Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Problems
Figure 5.18
0
0.5
1.5
1.O
M, =
4
2.0
2.445
U/C,
+ l
-y
- 1
li(y
- l)
(5.65)
A//-.
Review of a classic paper You may use an important paper in compressible ow as the
backbone of your project. The project must include a complete summary of the important
points of the paper and a brief review of the important references therein. An outstanding
project will also include an analysis that goes beyond the analysis in the paper. This might
include a numerical analysis of parameter space not included in the original manuscript, use
of theory in a design project, etc. Some good candidates for papers include:
Coleman and Mizel, Existence of caloric equations of state in thermodynamics. J.
Chem. Phys. 40 (1964) 11161125.
G. I. Taylor, The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion. (Parts I &
II). Proc. Royal Soc. A, 201 (1950).
Many, many other papers are listed in the bibliography in Thompson.
Whither supersonic ight? Recall all the fastest planes were built 3040 years ago (an eternity
on a technical time scale). Why is this? What technical and economic factors are driving the
development of supersonic ight? Remember this must be a technical paper. Your analysis
must include some technical calculations related to issues involving supersonic ight and/or
design.
Granular Flows Understanding processing and transport of granular is becoming increasingly
important in many industries including pharmaceuticals and ceramics. Currently our un
derstanding of these systems is limited, and even the fundamental equations of motion are
unknown. To devise a continuum model for these systems, it is necessary to include the eects
of compressibility as variations in density play an important role in these ows.
Rocket nozzles The design of an eective rocket nozzle requires conguring an expanding high
temperature ow so as to maximize thrust and minimize weight. How do these designs work
and what are the important supporting technologies?
Scramjet (supersonic combustible ramjet) What are they? How do they work? Is this the
next big thing in supersonic ight?
Expansion of cooling gases RankHilsch tubes (vortex tubes) and JouleThompson refrigera
tors rely on the tendency of gases to cool when they are expanded. Such devices nd signif
icant technical application when modest amounts of cooling are desired without the use of
complex mechanical systems. How do these systems work? What are the performance limits
of these systems?
Explosions and explosives Explosions are often regarded as strong shock waves. They may arise
from combustible gas mixtures, dustladen gases, solid materials and shaped charges and other
reactive media. What are the important technical aspects of explosions and explosives, and
how do explosions dier from simple shock waves?
Sonoluminescence and other thermoacoustic phenomena. Intense sound waves, when focused in
a resonating chamber, can lead to substantial localized heating. In sonoluminescence, sound
waves are focused on a gas bubble and the energy is converted into light.
RichtmyerMeshkov instability in shock fronts The contact surface between a strongly ac
celerated uid and the one it advances into can be unstable.
http://www.engr.arizona.edu/newsletters/AESpring02/microgravity.html
Focused implosions In some situations, such as inertial connement fusion and highexplosive
triggers for atomic bombs, it is desired to create a spherically imploding shock wave. The
original studies of such problems date from the Second World War.
Similarity transformations of the compressible boundary layer During much of the 20th
century, compressible boundary layers could be analyzed only by analytical techniques. Con
sequently, signicant eort was put into the development of boundary layer similarity transfor
mations that account for variations in density and other physical properties. Most textbooks
focus only on incompressible transformations (Blasius or FalknerSkan). Catalog the various
compressible boundary layer transformations (Howarth, Illingworth, CohenReshotko, and
many others), and determine how well their assumptions track experimental data.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
(1)
( u ) + ( v) = 0
x
y
Momentum equation
u (0) = 0
1 P 1 u
u
u
+
=
+v
x y y
y
x
P
=0
y
(2)
v(0) = v( x)
h
=0
y
(5)
u ( y ) U e ( x), h( y ) he ( x)
(6)
Energy equation
2
h
h u P 1 1 h u
+ (3)
u
+v
=
+
x
y x Pr y y y
u
v=
Ue
h
h=
=
he
u=
An equation of state
p = RT
h(0) = h( x)
(4)
where,
x : Direction along the surface creating the boundary
layer
y : Direction normal to the surface
u : Velocity in the x direction
v : Velocity in the y direction
: Density
p : Pressure
: Viscosity
: Kinematic viscosity
p : Pressure
h : Enthalpy
R : Gas constant
Comparing the energy equation (3) to the energy
equation (A.47) used in incompressible boundary layer
with forced convection shown in Appendix.4, the first
term in the energy equation in (3) is retained, which is
u P
. The second term on
the compressive work term
x
v
Ue
y=
y
L
P=
P
e U e2
x=
x
L
(7)
(8)
( u ) ( v )
+
=0
x
y
(9)
u
u
1 P
1 u
+v
=
+
x
y
x Re y y
u P 1 1 h
h
h
+v
= ( 1) M e2
+
x
y
x Pr Re y y
( 1) M e2
+
Re
u
v
y
(11)
where,
Re =
eU e L
: Reynolds number
e
( 1) M e2 =
Cp
Cv
Me =
U e2
he
Ue
: Mach number
c
(10)
H = h+
c p
Pr
. Therefore,
u2
2
(13)
where,
u : the velocity along the streamline
Using equation (13), the energy equation (3) becomes:
u
H
H
u
+v
u u
+ v =
x
y
y
x
2
u
1 H u
P
u
+ +
u
Pr y y y y
x
y
(14)
The pressure gradient term in the energy equation (14)
can be eliminated by multiplying the momentum
equation (2) by u and adding the result to the energy
equation (14). This results in:
2
1 u
H
H
u
+v
= 1 + u
u
x
y Pr y
y y
1 H
Pr y y
(15)
EQUATIONS IN TERMS OF STREAM FUNCTION
For the similarity transformations and the corresponding
similar solutions, the compressible stream function can
be defined by:
= u
y
= v
x
(16)
(17)
1 1
y x y x y y
P 1
+
=
x y y y
(18)
or integrating:
H H
y x
x y
U ( x)
(27)
= e
dy
2
N ( x) 0
1
1
1
1
+
= 1
y y y y
Pr y y
N (x) will be determined from the transformed
1 H
+
Pr y y
(19)
VARIABLE TRANSFORMATION
Dependent variable transformation
From the experience with the incompressible boundary
layer equations, the dependent variable transformations
are introduced as follows:
( x, y ) = N ( x) f ( , )
u ( x, y ) = U e ( x) f ( , )
H ( x, y ) = H e ( x) g ( , )
where, the subscript
(20)
(21)
(22)
= (x)
= ( x, y )
Relation between independent
variable through trnasformation
(23)
(24)
and
dependent
= N ( x)
f ( , ) = u = U e ( x) f ( , ) (25)
y
y
which results in:
U e ( x)
=
y
N ( x)
(26)
N
1 dP
U2
( f ) + x Uff U x ( f ) 2
2
N
U dx
N
= U x ( f f f f )
(28)
N
U
H e ( g ) + x H e Pr fg Pr H e , x f g +
2
N
N
(29)
3
U
(Pr 1) 2 ( f f ) = H e x ( f g f g )
N
where, the subscripts
differentiations.
= C , ( = 1)
e
Te
which, from
(30)
P
= 0 and the equation of state:
y
= C e e
(31)
N
1 dP
U2
e e (Cf ) + x Uff U x ( f ) 2
2
N
U dx
N
= U x ( f f f f )
(32)
SIMILARITY CONDITIONS
From equations (34) and (35), the similarity conditions
are:
N
U
H e e e (Cg ) + x H e Pr fg Pr H e , x f g +
2
N
N
3
U
(Pr 1) 2 e e (Cf f ) = H e x ( f g f g )
N
(33)
Condition (1)
NN x
= const
C e eU e
(36)
Condition (2)
U e2
restrictive. Since H e = he +
, both the static enthalpy
2
and the velocity can vary along the edge of the boundary
layer. From the fact that the stagnation enthalpy is
constant across a shock wave, the iso-energetic flow
assumption is reasonable when the shock wave is not
significantly curved
From these assumptions, equation (32) becomes
following (34) by replacing pressure gradient term using
Eulers equation at the edge of the boundary layer, i.e.,
U x = (1 / eU e )(dP / dx) :
f +
NN x
N 2U x
ff +
C e eU e
C e eU e2
f 2 = 0 (34)
N 2U x
C e eU e2
2
e
NN x
U
g +
Pr fg = (1 Pr)
( f f )
C e eU e
He
U e2
= const or Pr = 1
He
(38)
NN x
=1
C e eU e
(39)
N ( x) = 2 C e eU e dx
(40)
Ue
x
2 C e eU e dx
0
(35)
(37)
Condition (3)
f 2 = function of only
Since,
= (x) and:
dy
(41)
= C e eU e dx
(42)
results in:
U e ( x)
2
dy
(43)
f + ff + ( g f 2 ) = 0
(48)
g + Pr fg = (1 Pr)( f f )
(49)
where,
( 1) M e2
1 2
1+
Me
2
enthalpy:
h u2
u2
+
h+
he 2he
H
2
g ( ) =
=
=
He
U e2
u2
he +
1 +
2
2he
follows:
by
U2
g e f 2
2he
(45)
U e2
e
h
2
2
( g f 2 )
f =
f = 1 +
he
2he
H
= e (g f 2 )
he
U
=
He
U
he +
2
e
2
e
U
2
( 1) M
1 2
1+
Me
2
differentiating
(46)
and
dM e U e dU e U e2 dhe
( 1) M e
=
2
d
he d
2he d
1 dU e H e
= ( 1) M
U e d he
(51)
and
1 dU e H e
1 dM e
=
U e d he
M e d
(52)
d ln M e
2 dM e
= 2
M e d
d ln
= constant
(53)
2
e
[( 1) / 2]M e2 = U e2 / 2he
2
e
N 2U x H e
( g f 2 ) = ( g f 2 )
2
C e eU e he
(50)
is constant.
h U e2
= 1 +
he 2he
2 dU e H e 2 dU e 1 2
Me
=
1 +
U e d he U e d
2
M e = (const )
(54)
=1
(3) Pr = 1
(4) M e = const
f (0) = 0
(55a, b)
v( x) = 0
= 2 , i.e., M e
2 v( x)
= const
wU e ( x)
(2) M e = 0
(5)
f (0) =
=1
or
v( x) =
wU e ( x)
2
(56a, b)
(57a, b)
f ( ) 1 g ( ) 1
(58a, b)
SOLVING EQUATIONS
Similar solutions for equations (48) and (49) subject
these boundary conditions (55)~(58) can be obtained
according to the following cases. The results are
summarized in Appendix 6. In all the bellow cases, the
fundamental equations are transformed to equations
similar to the fundamental equations governing the
incompressible boundary layer.
Case 1: Low Speed Compressible Boundary Layer
with Variable Properties
= const , M e = 0, Pr = const
M e = 0 means neglecting the viscous dissipation and
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
f + ff + ( g f 2 ) = 0
(59)
g + Pr fg = 0
(60)
f (0) = 0
f (0) = f w = const
(61)
(62)
f ( ) 1 g ( ) 1
(63)
Since,
= 0 : Flat
g ( ) = 1 (1 g w )1 ( )
h( )
1 2
M e ( g f 2 )
= g ( ) +
he
2
From equation (64),
(64)
M e = 0 case results in
h( )
= g ( )
he
Solution g ( ) of equation (60) represents nondimensional static enthalpy profiles through the
boundary layer or non-dimensional temperature profile
for a constant specific heat at constant pressure ( c p ).
Further, from equation (50)
= (2 / U e )(dU e / d )
= (const ) x m (65)
where,
m /(2 )
: same as , i.e., Falkner-Skan pressure gradient
parameter in Appendix 3.
Coupled-equations
where,
d = C e eU e dx
(66)
f + ff + (1 f 2 ) = 0
Case1.1
transfer and 0 )
Due to the variable properties included in the solution,
the momentum and energy equations are coupled.
When there is heat transfer at the surface, the given
2 x C U
0 e e e
y=
0
U e
1/ 2
d =
2
eU e
2
eU e
H
J 2 + e J 1
he
2
eU e
e
d
He
2
( g f 2 ) d
1 (1 f ) +
he
(68)
Where,
J 1 = ( g f 2 ) d
0
J 2 = (1 f 2 )d
( g + Af ) + f ( g + Af ) + f ( f + ff ) = 0
(g +
= 0, M e = const , Pr = const
Integrating once:
f + ff = 0
(69)
Af ) + f ( g + Af ) = 0
( g + Af ) = (const )e 0
(71)
(72)
fd
(73)
again
g + Af = (const ) = g w
and
using
(74)
g + ( g w 1) f = g w
g + fg = 0
(70)
g w = const
(75)
g aw = 1 and
1)
g = K + KG1 + G2
(76)
G1 + Pr fG1 = 0
G1 (0) = 1 G1 ( ) 0
(77)
(78)
G2
or
+ Pr fG 2 = (1 Pr)( f f )
G2 (0) = 0 G2 ( ) 0
(79)
(80)
G2 ( ) =
=
f 2
+ Pr ( f ( )) Pr ( f ( )) 2 Pr d d
=
0
2
1
( f 2 1) + 2 ( )
2
(81)
where,
2 ( )
(A.71).
The constants K and K in equation (76) are evaluated
using the boundary conditions equations (61), (62), and
(63).
g aw = 1 + ( 2 (0) 1 / 2)
(84)
= const , M e = (const )
, Pr = 1
f + ff + ( g f 2 ) = 0
(85)
g + fg = 0
(86)
f (0) = f w = const
f (0) = 0
(87)
(88)
f ( ) 1 g ( ) 1
(89)
H / H e rather than h / he .
= 1 (1 g w )1 ( ) + ( 2 ( ) 2 (0)1 ( ))
+
( f 2 + 1 ( ))
(82)
When = 0 , equation (82) reduces to equation (66)
obtained for M e = 0 .
From
= ( 1) M e2 /[1 + (( 1) / 2) M e2 ] ,
the effects
HOWARTH TRANSFORMATION
= const , M e , Pr 1
f + ff + ( g f 2 ) = 0
(90)
g + Pr fg = 2(1 Pr)( f f )
(91)
f (0) = f w = const
f (0) = 0
(92)
(93)
f ( ) 1 g ( ) 1
(94)
RELIABILITY
OF
THE
TRANSFORMATION METHODS
SIMILARITY
v
=
and
=
r
r
y
x
(95)
= (x)
= ( x, y )
(96)
y =
y
y
=
y r
independent
dy
(97)
variable
(98)
=
y r
(99)
= x
+x
(100)
x ( ) =
1 P 1
+
( ) (101)
x r2
=C
r
Tr
and from
(102)
= C r r
(103)
x ( ) =
If C =constant, then with
( ) =
1 P
+ r (C )
x
1/ 2
(104)
h h =
x = C , i.e., = Cx ,
1 r 1 P
+ r
C r x
(105)
energy
equation
into
1 r
1 P
1
( h )
+
C
r x C Pr r2
1
( ) 2
2
C r
(110)
Introducing the Chapman-Rubesin viscosity law in
Appendix 1 and assuming that C r r is constant,
h h =
1 r
1 P r
+ h + r ( ) 2
C
r x Pr
(111)
In the absence of a pressure gradient, equation (105) is
equivalent to the energy equation governing forced
convection flow over a flat plate at zero-incidence.
STEWARTSON-ILLINGWORTH TRANSFORMATION
( , ) = (2U ( ) )1 / 2 f ( )
(106)
( f ) + f ( f ) = 0
The transformed boundary
impermeable surface are
f (0) = f (0) = 0
f ( ) 1
U ( )
=
(107)
conditions
for
an
(108)
(109)
.
Therefore, the solution of the momentum equation for
the compressible variable property boundary layer in the
absence of pressure gradient is reduced to the solution
of an equivalent incompressible constant property
equation, i.e., the Blasius equation in Appendix 2. In the
absence of a pressure gradient, the momentum equation
u
=
y
0
(112)
v
=
x
0
(113)
X = C
0
Y = C
0
Pe a e
dx
P0 a 0
(114)
e
dy
0
(115)
SUMMARY
S=
he
1
h0
(116)
V =
X
U=
(117)
REFERENCES
= AX aU ep f ( )
Y = BX bU eq
S = S ( )
(119)
(120)
(121)
U e = CX m or U e = C exp(C 2 X )
(122)
Then, the system of ODEs corresponding to the powerlaw velocity distribution of equations my be written:
f + ff = ( f 2 1 S )
where,
(118)
S + Pr fS = (1 Pr)
2m
: Pressure gradient
m +1
U
u
=
= f : Velocity ratio
U e ue
(123)
( 1) M e2
( f f + f 2 ) (124)
1 2
1+
Me
2
OTHER SOURCES
[1] O.A. Oleinik, V.N. Samokin, Mathematical models in
boundary layer theory, Chapman&Hall/CRC, 1999
[2] Josep A. Schetz, Boundary layer analysis, PrenticeHall, 1993
[3] Herrmann Schlichting, Klaus Gerstan, Boundarylayer theory, Springer, 2000
Image removed due to copyright considerations.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1.
PROPERTIES
VARIATION OF TRANSPORT
VISCOSITY
From monatomic gas theory, the viscosity of gases
depends only on the temperature and is independent of
the pressure. Experimental measurements confirm that
this result is essentially correct for all gases. For gases,
the viscosity increases with increasing temperature. In
contrast, the viscosity of liquids depends on both
temperature and pressure and decreases with
increasing temperature.
T
=
r Tr
3/ 2
Tr + S1
T + S1
(A.1)
S1 =198.6 R
Tr =491.6 R
= C
r
Tr
= 2.270
T 3/ 2
10 8 (lb sec/ ft 2 )
T + 198.6
(A.2)
(A.3)
= w ( x)
T
Tw ( x )
= (const )T
THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY
The thermal conductivity of gases k also depends only
on the temperature and is independent of pressure. The
variation of the thermal conductivity of air with
temperature is the same as that of the dynamic
viscosity.
EQUATIONS
u v
+
=0
x y
Momentum equation
(A.4)
u
u
2u
+v
= 2
x
y
y
Boundary condition
BOUDNARY
Continuity equation
AND
(A.5)
y = 0: u = v = 0
(A.6)
y : u U
(A.7)
u = y
v = x
(A.8)
y xy x yy = yyy
(A.9)
y=0
x = y = 0
(A.10)
y y U
(A.11)
=y
U
2x
( x, y ) = 2Ux f ( )
f + ff = 0
(A.12)
(A.13)
(A.14)
and f ( ) 1
(A.15)
EQUATIONS
AND
BOUDNARY
dU
dx
g =
dg
dx
y = ABU ( x) f ( , ) U ( x)
Continuity equation
u v
+
=0
x y
(A.16)
Momentum equation
U =
or f ( , )
1
AB
(A.26)
(A.27)
u
u
2u
1 P
+v
=
+ 2
x
y
x
y
(A.17)
Boundary condition
y = 0: u = v = 0
(A.18)
y : u U ( x)
(A.19)
A = U / and B = / U
(A.28)
y xy x yy = U
dU
+ yyy
dx
f + ff + (1 f 2 ) = g 2
(A.20)
x = y = 0
y y U ( x)
(A.21)
(A.22)
=x
Ay
g ( x)
(A.23)
( x, y ) = BU ( x) g ( x) f ( , )
(A.24)
( AB)
g U
g (Ug ) ff + 3 [1 ( AB) 2 f 2 ]
3
A B
A B
(A.25)
2
( AB) 2
g U ( f f f f )
=
A 3 B
f +
f =
f (0) = f (0) = 0
(A.32)
f ( ) 1
(A.33)
where,
f=
(A.30)
f + ff + (1 f 2 ) = 0
where,
g
g2
=
(Ug ) =
U
U
U
y=0
U
( f f f f ) (A.29)
U
f =
2g
1
g2
2 =
(Ug )
U =
( g 2U )
U
U
U
(A.34)
Providing
yields
U 2
g = (2 ) x
U
(A.35)
g
g2
U
=
(Ug )
U =
gg
U
U
U
(A.36)
U g2
g
g
( )
=
U =
U U
g
g
(A.37)
=y
(A.44)
=0
and
APPENDIX
4.
FORCED
CONVECTION
BOUNDARY LAYER WITHOOUT PRESSURE
GRADIENT PARALLE FLOW PAST A FLAT
PLATE
GOVERNING
CONDITION
EQUATIONS
AND
BOUNDARY
(m + 1) U
2 x
= U g = Kg
(A.38)
U ( x)
=K
U
2
2
[(2 ) x]
Continuity equation
= (const ) x m
(A.39)
and
U x
g ( x) = (2 )
U
or
(A.45)
Momentum equation
1/ 2
(A.40)
m=
u v
+
=0
x y
2m
m +1
u
u
2u
+v
= 2
x
y
y
(A.46)
Energy equation
u
T
2T
T
= k 2 +
c p u
+v
y
y
y
x
(A.47)
(A.41)
Boundary condition
2 x
U ( x) = K x m and g ( x) =
U
m +1U
y=0 u=v=0
(A.42)
where,
2
K = U K m +1
m + 1
(A.48)
1/ 2
(A.43)
T = Tw or
T
=0
y
y u U T T
(A.49)
(A.50)
2 + Pr f 2 = Pr f 2
with
2 (0) = 0
and
(A.64)
2 ( ) 0
(A.65)
=y
U
2x
( x, y ) = 2Ux f ( )
f + ff = 0
with
(A.52)
f (0) = f (0) = 0
(A.53)
Homogeneous solution
The solution of the homogeneous problem is
and f ( ) 1
(A.54)
U
d T
dT
f 2
+ Pr f
= Pr
2
d
cp
d
Pr
(A.55)
=0
Pr
= 0 (Pr)
( f ( )) Pr d
(A.66)
T T
=
Tw T
( f ( ))
( ) =
( f ( ))
where,
(A.56)
0 (Pr) = ( f ( )) Pr d
=0
0 (1) = 1 ,
+ Pr f = Pr Ef 2
(0) = 0
with
(0) = 1
and
( ) 0
or
(A.57)
U 2
c p (Tw T )
(A.59)
Non-homogeneous solution
(A.60)
( ) = K1 ( ) + E 2 ( )
(A.61)
Homogeneous equation
1 + Pr f1 = 0
1 ( 0) = 1
and
2 ( ) = Pr ( f ( )) Pr ( f ( )) 2 Pr d d
with
(A.67)
(A.58)
E=
1 ( ) = 1 f ( )
(A.62)
1 ( ) 0
Non-homogeneous equation
1
2
2 ( ) = (1 f 2 ( ))
(A.69)
Total solution
Using the condition
(A.63)
(A.68)
=1
at
=0
K = 1 E 2 (0)
and equation (A.61) becomes
(A.70)
( ) = [1 E 2 (0)]1 ( ) + E 2 ( )
(A.71)
1
For the special case of unit Prandtl number, 2 (0) =
2
( )
( ) = 1 ( ) + E 2 ( ) 1
(A.72)
2
APPENDIX
5.
FORCED
CONVECTION
BOUNDARY
LAYER
WITH
PRESSURE
GRADIENT AND NONISOTHERMAL SURFACE
CONDITION
GOVERNING
CONDITION
EQUATIONS
AND
BOUNDARY
TRANSFORMED EQUATION
f + ff + (1 f 2 ) = 0
(A.82)
f (0) = f (0) = 0
f ( ) 1
(A.83)
T 2 Pr
T
2T
T
m 1
f
+ 2 Pr
f x
+ Pr f
2
m + 1
x
m +1
= Pr
(A.84)
or
Continuity equation
u v
+
=0
x y
(A.73)
T
T
T
2T
(2 ) Pr f x
+ 2 Pr( 1)f
+ Pr f
2
x
= Pr
Momentum equation
(A.74)
Energy equation
u
h
h h
+
=
+v
2
y Pr y
x
y
2
y=0 u=v=0
(A.76)
T = T (x)
(A.77)
y u U T Te
(A.78)
m=
(A.79)
SIMILARITY TRANSFORAMTION
(A.80)
1/ 2
f ( )
(A.86)
+ Pr f Pr(2 )(1 ) f
(A.81)
x dTw
Te Tw dx
U 2
= Pr
x 2 m f 2
c p (Te Tw )
(A.87)
x dTw
= const
Te Tw dx
Tw Te = T1 x
(m + 1) U
=y
2 x
( x, y ) =
xU
m +1
T Tw
Te Tw
(A.75)
Boundary condition
U ( x) = U x m
U2
f 2
cp
(A.85)
u
u
1 dP
2u
u
+v
=
+ 2
dx
x
y
y
U2
f 2
cp
and
x 2m
= const
Te Tw
(A.88)
(A.89)
where,
T1 : a constant associated with the initial temperature
distribution (n=0 : Isothermal condition)
Using this assumption, equation (A.87) becomes
+ Pr f + n Pr(2 )(1 ) f = Pr E1 x 2 m n f 2
where,
the Eckert number is E = U 2 / c p T1
2) < 0
The surface temperature decreases in the direction of
the flow
(0) = 0
( ) = 1
(A.90)
SOLUTION
From equation (A.89), there are two classes of similar
solutions of the energy equation for forced convection:
those with viscous dissipation, and those without viscous
dissipation
Low speed incompressible flow (Neglect of viscous
dissipation)
In this case, the Eckert number is small, since U is
small. Under these conditions, the viscous dissipation on
the right hand side can be neglected.
+ Pr f + n Pr(2 )(1 ) f = 0
(A.91)
=2
0 and M e = 0
Equations
f + ff + ( g f 2 ) = 0
g + Pr fg = 0
f + ff + (1 f 2 ) = 0
g ( ) = 1
1.2 Isothermal Wall analytical Solutions (It can not be
solved)
Comments:
1) g ( ) =
h
he
3) = 0 and n = 0
Constant surface temperature
1) n = 0 (isothermal wall)
2)
1) 0 < < 2
The surface temperature increases in the direction of
the flow
0 and M e = const
Equations:
f + ff = 0
g + fg = (1 Pr)( f f )
f + ff = 0
g ( ) = 1 (Busseman Integral)
f + ff = 0
g ( ) = g w ( g w 1) f (Crocco integral)
2.2.2 Pr 1
f + ff = 0
g ( ) = 1 (1 g w )1 ( ) + ( 2 ( ) 2 (0)1 ( ))
+
( f 2 + 1 ( ))
Comments:
1) g ( ) =
H
He
1
Pr 1 , g aw = ( 2 (0) )
2
0 , M e = (const ) 2 , Pr = 1
Equations:
f + ff + ( g f 2 ) = 0
g + Pr fg = 0
3.1 Adiabatic Wall analytical Solutions (It can be solved):
f + ff + ( g f 2 ) = 0
g ( ) = 1
Image removed due to copyright considerations.
0 M e
Equations:
f + ff + ( g f 2 ) = 0
g + fg = 2(1 Pr)( f f )
4.1 Adiabatic Wall analytical Solutions (Cannot be
solved):
=2
0. Warmup Problems:
(a) In class we showed that the pressure, P , resulting from an innitessimal disturbance
in an isentropic (1D) uid medium at rest, is governed by a secondorder linear wave
equation.
Show that the velocity, u, and the density, , are also governed by a wave equation.
(b)
P o, o, T o
u, P
2
umax = 2ho or umax = co
.
1
Show that these two statements are equiva
lent.
1. Using a Tayor expansion, derive eq. (7.27a) in Thompson from eq. (7.26).
2. Thompson 6.10
3. Thompson 6.14
4. Thompson 7.2
5. Thompson 7.18
1. Thompson 7.12
2. Thompson 7.17
3. Thompson 8.2
4. Thompson 8.6
April 9, 2004
April 23, 2004 @5:00 PM