Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 21 June 2015
Received in revised form
6 July 2015
Accepted 28 July 2015
Objective: To compare the efcacy of acupressure for induction of labour for nulliparous women with a
post-dates pregnancy.
Design: A single-blind randomised trial.
Setting: Antenatal and labour ward of a UK district general hospital.
Participants: One hundred and thirty two women requiring induction of labour with a post-dates
pregnancy (>41 weeks gestation) with no signicant medical, obstetric or fetal condition.
Method: Acupressure: 20 intermittent presses to stimulate each pair of acupressure points; (Large Intestine 4, followed by Spleen 6) or Sham treatment: 20 intermittent presses to the patella and then to
the olecranon.
Main outcome measures: Treatment-to-commencement of labour interval.
Secondary outcome measures: Requirements for oxytocin, mode of delivery, duration of labour,
requirement for pre-labour Caesarean section, presence of meconium, neonatal intensive care admission,
5 min Apgar scores, and evaluation of maternal satisfaction.
Results: There were no signicant differences between the two groups in treatment-to-commencement
of labour interval, requirements for oxytocin or mode of delivery. Fewer inductions of labour were
required in the sham treatment group (p 0.004 CI 1e35). The incidence of meconium-stained liquor,
and neonatal outcomes were similar for both groups.
Conclusions: Acupressure performed at 41 weeks gestation in nulliparous women does not appear to be
effective for inducing labour for post-dates pregnancy.
Crown Copyright 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Acupressure
Acupuncture
Induction of labour
Post-dates pregnancy
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
Induction of labour is a common procedure that is performed in
around 20% of pregnancies in developed countries [1] It is indicated
when interrupting the pregnancy is thought to be advantageous for
the mother or baby and is often carried out for post-date pregnancies (>41 completed weeks of pregnancy), where it has been
shown to decrease perinatal mortality and morbidity [2]. Induction
of labour is not without risks and carries an increased prevalence of
* Corresponding author.
E-mail
addresses:
(S. Gregson).
segregson@btinternet.com,
sarah.gregson@nhs.net
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2015.07.003
1744-3881/Crown Copyright 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
258
259
groups, using the unpaired t-test if found to follow a normal distribution, and using the ManneWhitney test if not found to be
normally distributed.
All tests were 2-tailed and a signicance level of p < 0.05 was
accepted as statistically signicant. Ninety-ve percent condence
intervals (2-tailed) have been presented alongside summary measures (mean and percentage difference, medians) throughout.
3. Results
131 women were recruited of whom 70 received acupressure
and 60 received sham treatment. One participant went in to labour
before treatment was given, and was therefore excluded from the
analysis. Two women required a Caesarean section prior to labour
(either spontaneous or induced), however these were included in
the analysis as intention to treat.
Maternal demographic details were compared across experimental and control groups (Table 1). There were no signicant
differences except for a slight increase in BMI in the sham treatment group and a slightly lower Bishop's score prior to induction of
labour in the acupuncture group.
The results suggest there was no signicant difference in time
interval between treatment and start of labour (primary outcome)
Table 2.
Requirement for induction of labour was more common in the
acupressure group, with 14 more women having labour induced
than in the control group. The acupressure group also had a trend
towards requiring more use of oxytocin to augment labour,
although this result was not statistically signicant. No differences
between the groups were observed for mode of delivery, presence
of meconium or neonatal Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min. There were
no admissions to the Neonatal Unit in either group (Table 3).
Women found acupressure more uncomfortable than sham
treatment, although there was very little difference in the size of
the scores. It would appear that most women were motivated to
continue treatment whilst at home, with only 11% reporting that
they were too busy to do this (Table 4).
4. Discussion
This purpose of this study was to investigate the efcacy of
acupressure for reducing the need for induction of labour for
nulliparous women with a post-dates pregnancy. It was hypothesised that if effective, acupressure would be likely to be very
acceptable for women as a simple, non-invasive therapy with no
apparent side effects and also very cost effective for maternity
services to implement as 'routine' management for women with a
post-dates pregnancy. Unfortunately in this study, results did not
nd any evidence to support the use of acupressure for inducing
labour e and disappointingly found that sham treatment
Table 1
Maternal demographic details at onset of treatment.
Acupressure Sham treatment P Value
Age in years (16e40) Mean (SD)
28.6 (4.9)
27.9 (5.9)
Gestation in days (from EDD) (286e289) 287.2 (0.5) 287.1 (0.5)
BMI (18e37)
23.8 (3.7)
25.2 (3.7)
Birth weight of baby (gm) (2480e5230) 3737 (404) 3664 (480)
Bishop score at induction
3.4 (2.2)
4.3 (2.3)
Ethnicity
White
60 (86%)
53 (88%)
Black, Asian or Chinese
10 (14%)
7 (12%)
0.44
0.37
0.03
0.35
0.02
0.80
Values are given as a mean with standard deviation in brackets unless otherwise
indicated.
2 tailed t test used for all data except for Ethnicity (Fisher's Exact Test).
260
Table 2
Comparison of treatment-start of labour.
Median
SE
95% CI
Acupressure
Sham
P Value
103
(46.151)
17 (7.42)
72
(38, 110)
0
0.19
The results suggested that that there was no statistically signicant difference in the
time interval between delivering treatment between the two groups.
Table 3
Secondary outcomes: labour and neonatal outcomes.
Acupressure
Sham
P Value [1]
Percent diff.
Lower
Upper
28 (41%)
38 (54%)
22 (31%)
14 (24%)
23 (38%)
13 (22%)
0.04
0.07
0.21
17%
16%
10%
1%
1%
5%
33%
33%
25%
30
17
23
9
10
28
13
19
9
9
0.90
0
0
0
0
0
0
(43%)
(24%)
(33%)
(8, 9)
(9, 10)
(47%)
(22%)
(32%)
(8, 9)
(9, 10)
0.37
0.15
Analysis omitting one patient in sham group and one patient in acupressure group who required pre labour caesarean section.
Table 4
Women's experience of treatment.
Difference (95%CI)
P Value
4
2
3
49/52
3.3
6
4
1
4
40/51
3.1
6
0
1
0
16%
0.3
0
0.03
<0.001
0.40
0.02
0.22
0.67
(4.6)
(2.3)
(2.5)
(94%)
(1.1)
(5.7)
(4.6)
(1.2)
(2.6)
(78%)
(1.1)
(2.7)
(0.1)
(1.1)
(0.1)
(35, 29%)
(0.2,0.8)
(0.1)
5. Conclusion
In this study, stimulation of acupuncture points Large Intestine 4
and Spleen 6 to induce labour for nulliparous women with a postdates pregnancy does not appear to be effective. More research is
required to investigate whether other treatment regimens, adding
additional acupressure point stimulation or replacing acupressure
with acupuncture would be more likely to work.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the midwives working at
Maidstone Birth Centre and other staff at Maidstone and Tunbridge
Wells NHS Trust for their help and support with this research
project.
References
[1] National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Induction of Labour,
section 4.1, RCOG Press, 2008.
[2] M. Luckas, W. Buckett, Z. Alrevic, Comparison of outcomes in uncomplicated
term and post-term pregnancy following spontaneous labour, J. Perinat. Med.
26/6 (1998) 475e479.
[3] Cuervo LG. Induction of Labour for Improving Birth Outcomes for Women at
or beyond term: RHL Commentary (last revised: 28 December 2006). The
WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization.
[4] A. Chitty, Complementary Therapies in Pregnancy: Review of Evidence New
Digest, vol. 46, National Childbirth Trust, 2009.
[5] Smith C, Collins C, Crowther C, Levett K Acupuncture or acupressure for pain
management in labour Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. http://dx.doi.org/10.
1002/14651858, CD009232.
[6] K. Levett, C. Smith, H. Dahlen, A. Bensoussan, Acupuncture and acupressure for
pain management in labour and birth: A critical narrative of current systematic review evidence, Complement. Ther. Med. 22 (2014) 523e540 available online at: www.elsevierhealth.com.journals/ctim.
[7] C.A. Smith, C.A. Crowther, S.J. Grant, Acupuncture for induction of labour,
Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 8 (2013). CD002962.
[8] J.L. Tenore, Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor, Am. Fam.
Physician 67 (10) (2003) 2123e2128, 15.
[9] L. Summers, Methods of cervical ripening and labor induction, J. Nurse
Midwifery 42 (2) (1997) 71e85.
[10] E. Kubista, H. Kucera, E. Mller-Tyl, Initiating contractions of the gravid uterus
through electro-acupuncture, Am. J. Chin. Med. (Gard City N Y) 3 (4) (1975)
343e346.
[11] S.K. Yip, J.C. Pang, M.L. Sung, Induction of labor by acupuncture electrostimulation, Am. J. Chin. Med. (Gard City N Y) 4 (3) (1976) 257e265.
[12] J.J. Tsuei, Y. Lai, S.D. Sharma, The inuence of acupuncture stimulation during
pregnancy: the induction and inhibition of labor, Obstet. Gynecol. 50 (4)
(1977) 479e488.
[13] G.N. Asher, R.R. Coeytaux, W. Chen, Acupuncture to initiate labor (Acumoms
2): a randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial, J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med.
22 (10) (2009) 843e848.
[14] T.C. Harper, R.R. Coeytaux, W. Chen, et al., A randomized controlled trial of
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
261