Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.nl/locate/enggeo
Abstract
Over the past few years, the monitoring of natural phenomena has acquired great importance for the scientific
community. It aims to understand the mechanisms of disruptive processes, define adequate prevention measures for
the mitigation of their effects and reduce the loss of human lives and assets. In order to detect the stability conditions
of slopes belonging to different geological and environmental contexts, geotechnical investigations have been carried
out since 1982. The various types of landslides to be investigated, and the diverse socio-economic contexts involved,
have shown the need for constant surveillance, using the most up-to-date technology available. For this purpose,
automatic recording systems connected to different sensors have been installed, (and also serve civil defence purposes).
During this research activity, several problems arose, and several solutions had to be found. In this paper, some of
the main problems concerning the installation and management of monitoring equipment used for the study of three
landslides will be discussed. 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Instrumentation; Italy; Landslides; Warning system
1. Introduction
Hydrogeological disarrangement is one of the
most destructive natural events striking civilian
populations, urban settlements and infrastructures
world-wide every year, causing thousands of casualties and serious damage.
The monitoring of natural phenomena has
acquired great importance for the scientific community since the use of adequate monitoring systems is a powerful tool for understanding
kinematic aspects of mass movements and permits
their correct analysis and interpretation; in addition, it is an essential aid in identifying and checking alarm situations.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +39-49-829-5800;
fax: +39-49-829-5827.
E-mail address: alessandro.pasuto@irpi.pd.cnr.it (A.Pasuto)
0013-7952/00/$ - see front matter 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S0 0 1 3 -7 9 5 2 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 12 2 - 2
134
2. Tessina landslide
In the autumn of 1960, after a period of intense
precipitation, a landslide, characterised by a source
area in constant expansion affected by a complex
(rotational slideearth flow) slide movement with
a slip surface approximately 2030 m deep, was
activated in the province of Belluno (northeastern Italy).
The material from this area, which is intensely
fractured and dismembered, was channelised along
the Tessina valley, where it was progressively
remoulded with an increase of water content. Thus,
it underwent increasing fluidification, giving rise
to small earth flows that converged into the main
flow body.
The mass movement involved about two million
cubic metres of material, and was responsible for
endangering the villages of Funes and Lamosano
(Angeli et al., 1994; Pasuto and Silvano, 1995).
Further landslides occurred at the site in 1962,
1963, 1973, 1987, 1988, and 1989 after long-term
rainfall.
135
Fig. 1. Index map, location of the instrumentation and schematic cross-section of the Tessina landslide. Legend: (1) main flow body;
(2) roto-translational slide; (3) scree slope; (4) highly folded and fractured flysch; (5) flysch formation; (6) calcareous and marlycalcareous formations.
136
137
138
Fig. 5. Example of correlation between rainfall and displacement recorded by an extensometric device during the 1993 critical phase.
139
means of the apparatus shown in Fig. 4 was practicable up to a stretch limit of some tens of metres,
beyond which complete resetting of the extensometer devices was necessary.
Moreover, considering that each extensometric
apparatus placed within the body of the slide was
connected to a data logger with an electric cable
for data transmission, intense movements have
often broken the cable, thus necessitating the
reconnection of the cables, sometimes under
difficult conditions.
Other problems arose from the tilting of measuring equipment in the course of slide movements,
leading to misalignment between it and the wire.
Also, in these cases, the original equipment position needed to be reset to ensure its correct
functioning.
Despite all this, the system has allowed continual checking of the movements and the forecast
of several critical situations that have led to the
collapse of substantial sections of the slope
(Fig. 5).
2.1.2. Directional bar
This is a simple instrument consisting of a bar
that, when suspended from a cable running
through a channel, records the passing of
mud/debris flows and avalanches ( Fig. 6). The
working principle is based upon the tractional and
rising effect of the moving mass on the bars.
Groups of two and three bars were installed
upstream of Lamosano and Funes, respectively,
working as alarm systems (Fig. 1). They were
calibrated so as to set off an alarm signal by the
closure of a mercury switch only if they were tilted
more than 20 from the vertical position for more
than 20 s. This threshold was introduced as a way
of reducing false alarms usually due to the effects
of frequent gusts of wind for which this valley is
renowned.
The entire system was connected to
measuring/checking stations, which sent the various alarm signals to an operative centre.
In fact, the installation of several directional
bars, placed at reasonable intervals from one
another, allowed registration of both the mud flow
and its velocity so that the varying risk levels of
the area could be detected. An ultrasonic echo-
140
Fig. 7. Giau Pass landslide: location of boreholes and evolution scheme of the slope (reference to cross-section CC).
141
142
Fig. 9. Comparison of data recorded during two critical hydrological events in 1987 and 1988.
4. Sirolo landslide
The village of Sirolo, located on top of a steep
marly cliff along the Adriatic sea, several kilometres south of the harbour of Ancona (Central
Italy), is widely affected by instability phenomena
(rock falls, toppling of rock pillars, slides) (Angeli
et al., 1990b, 1991, 1996a; Angeli and Pontoni,
1995). The area is highly tectonised and subject to
recurrent high-intensity earthquakes. As a conse-
143
144
Fig. 11. Map of the Sirolo landslide area showing the location of the equipped boreholes and the control works.
tric bars, a rain gauge and several electric transducers of pressure and displacement were connected
to automatic data loggers. High-precision geodetic
surveys were also carried out.
Observation of all the data collected has permitted a first hypothesis on the main landslide mechanism. In particular, a huge block-type slide
occurring on a subhorizontal plane was identified.
Fluctuation of the groundwater table above a fixed
threshold was identified as being responsible for
periodic landslide reactivations.
Remedial measures consisted of a series of very
long pre-stressed steel anchors and subhorizontal
tubular drains.
145
Fig. 12. Schematic cross-section of the Sirolo landslide body: bedding planes dip 20 to 30 toward the observer.
5. Final remarks
From the three cases briefly illustrated, the wide
spectrum of situations in which even simple monitoring systems can be employed advantageously is
evident. Usually, the best possible results can only
be obtained if the position of the sensors is meaningful, and this can result only from a previous
in-depth understanding of the phenomena,
obtained through collection and analysis of all the
previous documentation. Geological conditions
must also be accurately investigated.
Another very important aspect is the choice of
parameters and frequency of sample data collection. It is indeed important to optimise data collection so that large amounts of poorly significant
data can be discarded.
In the case of alarm systems, it is very important
to avoid false alarms, to choose appropriately the
critical thresholds for the various parameters taken
into consideration, and possibly to use alternative
measures if such thresholds are exceeded.
Finally, it should be pointed out that the instru-
146
Fig. 13. Relationships between monthly rainfall, piezometric rise and landslide movement; piezometer BH1 is representative of the
landslide body, whereas piezometers BH8 and BH11 represent the piezometric behaviour of the stable area; BHH2 and BHH3 indicate
horizontal extensometric bars; A1, A2 and A3 refer to the three systems of anchors installed, and D1, D2 and D3 refer to the three
sets of tubular drains.
Acknowledgements
This paper is part of the CEC Environment
Programme
Project
NEWTECH
( ENVCT96-0248) New Technologies for Landslide
Hazard Assessment and Management in Europe.
References
Angeli, M.G., Gasparetto, P., Pasuto, A., Silvano, S., 1990a.
Analisi di un caso di frana in materiali morenici ( Val Fiorentina, Belluno). Mem. Sci. Geol. 42, 129154.
Angeli, M.G., Barbarella, M., Dramis, F., Garzonio, C.A., Pontoni, F., 1990b. A monitoring project for the definition of
the geostructural model of Sirolo landslide (Italy). Proc. 6th
ICFL, 12 September 1990, Milan, Italy, 175186.
Angeli, M.G., Barbarella, M., Pontoni, F., 1991. Instability of
a sea cliff: Sirolo landslide, Italy. In: Bell, D.H. ( Ed.), Landslides. Proc. 6th ISL, Christchurch (NZ). Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 10931100.
Angeli, M.G., Gasparetto, P., Menotti, R.M., Pasuto, A.,
Silvano, S., 1994. A system of monitoring and warning in a
complex landslide in northeastern Italy. Landslide News 8,
1215.
Angeli, M.G., Pontoni, F., 1995. Il monitoraggio e gli interventi
di stabilizzazione in una falesia di roccia fratturata, Atti
XIX Convegno Nazionale di Geotecnica, Pavia, Italy, 16.
147