Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
[Incidence of admissions due to pneumonia in children under 24 months old before and
after the introduction of the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine into the
National Immunization Program of Chile].
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading cause of bacterial pneumonia in children, especially in
the hospitalized population. The 10-valent pneumococcal vaccine was included in the National
Immunization Program of Chile in 2011. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of pneumonia
in hospitalized children<24 months of age in the Luis Calvo Mackenna Hospital before and after
the introduction of the pneumococcal vaccine into the National Immunization Program.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Passive surveillance study. Patients<24 months with discharge diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia
from Luis Calvo Mackenna Hospital were studied between 2009 and 2013. Data were obtained
from the Luis Calvo Mackenna Hospital's Statistical Service. The incidence of pneumonia was
evaluated in the pre-vaccination period (2009-2010) and in the post-vaccination period (20122013).
RESULTS:
During the study period, an average of 4,321 discharges/year was observed in children<24
months (range: 3,587-4,702), with a significant decrease from pre- to post-vaccination vaccine
period (4,644 vs 4,013, P<.001). The average incidence of pneumonia ranged from 3.4/100,000
to 1.5/100,000 in the pre- and post-vaccine period, respectively (P=.009), with an annual mean of
157 cases of pneumonia in the pre- vaccine period, and 62 cases in the postvaccine period
(P<.001) and a decrease in incidence between the two periods of 56%.
CONCLUSION:
This study confirms information previously obtained in other countries, which show a decrease
in the incidence of pneumonia associated with the implementation of a pneumococcal vaccine at
the population level. Ongoing surveillance is required to evaluate if this effect is maintained over
time and expands to older populations.
Copyright 2015 Sociedad Chilena de Pediatra. Publicado por Elsevier Espaa, S.L.U. All
rights reserved.
KEYWORDS:
Incidence; Incidencia; Neumona; Pneumonia; Streptococcus pneumoniae; Vaccine; Vacuna
Of the 331 patients, 60 had low interlobar collateral ventilation and successful lobar exclusion
(45 patients with upper lobe treatment and 15 patients with lower lobe treatment). There was no
difference in baseline characteristics between the groups except for a higher destruction score
(70.3 vs. 60.7%; p = 0.0010) and a higher heterogeneity index (24 vs. 13%; p = 0.0005) for the
upper lobe cohort. At 180 days, both groups had improved clinically. There were no significant
differences in mean changes or responder rates of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (+23.8 vs.
+22.9%), the St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (-6.50 vs. -7.53 points), the 6-min walk test
(+24.1 vs. +44.0 m), target lobe volume reduction (-1,199 vs. -1,042 ml), or in the adverse event
rate between both cohorts.
CONCLUSION:
Patients with lower and upper lobe predominant emphysema benefit equally from EBV therapy
when interlobar collateral ventilation is low and lobar exclusion is achieved. Patients with lower
lobe disease did not have increased adverse events compared to patients with upper lobe
emphysema.
underlying pathology. These should be considered in patients who present with chest pain after
cocaine use.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which allocated people (adults, or children over two years
of age) with acute bronchitis or acute cough and without known pulmonary disease to beta2agonist versus placebo, no treatment or alternative treatment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:
Three review authors independently selected outcomes and extracted data while blinded to study
results. Two review authors independently assessed each trial for risk of bias. We analysed trials
in children and adults separately.
MAIN RESULTS:
Two trials of moderate quality in children (n = 134) with no evidence of airflow restriction did
not find any benefits from oral beta2-agonists. Five trials in adults (n = 418) had mixed results
but overall summary statistics did not reveal any significant benefits from oral (three trials) nor
from inhaled (two trials) beta2-agonists. Three studies with low-quality evidence demonstrated
no significant differences in daily cough scores, nor in the percentage of adults still coughing
after seven days (control group 71%; risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63 to
1.18; 220 participants). In one trial, subgroups with evidence of airflow limitation had lower
symptom scores if given beta2-agonists. The trials that noted quicker resolution of cough with
beta2-agonists were those with a higher proportion of people wheezing at baseline. Low-quality
evidence suggests that adults given beta2-agonists were more likely to report tremor, shakiness
or nervousness (RR 7.94, 95% CI 1.17 to 53.94; 211 participants; number needed to treat for an
additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 2).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:
There is no evidence to support the use of beta2-agonists in children with acute cough who do
not have evidence of airflow restriction. There is also little evidence that the routine use of beta2agonists is helpful for adults with acute cough. These agents may reduce symptoms, including
cough, in people with evidence of airflow restriction. However, this potential benefit is not well
supported by the available data and must be weighed against the adverse effects associated with
their use.
Trends in Outpatient Visits with Benzodiazepines among US Adults With and Without
Bronchitis or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease from 1999 to 2010.
Abstract
Little is known about trends in prescriptions for benzodiazepines among patients with chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Our objective was to examine trends of office/outpatient
department visits with a mention of a benzodiazepine made by patients aged 40 years with
COPD in the United States. We used data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey
and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 1999-2010. From 1999 to 2010,
the estimated numbers of office/outpatient department visits with a benzodiazepine mentioned
increased from 20.7 million to 43.2 million among all patients, from 684,000 to 1.5 million
among patients with COPD, and from 20.0 million to 41.7 million among patients without
COPD. Using all 12-years of data, patients with COPD were more likely to have a visit with a
mention of a benzodiazepine than patients without COPD (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.48, 95%
CI = 1.27-1.71).The unadjusted percentage of all office/outpatient department visits by patients
with COPD with a mention of a benzodiazepine increased from 4.6% during 1999-2002 to
10.2% during 2007-2010 (P trend < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, and race, the adjusted
prevalence ratio for 2007-2010 compared with 1999-2002 was 2.26 (95% confidence interval:
1.60-3.17). Since 1999, the number and percentage of office/outpatient department visits with a
mention of a benzodiazepine by patients with COPD and all patients may have increased in the
United States.
KEYWORDS:
COPD; United States; benzodiazepines; prescriptions; therapeutics; trends