From: (b) (6)

To: Jeffrey.Self(b) (6)

Subject: Fw: Grazing license
Date: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 3:06:32 PM

(b)
(6)
I know you are traveling but have you had a chance to review this? Also who will be taking your place
as the "go to" for SBInet? Thanks.
(b)
(6)
----- Original Message -----
From: (b) (6)
To: SELF, JEFFREY D
Cc: (b) (6)
Sent: Mon Jun 11 17:38:31 2007
Subject: FW: Grazing license

Sir,

(b) (5)

(b) (6)

________________________________

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Mon 6/11/2007 5:20 PM
To: (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6)
Subject: Grazing license

(b)
(6)
(b) (5)

Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions.

Thanks,
(b) (6)
(b) (2)

Office of Assistant Chief Counsel

U.S. Customs and Border Protection
6650 Telecom Drive, Suite 100
Indianapolis, IN 46278
(b) (6)

THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT AND/OR ATTORNEY/CLIENT

COMMUNICATIONS AND, AS SUCH, IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IT IS
INTENDED ONLY FOR THE CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT AND ANY
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION (CBP) OFFICIALS WHO HAVE AN OFFICIAL
"NEED TO KNOW." ABSENT THE EXPRESS PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ASSISTANT CHIEF
COUNSEL (INDIANAPOLIS), IT IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RELEASE, DISCLOSURE, OR USE
BY ANYONE WITHIN OR OUTSIDE OF CBP OTHER THAN THE AFOREMENTIONED OFFICIALS.
From: (b) (6)
To: (b) (6)
Subject: FW: Latest pf 225 list
Date: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 1:18:22 PM

-----Original Message-----
From: (b) (6) l]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 10:51 AM
To: (b) (6)
Subject: FW: Latest pf 225 list

Our latest version, you should have this already.

-----Original Message-----
From: (b) (6)
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 8:59 AM
To: (b) (6)
Subject: RE: Latest pf 225 list

Talked with him this morning. He is due to receive an updated version from
(b) (6) this a.m. I will forward him our latest version as well.

(b)
(6)
-----Original Message-----
From: (b) (6)
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 8:35 AM
To: (b) (6)
Subject: Latest pf 225 list

I got a voice mail late last night from (b) (6) He wants to ensure he
has the latest update - he had heard about possibly a new version with more
miles in laredo an was concerned about that.

Please email him latest version.

From: (b) (6)
To: Jeffrey.Self(b) (6)
Subject: Fw: Names for MATOC contracts
Date: Monday, June 04, 2007 11:09:07 AM

Jeff,
This request from SBInet is short turn around. They are looking for a PF225 "expert" to go to Tulsa to
aid in the "contractor selection". Nobody on either side knows who "that person" is. Any ideas? I know
you miss me already. I can feel your anger "a disturbance in the force".
(b)
(6)
----- Original Message -----
From: (b) (6)
To: (b) (6)
Cc: Self, Jeffrey D (b) (6)

Sent: Mon Jun 04 10:49:40 2007

Subject: RE: Names for MATOC contracts

(b)
(6)

I just spoke with(b) (6) on this and the expertise they are looking for has to do with knowledge of
PF225. What they will be doing in Tulsa is reviewing the contractor’s proposals to be added as MATOCs
for the ACOE. That means the Corps will have a list of pre-approved contractors to choose from that
will bid on the PF225 projects. We don’t have anyone that is has in-depth knowledge of PF225 and
apparently this request has been sitting on someone’s desk, not (b) (6) and the Corp has asked him to
follow-up since no response has come from any other SBI folks.

Thanks,

(b) (6)

Acting Associate Chief

Office of Border Patrol / Headquarters

Facilities & Tactical Infrastructure Branch

(b) (6)

________________________________

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 9:47 AM
To: (b) (6)
Cc: Self, Jeffrey D; (b) (6)
Subject: Fw: Names for MATOC contracts

(b)
(6)
Is this request from SBInet for "an expert" in your realm? I guess there is a very short turnaround.
Please advise.
(b)
(6)
----- Original Message -----
From: (b) (6)
To: (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6)
Sent: Mon Jun 04 09:41:59 2007
Subject: FW: Names for MATOC contracts

Good morning,

Don’t know if you have been briefed on this request yet, but there is an extremely short turn-a-round
for POC submissions on this. The bid packages for the PF22’s RFP MATOCs will be reviewed the week
of June 18th. In discussion at the PMT, we believed a representative from Contracting, Asset
Management, and OBP would provide the expertise required for governmental (client) input and
oversight of the process. We would like for you to identify an individual who could travel to Tulsa for
this weeks meetings (18 – 22). Also, this individual would need to be available for a back-brief on June
29 and July 23. This brief will identify to the PMT those companies that were chosen and the reasons
for those choices.

Please let me know if this request is amenable to you and I apologize for the short turn-a-round as
these names need to be submitted within by 11:00 am today.

Thank you,

(b) (6)

Branch Chief, Infrastructure

SBInet, Program Management Office

(b) (6)

Warning: This document is FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY. It contains information that may be exempt from
public release under the Freedom of Information Act (5U.S.C. 552). This document is to be controlled,
handled, transmitted, distributed, and disposed of in accordance with DHS policy relating to Sensitive
But Unclassified (SBU) information and is not to be released to the public or other personnel who do not
have a valid "need-to-know" without prior approval from the originator. If you are not the intended
recipient , please contact the originator for disposition instructions.

________________________________

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 8:36 AM
To: (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6)
Subject: RE: Names for MATOC contracts

Sorry, BB battery down over the weekend.

Initial reveiw of proposals: 18 -22 June

First briefing, after determining competitive range - approximately 29 June

Final briefing prior to award of base contracts - week of 23 July.

All work will be in Tulsa OK.

This is for the first half of the proposals. (we are phasing 6 or 7 contracts in first phast and 8 or 9 in
second phase)

(b) (6)
Chief, Tactical Infrastructure Branch
ECSO
(b) (6)

________________________________

From: (b) (6) ]

Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 4:19 PM
To: (b) (6)
Subject: Re: Names for MATOC contracts

Give me the dates and location real quick.

----- Original Message -----

From: (b) (6)
To: (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6)

Sent: Fri Jun 01 16:51:16 2007

Subject: Names for MATOC contracts
(b) - we REALLY needed to have the other 2 names for the source selection TODAY (we have the
CBP rep from (b) (6)
(6) - still need the OBP and Contracting rep).

We also need the names of ALL participants planning to attend the 2 briefings. We needed these
names TODAY as well.

I have discussed with (b) (6) we can accept names thru 1000 hrs next Monday the 4th, but if beyond
this we can not incorporate into our process. PLEASE HELP get the names.

Sorry for the push, but we have run out of time.

(b) (6) ooks

Chief, Tactical Infrastructure Branch
ECSO
(b) (6)
From: SELF, JEFFREY (
To: AGUILAR, DAVID (
Cc: (b) (6) ; COLBURN, RONALD (
Subject: FW: Meeting Minutes
Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:30:12 PM

Chief,

As you'll see we conveyed our concerns and are working with SBInet and the Sectors to address
them. SBInet's concerns are that it be deployed on time and within funding limits. What this is
translating into is that several miles have been identified as being deployed in areas such as SRV
(Sonoita) and several miles along the Colorado River in Yuma, located a half mile to a mile off the
border. This is old news but just wanted to keep you updated.

Jeff

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:44 AM
To: (b) (6)
ADAMS, ROWDY D; (b) (6) SELF, JEFFREY D; (b) (6)

Subject: Meeting Minutes

Please see the attached draft meeting minutes from yesterday’s PF225 SRR. If you have any additions,
feel free to contact me. Also, feel free to send these to others who were there but not on the original
invite list sent out on behalf of (b) (6) thanks!

(b) (6)

___________________________________________
(b) (6)
SETA Support for SBInet PMO
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(b) (6)
From: (b) (6)
To: (b) (6)
Subject: FW: Meetings with Local GOV re: Fencing
Date: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 12:09:20 PM

Here is DRT’s response. No wonder it took so long.

From:(
Sent: bTuesday, May 01, 2007 12:08 PM
To: (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6) VITIELLO, RONALD D
Subject: Fw: Meetings with Local GOV re: Fencing

FYI

----- Original Message -----

From: (b) (6)
To: (b) (6)

Cc: (b) (6)

Sent: Tue May 01 12:08:04 2007
Subject: FW: Meetings with Local GOV re: Fencing

As requested.

_____

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 10:58 AM
To (b) (6)
Subject: RE: Meetings with Local GOV re: Fencing

Chief,

Realize this may be a bit confusing but, the only fencing discussions we have had with any Govt. or private entity
has been to discuss our Projects that were established or determined prior to HR 4437. These include the EGT
Project which is a PDT project that has been ongoing since 2004 ( 2002 PDT proposal) and includes, an all weather
road, cane eradication, re-vegetation, lighting and originally an ornamental fence. The other would be the DRT
project which was based on a 2002 PDT proposal that would include the installation of approx 1.25 miles of
ornamental fence along both sides of the Del Rio POE. Both projects fall upon both City's property which for the
most part are the only officials we have spoken to regarding these projects. Time lines and synopsis of these
discussions listed below:

EAGLE PASS PROJECT

January 2007---Presented “Eagle Pass Park Improvement Project” (Project) before the Council with request that
they allow the City Manager to negotiate easements for the project on behalf of the City. The initiative passed on a
three to two vote and negotiations are still underway, with the City Attorney still reviewing the easement packets.

Original design of the Project, pre-HR 4437-Secure Fence Act, included 1.1 miles of ornamental anti-personnel
fencing, cane removal, all weather roadways and lighting, all to be located on property owned by the City of Eagle
Pass in the immediate downtown area. After the Secure Fence Act was passed and prior to the Project being
presented to the City Council, Eagle Pass passed a resolution against any type of fencing along the border. Since
that resolution and in an effort to accomplish other major infrastructure portions of the Project the fencing aspect
was extracted from the Project presented to the City Council.

February 13, 2007--Meeting was also held with Albert Quintanilla of the Texas Department of Transportation
(TXDOT) concerning the possibility of negotiations with TXDOT to erect fencing on the TXDOT easement along a
section of the proposed State Loop 480, which will parallel the Rio Grande River south from the Eagle Pass Port-
of-Entry #2 for approximately five miles to a point where it intersects Farm to Market Road 1021. TXDOT is
currently in the process of land acquisition for the 480 Loop project.

DEL RIO PROJECT

January 2007--Initial Discussion-Mayor Efrain Valdez and City Manager and Assistant City Manager Ralph
Castillo and Billy Guerra with Del Rio Sector Staff to include CPA Hill, (b) (6) and (b) (6)
City staff were shown the PowerPoint relating to the proposed project and expressed initial support and
recommendation to contact City Council prior to placing project on Council Agenda for a vote.

March 26th-30th-(b) (6) met with LEO hierarchy Chief of Police Waylon Bullard, VVSO Sheriff
D’Wayne Jernigan and CBP Port Director Mike Perez all shown presentation and all expressed support for project
as outlined in PowerPoint.

April 4, 2007-(b) (6) met with Councilman Mike Wrob to discuss project. PowerPoint and question and
answer session ensued and Mr.. Wrob was receptive to idea but would not commit to endorsing project.

April 9, 2007-(b) (6) met with Councilman Rudy Chapa and he expressed support for project and
mentioned that he would inform Councilwoman Tina Martinez of project.
Continued attempts to meet with remaining council members is ongoing.

The project has not been placed on the Council Agenda as of this writing.

No discussions have been conducted regarding the recently received PF225 project other than land owner
identification. We held a meeting with our Sector Ranch Liaison officers and several PAIC's from each Station to
discuss future SBI Outreach attempts.

_____

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 8:51 AM
To: (b) (6) M
Cc: Hill, Randy R; CARRILLO, CARLOS X; (b) (6) VITIELLO, RONALD D
Subject: Meetings with Local GOV re: Fencing

Deputies,

Please advise me if anyone in your Sector has officially had any meetings with State, County, or Local
governments concerning building any fences within your AORs since passage of the Secure Fence Act. A
description of the meeting, with whom, and topics discussed is needed to OBP by 1200 EST, today.

Thanks,

(b) (6)