Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
NonConformalInterfaces&MovingZones
14.0Release
IntroductiontoANSYS
FLUENT
1
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Release14.0
Introduction
LectureTheme:
ManyCFDapplicationsacrossindustriesinvolvesystemsordeviceswith
movingparts.FLUENToffersmanydifferentmodelsforrotatingmachinery,
forarbitraryprescribedmotionandforobjectswhosepathisdeterminedby
theflow.
LearningAims:
Youwilllearn:
Howtodefinenonconformalinterfacesandperiodicboundaryconditions
Themodelsavailableforrotatingmachinerysuchasthemultiplereference
frameandslidingmeshmodels
Thedifferentdynamicmeshingmethodsforarbitrarymotion,includingthe
coupled6DOFsolver
LearningObjectives:
Youwillbeabletousenonconformalmeshesandwillbecomefamiliarwith
FLUENTsmodelsforsystemswithmovingpartsandwhenaparticularmodel
isapplicable.
Introduction
2
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
NonconformalInterfaces
Overview
Acrossaninterfacebetweentwocellzones,thenodesmayormaynotexactly
align
Ifthenodesmatchperfectly,thisisaConformalmesh
IfusingDesignModeler,combiningbodiesintoasinglepartwillgiveaconformalmesh
Ifthenodesdonotmatchup,thisisaNonConformalmesh
FLUENTcaninterpolateacrosstheinterface,butthismustbedefinedintheGUI.
Ifnot,FLUENTwilltreattheinterfaceasawall,andnofluidcanflowthrough.
Conformal
Introduction
3
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
NonConformal
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
NonconformalInterfaces
Overview
NonconformalInterfacescanbeusedfor:
Connectionofmismatchedmeshes(hextotet forexample)
asinglemeshfilemaycontainnonmatchingmeshregionsandrequirenon
conformalinterfaces
Changesinreferenceframesbetweencellzones
evenifthemeshmatches
Connectdifferenttypesofcellzonestogether(e.g.FluidandSolid)
Createperiodicregionswithinadomain
Introduction
4
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
NonconformalInterfaces
InsertingNonconformalInterfaces
Tocreateanonconformalinterface:
Step1:Define/BoundaryConditions
Changethetypeofeachpairofzones
thatcomprisesthenonconformal
boundarytointerface
Step2:Define/MeshInterfaces
EnteranamefortheinterfaceintheMeshInterfacetextentrybox
Specifythetwointerfacezonesthatcomprisethemeshinterfacebyselectingoneormore
zonesintheInterfaceZone1listandoneormorezonesintheInterfaceZone2list
Ifoneofyourinterfacezonesismuchsmallerthantheother,youshouldspecifythesmallerzone
asInterfaceZone1toimprovetheaccuracyoftheintersectioncalculation
EnablethedesiredInterfaceOptions ifappropriate
Introduction
5
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
NonconformalInterfaces
PeriodicBoundaryCondition
TocreateaPeriodicboundarycondition
EnablethePeriodicBoundaryConditionoptionintheMeshinterfacespanel
SelecteitherTranslationalorRotationalastheperiodicboundaryconditionType
RetaintheenableddefaultsettingofAutoComputeOffsetifyouwantANSYSFLUENTto
automaticallycomputetheoffset
Meshcanbenonconformal
TranslationalPeriodicity
Simulatesgeometriesthathavetranslational
periodicity
Allowsforeitherthemassflowrateorthe
pressurechangeacrosstheinterfacetobe
specified
Thequantitynotspecifiedwillbepartofthe
solution
RotationalPeriodicity
Simulatesrotationallyperiodicgeometries
Beforeproceeding,youhavetocorrectlyenter
therotationalaxisforthecorrespondingcell
zoneintheBCpanel
Introduction
6
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
IntroductiontoMovingZones
Manyflowproblemsinvolvedomainswhichcontain
translatingorrotatingcomponents
Twotypesofmotionarepossible:translationaland
rotational
Therearetwobasicmodelingapproachesformoving
domains:
MovingReferenceFrames
Frameofreferenceisattachedtothemovingdomain
Governingequationsaremodifiedtoaccountfor
movingframe
Moving/DeformingDomains
Domainpositionandshapearetrackedwithrespectto
astationaryreferenceframe
Solutionsareinherentlyunsteady
Introduction
7
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
MovingZones
MovingReferenceFramesvs.MeshMotion
y
MovingReferenceFrame
Domain moveswithcoordinatesystem
Tofollowthemotionofthebody,topologyofthemesh
doesnotneedtobeupdated
Rotation/TranslationoftheMovingdomain
MeshMotion
Domainchangesshapeasafunctionoftime
Tofollowthemotionofthebody,topologyofthemesh
needtobeupdated
Smoothing/Remeshing ofthedomain
Introduction
8
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
MovingZones
RotatingEquipment
Whyusearotatingreferenceframe?
Aflowfieldwhichisunsteadywhenviewedinastationaryframecan
becomesteadywhenviewedinarotatingframe
Steadystateproblemsareeasiertosolve...
Additionalaccelerationtermsareaddedtothemomentumequations
SimplerBCs
Lowcomputationalcost
Easiertopostprocessandanalyze
Limitation:
Centrifugal
Compressor
(single blade passage)
Youmaystillhaveunsteadinessintherotatingframedueto
turbulence,circumferentiallynonuniformvariationsinflow,
separation,etc.
Example:vortexsheddingfromfanbladetrailingedge
Rotationallyperiodicboundariescanbeemployedforefficiency
(reduceddomainsize)
Introduction
9
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
MovingZones
Singlevs.MultipleReferenceFrameModeling
Whendomainsrotateatdifferentratesorwhenstationarywallsdonot
formsurfacesofrevolutionMultipleReferenceFrames(MRF)areneeded
baffle
stationarywall
stationary wall
SRFis sufficient
Introduction
10
2011ANSYS,Inc.
MRFis necessary
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
stationarywall
RotatingZones
MRFis necessary
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
MovingZones
DifferentApproaches:
OverviewofModelingApproaches:
SingleReferenceFrame(SRF)
Entirecomputationaldomainisreferredtoamovingreferenceframe
steadystate
MultipleReferenceFrame(MRF)
Selectedregionsofthedomainarereferredtomovingreferenceframes
Interactioneffectsareignored
steadystate
MixingPlane(MPM)
Influenceofneighboringregionsaccountedforthroughuseofamixingplanemodelat
rotating/stationarydomaininterfaces
Circumferentialnonuniformitiesintheflowareignored
steadystate
SlidingMesh(SMM)
Motionofspecificregionsaccountedforbyameshmotionalgorithm
Flowvariablesinterpolatedacrossaslidinginterface
Unsteadyproblem cancaptureallinteractioneffectswithcompletefidelity,but
morecomputationallyexpensivethanSRF,MRF,orMPM
Introduction
11
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
MovingZones
DefiningaMRFZone
ThesimplestapproachtosetupandsolveisusingaMovingReferenceFrame
Solutionissteadystate
Meshneveractuallymoves,localaccelerationsappliedtoeachgridcell
Thisisapplicableifthereisasteadystatesolutiontotheproblem,so:
Exactrelativepositionsofmovingandstationary(rotor/stator)partsdoesnotmatter
Novortexsheddingorothertransientphenomena
Foreachcellzone,enable
FrameMotionandsetthe
detailsofthemotion.
Thismotioncanbedefinedrelativetoanother
zone,itdoesnthavetobesettoabsolutecoordinates
Introduction
12
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
MovingZones
DefiningaSlidingMeshproblem
Inotherproblems,onemustactuallymovethemeshcomponents.Thesolutionistherefore
transient.
DefinethelinearorrotationalmotionofeachzonetouseaslidingzonebysettingMesh
Motion
Rememberthatinthiscasethedifferentcellzonesareactuallymovedateachtimestep.
Makesurethemodelisalwayssavedbeforetestingthemotion!
Otherusefultipsaboutrunningatransientsimulation(likegeneratingimagesontheflywillbegivenin
alaterlecture.
Introduction
13
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
MovingZones
MeshDeformation
MeshDeformationcanbeappliedin
simulationswhereboundariesorobjects
aremoved
Thesolvercalculatesnodaldisplacementsoftheseregions
andadjuststhesurroundingmeshtoaccommodatethem
Examplesofdeformingmeshesinclude
Automotivepistonmovinginsideacylinder
Aflapmovingonanairplanewing
Avalveopeningandclosing
Anarteryexpandingandcontracting
Introduction
14
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
MovingZones
DynamicMesh(DM)Methods
Internalnodepositionsareautomaticallycalculatedbasedonuserspecified
boundary/objectmotion,celltype,andmeshingschemes
BasicSchemes
Springanalogy(smoothing)
Localremeshing
Layering
OtherMethods
2.5D
Userdefinedmeshmotion
Incylindermotion(RPM,strokelength,crankangle,)
PrescribedmotionviaprofilesorUDF
Coupledmotionbasedonhydrodynamicforcesfromtheflowsolution,viaFLUENTssixdegreeof
freedom(6DOF)solver
Introduction
15
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
MovingZones
DynamicMeshMethods
Layering
Layersofcellsaregeneratedand
collapsedastheyareoverrunby
themovingboundary.Layeringis
appropriateforquad/hex/prism
mesheswithlinearorrotational
motionandcantoleratesmallor
largeboundarydeflections
Introduction
16
2011ANSYS,Inc.
LocalRemeshing
SpringAnalogy
Inlocalremeshing,ascellsbecome
skewedduetomovingboundaries,
cellsarecollapsedandtheskewed
regionisremeshed.Localremeshing
isappropriatefortri/tet mesheswith
largerangeofboundarymotion
Springanalogyisusefulwhenthere
aresmallboundarydeformations.
Theconnectivityandcellcountis
unchangedduringmotion.Spring
analogyisappropriatefortri/tet
mesheswithsmalldeformations
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
MovingZones
TheDynamicMesh(DM)Model
Combinationofapproaches:
Initialmeshneedsproperdecomposition
Layering:
Valvetravelregion
Lowercylinderregion
Remeshing:
Uppercylinderregion
Nonconformalinterface
betweenzones
Anadvancedtrainingcourseon
DynamicMeshisavailable
Introduction
17
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
MovingZones
6DOFCoupledMotion
Objectsmoveasaresultofaerodynamic
forcesandmomentsactingtogetherwith
otherforces,suchasthegravityforce,
thrustforces,orejectorforces
Insuchcases,themotionandtheflowfield
arethuscoupled,andwecallthiscoupled
motion
FLUENTprovidesthe6DOFModel
Thetrajectoryofanobjectiscomputedbased
ontheaerodynamicforces/moments,
gravitationalforce,andejectorforces
The6DOFUDFisfullyparallelized
Introduction
18
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
MovingZones
Summary
Fivedifferentapproachesmaybeusedtomodelflowsovermovingparts
Single(Rotating)ReferenceFrameModel
MultipleReferenceFrameModel
MixingPlaneModel
SlidingMeshModel
DynamicMeshModel(ConsiderourAdvancedTrainings)
Thefirstthreemethodsareprimarilysteadystateapproacheswhilesliding
meshisinherentlyunsteady
Enablingthesemodelsinvolvesinpart,changingthestationaryfluidzonesto
eitherMovingReferenceFrameorMovingMesh
Mostphysicalmodelsarecompatiblewithmovingreferenceframesor
movingmeshes(e.g.multiphase,combustion,heattransfer,etc.)
Introduction
19
2011ANSYS,Inc.
NonConformalInterfaces
January19,2012
RotatingZones
DynamicMesh
Summary
Release14.0
Appendix
20
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Release14.0
MotioninSolidZones
Inmostsimulationsitisnotnecessarytospecifyanymotionin
solidzones
Solidzonemotionshouldbeusedwhentheconvectionofenergy
needstobeconsidered
Forexample,ahotjetimpingingonarotatingdisk.Topreventahotspotfrom
formingtheconvectionofenergyinthesolidneedstobeincluded
Inthiscasetheheattransferequationhasaconvectiveterm
21
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Release14.0
MotioninSolidZones
Insolidzones,theconservationoftheenergyequationcan
accountforheattransportduetomotionofthesolid,conduction
andvolumetricheatsources
h
( U S h ) ( T ) S E
t
Solid Velocity
Notethatthesolidisneverphysicallymovedwhenusingthis
approach,thereisonlyanadditionaladvectiontermaddedto
theenergyequation
22
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Release14.0
MotioninSolidZones
Solidzonemotioncanbeclassifiedq=0
intotwoareas:
TranslationalMotion
Tin = Tspec
q=0
q=0
Forexample,aprocesswherea
solidmovescontinuouslyinalinear
directionwhilecooling
Thesolidmustextendcompletely
throughthedomain
RotationalMotion
Forexample,abrakerotorwhichis
heatedbybrakepads
23
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Release14.0
MovingReferenceFrameModeling
Systemslikethesecanbesolvedbydividingthedomainintomultiplefluidzones
somezoneswillberotating,othersstationary
Stationary
zone
Interface
Rotating
zone
24
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Release14.0
NavierStokesEquations:RotatingReference
Frames
Equationscanbesolvedinabsoluteorrotating(relative)
referenceframe
RelativeVelocityFormulation
ObtainedbytransformingthestationaryframeNSequationstoarotating
referenceframe
Usestherelativevelocityasthedependentvariable
CanbeselectedundertheGeneraltabinProblemSetup
AbsoluteVelocityFormulation
Derivedfromtherelative
velocityformulation
Usestheabsolutevelocity
asthedependentvariable
DefaultformulationforrotatingzonesinFLUENT
Rotationalsourcetermsappear
inmomentumequations
z
25
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
y
CFD domain
ro
rotating
frame
z
stationary
frame
R
x
axis of
rotation
Release14.0
TheVelocityTriangle
Therelationshipbetweentheabsoluteandrelativevelocitiesisgivenby
Inturbomachinery,thisrelationshipcanbeillustratedusingthelawsofvectoraddition.
ThisisknownastheVelocityTriangle
V Absolute Velocity
W Relative Velocity
V
26
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Release14.0
ComparisonofFormulations
Relative Velocity Formulation: x-momentum equation
wx
p
W wx vrx 2 W r
t
x
Coriolis acceleration
Centripetal acceleration
v x
p
Wv x vx V
t
x
Coriolis + Centripetal accelerations
27
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Release14.0
IntroductiontotheMRFModel
Thedomainissubdividedintostationaryandrotatingfluidzones
Morethanonerotatingzoneispermitted
Zonescanrotateatdifferentspeeds
Governingequationsaresolvedineachfluidzone
SRFequationsusedinrotatingzones
Attheinterfacesbetweentherotatingandstationaryzones,appropriate
transformationsofthevelocityvectorandvelocitygradientsareperformedto
computefluxesofmass,momentum,energy,andotherscalars
Flowisassumedtobesteadyineachzone(clearlyanapproximation)
MRFignorestherelativemotionsofthezoneswithrespecttoeachother
Doesnotaccountforfluiddynamicinteractionbetweenstationaryandrotating
components
ForthisreasonMRFisoftenreferredtoasthefrozenrotorapproach
Ideally,theflowattheMRFinterfacesshouldberelativelyuniformormixed
out
28
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Release14.0
TheMixingPlaneModel(MPM)
TheMPMisatechniquewhichpermitssteadystatesolutionsformultistageaxial
andcentrifugalturbomachines whereupstreamanddownstreamperiodic
domainsdonotmatchattheconnection
Advantage:
MPMrequiresonlyasinglebladepassageperbladerowregardlessofthenumberofblades,because
ofcircumferentialaveragingnonuniformitiesintheflowatthemixingplaneinterface
MPMcanhandledifferentnumbersofbladesatbothsidesofmixingplane
Fan (9 blades)
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Release14.0
MPMvs.MRF
MRFcanbeusedonlyifwehaveequalperiodic
anglesforeachrow
Formultistageturbomachinery problems
Thestageboundaryconditionsareoftenknown(e.g.inlettotal
pressureandtemperatureandstageoutletstaticpressure)but
nottheinterstageconditions
Bladecountswillgenerallynotbethesame fromonerowtothe
next
TheMPMrequiresonlyasinglebladepassageper
bladerowregardlessofthenumberofblades
Thisisaccomplishedbymixingout(averaging)the
circumferentialnonuniformitiesintheflowattheinterstage
(mixingplane)interface
30
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Release14.0
Axialvs.RadialMixingPlanes
SRFsolutionsareobtainedineachdomain,withthedomainslinkedbypassing
boundaryconditionsfromonezonetoanother
Theinlet/outletboundariesmustbeassignedBCtypesinoneofthefollowing
combinations:
Pressureoutlet/Pressureinlet
Pressureoutlet/Velocityinlet
Pressureoutlet/Massflowinlet
Axial machines
31
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Radial machines
Release14.0
MixingPlane SetUp
MixingPlaneModel
GUI:Define MixingPlanes
(r )
z
( z)
r
32
2011ANSYS,Inc.
1
p
1
p
(r, ) d
( z , ) d
January19,2012
MixingPlaneGeometrydetermines
methodofcircumferentialaveraging
ChooseRadialforaxialflowmachines
ChooseAxialforradialflowmachines
Release14.0
TheSlidingMeshModel(SMM)
Therelativemotionofstationaryandrotating
componentsinaturbomachinewillgiveriseto
unsteadyinteractions
Shock
interaction
Theseinteractionsaregenerallyclassifiedasfollows:
potential
interaction
Potentialinteractions
(pressurewaveinteractions)
Wakeinteractions
Shockinteractions
BothMRFandMPMneglectunsteadyinteraction
entirelyandthusarelimitedtoflowswhere
theseeffectsareweak
Stator
Rotor
wake interaction
Ifunsteadyinteractioncannotbeneglected,wecan
employtheSlidingMeshmodel(SMM)to
accountfortherelativemotionbetweenthe
stationaryandrotatingcomponents
33
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Release14.0
HowtheSlidingMeshModelWorks
LiketheMRFmodel,thedomainisdividedintomovingandstationaryzones,
separatedbynonconformalinterfaces
UnliketheMRFmodel,eachmovingzonesmeshwillbeupdatedasafunction
oftime,thusmakingthemathematicalprobleminherentlyunsteady.
cells at time t
cells at time t + t
AnotherdifferencewithMRFisthatthegoverningequationshaveanew
movingmeshform,andaresolvedinthestationaryreferenceframefor
absolutequantities
MovingreferenceframeformulationisNOTusedhere(i.e.noadditionalaccelerations
actingassourcestermsinthemomentumequations)
Equationsareaspecialcaseofthegeneralmoving/deformingmeshformulation
Assumesrigidmeshmotionandsliding,nonconformalinterfaces
34
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Release14.0
NSEquations:SlidingMesh
d
dV (V U ) 0
dt V
S
d
v x dV V U v x pi dS vx dS
dt V
S
S
v y dV V U v y pj dS vy dS
dt V
S
S
d
v z dV V U v z pk vz dS
dt V
S
S
(x momentum)
(y momentum)
(z momentum)
d
et V U
dt V
S
35
2011ANSYS,Inc.
(continuity)
p
et dS vx v x vy v y vz v z q dS (energy)
January19,2012
Release14.0
SMM Setup
Enabletheunsteadysolver
DefineslidingzonesasInterfaceBCtypes
Foreachinterfacezonepair,createanon
conformalinterface
EnablePeriodic optionifsliding/rotatingmotionis
periodic.
EnableCoupled forconjugateheattransfer
OtherBCsaresameasSRF,MRFmodels
36
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Release14.0
SolvingSMMProblems
ChooseappropriateTime Step Size andMax Iterations
s
t
R
Advancethesolutionuntiltheflowbecomes
timeperiodic(pressures,velocities,etc.,
oscillatewitharepeatingtimevariation).
Usuallyrequiresseveralrevolutionsofthegrid.
Goodinitialconditionscanreducethetime
neededtoachievetimeperiodicity`
37
2011ANSYS,Inc.
January19,2012
Release14.0