Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
IN BEVERAGE INDUSTRY
M. Dachyar1, Andri Adi Mijaya2
Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Indonesia, Kampus Baru, Depok 16424
Email : 1mdachyar@ie.ui.ac.id, 2andriadimijaya@yahoo.co.id
Abstract
Maintenance management in the beverage industry is related to productivity so that the company needed a system of
performance measurement. In measurements needed to gauge the performance indicators that can provide a reference to
the performance measuring process of maintenance management.
The methodology in setting key performance indicators of maintenance management is the questionnaire survey.
Survey respondents are practitioners ekspert field maintenance in the beverage company. The result is a data
questionnaire respondents rating the indicators of performance maintenance.
Based on the data processing results of the questionnaire survey in 6 beverage company established 30 key performance
indicators of maintenance management. Indicator groups that have key performance indicators was the type reliability,
while the key criteria in the measurement is the recording of data.
Keywords : Key Performance Indicator, Performance Measurement, Maintenance Management.
1.
Introduction
2.
Basic Teory
Maintenance Management
George R. Terry (1966) defines management as a
process of action planning, organization, execution and
3.
Methods
Likert Scale
The performance indicators are divided into 3 groups
of the type that is the type of reliability, cost and type
of material type. Each type of group consists of several
criteria and indicators. The amount and percentage of
total construction cost index from the third type of
group it can be seen from the following table 3.1
4.
Group Indicator
Reliability
Cost
Material
Total
Amount
23
5
2
30
%
76,67
16,67
6,67
100,00
Criteria
Availability
Data Record
Work Control
Planning dan Scheduling
PM & PdM
Product Defect / Failure
Total
Amount
2
9
2
5
3
2
23
%
9%
39%
9%
22%
13%
9%
100.00%
Availability
A.1
A.2
Data Records
B.1
B.3
Code
Code
B.4
Total
Score
B.5
B.7
28
B.8
29
B.11
B.12
B.13
Total
Score
27
27
27
24
28
27
27
27
27
Code
D.1
D.2
D.4
D.6
Work Control
The existence of control functions work /
process documentation are clearly defined
The existence of a system of priorities that
are working well, based on critical
equipment, safety factors, the cost down,
machines, etc.
C.1
C.4
26
26
28
26
29
Code
Total
Score
Total
Score
25
28
Code
E.1
E.5
E.6
Total
Score
29
28
Code
28
F.1
F.2
Total
Score
27
25
Criteria
Maintenance Cost
Amount
40%
20%
Inventory Cost
20%
Control of Budget/Cost
40%
Total
100%
Code
H.1
I
Code
Maintenance Cost
G.1
G.3
Total
Score
I.1
J
26
J.1
25
Total
Score
25
25
24
Code
K
K.1
L
Inventory
accuracy supply warehouse
Material Management
L.2
Reference
[1] Mann, Lawrence Jr., (1976), Maintenance
Management, Hal.1
[2] Arts, RHPM., et.al., (1999), Journal of
Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Hal.6
[3] Blanchared, B.S., et.al., (1995), A Key to
Effective Serviccability and Maintenance
Management, Hal.18
[4] Neely, A., Gregory, M., and Platts, K., (1995),
Performance Measurement System Design,
Hal. 80 116
[5] Walter, W.C., Chung, Michael, F.S., Chan,
(2006), A Framework of Performance
Modeling for Dynamic Strategy, Hal.3
[6] Wiremann, Terry, (1998), Developing
Performance Indicators for Managing
Maintenance, Hal.xii
[7] W.M.K., Trochim, (2000), Likert Scaling,
http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/kb/scallik
Total
Score
27
28
5.
Conclusion