculated bond distances () for complex
Experimental
2.318(2)
2.037(7)
2.318(2)
2.037(7)
Cu1 -Cl1
Cu1 -N1
Cu1-Cl1_d
Cu1-N1_d
Calculated
2.39298
1.99960
2.39303
1.99960
Cl1-Cu1-N1
Cl1-Cu1-Cl1_d
Cl1-Cu1-N1_d
Cl1_d-Cu1-N1
N1-Cu1-N1_d
Cl1_d-Cu1-N1_d
Calculated
90.00447
179.93717
90.00595
89.99571
179.97255
89.99390
Table 5
Selected list of excitation energies of complex(1) in Methanol using CPCM model.
Excitation
4
6
8
9
12
Wavelength
(nm)
534.54
487.66
395.51
393.89
325.68
Oscillatory
strength (f)
0.0087
0.0008
0.0007
0.173
0.0015
14
16
18
302.07
290.50
290.12
0.0189
0.0134
0.0028
19
22
24
288.74
272.65
267.53
0.2786
0.0002
0.0002
26
264.35
0.0054
Major Contribution
Assignment
HOMO-1()LUMO() (99%)
HOMO-3() LUMO() (97%)
HOMO-13() LUMO() (68%)
HOMO-4() LUMO() (94%)
HOMO-5() LUMO +3() (10%),
HOMO-5() LUMO +4() (10%)
HOMO() LUMO() (84%)
HOMO-9() LUMO() (94%)
HOMO-5() LUMO() (19%),
HOMO-2() LUMO +1() (10%),
HOMO-6() LUMO +2() (13%),
HOMO-5() LUMO +1() (18%)
HOMO-10() LUMO() (95%)
HOMO() LUMO +1() (52%)
HOMO-1() LUMO() (64%), HOMO()
LUMO +1() (30%)
HOMO-2() LUMO +1() (94%)
L1MCT
L1MCT
IMCT
L1MCT
ILCT
ILCT
L1LCT
LMCT
ILCT
L1LCT
ILCT
ILCT
LMCT
L1LCT
L1LCTL1LCT
L1LCT
Page 33
261.91
0.0075
30
259.54
0.0041
L1LCTL1LCT
L1LCT
L1LCT
LMCT= Pyridine ring to copper charge transfer, L1MCT= Chlorine to copper charge transfer,
ILCT= Intra pyridine charge transfer, L1LCT= Chlorine to pyridine charge trans
Table 6
Selected MOs along with their energies and compositions of complex(1)
MOs
Energy (eV)
% of Composition
Ring
Cu
-MOs
LUMO+15
LUMO+14
LUMO+13
LUMO+12
LUMO+11
LUMO+10
LUMO+9
LUMO+8
LUMO+7
LUMO+6
LUMO+5
LUMO+4
LUMO+3
LUMO+2
LUMO+1
HOMO -1
HOMO -2
HOMO -3
HOMO -4
HOMO -5
HOMO -6
HOMO -7
HOMO -8
HOMO -9
HOMO -10
HOMO -11
HOMO -12
HOMO -13
HOMO -14
HOMO -15
Cl
4.17
3.99
3.98
3.70
3.47
2.73
2.73
2.11
0.92
0.74
0.49
0.48
-1.07
-1.13
-1.76
-1.82
100
98
92
98
96
97
100
13
0
0
0
0
99
98
99
98
0
2
7
2
4
3
0
86
100
100
100
97
1
2
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
-6.85
27
16
57
-7.18
-7.26
-7.30
-7.52
-7.96
-8.04
-8.09
-8.62
-8.88
-9.28
-9.33
-10.37
-10.44
-10.61
-10.63
6
16
3
1
98
88
20
90
79
97
35
13
4
31
61
1
2
4
4
0
0
7
7
3
2
49
87
93
61
38
92
82
93
94
2
11
73
3
18
2
16
0
3
7
1
4.01
3.99
3.70
3.50
98
92
98
96
2
8
2
3
0
0
0
1
-MOs
LUMO+15
LUMO+14
LUMO+13
LUMO+12
Page 34
2.75
2.75
2.09
0.92
0.75
0.59
0.48
-1.08
-1.13
-1.73
-1.79
3.68
7.09
HOMO -1
HOMO -2
HOMO -3
HOMO -4
HOMO -5
HOMO -6
HOMO -7
HOMO -8
HOMO -9
HOMO -10
HOMO -11
HOMO -12
HOMO -13
HOMO -14
HOMO -15
-7.17
-7.19
-7.43
-7.68
-7.96
-8.03
-8.56
-8.69
-8.80
-9.05
-9.55
-9.95
-9.97
-10.31
-10.49
100
97
13
-5
0
-1
0
99
98
99
98
18
0
2
87
105
100
100
97
0
1
1
1
53
0
0
1
1
0
0
3
0
1
0
1
30
92
15
2
2
9
98
91
87
5
89
95
26
9
1
55
27
2
5
4
10
0
0
10
53
2
2
61
91
93
39
71
83
93
93
81
1
9
3
41
8
3
14
0
5
5
1
ALL FIGURES
Fig.2a. DFT complex(1) optimized structure (Selected and MOS ( Fig. 2b & 2c).)
Alpha MOs
Fig.2b
HOMO-5, 54
HOMO-2,57
HOMO-4, 55
HOMO-3, 56
HOMO-1,58
HOMO,59
Page 35
LUMO, 60
LUMO+3, 63
LUMO+1, 61
LUMO+4, 64
Beta MOs
LUMO+2, 62
LUMO+5, 65
Fig.2c
HOMO-3, 55
HOMO-5, 53
HOMO-2, 56
HOMO-4, 54
HOMO-1, 57
HOMO, 58
LUMO+1, 60
LUMO+2, 61
LUMO+4, 63
LUMO+5, 64
LUMO, 59
LUMO+3, 62
Additional Supporting Files can be downloaded from main issue of journal
http://www.onlinejournal.in/v2i32016/
Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR)
Page 36