Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Deployment Analysis
Location: West Horseshoe Canyon (Zone 27), San Diego, California – 0.82 Miles of
Remote Area
Key Issues/Constraints:
• West Horseshoe Canyon is in remote east San Diego County, located
approximately ½ mile east of the Gun Sites area and approximately 4 miles east
of the Tecate Port of Entry and approximately 2.5 miles southeast of Potrero, CA.
• Immediately north of the international boundary, the terrain is comprised of deep
ravines and mountains. (b) (7)(E)
• The border road along this stretch of the international boundary curves northward
away from the border. It extends more than ¼ mile north of the boundary,
preventing agents on the border road from seeing entries as they occur. Illegal
entrants travel north, using the surrounding ravines as cover. Sensors are
effective in this area, but due to the distance between the border road and the
international boundary, agents are required to hike down these steep ravines and
mountainsides in order to intercept and apprehend illegal crossers.
• There is one secondary east/west road between the border road and State Route
94, located less than 100 yards north of the border road. Once entrants reach the
border road, it is a short climb to reach the secondary road. Once north of the
secondary road, the groups can continue north through the mountains until
reaching State Route 94 in the area of Harris Ranch Road.
(b) (7)(E)
• The area immediately south of Horseshoe Canyon is a rural area of Tecate, Baja
California, Mexico. The town of Tecate supports a population of nearly 100,000.
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
The lack of access during inclement weather, the high-point advantage on the south side
that allows guides to conduct counter surveillance operations, and (b) (7)(E)
Analysis of Alternatives:
• Baseline – Current resource deployments in Zone 27 surrounding the West
Horseshoe Canyon (b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
o The Sector Chief anticipates that the deployment of MSS combined the
current deployment baseline will facilitate increased detection and
identification but will not meet classification or response requirements that
the pedestrian fence alternative provides.
• Border Patrol Agents – Border Patrol Agents are capable of detecting entries,
identifying and classifying the threat, and responding to intrusions, but can be
inundated by the number of illegal entrants (on foot) they encounter. However,
these capabilities are hindered by the West Horseshoe Canyon terrain
environment and time and distance advantage to the target area held by the drug
and alien smuggling organizations. Current deployment requires the use of air
assets and increased mobile patrols which drains manpower as well as budgetary
resources and is not sustainable over a long period of time.
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
o The Sector Chief anticipates that the deployment of the additional 116
total agents combined with the current baseline deployment will enhance
detection, identification, classification and response requirements, but is
• Vehicle Fence – Vehicle fence will provide persistent impedance for drive-
through traffic, but the majority of activity entering through this area is pedestrian
traffic. As a result, vehicle fence will not answer the time and distance
requirements for the volume of pedestrian traffic seen in this area.
o Estimated cost to construct vehicle fence is $2.2 million per mile, not
including necessary road and drainage structures.
o Total cost for the West Horseshoe project section of vehicle fence would
be $2,345,200 (includes costs for three years of maintenance).
o The Sector Chief Patrol Agent anticipates that the deployment of the
vehicle fence combined with the current deployment baseline will not
enhance detection, identification, classification and response requirements.
• Best Technology Combination – An analysis of technology components was
conducted to determine what complement of technology would be most cost
effective. Based on the analysis conducted by field commanders and the sector
chief, the most cost effective combination of technology mix for the A-2D
• The fiscal cost of such a deployment over three years is estimated at $52,200,000.
(b) (7)(E)
• The installation of technology, as a stand alone alternative, would not provide the
required level of deterrence or enhance agent time-distance response.
Recommended Solution:
• Deploy pedestrian fencing to deter and to significantly slow those who are not fit
enough to negotiate the fence. Fencing will deflect a large number of humans
physically unable to scale an 18’ high PV-1 bollard design fence from crossing
the border.
• Build access roads to facilitate fence construction and upgrade to all-weather for
maintenance activities.
• Deploy a sensor system on or in the area of the fence to alert agents when a
person is attempting entry or is tampering with infrastructure.
• Deploy cameras providing overlapping view sheds of the fence and brush clearing
when necessary to provide enhanced surveillance and compliment detection
capabilities.
• Deploy visual deterrence systems (lights that may be activated by camera
operators) for nighttime deterrence.
• Deploy agents in a mobile capacity, patrolling the fence and responding when the
technology systems detect an illegal entry.
Projected Results:
• Fewer illegal entries will occur resulting in a lesser agent and alien presence in
West Horseshoe Canyon. This ultimately will minimize exposure to the dangers
associated with terrain and subsequent environmental impacts.
• The tolerance to depth of intrusion will be maintained to the immediate border
area. The added tactical infrastructure will afford agents the ability to confront,
intercept and deter illegal entrants before entering into a more hazardous
environment.