Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
I. INTRODUCTION
Diesel accounts for the majority of energy generation
within remote area power systems (RAPS) [1], yet renewables
offer cost competitive supply alternatives [2]. A key roadblock
to greater renewable penetration remains the performance of
the diesel generators and their inability to run at low loads. The
lower a low load operating capability, typically within the
range of 30% to 40% rated capacity, the greater the share of
renewable penetration that can be achieved. Consequently low
load capabilities for diesel generators are increasingly of
interest to stakeholders looking to lower the cost and
environmental impact of electricity generation within remote
applications.
Prior to researching low load diesel technologies and
applications, an understanding of the current perceptions and
practices surrounding low load diesel generation is beneficial.
Such an understanding affords the audience an opportunity to
identify and remove any duplication of effort, to target
subsequent research optimally to meet the market need and
importantly to define the field of research. The University of
Tasmanias Centre for Renewable Energy and Power Systems
has prioritised low load diesel application as an energy research
initiative having surveyed stakeholders to explore existing
perceptions and practices ahead of pioneering research within
the sector. This paper compiles and publishes the results of the
D. Prior Research
Stakeholder responses conveyed a general awareness of
prior low load diesel initiatives, specifically the high renewable
penetration wind/solar diesel hybrid systems installed across
Western Australia between 2008-2012 [4]. Knowledge of such
programs extended to recognition of an achieved low load
operational capability and the identification of cylinder
temperature as a key operational parameter in determining
success of any low load operational trial. However little market
insight was available beyond this high level knowledge, a
possible consequence of both the proponent and the technology
supplier having since been merged into larger corporate
structures, with a subsequent restructure of business priorities
away from low load diesel research.
An important future outcome of the survey will be to demystify knowledge of these legacy trials via both broad
industry survey and broad distribution of survey results.
Additionally, low load capabilities of diesel generators have
significantly improved since 2008, facilitated in part by the
rapid development of efficient automotive diesel engine
technologies. As such, the timing of the survey was also
appropriate to re-engage with industry, to explore current
perceptions and practices surrounding low load diesel
operation, given improvements in diesel low load capabilities.
Outside of these prior research initiatives, a general
acceptance that low load capabilities were feasible and the
apparent opportunity to improve the knowledge sharing
outcomes of previous investigation, little publication of low
load diesel research was identified. The exception to this has
been the applied research into low load diesel capabilities
undertaken by the Alaska Energy Authority [5] and the
Norwegian University of Science and Technology [6].
III. SURVEY RESPONSE
All survey responses were received electronically, with the
exception of a hard copy survey posted by the author to
investigate the reliability of the mailing address provided. The
response rate of 14% allowed for an informed sample size
including most of the relevant Australian utilities and
independent power producers (IPP).
A number of respondents were uneasy about providing
personal contact details, despite reassurances of confidentiality,
their personal contact details already being known, as used to
invite their participation, and their future interest in receiving
summary results from the survey campaign (as indicated via a
prior question). Such reluctance illustrates a distrust in the
survey medium, with the majority of participants appearing to
decide to participate within the survey after only a few
questions had been completed (dropout rates were significant
within the first few questions and then fairly negligible). In a
number of instances the requested information was deemed by
the respondent to be confidential in nature, and was thus not
provided. These observations suggest that a survey may not
have been the optimal form of data capture from a trust and
participation perspective.
Professional experience of respondents was satisfactory,
with over three quarters of respondents reporting greater than 5
years RAPS experience and greater than two thirds reporting
owner operator accountabilities. System capacity varied
significantly across respondents with a need to normalise some
Figure 2. Main problems reported within remote area power systems. The
majority of respondents identified diesel operation as their single largest
problem. Other problems identified included birds, bats and vandalism.
Figure 3. Diesel fuel costs $AUD per litre, reported within remote area
power systems. The large cost variation is attributed to the significant
transportation costs faced by some remote communities.
Figure 4. Cost recovery mechanisms. As no single party pays the full costs
associated with generation, any case for delivering lower power prices may
present only partial value to individual stakeholders.
Renewable
content %
Fuel
Savings %
20% nameplate
capacity
10% nameplate
capacity
+ 8%
+ 15%
+6%
+12%
Figure 6. Fuel efficiency curve for the diesel generators within the
modelled remote area power system.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]