Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
Page
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
4.1
4.2
General ................................................................................................................................3
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
General ................................................................................................................................6
6.2
ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................. 8
7.1
7.2
7.3
8.0
7.2.1
7.2.2
7.2.3
Topsoil Electro-Chemistry.........................................................................................9
REPORTING ............................................................................................. 10
8.1
General ..............................................................................................................................10
8.2
Format ...............................................................................................................................10
8.3
Presentation ....................................................................................................................11
esc_soil_sampling_testing.doc
APPENDIX B - REFERENCES
esc_soil_sampling_testing.doc
1.0
2.0
esc_soil_sampling_testing.doc
Page 1
3.0
RELATED DOCUMENTS
The Soil Sampling and Testing Guideline for Erosion Potential should be read in
conjunction with the following related documents:
4.0
Soil erodibility potential is the likelihood that erosion will occur when soils are
exposed to water (and/or wind) during or as a result of land-disturbing activities.
Erodibility potential is highest on slopes, and when low plasticity silty soils or fine
sands are disturbed. There are other soil-related factors that contribute to
erodibility potential but these will not be discussed further here.
4.2
Soil dispersion potential is the likelihood that soils will release a cloud of fine clay
particles when brought into contact with water. These clay particles may remain
suspended for an indefinite period of time, resulting in turbid, dirty water, which
can impact on plant and animal life in and around our waterways and in Moreton
Bay. Scientific studies focussing upon the health of the Brisbane River and
Moreton Bay have demonstrated that sedimentation of these particles is
threatening seagrass meadows in the Bay, with corresponding impacts on Bay
ecology and specific species such as dugong, green sea turtles and fisheries.
Note that soil dispersion can occur without the influence of slope,
mechanical action or run-off velocity, ie. in still water, so it is imperative
that run-off from dispersive soils is retained and treated on-site wherever
practicable (even on smaller sites), before release into the natural or
constructed stormwater system.
Soil dispersion potential is measured as the Emerson Class number (a simple
semi-quantitative dispersion test), which considers soil consistency, depth, and in
some cases established soil electro-chemical data. Note that weathered parent
rock substrates can show dispersive tendencies also. Dispersive soils usually
contain significant amounts of clay, with at least moderate levels of chemically
exchangeable Sodium, if they are not buffered by salinity.
esc_soil_sampling_testing.doc
Page 2
5.0
General
Soil sample intensity for an investigation is dependent on the depth and area of
disturbance proposed for the site. Most assessments of soil erosion potential will
require sufficient sampling to create a simple three-dimensional model of the site.
Sampling intensity and minimum soil testing requirements do vary, depending on
whether the site is located in a high, moderate or low erosion potential soil
landscape, as determined by its Site Assessment Investigation Level.
Table 1 below shows the three levels of site assessment referred to in this
Guideline. Other details of the site and surrounding catchment need to be
recorded at the time of investigation. These are discussed in the following
sections.
Table 1 Required Level of Site Assessment
Site Characteristics
The site is located in Suburb Group 1 (refer
to Councils Erosion Hazard Assessment
Supporting Technical Notes - Table 5) ; or
Note that where previous on-site soil testing identifies soils with an Emerson Class of 7
or 8, or a Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) Group of GW, GP, GM or GC, soil
sampling and testing in accordance with this Guideline is not required provided that:-
5.2
rock outcrops;
esc_soil_sampling_testing.doc
Page 3
5.3
Site Description
Specific details of the site should also be recorded at the time of investigation,
these should include:
Layout of site, including address & real property description (ie. Lot and RP
No.), site boundaries & north point;
Direction & grade of slopes, within and leading onto and off the site;
5.4
The number of test pits or boreholes required for adequate assessment of erosion
and dispersion potential of a site are listed in Table 2.
Table 2 Sample Borehole Frequencies
Area of site
disturbance
< 1000 m
Number of Boreholes
(Level 1 Assessment)
Number of Boreholes
(Level 2 & 3 Assessments)
Up to ha
4 holes
2 holes
Up to 1 ha
4 holes
3 holes
1-2 ha
6 holes
4 holes
2-3 ha
8 holes
6 holes
3-4 ha
10 holes
8 holes
> 4 ha
5 holes/ 2 ha
2 holes / ha
5.5
Each borehole should be sampled and details recorded as follows:1. Boreholes should be drilled to at least 0.8m deep, (deeper if any fill material is
encountered on the surface to penetrate a 0.8m deep natural profile); or to
0.5m below anticipated excavation depths, which ever is the deeper;
2. The location of each borehole using reference to the Australian Metric Grid or
Latitude and Longitude and the existing surface level (AHD) should be
accurately surveyed and recorded. This assists when comparing RL and slope
grades to those expected in the subject landscape. The expected accuracy (ie.
x metres) of the GPS or survey equipment used should also be reported.
Investigations for smaller projects may derive sufficient location information and
contour data from subdivisional survey plans where available;
3. Depths of soil layers and descriptions using the nomenclature of the Australian
Standard for Geotechnical site investigations AS 1726 1993, should be
esc_soil_sampling_testing.doc
Page 4
logged for all soil types encountered. Particular attention should be paid to the
description of soil consistency and structure. Auger refusal on shallow rock, shallow
water tables and the presence of fill should also be noted, if encountered;
4. Starting from the existing soil surface, disturbed samples representing the
following soil horizons should be collected from each borehole or test pit:
lower topsoil (ie. upper soil layer directly beneath grass root mat generally
the A2 and/or A3 Horizons);
upper and lower subsoils (ie. B Horizons) if different soil types are identified
in the subsoil profile;
Sample sizes should be about 3kg for gravels, and 0.5kg for other finer grained
soils (sands, silts & clays).
It should be noted that any fill materials encountered should also be sampled and
tested, along with the naturally occurring soils.
A variety of manual and mechanical sampling equipment may be employed. Choice
of equipment will depend on soil texture and wetness. Common equipment in use is
listed and commented on below.
Manual Equipment
Jarret auger - usually restricted to the upper profile of dry and moist soil
only and generally not suitable for sands;
Tapered gouge auger - suitable for soft muds, but not sands;
Push tube with tapered tip - limited sample retention as suction is created
on extraction and sample loss can be a problem (adding a sealable cap
before extraction improves retention), not suitable for saturated sands;
Dormer sand auger - acceptable for many soils but saturated sands may fall
out and the walls of the borehole may collapse;
Piston sampler - good for saturated sands but limited to the length of the
piston as walls collapse as it is withdrawn. Using a suitable size PVC pipe
for casing can increase the depth of excavation on saturated sands but care
is needed to limit sample mixing.
Mechanical Equipment
Hollow flight screw auger incorporating an internal split tube sampler uses a hollow screw auger with an internal sampler that can be withdrawn
regularly. The internal sampler is fitted with a split tube and takes suitable
core samples, but can have trouble with compression on muds and loss of
sample on sands below the water table. A catcher often improves
retention on sands. Some well-equipped geotechnical drilling rigs can also
use a Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler or thin walled 50 mm
diameter U50 tube (usually used for undisturbed sampling), within the
hollow flight auger;
esc_soil_sampling_testing.doc
Page 5
SOIL TESTING
6.1
General
The type and number of soil tests required to enable assessment of the erosion
and dispersion potential of a site are dependent on the scope of the proposed
development and the Site Assessment Investigation Level determined for the soil
landscape. Standard laboratory tests to determine soil chemistry and erosion
potential required to undertake a Level 1, 2 or 3 site assessment are listed in
Table 3.
Table 3 - Site Assessment Test Requirements
Required Testing - Level 1 Assessment
Number of Tests
esc_soil_sampling_testing.doc
Page 6
Number of Tests
Number of Tests
Where soils are found to be fine grained, To be undertaken on fine grained soils to
Atterberg Limits should be determined in determine whether or not the material is of
accordance with AS 1289 3.3 test methods. high plasticity (ie. may resist erosion).
esc_soil_sampling_testing.doc
Page 7
6.2
ASSESSMENT
7.1
Reference should be made to the sites soil landscape and dominant soil group,
as described on the 1:100 000 scale map - The Soil Landscapes of Brisbane and
South-Eastern Environs - 1985, published by the CSIRO. It may also be
beneficial to make reference to an appropriate Geological Map of the area, for
further information on parent geology.
Any variations between soil profiles encountered on the site, and the soil types
described in the reference map used should be noted, as this may form part of
grounds for reclassification of the landscape or erosion classification of the site. If
there are fill materials of external origin on the site, then this should be taken into
account, as the fill may be responsible for higher or lower erosion potential than
would normally be associated with a particular landscape.
7.2
7.2.1
Dispersion Potential
Where dispersive soils are encountered, it is likely that a Type D sediment basin
will need to be constructed on the site for the duration of land-disturbing activities
(refer to BCCs Sediment Basin Design, Construction & Maintenance Guidelines
Jan 2001 or later version). Determination of the dispersion potential in either
topsoil or subsoil is based on how much dispersive material is present in the soil,
and how dispersive it is. An Emerson Class Number of 1 or 2 is indicative of
highly dispersive soils, however if the majority of the soil consists of sand or fine
gravel which is inert, then the soil may not represent so high a dispersion risk.
Results of the Dispersion Index (DI) test (AS 1289 3.8.2), undertaken on the most
dispersive soils (ie. the lowest Emerson Class Number), should be interpreted as
follows:-
esc_soil_sampling_testing.doc
Page 8
Soils are dispersive where the combined percentage of clay (<0.002mm) plus half
the percentage of Silt1 (0.002-0.02mm), expressed as a decimal fraction, then
multiplied by the Dispersion Index (DI); is greater than 10%.
For Example, a soil sample with 20% clay & 18% silt with a DI of 40%, would have
a dispersion percentage of: (0.20 + 0.09) x 40 = 11.6%; would be considered - a
Dispersive Soil.
Materials used in the construction of sediment basins should not have an
Emerson Number of 3 or less (ie. dispersive soils cannot be used to construct
sediment basins).
7.2.2
Erosion Potential
Sites classified into Site Assessment Investigation Levels 1 and 2 (or Suburb
Groups 1, 2 and All other) according to BCCs Erosion Hazard Assessment
Supporting Technical Notes) are considered to have a high to very high erosion
potential. This is usually because of the presence of moderate or steeper slopes
(ie. > 5 10%), and/ or readily erodible soil profiles. Soils with relatively high silt
and fine sand fractions are most susceptible to erosion, while very fine grained,
high plasticity clay soils are least susceptible.
Laboratory test data is required for the following purposes:1. To determine if soils present on the site are predominantly fine or coarse
grained, (ie. fine grained soils contain 33% by weight finer than 0.02mm); and
2. To determine the D30 particle size (ie. the particle size of which 30% by weight
is smaller), for use in design of a Type C sediment basin, in areas where the
soil has a uniform, coarse grain size.
Refer to BCC's Sediment Basin Design, Construction and Maintenance
Guidelines (Jan 2001 or later version) for specific data requirements.
There is a much higher risk of erosion occurring on significant slopes. Any site
containing slopes of 20% or steeper (5H : 1V), should be considered as having a
high erosion potential, regardless of its suburb group or site assessment
investigation level, unless consisting almost entirely of slightly weathered or fresh
rock outcrop, with negligible soil profile development. Relatively level sites with
high soil erosion-potential classifications may not constitute a significant erosion
risk from coarse sediment if they do not contain slopes steeper than 3%, (about
33H : 1V). In this case, the soils dispersion potential along with other
site/proposal characteristics must be taken into account to determine the overall
erosion risk of the development proposal (eg. exposed site area, duration of
works, time of year for construction).
Sites containing intermediate slope gradients of 3% to 20% should be assessed
using a combination of slope gradient and soil erosion factors. Consideration
should also be given to the area of soil disturbance, whether or not shallow rock is
present on the site, the proposed length of site disturbance and other
environmental influences.
7.2.3
Topsoil Electro-Chemistry
Note that the upper particle size range for Silt in accordance with Australian Standard Test Methods is 0.06mm.
However for the purpose of all calculations in accordance with Councils Sediment Basin Design, Construction and
Maintenance Guidelines (Jan 2001 or later version) the upper particle size range for Silt shall be taken as 0.02mm.
esc_soil_sampling_testing.doc
Page 9
pH, EC & Total Dissolved Salts (TDS) derived from EC, can be useful indicators
for the assessment of dispersive soils.
Saline soils with TDS greater than 2000 mg/kg may not be suitable for growing
certain salt intolerant species of plants. It is also useful to know whether a soil is
strongly acidic (ie. pH less than 5.0), as acidity, in addition to salinity may
influence the choice of plant species to be used for revegetation of a site, which in
itself is an important erosion control measure. It should be noted that if topsoil is
to be imported onto the site specifically for grass stabilisation, then its pH should
be determined, to ensure suitability for planned revegetation species.
Where soil characteristics such as salinity or high acidity are encountered,
specialist input into construction phase water quality management, soil
ameliorants and plant species selection should be sought.
7.3
8.0
REPORTING
8.1
General
Assessment reports should include details of the applicant and consultant, (name
and contact details), and site details including Lot and RP number and site
address. Reports should include accurate borelogs and copies of all laboratory
test results (attached as appendices) and a detailed site plan showing:
any other relevant site features, (existing structures, pavements etc.); and
8.2
Format
esc_soil_sampling_testing.doc
Page 10
soil electro-chemistry.
8.3
undertaken
and
the
Reports need not be bound, however binding does ensure that no pages or
attachments are lost or misplaced. It is recommended that a table of contents at
the front of the report be included, and that the site plan and all other supporting
documentation be attached as appendices.
Prepare three copies of the report for submission to Council, (and probably a
fourth for retention by the client). This will contribute towards a well made
esc_soil_sampling_testing.doc
Page 11
esc_soil_sampling_testing.doc
Page 12
APPENDIX A
SAMPLE LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TABLE
Soil Type
Emerson
Class No.
pH
BH1
0.0 - 0.2m
(mS/cm)
BH1
Silty CLAY (CH),
0.2 - 0.9m grey & red-brown
EC
Dispersion
[2]
Index
(%)
Passing
0.002mm
(%)
Passing
Percent
D30
0.02mm Dispersion[3] (mm)
(%)
(%)
4.6
0.20
24
15
24
4.7
0.03
6.8
0.04
45
40
54
21
[2]
[3]
As defined in Councils Sediment Basin Design, Construction & Maintenance Guidelines Jan 2001
NOTE: Where particular soil properties are not required, they may be omitted from the results table.
APPENDIX B
REFERENCES
REFERENCES
1. The following Brisbane City Council Publications:
Councils Erosion Hazard Assessment form CC2085 (6/2001 or later version) and
Supporting Technical Notes CC2085 TN (6/2001 or later version);
2. Parent Material and Soils DLWC Technical Report N0 45, 1999. New South Wales
Department of Land and Water Conservation.
3. Soil Erosion and Sediment Control - Engineering Guidelines for Queensland
Construction Sites. The Institute of Engineers Australia (Qld Division) 1996.
4. The Soil Landscapes of Brisbane and South-eastern Environs. GG Beckmann,
GD Hubble and CH Thompson, CSIRO Aust 1987.
5. Australian Soil and Land Survey Field Handbook (2nd Edition). RC McDonald,
RF Isbell, JG Speight, J Walker and MS Hopkins, CSIRO 1998.
6. AS 1289 Soil Testing for Engineering Purposes.
NOTES