Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Sumira Jan , Talat Parween , Rehana Hamid , T.O. Siddiqi & Mahmooduzzafar
a
To cite this article: Sumira Jan, Talat Parween, Rehana Hamid, T.O. Siddiqi & Mahmooduzzafar (2015): Elemental,
biochemical and essential oil modulation in developing seedlings of Psoralea corylifolia L. exposed to different presowing
gamma irradiation treatment, Journal of Essential Oil Research, DOI: 10.1080/10412905.2015.1024890
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2015.1024890
CORD, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India; bIPFT, Gurgaon, India; cDepartment of Botany,
Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
1. Introduction
In recent years, more attention has been paid to some
physical factors that favorably inuence the sowing
material of cultivated plants and improve disinfestation
of grains (13). The prevailing opinion is that physical
methods for the processing of pre-sowing material
(seed) stimulate metabolic changes in the seeds (47).
One of the physical methods that can be applied to the
improvement of the sowing material is seed treatment
with gamma radiation (8, 9). However, the viability
and sometimes the developmental process of the seedling or the plant have been seriously hampered by
radiation (10). The stimulatory effects of gamma rays
have been recorded on some aromatic plants such as
chamomile (11), peppermint (12, 13), lemongrass (14),
and Mathiola incana and Delphinium ajacis (15).
Psoralea corylifolia well known for its antioxidative, anti-microbial, anti inammatory, anti-tumor,
anti-mutagenic, anti-HIV activity, insect hormonal
activities and in the inhibition of mitochondrial lipid
peroxidation has been extensively used on a commercial scale by Indian pharmaceutical industries resulting
in fast decline of its wild population (1622). Apart
from active compounds, Psoralea corylifolia L. yields
a pale yellowish oil with a characteristic, terpenic,
*Corresponding author. Email: sumira.sam@gmail.com
2015 Taylor & Francis
S. Jan et al.
2. Experimental
2.1 Procurement of seeds and irradiation
Dry seeds of babchi [Psoralea corylifolia L.], belonging to the family Fabaceace, were acquired from
NBPGR (National Bureau Plant Genome Research),
Indian Agriculture Research Institute (IARI), New
Delhi. The seed samples (25 g each) were packed in
polythene and were irradiated with various doses of
gamma rays (T1=2.5, T2=5, T3=10, T4=15 and T5=20
kGy) from 60Co (Gamma chamber, GC, 5000) at a
dose rate of 1.65 kGy/hour (27) under ambient room
temperature in INMAS (Institute of Nuclear Medicine
and Applied Sciences), New Delhi.
Irradiated seeds were transferred and planted in the
herbal garden of Hamdard University, New Delhi, India
(2838N, 7711E; elevation 228 m), about 7080%
relative humidity, 35C temperature, sandy-loam soil
(pH 7.3). Soil analysis exhibited 51 and 7.9 ppm concentrations of nitrogen and sulfur levels, respectively.
Each sample was planted in six rows, 4 m long and 0.6
m wide, making an area of 14.4 m2. Hills were 30 cm
apart; ve seeds per hill to avoid root interruption in
Psoralea corylifolia L. owing to the high sensitivity of
roots. The leaves from developing seedlings were collected at three developmental stages [pre-owering (45
DAS), owering (90 DAS) and post-owering (135
DAS)] to analyze the effects of the gamma irradiation
on biochemical and elemental parameters. Field experiments were repeated three times with ve replicates.
The mature seeds of developing plants of different sets
(T0=control, T1=2.5, T2=5, T3=10, T4=15 and T5=20
kGy) were harvested in mid-November to estimate and
evaluate the oil yield and quality by gas chromatographymass spectrometry (GCMS) and solid-phase
particle microextraction (SPME) analysis.
2.2 Chemicals
All chemicals used were of analytical reagent (AR) or
guaranteed reagent (GR) quality. Most of the chemicals
were the products of SRL, E. Merck, Aldrich-sigma
and S.D. Fine.
2.3 Nitrate content measurement
The nitrate content of leaves was estimated using the
method given by Grover et al. (28). Half a gram of
fresh leaves was placed in a conical ask, to which 50
mg charcoal and 10 mL distilled water were added and
the ask was boiled for 45 minutes. After ltration,
the volume was made up to 50 mL by adding doubledistilled water; 1 mL of this aliquot was taken and
0.5 mL of 2 mM CuSO4 solution, 0.25 mL of 0.01 M
hydrazine sulfate and 0.25 mL of 0.1 N NaOH was
added. The vials were kept in a water bath incubator
a Clevenger-type apparatus. The essential oils were dissolved in Et2O, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, ltered
and the solvent was removed by evaporation on a water
bath. The plant material was ltered off and the aqueous residues were extracted, rst with n-hexane
(250 mL) and then with Et2O (250 mL), to remove
traces of volatile compounds. The organic solvents, dissolved in the aqueous phase, were evaporated under
reduced pressure at room temperature. The remaining
aqueous extracts were treated with -glucosidase
(41 mg) from almonds (BioChemika, 1 g, Lot. 49290,
Fluka) at 28C for 16 hours and the volatile compounds were collected in n-hexane (0.5 mL) by
hydrodistillation. All the essential oils and the volatile
fractions were analyzed by GC and GCMS.
2.10 Gas chromatography
GC analyses were accomplished with a HP-5890 Series II
instrument equipped with HP-WAX and HP-DB-5
capillary columns (30 m 0.25 mm, 0.25 m lm thickness), working with the following temperature program:
60C for 10 minutes, rising at 5C/minute to 220C;
injector and detector temperatures, 250C; carrier gas,
nitrogen (2 mL/minute); detector, dual FID; split ratio,
1:30; injection, 0.5 mL. The identication of the components was performed, for both the columns, by the
comparison of their retention time with those of pure
authentic samples and by means of their linear retention
indices (Lri) relative to the series of n-hydrocarbons. The
relative proportions of the essential oil constituent percentages were obtained by FID peak-area normalization,
all relative response factors being taken as one.
2.11 Gas ChromatographyMass Spectrometry
GCMS analyses were performed with a Varian CP3800 gas chromatograph equipped with a DB-5 capillary column (30 m 0.25 mm; coating thickness 0.25
m) and a Varian Saturn 2000 ion trap mass detector.
Analytical conditions: injector and transfer line temperatures 220 and 240C, respectively; oven temperature programmed from 60 to 240C at 30C/minute;
carrier gas helium at 1 mL/minute; injection 0.2 L
(10% hexane solution); split ratio 1:30. Identication of
the constituents was based on comparison of the retention times with those of authentic samples, comparing
their linear retention indices relative to the series of
n-hydrocarbons, and on computer matching against
commercial indexes (NIST 98 and Adams) besides a
home-made library of mass spectra built up from pure
substances and components of known oils and MS literature data. Moreover, the molecular weights of all the
identied substances were conrmed by GCchemical
ionization MS (CIMS), using Me-OH as the CI gas.
S. Jan et al.
Table 1. Variation in soluble protein content (mg/g fr.wt.) at various growth stages of Psoralea corylifolia L. exposed to different
doses of gamma rays.
Developmental stage
Treatments
Control
2.5 kGy
5 kGy
10 kGy
15 kGy
20 kGy
Pre-owering
18.67a
21.66
24.93
29.72
13.16
10.85
0.13
0.06
0.01
0.08
0.05
0.12
(16.01)b
(33.52)c
(59.18)d
(29.51)e
(41.88)f
Flowering
24.5g
25.7
26.7
32.12
28.5
29.1
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.01
(4.89)h
(8.97)i
(31.10)n
(16.32)k
(18.81)l
Post-owering
19.39m
23.51
26.66
27.5
14.56
11.70
0.23
0.09
0.02
0.01
0.08
0.03
(21.24)m
(37.49)mn
(12.24)j
(24.90)no
(39.65)o
Note: Values in parenthesis represent percent variation. Values with different superscripts are signicantly (p < 0.05) different from each other
(Duncans multiple range test). *p 0.05. The values represent mean SE (n = 5). CD at 5%. Treatments: 0.099*; developmental stages: 0.070*;
treatment developmental stages: 0.221*.
Table 2. Variation in free amino acid (mg/g fr.wt.) at various growth stages of Psoralea corylifolia L. exposed to different doses
of gamma rays.
Developmental stages
Treatments
Control
2.5 kGy
5 kGy
10 kGy
15 kGy
20 kGy
Pre-owering
12.71a
16.92
21.92
32.70
8.06ab
6.00bc
0.11
0.08
0.05
0.07
0.05
0.01
(33.12)a
(72.46)a
(157.27)a
(36.58)ab
(52.79)bc
Flowering
14.81c
18.49
24.54
38.76
11.76
8.87d
0.06
0.13
0.04
0.02
0.06
0.04
(24.84)c
(65.49)c
(161.38)cd
(20.59)d
(40.10)d
Post-owering
13.10d
17.41
14.55
11.55
7.67d
7.07d
30.60
28.10
25.56
21.06
14.13
21.65
(32.90)d
(11.06)d
(11.83)d
(41.45)d
(46.03)d
Note: Values in parenthesis represent percent variation. Values with different superscripts are signicantly (p < 0.05) different from each other
(Duncans multiple range test). *p 0.05. The values represent mean SE (n = 5). CD at 5%; treatments: 17.11*; developmental stages: 12.10*;
treatment developmental stages: 38.25*.
Table 3. Variation in nitrate content (mmol/g fr.wt.) at various growth stages of Psoralea corylifolia L. exposed to different doses
of gamma rays.
Developmental stages
Treatments
Control
2.5 kGy
5 kGy
10 kGy
15 kGy
20 kGy
Pre-owering
4.62a
7.05
8.60
10.79
3.58
2.55
0.05
0.01
0.13
0.04
0.08
0.07
(52.59)b
(86.14)c
(133.54)c
(22.51)d
(44.80)e
Flowering
5.91f
8.21
10.67h
12.43
4.53
3.11
0.05
0.04
0.06
0.07
0.09
0.02
(38.91)g
(80.54)h
(110.32)i
(23.35)j
(47.37)k
Post-owering
5.54k
7.76l
9.59
11.55
3.80
2.76
0.13
0.06
0.12
0.06
0.03
0.05
(40.07)m
(73.10)m
(108.48)n
(31.40)o
(50.18)p
Note: Values in parenthesis represents percent variation Values with different superscripts are signicantly (p < 0.05) different from each other
(Duncans multiple range test). *p 0.05. The values represent mean SE (n = 10). CD at 5%; treatments: 0.077*; developmental stages: 0.055*;
treatment developmental stages: 0.173*.
Table 4. Variation in nitrate reductase activity (mol/g fr.wt./hour) at various growth stages of Psoralea corylifolia L. exposed to
different doses of gamma rays.
Developmental stages
Treatments
Control
2.5 kGy
5 kGy
10 kGy
15 kGy
20 kGy
Pre-owering
31.28a
36.04
43.24
48.32
26.87
19.51
0.06
0.22
0.04
0.08
0.13
0.09
(15.21)b
(38.23)c
(54.47)c
(14.09)d
(37.62)e
Flowering
34.45f
39.26
48.16
52.62
31.66
23.82
0.06
0.05
0.12
0.05
0.18
0.03
(13.96)g
(39.79)h
(52.74)i
(8.09)j
(30.85)k
Post-owering
34.07
38.57
45.83
50.88
29.86p
22.56
0.02
0.23
0.04
0.03
0.07
0.13
(13.20)m
(34.51)n
(49.33)o
(12.35)p
(33.78)q
Note: Values in parenthesis represent percent variation. Values with different superscripts are signicantly (p < 0.05) different from each other
(Duncans multiple range test). *p 0.05. The values represent mean SE (n=10). CD at 5%; treatments: 0.159*; developmental stages: 0.112*;
treatment developmental stages: 0.355*.
Figure 1. Variation in total nitrogen (%) content per mg at various developmental stages of Psoralea corylifolia L. exposed to
different doses of gamma rays (T1=2.5, T2=5, T3=10, T4=15 and T5=20 kGy). Bars represents the mean SE (n = 10). Values
with different letters are signicantly (p < 0.05) different from each other (Duncans multiple range test).
S. Jan et al.
Figure 2. Variation in total sulfur (%) content per mg at various developmental stages of Psoralea corylifolia L. exposed to
different doses of gamma rays (T1=2.5, T2=5, T3=10, T4=15 and T5=20 kGy). Bars represents the mean SE (n = 10). Values
with different letters are signicantly (p < 0.05) different from each other (Duncans multiple range test).
Variation in essential oil content (%) in Psoralea corylifolia L. seeds following different gamma irradiation dosage.
Treatments
Control, mean SD
T2, 5 kGy
T3, 10 kGy
T4, 15 Gy
T5, 20 kGy
Essential oil
0.89 0.04
1.01 0.01
(13.48)d
1.1 0.06
(23.59)bc
1.3 0.38
(46.06)ab
1.49 0.29
(67.41)a
1.60 0.15
(79.77)a
Note: Each data represents the mean standard errors.Values with different superscripts are signicantly different from each other (ANOVA,
Tukeys test, p 0.05). Value in parenthesis indicates percent variation. *p 0.05. The values represent mean SE (n=10). CD at 5%; treatments:
essential oil, 0.129*, other volatile fraction, 0.113*.
Table 6. GCMS analysis of the essential oil and other volatile fractions of the seeds of Psoralea corylifolia L. exposed to variable doses of gamma radiation.
Compounds
RIp
3-(E)-Hexen-1-ol
Heptanal
Tricyclene
-pinene
Camphene
-Pinene
Sabinene
1-Octen-ol
-Myrcene
Limonene
-Phellandrene
Linalool
Nonanal
Terpinen-4-ol
Geraniol
Geranial
Caryophyllene
cis-Piperitol
Thymol
Gernyl acetate
-Caryophyllene
-Gurjunene
-Humulene
Germacrene D
-Cadinene
Spathulenol
Caryophyllene oxide
Apiol
-Cadinol
Angelicin
Psoralen
Bakuchiol
(E)-Phytol
n-Docosane
Viridiorol
n-Heneicosane
Bicyclogermacrene
-Muurolol
allo-Aromadendrene
Humulene oxide-2
n-Bourbonene
-Terpineol
n-Hexadecane
trans--Cadinene
-(E)-Ocimene
Total (%)
845
903
924
936
949
987
976
986
984
1035
1036
1100
1107
1174
1227
1243
1428
1181
1274
1364
1417
1432
1454
1479
1532
1578
1586
1619
1643
1774
1829
1837
2099
2200
1593
2100
1496
1645
1463
1610
1386
1180
1600
1513
1038
Control
2.5 kGy
5 kGy
10 kGy
15 kGy
20 kGy
1363
1179
1010
1027
1087
1116
1130
1164
1453
1206
1208
1495
1394
1633
1787
1717
1593
1748
2162
1753
1593
1537
1709
1707
2150
2104
1962
2210
2102
2265
2297
2285
1027
2217
2211
2100
1767
2102
1683
2018
1530
1167
1608
1767
1253
0.69
0.48
9.8
52.2
3.6
0.58
0.43
0.8
4.2
0.6
0.30
1.9
0.4
0.9
0.6
0.9
6.5
0.8
0.4
0.6
18.5
0.3
4.6
6.8
0.9
0.9
1.9
0.78
0.68
6.24
24.8
22.78
0.9
0.4
0.5
0.86
0.89
10.2
54.12
5.01
0.69
0.5
0.90
5.10
0.90
0.43
2.5
1.4
0.9
0.79
1.4
7.5
1.2
0.8
0.9
21.0
0.9
5.0
7.0
1.4
1.2
2.3
0.82
0.72
6.58
25.0
23.80
1.5
0.6
1.2
1.3
1.0
0.6
0.9
0.8
2.0
0.9
0.7
1.0
1.3
209.59
0.70
0.50
9.9
53.7
4.8
0.69
0.49
0.90
4.7
0.90
0.37
2.4
0.7
1.5
0.77
1.6
7.6
1.2
0.7
0.9
19.5
0.8
5.0
7.01
1.5
1.5
2.4
0.78
0.75
7.08
25.96
25.93
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.2
0.7
0.9
0.8
2.2
1.2
0.8
0.9
1.6
211.93
0.90
0.94
11.3
56.12
6.09
0.76
0.90
0.95
5.15
0.95
0.46
2.80
1.2
1.9
0.89
1.56
8.09
1.90
0.90
1.2
22.09
10.7
5.32
8.56
2.34
1.9
2.8
0.98
0.80
7.90
26.04
24.09
1.90
0.9
1.9
1.65
1.7
0.8
1.2
0.85
2.4
1.3
0.9
1.2
1.7
239.62
0.94
0.98
12.34
58.90
7.98
0.79
0.94
1.45
6.34
1.45
0.56
3.06
1.5
2.09
0.97
1.89
8.98
2.34
1.23
1.87
23.19
11.87
7.02
9.06
4.34
2.07
2.78
1.45
0.98
7.76
27.04
25.09
2.03
1.0
2.5
1.7
1.9
0.97
1.7
0.95
2.65
1.87
1.45
1.67
1.98
266.2
1.23
1.45
14.54
60.90
8.98
0.89
1.04
1.05
7.74
1.87
0.87
4.98
1.98
2.87
1.34
2.09
9.04
2.89
1.67
1.98
25.87
14.89
7.08
9.009
4.64
2.17
2.89
1.78
1.09
7.89
37.04
35.09
2.53
1.56
2.67
1.85
2.09
1.23
1.67
1.23
2.89
1.90
1.69
1.87
2.01
308.96
RIp
0.7
0.2
0.6
0.2
1.9
0.4
0.3
0.1
1.3
185.16
S. Jan et al.
Table 7. Gas chromatographymass spectrometry (GCMS) analysis after hydrolysis by -glucocidase in the seeds of Psoralea
corylifolia L.exposed to variable doses of gamma radiation.
-glucosidase (%)
a
Control
2.5 kGy
5 kGy
10 kGy
15 kGy
20 kGy
4.6
11.2
27.1
31.4
1.1
8.1
5.4
6.4
26.5
3.2
2.1
0.76
0.5
3.8
1.5
133.66
5.98
12.01
28.01
30.03
1.9
8.9
6.0
7.0
28.02
3.8
4.5
1.8
0.90
4.68
1.69
146.22
6.4
12.7
28.5
30.5
1.70
9.1
7.8
6.8
28.6
4.5
4.3
0.90
0.94
4.56
1.63
148.90
7.09
13.09
30.09
31.45
1.98
10.03
7.9
7.09
29.05
4.76
4.90
1.90
1.87
4.98
1.76
157.94
8.05
14.29
31.19
32.05
2.03
11.78
8.03
7.23
30.08
5.09
5.60
2.0
1.97
5.18
1.86
166.43
9.07
15.09
32.17
33.08
2.23
12.08
9.13
8.23
31.88
6.19
6.60
2.23
2.24
5.35
1.95
177.52
Compounds
RIp
RIp
3-(E)-Hexen-1-ol
Tricyclene
-pinene
Camphene
1-Octen-ol
-Myrcene
Limonene
Caryophyllene
Germacrene D
-Cadinene
Spathulenol
n-Docosane
n-Eicosane
Bicyclogermacrene
n-Bourbonene
Total (%)
845
924
936
949
986
984
1035
1428
1479
1532
1578
2200
2100
1496
1386
1363
1010
1027
1087
1164
1453
1206
1593
1707
2150
2104
2217
2100
1767
1530
Note: RIpa refers to retention indices of compounds are listed in order of their elution from HP5-apolar column. RIpb refers to retention indices on
DB-WAX polar column.
gamma irradiation. Ionizing irradiation has a pronounced effect on protein sulfhydryl group as investigated in animals; however, there is a paucity of
research done on sulfur metabolism in plants (41). Cysteine, lysine and glutathione are known to increase after
low dose gamma irradiation (26, 42). Ionizing radiation
inhibited the utilization of methionine (43). Further,
Fan et al. (44) showed that gamma irradiation at doses
of pathogen inactivation signicantly increased the concentrations of most sulfur compounds, especially with
10 kGy. Ionizing radiation caused an increase in the
levels of phenylalanine ammonia lyase enzyme and
superoxide dismutase activity (26, 34). However, Jan
et al. (26) reported a decrease in glutathione with
increase in gamma irradiation doses.
GCMS and SPME analysis of volatile compounds
in P. corylifolia L. seeds exposed to variable doses of
gamma rays were summarized in Tables 68. A yellowish oil with a peppermint-like pleasant smell was
produced by hydro-distillation of seeds of P. corylifolia.
Oil content in Psoralea seeds showed statistically signicant differences among the treatments. Maximum oil
content (1.60%) was found in seeds irradiated with
20 kGy and minimum oil content was found in control
seeds (0.89%) as represented in Table 6. Our result
showed a high content of coumarins, phenylpropanoids
and isoavones, especially in seeds exposed to 15 and
20 kGy. Plants raised from seeds exposed to 20 kGy
exhibited the maximum increment in tricyclene
(48.36%), -pinene (16.66 %), camphene (149.44%),
-caryophyllene (39.83%), angelicin (26.44%), psoralen
(49.35%), bakuchiol (54.09%), gerianal (132.22%) and
Table 8. Variation in volatile fractions of seeds of Psoralea corylifolia L. plants developed from variably gamma irradiated seeds
using solid-phase particle microextraction (SPME) analysis.
SPME analyses
Compounds
RIaa
RIpb
Control
2.5 kGy
5 kGy
10 kGy
15 kGy
20 kGy
3-(E)-Hexen-1-ol
Heptanal
Tricyclene
-pinene
Camphene
Sabinene
1-Octen-3-ol
-pinene
(Z)-3-Hexene-ol
Limonene
-Phellandrene
-(E)-Ocimene
Terpinolene
Linalool
n-Nonanal
Geraniol
Geranial
-Cubebene
-Vlangene
-Copaene
-Bourbonone
-Cubebene
Isocaryophyllene
-Gurajenene
Caryophyllene
-Cedrene
-Gurjenene
-(E)-Farnesene
-Humelene
alloaromadendrene
-Murrolene
Germacrene D
Bicyclogermacrene
-Muurolene
n-Pentadecane
-(E-E)-Farnesene
cis--Cadinene
trans--Cadinene
-Cadinene
Spathulenol
n-Hexadecane
Humulene oxide II
-Muurolol
-Cadinol
-Bisabolol
n-Heptadecane
n-Nonadecane
n-Heneicosane
Total (%)
854
906
928
942
952
978
985
1017
1036
1039
1040
1038
1084
1093
1109
1237
1258
1352
1375
1378
1386
1393
1406
1409
1429
1432
1437
1440
1454
1463
1363
1185
1009
1038
1082
1130
1457
1119
1316
1209
1219
1256
1287
1509
1398
1795
1729
1457
1487
1517
1530
1543
1529
1617
1608
1539
1669
1707
1681
1694
0.7
4.5
16.9
45.3
1.4
0.6
0.83
4.92
17.03
47.86
1.72
0.9
0.89
5.20
17.89
49.98
1.83
0.93
0.90
5.34
18.78
51.23
1.97
1.2
0.95
6.09
18.98
53.54
2.09
1.30
1.23
7.09
18.90
54.87
2.12
1.32
0.9
7.5
0.5
0.4
0.9
1.2
8.3
0.62
0.68
1.3
1.42
8.7
0.77
0.70
1.5
1.57
8.9
0.82
0.73
1.70
1.63
9.2
0.93
0.79
1.78
1.67
9.7
0.98
0.87
1.98
3.3
3.7
3.9
3.95
3.97
4.35
0.3
0.5
0.45
0.65
0.56
0.72
0.67
0.79
0.73
0.89
0.80
0.93
3.2
3.7
3.9
4.02
4.98
5.45
0.6
0.8
0.90
1.02
1.05
1.78
1478
1482
1497
1499
1502
1504
1512
1513
1524
1579
1603
1608
1645
1654
1687
1703
1900
2100
1719
1769
1729
1497
1735
1768
1767
2147
2149
2153
1602
2017
2104
2221
2043
1700
1900
2100
7.4
0.9
7.9
1.4
8.2
1.5
8.7
1.9
8.90
2.0
9.04
2.05
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.67
0.78
0.65
0.83
0.78
0.89
0.72
0.89
0.89
0.90
0.77
0.99
0.98
0.95
0.86
1.3
97.3
106.26
112.42
117.47
123.35
129.22
increase of caryophyllene, and a twofold increase in psoralen and bakuchiol in comparison with control (Table 8).
These changes can be explained through the irradiation
effects on terpenes. Irradiation does not show any thermal effect on the avor compounds but via oxidation or
10
S. Jan et al.
4. Conclusion
Overall, the present investigation concluded that presowing gamma irradiation of Psoralea corylifolia L.
could substantially improve the biochemical aspects
and elemental composition up to 10 kGy. However,
higher doses of gamma irradiation might lead to a
deterioration in biochemical and elemental aspects,
especially sulfur content, which seems to be the most
sensitive to gamma irradiation. Low as well as high
doses of gamma irradiation were effective in increasing
the variability for essential oil content. The variability
was obliquely directed towards high levels of essential
oil components, thus improving the oxidative stability
of P. corylifolia L. The yield and quality of oil at 15
and 20 kGy were enhanced signicantly, indicating that
the genes responsible for oil yield and quality get
affected and produce micromutations. Elicitation of
secondary metabolites has application in the overproduction of desired compounds, which is an area of
commercial importance especially for high-value and
low-volume products.
Acknowledgements
I will like to thank faculty members of INMAS for providing
me the Gamma Cell facility required for irradiation of seeds
References
1. P.S. Phirke, A.B. Kudbe and S.P. Umbarkar, The
inuence of magnetic eld on plant growth. Seed Sci.
Technol., 24, 375392 (1996).
2. S. Jan, T. Parween, T.O. Siddiqi and Mahmooduzzafar,
Gamma irradiation induced qualitative and quantitative
changes in growth and productivity with special reference
to enhanced production of psoralen. Plant Growth
Regul., 64, 163171 (2011).
3. S.O. Fapohunda, S.T. Anjorin, E.C. Akueche and B.
Harcourt, Multi mycotoxin prole of gamma-radiated
sesame seeds from Abuja markets. Nigeria using LC-MS/
MS. Nat. Sci., 10, 127134 (2012).
4. A. Anisimov, V. Vorobev and A. Zuikov, The inuence
of laser radiation on the velocity of rotational motion of
protoplasm in Elodea cells. Laser Phys., 7, 11321137
(1997).
5. J. Podleny, Studies on inuence of laser light on seeds,
growth, development and yielding of the white lupine
(Lupinus albus L.) plants (in Polish). Monograe
Rozprawy Naukowe, IUNG, Puawy, 3, 159 (2002).
6. R.H. Moussa, Gamma irradiation regulation of nitrate
level in rocket (Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa) plants. J.
New. Seed., 8, 91101 (2006).
7. S. Jan, T. Parween, T.O. Siddiqi and Mahmooduzzafar,
Effect of gamma radiation on morphological, biochemical
and physiological aspects of plants and plant products.
Environ. Rev., 20, 1739 (2012).
8. H.R. Moussa, Low dose of gamma irradiation enhanced
drought tolerance in soybean. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 17,
6372 (2011).
9. A.M.R. Afy, H.S. El-Beltagi, A.A. Aly and A.E.
El-Ansary, The impact of -irradiation, essential oils and
iodine on biochemical components and metabolism of
potato tubers during storage. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobo.,
40, 129139 (2012).
10. A.P. Casarett, Effects of radiation on higher plants and
plant communities. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 59, 514 (1968).
11. L.V. Selenia and O.G. Stepanenko, Effect of pre-sowing
gamma irradiation on the productivity and active principle content of Matricaria recutita. Rastitelnye Ressusy,
15, 143154 (1979).
12. V. Zheljazkov, A. Margine, T. Stovea and K. Shetty,
Effect of gamma irradiation on some quantitative
characteristics in mint and cornmint. Acta Hort., 426,
381388 (1996).
13. A.A. Youssef and A.Z. Moussa, Effect of gamma rays on
growth and essential oil composition of chamomile
(Chamomilla recutita L.). Arab. Univ. J. Agric. Sci., 6,
301311 (1998).
14. N.S.D. Deaf, Chemical and biological studies on some
wild plants. M.Sc. Thesis, Fac. Agric., Zagazig Univ.,
Zagazig, Egypt (2000).
15. F.A.N. Mahmoud, Effect of gamma radiation and some
agrochemicals on germination, growth and owering of
Delphinium ajacis and Mathiola incana plants. M.Sc.
Thesis. Fac. Agric., Moshtohor, Zagazig Univ., Egypt
(2002).
11
12
S. Jan et al.
48. J. Sadecka, Inuence of two sterilisation ways, gammairradiation and heat treatment, on the volatiles of black
pepper (Piper nigrum L.). Czech J. Food Sci., 28, 4452
(2010).
49. R. Kumari, S. Singh and S.B. Agrawal, Responses of
ultraviolet-B induced antioxidant defense system in a
medicinal plant, Acorus calamus L. J. Environ. Biol., 31,
907911 (2010).
50. M. Haddad, M.F. Herent, B. Tilquin and J.
Quetin-Leclercq, Effect of gamma and e-beam radiation
on the essential oils of Thymus vulgaris thymoliferum,
Eucalyptus radiata and Lavandula angustifolia. J. Agric.
Food Chem., 55, 60826086 (2007).
51. S. Scalia and M. Mezzena, Incorporation of quercetin in
lipid microparticles: Effect on photo and chemical-stability. J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. Anal., 10, 9094 (2009).
52. D. Kozlowski, P. Marsal, M. Steel, R. Mokrini, J.L.
Duroux, R. Lazzaroni and P. Trouillas, Theoretical
investigation of the formation of a new series of
antioxidant depsides from the radiolysis of avonoid
compounds. Rad. Res., 168, 243252 (2007).
53. R. Arora, A.S. Dhakerb, M. Adhikarib, J. Sharma, R.
Chawla, D. Gupta, A. Zhelevaa, Y. Karamalakovaa, R.
Kumarb, R.J. Sharmac, A. Sharmab, S. Sultana, R.P.
Tripathi, R.K. Sharma and V. Gadjevaa, Radical scavenging and radiomodulatory effects of Psoralea corylifolia
Linn. substantiated by in vitro assays and EPR
spectroscopy. Z. Naturfor. C. J. Biosci., 66, 35 (2011).
54. S. Adhakari, K.I. Priyadarsini and T. Mukherjee, Physico-chemical studies on the evaluation of the antioxidant
activity of herbal extracts and active principles of some
Indian medicinal plants. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutri., 40,
174183 (2007).
55. S. Nirmala, S. Anurag, M. Yadav, Psoralea corylifolia L.,
an endangered medicinal plant with broad spectrum
properties. Med. Plants Int. J. Phytomed. Rel. Indust., 6,
1320 (2014).
56. R. Gyawali, H. Seo, H. Lee, H. Song, D. Kim, M. Byun
and K. Kim, Effect of -irradiation on volatile
compounds of dried welsh onion (Allium stulosum L.).
Rad. Phys. Chem., 75, 322328 (2006).
57. P. Variyar, C. Bandyopadhyay and P. Thomas, Effect of
gamma irradiation on the phenolic acids of some Indian
spices. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 33, 533537 (1998).
58. S.F. Mexis and M.G. Kontominas, Effect of gammairradiation on the physiochemical and sensory properties
of hazelnuts (Corylus avellana L.). Rad. Phys. Chem., 78,
407413 (2009).
59. H. Yalcin, I. Ozturk, M. Hayta, O. Sagdic and T. Gumus,
Effect of gamma irradiation on some chemical
characteristics and volatiles content of linseed. J. Med.
Food, (2011). doi:10.1089/jmf,2010.0249.