Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Mechanical Design and Production Department, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt
Received 1 January 2011; revised 18 April 2011; accepted 5 May 2011
Available online 6 August 2011
KEYWORDS
Functional graded plates;
Laminated composite plates;
First order shear deformation model;
Elastostatic nite element
analysis
Abstract In the present paper, the rst-order shear deformation plate (FSDT) model is exploited
to investigate the mechanical behavior of laminated composite and functional graded plates. Three
approaches are developed to transform the laminated composite plate, with stepped material properties, to an equivalent functionally graded (FG) plate with a continuous property function across
the plate thickness. Such transformations are used to determine the details of a functional graded
plate equivalent to the original laminated one. In addition it may provide an easy and efcient way
to investigate the behavior of multilayer composite plates, with direct and less computational
efforts. A comparative study has been developed to compare the effectiveness of the three proposed
transformation procedures.
2011 Ain Shams University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.
All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Composite materials are those formed by combining two or
more materials on a macroscopic scale such that they have bet* Corresponding author. Tel.: +20 012 2232469.
E-mail address: ShaatScience@yahoo.com (M. Shaat).
2090-4479 2011 Ain Shams University. Production and hosting by
Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Peer review under responsibility of Ain Shams University.
doi:10.1016/j.asej.2011.05.003
54
are mainly constructed to operate in high temperature
environments.
In conventional laminated composite structures, homogeneous elastic lamina are bonded together to obtain enhanced
mechanical and thermal properties. The main inconvenience
of such an assembly is to create stress concentrations along
the interfaces and more specically when high temperatures
are involved. This can lead to delaminations, matrix cracks,
and other damage mechanisms which result from the abrupt
change of the mechanical properties at the interface between
the layers. One way to overcome this problem is to use functionally graded materials within which material properties vary
continuously. The concept of functionally graded material
(FGM) was proposed in 1984 by the material scientists in Japan [2]. The FGM is a composite material whose composition
varies according to the required performance. It can be produced with a continuously graded variation of the volume fractions of the constituents, which leads to a continuity of the
material properties of FGM which is the main difference between such a material and the usual composite one. FGMs
are usually made of a mixture of ceramic and metals.
The ceramic constituent of the material provides a high
temperature resistance due to its low thermal conductivity,
while the ductile metal constituent, on the other hand, prevents
the fracture caused by thermal stress due to high temperature
gradient in a very short period of time.
The composite plates are studied widely in the literature (a
review of the plate theories can be found in Ghugal and Shimpi
[3], and Reddy [1]). Plate models for the functionally graded
materials have been developed analytically and numerically.
Various approaches have been developed to establish the
appropriate analysis of the functionally graded (FG) plates.
An analytical model, based on the classical plate theory
(CPT) of LoveKirchhoff has been developed by Chi and
Chung [4,5] for the FGM plates. They developed the analytical
solution for simply supported FG plates subjected to mechanical loads. In practice, this model is not valid for thick plates
where there is a comparability for shear deformation energy.
Several authors suggested computational models that take into
account the transversal shear effect, by using the rst-order
shear deformation theory (FSDT) [6,7] and higher-order shear
deformation theories [8,1]. Praveen and Reddy [9] examined
the nonlinear static and dynamic responses of functionally
graded ceramicmetal plates using the rst-order shear deformation theory (FSDT) and the von Karman strain. Zenkour
[10] presented the analysis of FG sandwich plates for the
deection, stresses, buckling and free vibration in [11,12].
The rst-order shear deformation plate models for the
investigation of the behavior of structures made of functionally graded materials are proposed by Nguyen, et al. [13].
The identication of transverse shear factors is investigated
through these models by energy equivalence. The static
analysis of functionally graded, anisotropic and linear magnetoelectroelastic plates which has been carried out by
semi-analytical nite element method is proposed by Rajesh
et al. [14]. The nite element model is derived based on
constitutive equation of piezomagnetic material accounting
for coupling between elasticity, electric and magnetic effect.
Reddy et al. [15] studied the axisymmetric bending and
stretching of FG solid and annular circular plates using the
FSDT. The solutions for deections, force and moment resultants were presented in terms of the corresponding quantities
2:1
where u0 ; m0 ; x0 ; ;x ; ;y are unknown functions to be determined, t denotes the time and u0 ; m0 ; x0 denotes the displace ;x and @m
;y
ments of the mid plane (z = 0). Note that @u
@z
@z
A rst-order shear deformation nite element model for elastostatic analysis of laminated composite plates
cxz x; y; z
cyz x; y; z
1 0
0 1
" @x
0 x;y
@x
@x0 x;y
@y
;x x; y
55
#
;y x; y
orfes g Zs fe0s g
fe0b g
2:6
fe0s g
where
is the nodal bending strain and
is the nodal
shear strain. The nodal strain components are determined in
coming sections. Substitute Eq. (2.5) and Eq. (2.6) into Eq.
(2.3), we can obtain:
ZZZ
S:E
fe0b gT zb T Db T zb fe0b g
fe0s gT zs T Ds T zs fe0s gdxdydz
2:7
where the material matrix can be determined from the integration over the material thickness
Z h2
DEEb
zb T Db T zb dz
2:8
h2
cxy
@y
@x
@y
@x
@x0
;x
cxz
@x
@x0
;y
cyz
@y
exx
2:4
So, the strain components can divided into feb g bending strain,
and fes g shear strain components.
3
2
@u0 x;y
orfeb g Zb fe0b g
Bij
h2
h
2
zQij zdz
h2
Dij
h
2
z2 Qij zdz
h2
8
9 2
1
>
< exx x; y; z >
=
6
eyy x; y; z 4 0
>
>
:
;
cxy x; y; z
0
0 0 z 0
1 0 0 z
0 1 0 0
@x
7
6
@m0 x;y
7
6
7
6
@y
36
7
0 6 @u0 x;y @m0 x;y 7
7
6
@y
@x
7
7
0 56
7
6
@;x x;y
7
6
@x
z 6
7
@;y x;y
7
6
7
6
@y
5
4
@;y x;y
@;x x;y
@y
@x
2:5
where Aij is the extensional stiffness components, Bij is bending-extensional coupling stiffness components, and Dij is bending stiffness components.
Z h2
zs T Ds T zs dz
2:9
andDEEs
h2
2:10
2:11
Note that Qij z is the equivalent material property components as a function of the material thickness direction z. Where
in FG plate, its material properties vary smoothly and continuously over the thickness of the structure.
2.2. Finite element model
The displacements and normal rotations at any point into a nite element e may be expressed in terms of the n nodes of the
element:
56
8
9
2 e
u0 x; y >
wi
>
>
>
>
>
> m0 x; y >
>
6 0
>
<
= X
n 6
6
x0 x; y
6 0
>
>
6
>
>
i1 4
>
>
;
x;
y
0
>
>
x
>
>
:
;
;y x; y
0
0
wei
0
0
0
0
0
wei
0
0
0
0
0
wei
0
38 ue 9
0 >
0 >
>
>
>
>
>
e >
>
>
m
0 7
>
=
7< 0 >
7 we
0 7
0
7>
> ;e >
>
>
0 5>
>
> x0 >
>
>
>
e : e ;
;y0
wi
2:12
orfrb g Db feb g
wei
n1
g
1
n
1
g
>
>
6>
>
7
6
> >
>
>
7
6
2
2
2
>
>
w7 >
21 n 1 g 1 n 1 g
>
7
6
>
>
>
>
7
6
>w >
>
2
2
2
>
5
4
21
n1
g
1
n
1
g
>
>
8
>
: >
;
2
2
w9
41 n 1 g
2:13
The nodal bending strain can be written as follow
2 e
3
8
9
@wi
@u0 x;y
>
>
0 0
0
0
>
>
@x
@x
>
>
6
78 e 9
>
>
>
>
@ve0 x;y
6 0 @wei 0
>
>
u0 >
>
>
0
0 7
6
7>
>
>
>
>
@y
@y
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
6
7
e >
>
>
>
>
e
e
e x;y >
v
@v
@w
@w
>
>
>
6
7
0
@u
x;y
i
i
0
n 6
<
< 0
=
= X
0
0
0
7
@y
@x
e
@y
@x
6
7
x
0
e
6
7
@w
@;
x;y
x
>
>
> ;e >
>
>
>
0 0 @xi
0 7>
i1 6 0
>
>
@x
> x0 >
>
>
>
6
7>
>
>
>
e 7>
>
>
>
>
6
@w
@;
x;y
y
>
>
>
>
0 0
0
@yi 7: ;ey ;
6 0
>
>
@y
>
>
0
4
5
>
>
>
@we
@we
: @;x x;y @;y x;y >
;
0
0 0 i i
@y
@x
n
X
Bb fu0 g
orfe0b g
@y
@x
2:14
i1
;
x;
y
0
0
w
0
x
i
@x
@x
e
4
5
x
e
0
@x0 x;y
@w
>
;y x; y
0
wei >
0 0 @yi
>
i1
@y
> ;ex >
>
>
> 0>
>
>
: e >
;
;y0
n
X
Bs fu0 g
2:15
orfe0s g
2:19
rxz
cxz
Q45 z Q55 z
orfrg Ds fes g
2:20
Q11 z Q22 z;
i1
Where [Bs] is the shear strain-displacement matrix. So, the element stiffness matrices and load vector may be written as
follows:
Z
Keb Bb T DEEb Bb dA
2:16
A
Kes
2:17
wei T fqgdA
2:18
ffe g
Z
A
where {q} is the applied force vector.So Eq. (2.14) and (2.15),
into Eq. (2.5) and (2.6) the bending and shear strain vectors
can be obtained by substitution of.
A rst-order shear deformation nite element model for elastostatic analysis of laminated composite plates
thermal properties include the coefcient of thermal expansion
a, the thermal conductivity k, and the specic heat capacity C.
q and t are usually linear functions of material volume ratios,
but others are nonlinear functions of material volume ratios
because they depend on material microstructures [19]. The
FG plate theory presented here can work with effective material properties estimated by using any method. For state of
simplicity, the effective property P will be estimated using
the simple, Voigt arithmetic method as:
P P1 V1 P2 V2 ;
57
constituents with the volume fraction of the composite material constituents. This approach provides an FG plate of the
same constituents of the composite plate, and of the same volume fraction of constituent materials.
To compare between the three approaches, numerical simulations are performed to this aim, these simulations are discussed in the coming section.
5. Numerical result
V1 V2 1
where P1 and P2 are the properties of the rst and second constituent materials (metal and ceramic), and V1 and V2 are the
volume fractions of the constituent materials. The distributions of volume fractions through the plate thickness are assumed to follow the following simple power law:
n
z zi
V2
zi1 zi
where n can be any non-negative real number and
zi+1 P z P zi. Note that the plate thickness h = zi+1zi,
hence we have the effective material property is given by
z zi
P P1 P2 P1
3:1
zi1 zi
For detailed modeling of effective material properties of
FGMs the reader has to refer to Refs. [1921].
4. Proposed transformation procedures of a laminated composite
plate to an equivalent single-layer FG plate
Many approaches are used to transform a laminated plate,
having stepped material properties across the plate thickness,
to an equivalent FG plate with continuous material property
function across the thickness. A comparative study is developed to check the effectiveness of the different procedure
according to the consistency between the behavior of the original laminated plate and those of the equivalent FG plates.
The rst approach is a curve tting approach which is used
to obtain an equivalent function of the FG material property,
consistent with the distribution of the composite material
property across the plate thickness. This approach provides
an FG plate of constituents having nearly the same properties
of the original laminated plate. The effective material property
of the equivalent FG plate can be obtained by equating the total area under the stepped distribution curve of laminated
composite materials properties and the area of the continuous
curve concerning the material property function of the equivalent FG plate.
The second approach is the effective material property approach. In this approach, the FG material property varies
through the plate thickness with the power law given in Eq.
(3.1), and the value of n is calculated by equating the effective
material property of the FG material with the effective material property of the composite material. This approach provides an FG plate of the same constituents of the composite
plate, and of the same effective material property.
The third approach is the volume fraction approach. In it
the FG material property varies through the plate thickness
with the power law given in Eq. (3.1), and the value of n is calculated by equating the volume fractions of the FG material
In this section we present several numerical simulations, in order to assess the behavior of functionally graded plates subjected to mechanical loads. To this aim we will consider a
simple supported plate. The plate is made by a ceramic material at the top, a metallic at the bottom and law Eq. (3.1), with
n = 0, 0.5, 1, 2 is used for the through-the-thickness variation.
5.1. Verication of the Proposed Model
The analysis of the FGMs plates is performed for a combination of materials of type ceramic-metal. The lower plate surface is assumed to be aluminum while the top surface is
assumed to be zirconia. Material properties vary with the
power law and the values n = 0, 0.5, 1, 2 are considered. Physical material properties are given in Table 1 [22]. A simply supported square plate is considered of side a = 0.2 m and
thickness h = 0.01 m. The plate is subjected to a uniformly distributed mechanical normal load on the top surface (See Fig.
3)
To determine the elastic-static response of FG plates with
material constituents (aluminum and zirconia), several simulations are performed for different values of the grading parameter n. The following non-dimensional parameters are
introduced for use within the numerical simulations to be
Table 1
Material properties.
Property
Aluminum
Zirconia
Youngs modulus
Poissons ratio
EL = 70 GPa
tL = 0.3
EU = 151 GPa
tU = 0.3
Figure 3
58
0.0015
x=h
Central deflection x
0.0005
5:1
0.001
Strain xx
a4 q
Load parameter P
Eb h4
Thickness h h=a
n = 0.5
n=1
n=2
ceramic
metal
-0.0005
-0.001
-0.0015
-0.5
0.5
z/h
Figure 5
2
4
6
8
10
12
for
(w)
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Ceramic
n = 0.5
n=1
n =2
Metal
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
Ceramic
n = 0.5
n=1
n=2
Metal
-0.4
0.04
0.08
0.13
0.17
0.21
0.25
0.06
0.13
0.19
0.25
0.32
0.38
0.06
0.11
0.17
0.23
0.29
0.34
0.05
0.11
0.16
0.21
0.27
0.32
0.09
0.18
0.27
0.36
0.45
0.54
-0.5
-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1
0
z/h
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Non-Dimensional Center
Deflection (w/h)
A rst-order shear deformation nite element model for elastostatic analysis of laminated composite plates
E1/E2 = 1
E1/E2= 2
E1/E2 = 10
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
2
4
6
Aspect ratio a/b
10
E1/E2 = 2
E1/E2 = 10
1
2
4
6
8
10
0.13295
0.33015
0.41615
0.42645
0.4330
0.4368
0.1662
0.41265
0.52015
0.533
0.54125
0.546
0.2077
0.51575
0.6502
0.66625
0.6765
0.68245
59
60
Figure 8 Material youngs modulus distribution along the plate thickness for (a) Multilayer composite plate (State 1). (b) FGM, Curve
tting approach (State 2). (c) FGM, Effective material property approach n = 0.6 (State 3). (d) FGM, Volume fraction approach n = 2.2
(State 4).
analysis provides higher performance than multilayer composite analysis. The single-layer FG analysis reduces the number
of the numerical operations required to form the overall material matrix, this leads to reduction in computational effort and
analysis time. For the previous simulation example the save in
the analysis time is nearly 65.625%, while this value could be
increased for increased number of layers for laminate composite plate.
6. Conclusion
A rst-order shear deformation nite element model for elastostatic analysis of laminated composite plates
1.5
0.45
Non-dimensional deflection
0.4
0.35
0.3
State 1
State 2
State3
State4
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
2
6
8
Load Parameter P
10
State 1
State 2
State3
State4
1
0.5
0
-0.5
-1
-1.5
12
61
-1
-0.75
-0.5
-0.25
0.25
0.5
0.75
Thickness direction z
2
4
6
8
10
12
w=h
w
State 1
State 2
State 3
State 4
0.05405
0.1081
0.16215
0.2162
0.27025
0.3243
0.0673
0.1346
0.2019
0.2692
0.3365
0.4038
0.06155
0.12305
0.1846
0.24615
0.30765
0.3692
0.05295
0.10585
0.1588
0.21175
0.26465
0.3176
1
0.75
0.5
0.25
00
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
State 2
State 3
State 4
1.2583
0.9437
0.62917
0.31458
00
0.31458
0.62917
0.9437
1.2583
0.39942
0.138994
0.092766
0.0861517
00
0.06969
0.059835
0.138938
0.39926
0.3655
0.23189
0.14008
0.064164
00
0.0544
0.10026
0.1384
0.16943
0.31476
0.23477
0.153384
0.073813
00
0.063682
0.11255
0.14167
0.1459188
0.0008
0.0004
Axial Strain
State 1
State 2
State 3
State 4
0.0006
0.0002
0
-0.0002
References
-0.0004
-0.0006
-0.0008
-1
Figure 10
Thickness direction z
62
[8] Reddy JN. Theory and analysis of elastic plates. Philadelphia:
Taylor Francis; 1999.
[9] Praveen GN, Reddy JN. Nonlinear transient thermoelastic
analysis of functionally graded ceramicmetal plates. Int J Solids
Struct 1998;35:445776.
[10] Zenkour AM. Generalized shear deformation theory for bending
analysis of functionally graded materials. Appl Math Modell
2006;30:6784.
[11] Zenkour AM. A comprehensive analysis of functionally graded
sandwich plates: Part 1 Deection and stresses. Int J Solids
Struct 2005;42:522442.
[12] Zenkour AM. A comprehensive analysis of functionally graded
sandwich plates: Part 2 - Buckling and free vibration. Int J Solids
Struct 2005;42:524358.
[13] Trung-Kien a Nguyen, Karam a Sab, Guy b Bonnet. First-order
shear deformation plate models for functionally graded materials.
Compos Struct 2008;83:2536.
[14] Rajesh K, Bhangale L, Ganesan N. Static analysis of simply
supported functionally graded and layered magneto-electro-elastic
plates. Int J Solids Struct 2006;43:323053.
[15] Reddy JN, Wang CM, Kitipornchai S. Axisymmetric bending of
functionally graded circular and annular plate. Eur. J. Mech. A/
Solids 1999;18:18599.
[16] Lanhe W. Thermal buckling of a simply supported moderately
thick rectangular FGM plate. Compos. Struct. 2004;64:2118.
[17] Bayat a,b M, Sahari a,b BB, Saleem c M, Ali a Aidy, Wong a SV.
Bending analysis of a functionally graded rotating disk based on
the rst order shear deformation theory. Appl Math Modell
2009;33:421530.
[18] Frank Pai P, Palazotto Anthony N. Two-dimensional sublamination theory for analysis of functionally graded plates. J. Sound
Vib. 2007;308:16489.
[19] Aboudi J. Mechanics of Composite Materials A Unied
Micromechanical Approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1991.
[20] Suresh S, Mortensen A. Fundamentals of Functionally Graded
Materials. The Institute of Materials. London: IOM Communications Ltd.; 1998.
[21] Muliana Anastasia H. A micromechanical model for predicting
thermal properties and thermo-viscoelastic responses of functionally graded materials. Int J Solids Struct 2009;46:191124.
[22] Croce Lucia Della, Venini Paolo. Finite elements for functionally
graded ReissnerMindlin plates. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech.
Eng. 2004;193:70525.
[23] Han Sung-Cheon, Lee Won-Hong, Park Weon-Tae. Non-linear
analysis of laminated composite and sigmoid functionally graded