Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
http://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/2596/what-is-the-most-effective-way-ofreducing-blunders
up
vote16dow
n
votefavorite
1
Many people suggest that tactical exercises as the best form of study
for this purpose but I find that it only attacks the problem from one
dimension (not making the strongest in a position). Analyzing my own
games I find that I'm much more likely at losing a game by making a
dumb blunder rather than missing a winning combination so solving
more chess puzzles doesn't seem very effective at improving that.
Any other forms of exercise that could help with this?
learning psychology best-practice blunder
share|improve
this question
Rauan Sagit
rgrinberg
3,68611342
18315
each move. Checking which of your pieces are attacked and which of
your pieces are hanging would be a good start. The brain will
catalogue this information into 8x8-grid punch-card type patterns in
your head that act as a warning system against stupid errors.
It can however be surprisingly difficult to take a regimented approach
like this even if on the surface it seems quite a trivial task to
complete at the start of each of your moves. The brain has a
tendency to immediately want to investigate interesting lines and
will wander sometimes never to return. Even harder if you're an older
player who has never applied such discipline.
But if you stick at it over time it becomes second nature and you just
see better and don't blunder as much.
share|improve edited Jul 23 '13 at 19:39 answered Jul 23 '13 at
this answer
12:15
b1_
993312
I feel as if there could be useful exercises to practice this ability
to inventory check the position fast. For example you are asked
2
to look at the position for 10 and then name pieces that are
undefended. What do you think about such an exercise?
rgrinberg Jul 23 '13 at 15:22
Certainly such an exercise would be helpful. I imagine a simple
1 chess training computer program could be created to hone a
students visualisation skills in this area for sure. b1_ Jul 23 '13
at 19:19
add a comment |
up
vote7dow
n vote
Tactics cover a broad area that doesn't only concern mistakes that your
opponents make. The pattern recognition faculties that you improve
through tactics also help you realize the blunders that you yourself
make. I don't recommend trying to change your style of play at all - I
tell my students that at an early level, one of the most important things
is to not hang pieces and to take advantage of your opponents' hanging
pieces. Thus, before you make your move, specifically ask yourself if
you see any potential tactics for you opponent. Likewise, do the same
after every single opponent's move.
share|improve this answer
Andrew Ng
2,627519
add a comment |
up
vote7dow
n vote
remaining possible reasons for not considering the best moves of your
opponent and most of them deal with the self-bias:
Too focused on attacking to see that your opponent has the stronger
attack and you are better served by defending
Fail to evaluate a tactic to a quiescent position because you feel like
you're better than your opponent so it must work out in your favour
You are several points up in material, you don't have to work anymore
your opponent should just keel over and give you your well-earned
victory, why must they insist on fighting on?
How can I overcome this?
Short answer: you can't. By definition, it's part of you, unless you are
born with some weird genetic mutation. Luckily, there are all sorts of
ways to "trick" your brain into avoiding a thought process that is
controlled by the self-bias. My favorite trick is simplest of all and it
comes from an old adage:
Before you judge someone walk a mile in their shoes, that way you are
a mile away and you have their shoes :)
To make it clear, what I mean is simply look at the game from your
opponents perspective, and search for that "killer" move to win the
game, but on his side. That way, you can spot it and direct the game
away from it.
share|improve this answer
ldog
80139
add a comment |
up
vote4dow
n vote
Nathan Monteleone
28117
+1. Similarly, moving a piece that was helping defend a square, but
is no longer. lkessler Sep 1 '13 at 14:47
add a comment |
up
vote4dow
n vote
always ask yourself what is your opponent trying to achieve with his
last move.
make your move in your head without submitting it, then find the best
reply for your opponent (if he can do something serious, undo your
move and try to stop it, if it is too late to stop it, then consider
resigning).
This will greatly cut down the direct blunders by a lot, however, as you
play with stronger opponents, you will need to do #2 several times to
see more than 1 move into the future, but it gets pretty hard depending
on how good you calculate and what time settings you play with.
Also, like a bonus, study lots of tactics, learn how they can be used
against you, the most common ones I think are:
having overloaded pieces
leaving pieces hanging
not seeing that he just did something sneaky like a discovered attack or
preparing a fork
But one can never do enough calculations, it would be unfair to say
white blundered in this game.
share|improve
this answer
ajax333221
1,453729
add a comment |
up
vote3dow
n vote
From my own experience, and i'm not a highly rated player or anything
like that, the best way to eliminate blunders is not to play aggressive
openings, defensive players commit less blunders, they may lose
because they don't have the space advantage but they don't make
blunders as much as aggressive players.
Why do players make blunders usually?
They start to attack without counting how many defenders are there.
They exchange pieces trying to open up the game or to counter an
attack, without counting how many defenders they have.
They start to attack without securing the king safety.
They rush into the middle game, without having completed developing
their pieces.
They rush into the end game, trying to finish the opponent too early.
They play complex positions, they don't even understand.
From my experience, the majority of the blunders is simply because the
players fail to count the defenders or because they rush to attack. Of
course failing to understand your opponent opening will result in
blunders but this is usually isn't the main cause with average players.
So take your time, develop all the pieces, try to control the pace of the
game, space advantage is so important but don't rush it, and keep your
game simple, don't play positions you are not familiar with.
share|improve this answer
Lynob
2,005937
The suggestion that defensive play trumps aggressive play should
1 be taken with a grain of salt. It's true that overreaching can lead to
tactical mistakes, but the same could be said for playing too
passively. Andrew Ng Jul 22 '13 at 13:36
@AndrewNg very true, but playing passively and defending well
could get you a draw at the very least, besides if you're playing
against an average opponent, he could make blunders if he thinks
he has an advantage on you, and you counter attack Lynob Jul 22
'13 at 13:50
I disagree. Your answer is a generalization based upon your
interpretation of "defensive" and "aggressive" approaches to chess.
Playing passively certainly does not get you a draw at the very
least, and the same can be said for playing aggressively. Your
3 examples of why players make blunders isn't specific to aggressive
players, but rather inexperienced ones. Playing styles are
established after a player has a firm grasp of the understanding of
the game that leads him or her NOT to "start to attack without king
safety" or "playing complex positions they don't understand."
Andrew Ng Jul 22 '13 at 13:55
add a comment |
up
vote3dow
n vote
Sean Bernardino
18116
add a comment |
up
vote2dow
n vote
Arlen
1,69894
add a comment |
up
vote2dow
n vote
Evgeny Chuzhakin
211
Hi are you the real Chuzakin? It would be awesome if you are
CognisMantis
941110
add a comment |
up
vote0dow
n vote
Evgeny
1
Hi Evgeny, answers that only contain links are discouraged without
additional context. Can you elaborate on your system here too?
Andrew Jul 27 '14 at 18:17
add a comment |
Top of Form
Your Answer
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Name
Email
<h3>Post as a guest</h3> <div class="form-item"> <table> <tr> <td
class="vm"> <div> <label for="display-name">Name</label> <input id="displayname" name="display-name" type="text" size="30" maxlength="30" value=""
tabindex="105"> </div> <div> <label for="m-address">Email</label> <input
id="m-address" name="m-address" type="email" size="30" maxlength="100"
value="" tabindex="106" placeholder="required, but never shown" /> </div> </td>
</tr> </table> </div>
Post Your Answ er
discard
By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.
Bottom of Form
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged learning
psychology best-practice blunder or ask your own question.
aske
d
2 years
ago
viewe 4301
d
times
activ
e
1 year
ago
Linked
7
Ways to improve defensive skills
Related
15
16
How to recover from a blunder?
13
Most effective way to achieve a 2000+ rating in one year, starting as a 1600?
11
What is the better way to stop blundering all my games?
13
What to do after losing a game?
3
What should you do after blundering during a game?
4
What are good ways to check blunders after the match?
7
What is a blunder?
4
What percent of chess games contain a blunder?
3
How do i prevent blunders?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Concentrate on finding the best move in a reasonable amount of time in every position. It
doesn't matter how well you played earlier if you make a blunder at the end, so when you are
clearly winning or in a dead drawn position, try and find the surest way to win or hold your draw.
Blunders can be strategic as well as tactical. Many strategic blunders involve weakening
key squares with some pawn move or making a bad 'equal' exchange of pieces, so take the time to
judge who benefits more from the change in the position.
Keep a healthy sense of danger. If you lose a lot of time grabbing a pawn and open lines in
front of your king while your pieces are undeveloped, the chances are the pawn grab is unsafe,
and you'd be better off continuing development and castling your king.
To avoid really silly blunders, use 'Blumenfeld's Rule' and double-check the really basic
stuff like whether you are getting mated or if one of your pieces is unsafe.
Another good technique is to check for forcing moves (moves which threaten to win
material or checkmate) in your half of the board.
When you reach the end of a line in your calculations from a fairly critical or sharp
position, check one move further to make sure you haven't missed anything important.
We can improve our concentration by not thinking about the opponent's rating, the result
of the game and other extraneous data not related to finding the best move on the board.
+++++++
Deliberate practice
Mr. Z. provided the following text:
".... At one point, not long after I started training, my memory stopped
improving. No matter how much I practiced, I couldnt memorize playing
cards any faster than 1 every 10 seconds. I was stuck in a rut, and I couldnt
figure out why. My card times have hit a plateau, I lamented.
I would recommend you check out the literature on speed typing, he
replied.
When people first learn to use a keyboard, they improve very quickly from
sloppy single-finger pecking to careful two-handed typing, until eventually
the fingers move effortlessly and the whole process becomes unconscious. At
this point, most peoples typing skills stop progressing. They reach a
plateau. If you think about it, its strange. Weve always been told
that practice makes perfect, and yet many people sit
behind a keyboard for hours a day. So why dont they just keeping
getting better and better?
In the 1960s, the psychologists Paul Fitts and Michael Posner tried to answer
With typing, its relatively easy to get past the O.K. plateau. Psychologists
have discovered that the most efficient method is to force yourself to type 10
to 20 percent faster than your comfort pace and to allow yourself to make
mistakes. Only by watching yourself mistype at that faster speed can you
figure out the obstacles that are slowing you down and overcome them.
Ericsson suggested that I try the same thing with cards. He told me to find a
metronome and to try to memorize a card every time it clicked. Once I
figured out my limits, he instructed me to set the metronome 10 to 20
percent faster and keep trying at the quicker pace until I stopped making
mistakes. Whenever I came across a card that was particularly troublesome,
I was supposed to make a note of it and see if I could figure out why it was
giving me cognitive hiccups. The technique worked, and within a couple
days I was off the O.K. plateau, and my card times began falling
again at a steady clip. Before long, I was committing entire decks to
memory in just a few minutes...."
I invite you to consider which of the following methods is more in the spirit of
deliberate practice in the light of this text:
Doing easy tactics over and over again untill you have memorized them all.
Focussing on assimilation of low level patterns in huge quantities.
Doing difficult problems and focus on where and why you go astray and
trying to prevent the same mistakes in the future. Changing strategy when
matters are executed on autopilot.