Institute Of Teacher Education Penang Campus

Course Work Assessment - Project

(Assignment Specification Table, Assignment Questions and Marking Rubrics)

Code/Course
Name :

EDUP3013: Philosophy And Education

In Malaysia

Duration: 4 weeks

Starting Date: 10.8.2015

Due Date:

Programme:

PISMP

Semester/Year:

2/2015

Intake:

Jun 2015

2.10.2015

Group:

T1TESL

Prepared by:

DR. HELEN KHOO CHOOI SIM, EN. HONG KIM GUAN, PN. NORHAILEE ABDUL RASID & Pn.
NORAZIAH BT. AHAMAD SHATAR
Course Coordinator
Head Of Department

Certified by :
Name & Signature

NG WENG TUTT

CHAN FAN HO

22 Jun 2015

22 Jun 2015

Date:

INSTITUTE OF TEACHER EDUCATION PENANG CAMPUS

PROJECT ASSIGNMENT SPECIFICATION TABLE
DEPARTMENT : EDUCATIONAL STUDIES
CODE /COURSE NAME : EDUP3013- PHILOSOPHY AND EDUCATION IN MALAYSIA
GROUP : T1TESL
SEMESTER/YEAR : 2/2015

Starting Date

10.8.2015

Due Date

2.10.2015

Course Outcome Learning:

1. Explain the basic concepts of philosophy, philosophy of education and the historical development of the education system in Malaysia
2. Describe the views of the Islamic, Western and Eastern philosophers on knowledge and education through literature review
3. Assessing the elements of the National Education of Philosophy (FPK) and the Philosophy of Teacher Education (FPG) in the teaching service
4. Analyze the curriculum model and the implementation of curriculum in school during presentation activities
5. Analyze issues in the philosophy of education in Malaysia through the relevant reference sources
This project is to assess the Learning Outcome 1,2,4 and 5
Objective Project:
Students can perform the following tasks:

1. Produce an academic writing based on the course topic.

2. Answer quiz questions.
3. Choose the appropriate reference materials, provide presentation materials according to the selected titles and a list of references according
to APA format

TASK SPECIFICATION
TASK

PERCENTAGE

REMARK

TOPIC
1. Basic Concepts of Philosophy and
Philosophy of Education
2. Branches of Philosophy
3. Education Development in
Malaysia
4. Education Philosophy in Malaysia
5. Curriculum in Education
6. Curriculum Model and the
Implementation of the Curriculum
7. Issues in the Education
Philosophy

1. Academic Writing

60%

Based on the paragraph given,

discuss how far(sejauhmanakah)
do you agree with the
paragraph? Discuss and give
evidence on how to menghasilkan
modal insan yang berilmu,
berkemahiran dan berakhlak mulia
dengan mengambilkira
kepelbagaian potensi murid. (Topic

7)
2. Quiz 20 objective questions

(Topic 1, 2 & 3)
3. Presentation in class
- Duration of the presentation:
Throughout the months JulyOctober 2015; 40-45 minutes each
group; 15-20 minutes is allocated
after the presentation for Question
and Answer session (Q&A) or
discussion about the topic.

20%

20%

Overall marking criteria:

- Contents
- Critical and Reflective Discussion
- Performance
- Organization
- Language
- Reference and supporting
materials
Commitment
- Showing the dedication and
involvement during the
coursework.
- Taking the initiative to find the
relevant and latest materials for
reference.
Writing
- Showing the ability to think
reflectively with quality writing
skills.

Institute Of Teacher Education Penang Campus

Course Work Assessment - Project
PROGRAM: PISMP
CODE/NAME OF THE COURSE: EDUP3013
PHILOSOPHY AND EDUCATION IN MALAYSIA
TARIKH MULA : 10.8.2015

STUDENT NAME:
SEMESTER: 1 (Jun 2015 Intake)

DATE OF SUBMISSION: 2.10.2015

Course Outcome Learning:

1. Explain the basic concepts of philosophy, philosophy of education and the historical
development of the education system in Malaysia
2. Describe the views of the Islamic, Western and Eastern philosophers on knowledge
and education through literature review
3. Assessing the elements of the National Education of Philosophy (FPK) and the
Philosophy of Teacher Education (FPG) in the teaching service
4. Analyze the curriculum model and the implementation of curriculum in school during
presentation activities
5. Analyze issues in the philosophy of education in Malaysia through the relevant
reference sources
This project is to assess the Learning Outcome 1,2,4 and 5
Objective Project:
Students can perform the following tasks:
1. Produce an academic writing based on the course topic.
2. Answer quiz questions.
3. Choose the appropriate reference materials, provide presentation materials
according to the selected titles and a list of references according to APA format

TASK 1 (60%)
Students are required to do an academic writing (60%) based on the topic below:
Human capital that we would like to develop should not only be equipped with
knowledge and skills alone but also be strengthened with good characteristics
and noble values. To me, morale aspects, good manners, integrity, honesty
and noble values are important components in nation building and achieving
sustainable economic development
.
Speech text
Yab Tan Sri Dato' Haji Muhyiddin Bin Haji Mohd. Yassin
Deputy Prime Minister cum Minister of Education
At the National Teachers Day Celebration 2015
16 Mei 2015, Dewan Wawasan, Jitra, Kedah.
"Guru: Membina Ilmu Menyempurnakan Akhlak"

How far do you agree with the statement above? Discuss with evidence and examples on
how you can produce a human capitol who is knowledgeable, skillful and has good moral
values while considering the variety of potentials of a student.

Guidelines to Task 1
1.
This is an individual assignment.
2.
Writing Format:
Font typeface: Arial
Font Size : 11
Line spacing: 1
Front page should have the following:
a. Course Code and Name
b. Title of the Assignment
c. Name, Identity Card Number, and Index Number
d. Academic Group
e. Name of the Lecturers
3.
Plagiarism is strictly prohibited.
4.
The total number of words should not be more than 1000 words.
5.
This coursework contribute 60% to the final grade for the course.
6.
Assignment Duration: 17 August 1 September 2015
7.
Assignment Due Date: 1 September 2015
A good coursework should have the following criteria:
1.
An academic writing which is relevant, comprehensive, consistent, and detailed.
2.
The ideas and writing should show the originality of the writing.
3.
The format and organization of the writing should be clear and coherent.
4.
The writing must show fluent language use, full- fledged discussion in transferring
information critically, reflectively, and analytically.

TASK 2 (20%)
QUIZ 20 OBJECTIVE QUESTIONS
Students should take the quiz individually.
Guidelines to Task 2
1.
2.
3.

Should be done individually.

This quiz carries a total of 20%.
The quiz will be held on 10 14 August 2015.

TASK 3 (20%)
A.

Students are divided into groups to prepare for the presentation based on the
topics below:
1. Elaborate the factors that affect the change in school curriculum. Suggest the
curriculum aspects that can be improvised to strengthen the existing curiculum of the
primary schools. Justify your point of view.

2. Discuss the role of a teacher as an implementing agent. Discuss the ways that can be
taken to deliver the teaching and learning process in your specialization effectively.

3. Compare and contrast the constructive curriculum theory based on objective and
process model. How can this models be applied on teaching and learning of your
major subject.
4. Discuss the implementation of KSSR and the ways that can be taken to produce the
human capital as stated in the National Educational Philosophy (NEP).
5. Compare and contrast KBSR and KSSR. To what extend does KSSR realize the
purpose of NEP?
Guidelines to Task 3
1.
2.
3.
4.

This task is a group work. (2 or 3 people in a group).

Each group must choose and present only ONE topic.
Each topic MUST be presented in all academic groups
All group members must work together and participate, in preparing the assignment
and during the presentation.
5.
Each group can present the findings in any visual form. Usage of ICT is encouraged.
6.
Writing Format:
PowerPoint presentation
First slide should have the following information:
(i)
Course Code and Name
(ii)
Title of the Assignment
(iii)
Name, Identity Card Number, and Index Number
(iv)
Academic Group
(v)
Name of the Lecturers
7.
Plagiarism is strictly prohibited.
8.
This coursework contribute 20% to the final grade for the course.
9.
Presentation Duration: Throughout month August October 2015; 40-45 minutes each
group; 15-20 minutes is allocated after each presentation for Question and Answer (Q&A)
and discussion. Refer the TLO for the topics and dates of presentation.
10.
Hard copy of the notes/presentation must be given to the lecturer before the
presentation.
11.
Attach a bibliography.
12.
Date of submission for soft copy: One week after presentation.
A good coursework should have the following criteria:
1.
An academic writing which is relevant, comprehensive, consistent, and detailed
2.
This task must consist of:
Introduction
Body: development of facts and elaboration for each point
Conclusion
Bibliography (at least 5 sources)
3.
All the points and elaboration in the coursework must show originality in the referred
articles and reference.
4.
The format, organization of writing and presentation must be clear and coherent.
5.
The writing must show fluent language use, full- fledged discussion in transferring
information critically, reflectively, and analytically.
6.
References must be from different sources which are accurate and relevant with the
coursework.

MARKING CRITERIA
1.

Projek ini dinilai berdasarkan rubrik pemarkahan yang disediakan.

2.

Markah keseluruhan ialah 100%, dengan wajaran 50%.

Prepared by:

Checked by:

(NG WENG TUTT)

Course Coordinator EDUP3013
Educational Studies Department
IPG Penang Campus

(DR. RAJOO A/L AROKIASAMY)

Subject Matter Expert (SME)
Falsafah dan Pendidikan di Malaysia.
Educational Studies Department
IPG Penang Campus

Approved by:

(CHAN FAN HO)

Head of Department
Educational Studies Department
IPG Penang Campus

MARKING CRITERIA (HOLISTIC RUBRICS)

ACADEMIC WRITING
SCALE

WEIGHTAGE
(60%)

High
Distinction
54-60%

CRITERIA
Contents
Demonstration of vast knowledge
Comprehensive, consistent and detailed coverage

90-100
Critical and Reflective Discussion
Conceptual understanding is applied very effectively
The argument is supported by evidence and able to relate it to the latest
research
Discussion were very clear and critical and have the ability to analyse and

SCALE

WEIGHTAGE
(60%)

CRITERIA
synthesize a comprehensive conclusion
Able to generate critical thinking effectively
Organization
Excellent organization of information
Clear structure with logical association of ideas
Writing not exceeding 1,000 words
Language
Smooth usage of language
Used a wide range of vocabulary appropriately
Correct sentence structure with interesting style and highly appropriate use
of cohesive features
correct spelling

Distinction
75-89

45-53.9%

Referring skills
relevant references that show referencing from various sources
Adhere to Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association
(APA) with the conventions of academic writing
List of bibliography adhere to the APA format
Contents
Demonstration of sufficient knowledge
Sufficient and consistent coverage that meets the requirements of
assignment
Critical and Reflective Discussion
Conceptual understanding is applied effectively
The argument is supported by appropriate evidence and have the ability to
relate to researches
Clear and critical discussion and have the ability to analyze and able to
synthesize a comprehensive conclusion
Can engage readers with insights
Organization
Organization of appropriate information
Able to develop a clear overall idea
Writing not exceeding 1,000 words
Language
Current and comprehensive vocabulary usage
Correct sentence structure with appropriate usage of cohesive features
Slight misspellings
Referring skills
relevant references that show referencing from various sources
Adhere to Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association
(APA) with the conventions of academic writing
List of bibliography adhere to the APA format

Credit

Contents

 Demonstration of knowledge is applied satisfactorily.

Meets the criteria but with some errors
65-74%

39-44.9%
Critical and Reflective Discussion
Conceptual understanding is applied satisfactorily
Shows critical discussion but with some errors.
Generally acceptable discussion of topics and have the ability to
analyse and able to synthesize a comprehensive conclusion
Can engage readers with insights satisfactorily
Organization
Organization of information is substantially correct
Structures exist but with some errors
Repetition of ideas
Language
Appropriate usage of vocabulary
A core range of correct sentence structures is used which is in
accordance with the topic but with errors on some parts
Slight misspellings
Referring skills
relevant references and demonstrate satisfactory referencing of
sources
Adhered to Publication Manual of the American Psychological
Association (APA) with conventions of academic writing
List of bibliography adhere to the APA format
Contents
Demonstrate limited knowledge
Content is incomplete

Pass
30-38.9%
50-64

Critical and Reflective Discussion

The discussion showed a limited conceptual understanding
No attempt to make arguments or discussion
Discussion is limited, less critical and analytical
Insufficient generation of insights for the readers
Organization
Errors in organization of information
Structure is incomplete with unclear conclusion
Numerous errors in organisation
Limited vocabulary usage
Sentence structure is much to be corrected
Significant spelling mistake
Referring skills
Only a few relevant references
The writing less and less geared to meet Publication Manual of the
American Psychological Association (APA) and
conventions of academic writing
List bibliography
Contents
Limited demonstration of knowledge
Content is incomplete

Fail
0-49
<29.9%

Critical and Reflective Discussion

No understanding of the concept of topic
No attempt to make arguments or discussing research
Limited discussion, unable to analyse and synthesize discussion
critically
Unable to generate insights in readers
Organization
Organisational information groundwater

 Structure is incomplete with unclear conclusion

language
Limited usage of vocabulary
Delivery of ideas is unclear
Entire structure of the paragraph should be amended
Errors in vocabulary usage is significant
Referring skills
Inadequate or no reference
Does not adhere to the Publication Manual of the American
Psychological Association (APA) with no conventions of academic writing
Inadequate or no material support

MARKING CRITERIA (HOLISTIC RUBRICS)

PRESENTATION
Understanding Content
Coverage of accurate, relevant and detailed
Extensive scope, comprehensive and appropriate literature
The relationship is clearly demonstrated

High
Distinction
90 - 100
18-20%

Organization
The best, logical and coherent layout
Idea thoroughly developed and clear with suitable examples ,
explanation and additional description
Quality Resources
Excellent references and bibliography skills
Have a variety of primary and secondary sources
Presentation skills
Effective and attract the attention of listeners
Good and effective usage of TMK
Meets specified time
Very active student involvement

Distinction
75 - 89
15-17.9%

Understanding Content
The coverage is adequate and relevant
The scope of comprehensive literature selected and used appropriately
Relations of clear idea
Organization
Logical and coherent layout
Idea thoroughly developed and clear with suitable examples ,
explanations and descriptions
Quality Resources
Skills to make good references and bibliography
Have a variety of primary and secondary sources
Presentation skills
Good and attract the attention of listeners
Use of good and effective TMK

10

 Meets specified time

Active student involvement
Credit
65 - 74

13-14.9%

Understanding Content
Coverage of relevant and good content
Coverage been satisfactory and appropriate
A clear idea relations
Organization
Logical and coherent layout
Idea thoroughly developed and clear with suitable examples ,
explanations and descriptions
Quality Resources
Skills to make good references and bibliography
Contains a number of primary and secondary source material sufficient
Presentation Skills
Good and attract the attention of listeners
Use a good TMK
Meets specified time
Active student involvement

Pass
50 - 64

10-12.9%

Understanding Content
Coverage of relevant content and adequate
Only a small number of selected literature and used
Some clear idea relationships
Organization
Satisfied with some layout errors
Some of the ideas developed with the support of the facts / examples
Quality Resources
Skills and bibliographic references quite good with some errors
The number of resources is insufficient
Presentation skills
Drawing the attention of the listener
Use a satisfactory TMK
Meets specified time
The involvement of students satisfied
Understanding Content
Coverage of content is insufficient and irrelevant
No clear idea Relations

Lulus
0 49

<9.9%
Organization
The layout of the ground with obvious mistake
Idea weakly developed with little or no additional description
Quality Resources
Skills to make bibliographic references and ground
Lack of primary and secondary source materials
Presentation skills
Failed to seek the attention of the listener
No use of ICT
Not meeting the specified time
No student involvement

11

12