Human Rights Alert

PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750

Digitally signed by Joseph H Zernik
Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net DN: cn=Joseph H Zernik, o, ou,
email=jz12345@earthlink.net, c=US
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Location: La Verne, California
Date: 2010.04.19 01:08:03 -07'00'
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

10-04-18 Human Rights Alert - Appendix to UPR Report

The appendix includes a series of records in support of the allegations, conclusions, and recommendations in
the report. Links are provided to the online, digitally verified copies of records at the Human Rights Alert
Scribd account.

1) April 18, 2010 Human Rights Alert – Final Submission for the 2010 UPR of the United States
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/10-04-18-Human-Rights-Alert-Final-Submission-to-the-
United-Nations-for-the-2010-Universal-Periodic-Review-of-the-US-s

2) The case of the Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons)

A list of reports and studies by other organizations who document the scope and nature of the case, which
is claimed to be a Human Rights violation of historic proportions. The best estimate for the number of
those falsely imprisoned for over a decade is from the acclaimed series by Public Broadcasting Service
(PBS) LAPD Blues, and the estimates were at minimum 8,000, and possibly 16,000 or more.

a) Rampart FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) – a Review – by Dr Joseph Zernik for Human Rights
Alert.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729660/09-12-17-Rampart-FIPs-Falsely-Imprisoned-Persons-Review

b) 2001 Rampart False Imprisonments – by PBS Frontline Series: LAPD Blues

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24901612/01-05-01-Rampart-FIPs-Rampart-First-Trial-PBS-Frontline-
Rampart-False-Imprisonments-s

c)_ 2006 Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/06-07-15-LAPD-s-Blue-Ribbon-Review-Panel-Report-2006

d) 2001 The Justice System of Los Angeles County – by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/00-09-01-The-criminal-justice-system-of-Los-Angeles-
County-California-by-E-Chemerinsky-57-Guild-Prac-121-2000

e) 2001 Policing the Justice System – by Prof David Burcham and Prof Katherine Fisk
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/00-00-00-David-Burcham-and-Katherine-Fisk-Loyola-
Symposium-The-Rampart-Scandal-Policing-the-Criminal-Justice-System-2000-s

3) Case of Richard Fine

a) Richard Fine – a Review - by Dr Joseph Zernik for Human Rights Alert

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729084/09-12-17-Richard-Isaac-Fine-Review-e

b) Motion for Intervention in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827), at the US Supreme Court, for a conference
scheduled for April 23, 2010 – by Dr Joseph Zernik
At the time of writing this appendix, such papers were served on parties, but it is not known if the
court would accept the filing of such papers in a timely manner. The motion and its Appendices
document the various fraudulent schemes employed against the 70 year old Richard Fine, who is held
in solitary confinement for over a year, with no warrant, and no judgment, conviction, or sentencing
ever entered in his case.
z Page 2/4 April 19, 2010

A series of letters by Frederick Bennett, Court Counsel, Los Angeles Superior Court, in response to
letters addressed to the Clerk of the Court and Presiding Judge. Such letters document that the Los
Angeles Superior Court never operated for over a quarter century with honest, published Local Rules
of Court, instead, the court counsel made conflicting statements in various letters regarding the Rules
of Court. Most significant was the effective admission of the Court Counsel, that for over a quarter
century the Los Angeles Superior Court published false and deliberately misleading Local Rules of
Court relative to true nature of Books of Judgments and Entry of Judgment in the Court. It is claimed
that the ambiguity created in entry of judgment at the Los Angeles Superior Court was key in the
racketeering activity of judges of the court.
Following the Court Counsel’s claim that the Microfilm Judgments archive was today the court’s
effective Book of Judgments, a search was conducted that showed that no judgment for contempt
were ever entered in the case that was purported to be the basis for Richard Fine arrest- Marina
Strand Colony II Homeowners Assn. vs County of L.A. Marina v LA County (BS109420).
Likewise, evidence is presented that no judgments were entered in other cases of significance:
i. Sturgeon v Los Angeles County (BC351286) – a case that was purported to review the legal
foundation for the taking by ALL judges of secret payments from Los Angeles County for
over a decade.
ii. Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) – a case that is alleged as the prototype of real estate fraud by
judges and attorneys under the guise of litigation at the court.
iii. Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) – a case that was opined as real estate fraud under the guise of
real estate litigation, and followed the prototype of Galdjie v Darwish.

a) April 18, 2010 Amended Motion to Intervene

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161573/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-1-Amended-Motion-to-
Intervene-s

b) April 18, 2010 Amended Request for Lenience for Pro Se Filer
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161636/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-2-Amended-Request-for-
Lenience-by-Pro-Se-Filer-s

c) April 18, 2010 Amended Request for Incorporation by Reference

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162109/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-3-Amended-Request-for-
Corrections-in-US-Supreme-Court-Records-s

d) April 18, 2010 Amended Request for Corrections in US Supreme Court Records
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162144/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-4-Amended-Request-for-
Incorporation-by-Reference-s

e) April 18, 2010 Amended Appendix for Motion to Intervene

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161692/10-04-18-Fine-v-Sheriff-09-A827-5-Amended-Appendices-s
4) Case of Dr Joseph Zernik
The Addendum to Complaint to the Inspector General of the US Department of Justice documented the
disregard of senior US Officers to the Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of the 10 million residents
of Los Angeles County, California. The Inspector General, Glenn A Fine, so far refused to respond on the
complaint. An inquiry in this regard was issued by the Hon Dianne Feinstein, Senator from California.
Likewise, the complaint filed with Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) reflects refusal of senior
US Officers to provide equal protection. The OCC so far refuses to answer on the complaint, and inquiry
in this regard was issued by the Hon Dianne Feinstein, Senator from California.
The records linked below provide evidence for involvement of the most senior US officers and US
corporate management in conduct that was in disrespect of the Human, Constitutional, and Civil rights of
US citizens, and demonstrated the ongoing refusal to enforce the law in Los Angeles County, California.

c) January 19, 2010 Addendum to Complaint filed on November 23, 2009, and again on December
2, 2009 with Inspector General of US Department of Justice against Kenneth Kaiser – Assistant
Director of FBI for Criminal Investigations, and Kenneth Melson – then Director of US Dept of
Justice, Office of US Attorneys
z Page 3/4 April 19, 2010

http://www.scribd.com/doc/25445659/10-01-19-Addendum-to-Complaint-to-Inspector-General-US-
Dept-of-Justice-re-refusal-to-protect-Los-Angeles-County-residents-against-racketeering-judg

b) March 9, 2010 Addendum to Complaint filed on November 23, 2009, and again on December 2,
2009 with Inspector General of US Department of Justice against Kenneth Kaiser – Assistant
Director of FBI for Criminal Investigations, and Kenneth Melson – then Director of US Dept of
Justice, Office of US Attorneys
http://www.scribd.com/doc/28125499/10-03-09-Addendum-to-Complaint-to-DOJ-IG-Regarding-
Fraud-by-Kenneth-Kaiser-Assistant-Director-of-FBI-for-Criminal-Investigations

c) March 6, 2010 Addendum to Complaint filed with OCC against Bank of America Corporation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29653627/10-03-06-Bank-of-America-Addendum-to-Appeal-1070442-
filed-with-Office-of-Comptroller-of-the-Currency-against-Brian-Moynihan

d) February 26, 2010 Letter from the Office of the Hon Dianne Feinstein Re: Inquiry on US Dept
of Justice Inspector General
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29659469/10-02-26-Senator-Feinstein-s-Inquiry-on-US-Department-of-
Justice-Inspector-General-Glenn-A-Fine-s

e) March 11, 2010 Follow up letter from the Office of the Hon Dianne Feinstein Re: Inquiry on US
OCC
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29647939/10-03-11-Bank-of-America-Senator-Dianne-Feinstein-Follow-
Up-with-US-Office-of-Comptroller-of-the-Currency-Re-Bank-of-America-Corporation-s

5) Case management system (CMS) of the sheriff’s Department, Los Angeles County, California
Large scale false imprisonments in Los Angeles County, California are alleged through holding of
inmates based on false records, routinely posted by the Sheriff’s Department in its online public access
system “Inmate Information Center”, while denying access to the true arrest and booking records, which
are public records by California Public Records Act – GOVT. CODE §§ 6250 - 6276.48

a) Data Survey
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24809956/10-01-04-Los-Angeles-Sheriff-Department-Inmate-
information-Center-data-survey-Jose-Martinez-s

b) Data Survey
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25064776/10-01-11-Sheriff-s-Department-of-Los-Angeles-County-
Inmate-Information-Center-data-survey-Jose-Rodriguez-s

c) Data Survey
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24816245/10-01-05-Sheriff-s-Department-of-Los-Angeles-County-
Inmate-Information-Center-data-survey-John-Smith-s

d) Data Survey
http://www.scribd.com/doc/28350775/10-03-14-Survey-of-Los-Angeles-County-Sheriff-s-
Department-Inmate-Information-Consecutive-Numbers-s

e) Data Survey
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25315610/10-01-16-Los-Angeles-County-Sheriff-s-Department-
inmate-data-survey-VINE-vs-Inmate-Information-Center-re-Jose-Martinez-Jose-Rodriguez-s

f) Addendum to Complaint filed with the Sheriff’s Department – alleged fraud in Booking
Terminals
http://www.scribd.com/doc/28322231/10-03-13-Addendum-to-Complaint-Sc2262473-Sheriff-s-
Department-re-Alleged-Fraud-in-Booking-Terminals-s

6) Case management system (CMS) of the Los Angeles County, California, Superior Court
z Page 4/4 April 19, 2010

Several records, which were written as abstracts or manuscripts, describing features of the systems, which
are alleged as inherent fraud.

a) Sustain – the CMS of the Civil Division of the Los Angeles Superior Court – Abstract and
Figures – by Dr Joseph Zernik for Human Rights Alert
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162880/08-06-10-Beyond-Voting-Machines-Computers-the-Courts-
Sustain-CMS-of-the-Los-Angeles-Superior-Court-Abstract-and-Figures-s

b) Registers of Actions in Sustain - the CMS of the Civil Division of the Los Angeles Superior
Court – Abstract and Figures – by Dr Joseph Zernik for Human Rights Alert
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162461/08-10-19-Computers-the-Courts-Sustain-CMS-of-the-Los-
Angeles-Superior-Court-Registers-of-Action

7) Case management system (CMS) and public access system of the US District Court, Central
District of California, and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit.
The data is written as a solicitation for expert opinions on the validity and integrity of such system.
Although the writing is based on evidence. Which originated from Los Angeles County, California, it bear
much wider significance, since the same systems, PACER, and CM/ECF were installed in the past decade
in the US courts throughout the US

a) Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) – A Review – by Dr Joseph Zernik for Human Rights Alert
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24732941/10-01-03-Notice-of-Electronic-Filing-NEF-First-Amendment-
CMSs-Review

b) Solicitation of Expert Opinions on PACER and CM/ECF

http://www.scribd.com/doc/29525744/10-03-25-Request-for-Experts-Opinions-RE-CM-ECF-case-
management-system-of-the-US-Dist-Court-Los-Angeles-s

c) Addendum #1 to Solicitation of Expert Opinions on PACER and CM/ECF

http://www.scribd.com/doc/29525890/10-03-27-Addendum-1-to-Request-for-Opinions-Re-CM-ECF-
case-management-system-of-the-US-Court-of-Appeals-9th-Circuit-as-reviewed-in-orders-in-Fine

d) Addendum #2 to Solicitation of Expert Opinions on PACER and CM/ECF

http://www.scribd.com/doc/29527583/10-04-05-Addendum-2-to-Request-for-Experts-Opinions-RE-
Case-management-system-NDAs-US-Court-of-Appeals-9th-Circuit-s-Us-Court-Appeals-9th-s

Dated: April 19, 2010

La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California For Human Rights Alert

By: ______________
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750
Phone: 323.515.4583
Fax: 323.488.9697
Email <jz12345@earthlink.net>
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert