Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
the Court must sentence them. From least severe to most severe, the most
common sentencing options available to the Court under New South Wales
law are:1
Least severe
No Conviction
s10(1)(b)
s10(1)(a)
Good
Dismissal Behaviour
Bond
Most severe
Custodial Sentences with a Conviction
s9 Good Communit
s12
Intensive
Home
Full time
Behaviour y Service Suspended
Corrections
Detention
custody
Bond
Order
Sentence
Order
The sentencing task is discretionary and complicated: the Court must take
into account lots of different factors to determine the most appropriate
sentence. The seriousness of an offence and the needs to punish
wrongdoing, deter crime, protect the community must be balanced against a
range of favourable subjective factors and the need to promote the
rehabilitation of offenders.
The subjective factors the Court must take into account include whether or
not a person has a previous criminal history, their age, whether they are of
good character, their prospects of rehabilitation, any remorse they have
shown for the offending and the likelihood they will not re-offend. If mental
health issues, substance dependency or other factors suggesting an offender
suffers particular disadvantage exist, then these things are relevant and
should play a big part in informing the exercise of the Court's discretion.
Often, the circumstances of a particular case will disclose a range of
appropriate sentencing outcomes. I often explain this to people by using the
above table and a "goal-posts" metaphor: anything less severe than a
particular outcome would be too lenient and anything more severe than
some other outcome would be too harsh.