Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Ron Martin
October 8-9, 2013 Dallas, TX
Internal
1
Presentation Goals
Discuss sanitizer regulation
What identifies it as a sanitizer
Label Information
Why Do We Sanitize?
For product safety purposes
Consumer health and satisfaction
For product quality purposes
Job security
Most water supplies are not bacteria free
To comply with U.S. regulations
Internal
EPA
Regulates the registration and approval of sanitizers
FDA
Regulates the use of sanitizers on food contact
surfaces
Internal
FDA
Internal
EPA
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
The agency responsible for sanitizer registration and approval
under the FIFRA
Internal
Sterilants
Disinfectants
Sanitizers
Antiseptics and Germicides
Internal
Sanitizer / Sanitize:
When used at a specified dilution; an agent that
reduces the microbial contaminants on inanimate
surfaces to levels considered safe from a public
health standpoint.
Internal
Internal
Label Information
Premium Peroxide II
SANITIZING FOOD CONTACT SURFACES
It is a violation of Federal Law to use this product in a matter inconsistent
with its labeling.
This product can be used in Federally Inspected Meat and Poultry Facilities as a
sanitizer.
Prior to sanitizing, remove gross food particles, then wash with a detergent
solution, followed by a potable water rinse.
Sanitize with a concentration of 1.0 ounce
Premium Peroxide II dissolved in 5 gallons of water (0.16% v/v concentration,
or 98 ppm active peroxyacetic acid).
At this dilution Premium Peroxide II is
effective against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella
choleraesuis, and Listeria monocytogenes. Use immersion, coarse spray or
circulation techniques as appropriate to the equipment. All surfaces should be
exposed to sanitizing solution for a period of at least 60 seconds or more if
specified by a governing code.
Allow to free Drain. Do not rinse.
Internal
Sanitizing Methods
Physical
Heat
Steam
Hot Water
Chemical
Internal
Internal
Non-Chemical Methods
HOT WATER SANITIZING:
ADVANTAGES:
Relatively inexpensive (No Chemical) and readily available
Offers excellent heat penetration into difficult areas
Broad spectrum of kill
Non-corrosive
Internal
Non-Chemical Methods
HOT WATER SANITIZING:
DISADVANTAGES:
Non-Chemical Methods
2. STEAM SANITIZING:
May be employed in a closed system when the temperature of the
drainage at the outlet is not less than 200 F (93.3 C) for at
least 5 minutes.
Except for aseptic operations steam is not normally recommended
because:
Heat stress
Not energy efficient
Detrimental effect on rubber
Time constraints
Internal
Internal
Non-toxic
Quick acting
Broad spectrum
THE PERFECT SANITIZER
Rapid kill
MEETING ALL CRITERIA
Stable
ABOVE CURRENTLY DOES
Non-corrosive
NOT EXIST
Easy-to-use
Inexpensive
Recognized by EPA and FDA accordingly
SANITIZER TYPES
Chlorine
Dioxide
Hypochlorites
Iodophors
CHEMICAL SANITIZERS
Ozone
Quats
Carboxylic Acid
Sanitizers
Acid Sanitizers
Peroxyacetic Acid
Internal
Hypochlorite's Chlorines
They are most commonly used in the food and dairy industry
Very economical and effective for plant use
Can be either in powdered or liquid form
Can be considered hazardous and corrosive
Most effective at a neutral or weakly acidic condition and
become less effective above a 8.5 pH
Use cost $0.58/100 gals of solution
- EXAMPLE:
EXTRACT-2
Internal
Hypochlorite's
FDA allowable non-rinse claim
max 200 PPM of available chlorine
ADVANTAGES:
Broad spectrum of kill
Colorless and non-staining
Easy to handle
Most economical to use
Low Foam
Dilutions:
Internal
Hypochlorites
DISADVANTAGES:
Short shelf life (liquids have limited stability)
Can be quite corrosive - Yikes
Rusting, pitting
Environmental impact
Becoming increasingly controlled & prohibited
Form Trichlorohalomethanes
Internal
60
40
20
0
1
7
pH
Internal
pH = LESS EFFECTIVE
9 10 11 12 13 14
Iodophors
Iodophors are a combination of iodine with non-ionic wetting agents
They are usually acidified for stability
Iodophors are generally less corrosive at proper use concentrations
than chlorine sanitizers
The lower the pH the more effective the iodine sanitizer
Use cost $1.8/100 gals of solution
- EXAMPLE
ZZZ
Internal
Iodophors
Dilutions: FDA allowable non-rinse claim
12.5 to 25 PPM available iodine
ADVANTAGES:
Quick kill on a wide range of microorganisms
Good soil tolerance
Provide an acidified rinse for mineral control
Good visual indicator foot baths, hand sanitizing
Internal
Iodophors
DISADVANTAGES:
Some formulas are expensive to use
Temperatures above 90 F increase staining effect
Potential staining of porous and certain plastic surfaces
Internal
60
40
20
0
1
7
pH
Internal
pH = LESS EFFECTIVE
9 10 11 12 13 14
Internal
Internal
Peroxyacetic Acid
Commonly referred to as PAA sanitizers
Sanitizers based on peracetic acid and hydrogen
peroxide mixtures
Internal
Peroxyacetic Acid
FDA allowable non-rinse claim at use
dilution specified on label (= 82-197 PPM)
ADVANTAGES:
Broad spectrum kill over broad pH range up to 7.5 pH
They are more environmental and effluent friendly
Dilutions:
Phosphate free
Breaks down to vinegar and water
Internal
Peroxyacetic Acid
DISADVANTAGES:
Some concern with corrosion
Cannot be controlled by conductivity
Strong offensive odor
More expensive compared to other sanitizers
Are not available in bulk quantities - Due to
being a strong Oxidizer
Internal
Acid-Anionic Sanitizers
Are a mixture of acids and wetting agents
Provide double action: sanitize and provide acidified rinse to
control milkstone
Their germicidal properties are based upon the lower pH and the
activity of the wetting agents at this low pH
They are generally slower acting than oxidizing sanitizers like
hypochlorite and PAA sanitizers
Acid sanitizers are most effective between a pH of 2.0 to 3.5,
with many becoming ineffective above 4 pH
Use cost $2.03/100 gals of solution
-EXAMPLE: Acidet
Internal
60
40
20
0
1
9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
Internal
Acid-Anionic Sanitizers:
Dilutions: FDA allowable non-rinse claim at use dilution specified
on label (1oz/5 gal provides 300 PPM of DDBSA Acid)
ADVANTAGES:
Non-staining, stable, long shelf life
Visual detection foam
Removes and prevents milkstone and waterstone formation
Effective against a wide spectrum of microorganisms
Normally non-corrosive to stainless steel
Can be controlled with conductivity
Internal
Acid-Anionic Sanitizers
DISADVANTAGES:
Effective at acid pH only
Some products generate foam in recirculation
Contribute to phosphate loading
Low activity against spore forming organisms (Molds & __ )
Slower acting
High Foaming in CIP Systems
Internal
60
40
20
0
1
9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
Internal
pH = CREATES EFFECTIVNESS
Internal
Internal
Chlorine Dioxide
Ozone
Sterilex
Internal
Chlorine Dioxide
Sodium chlorite solution and an acid activator
? & ? generated solutions of ClO2
Is an effective antimicrobial agent
It is a gas that is soluble in water exists as a gas in H2O
Fogging Process and Food Storage Areas
Also used predominately as an environmental sanitizer
Typical use is at concentrations of chlorine dioxide between 1
to 50 PPM
-EXAMPLES: Selectrocide
Premium Dioxide 3000 / Redi-Ox
Internal
Chlorine Dioxide
ClO2 is a chemical oxidizer, but does not chlorinate.
ClO2 is a powerful biocide that is effective in air or
in water over a wide pH range.
ClO2 is a deodorizer.
Does not form chlorinated organic by-products
Internal
Chlorine Dioxide
Dilutions: FDA allowable non-rinse claim at use dilution specified on label (Varies by Application)
ADVANTAGES:
Very strong oxidizer
Not readily affected by organic soiling
Very Effective in removing Biofilms
Very minimal foam production
Is 3 to 4x more potent than chlorine (2.5 x Oxidizing power of Chlorine)
Effective against a wide spectrum of microorganisms
Less corrosive to stainless steel
Less pH sensitive
Environmentally Friendly
Internal
Chlorine Dioxide
DISADVANTAGES:
Worker Safety & toxicity
Limited Shelf Life after generation (in some cases)
(Rapid decomposition in presence of light )
Multiple products some types require the need
of an activator or an onsite generator
Costly with initial capital cost of on-site generator
Individual packets are costly to use but offer a
safer alternative
Internal
Ozone
Ozone is formed when oxygen molecules collide with
oxygen atoms to produce O3
Is an effective antimicrobial agent
Is a powerful and naturally unstable oxidizing gas
Excellent broad spectrum of germicidal activity
Typically more effective than chlorine or chlorine
dioxide
Primary use is for treatment of water
Internal
Ozone
FDA:
Internal
Ozone
DISADVANTAGES:
Extremely unstable as a result must be generated /
produced on-site
Safety concern, is very irritating and toxic
Extremely reactive and corrosive
No measurable residual to detect for efficacy
No organic tolerances
Costly with initial capital cost of generator and operational
costs
Internal
Sterilex
Not an end use / No-Rinse Sanitation
EPA Approved Anti-Biofilm Control
Removes Biofilms & Kills Listeria, Ecoli, Staph, Mold & Mildew
Recommended by USDA as a Best Practice for Listeria kill &
Biofilm control
Internal
Sanitizer Tip:
Having micro issues in your freezer or environmental areas?
Consider Foaming with a combination of a QAC with Chlorine Dioxide.
Chemicals are stable ?
Internal
Sanitizer Tip
Have a need for continuous Dosing of ClO2? Dont want to purchase /
maintain an expensive generator?
Consider Pregenerated Premium Dioxide 3000 & Redi-Ox (Approved
for direct application on meat, poultry, fruit & vegetable washing)
Surface Contact
Must contact the cell wall
Soil and non-smooth surfaces can affect this
Contact Time
The longer the contact time the greater the efficacy
Internal
pH Conditions
Especially true for acid and chlorine sanitizers
This is significant between wash and rinse cycles
Internal
Build Up of Resistance
Sanitizers destroy 99.999% of the bacteria present under
normal conditions
The sanitizing agent must result in irreversible damage
referred to as microbial death
Internal
Internal
Thank You
60