Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
AMERICAN
NUMISMATIC
MUSEUM
SOCIETY
NOTES
22
ATIC-'
MWM&f J
' NU/AIStt
/
'50CIETY
THE
AMERICAN
NUMISMATIC
NEW
SOCIETY
YORK
1977
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:39:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
THE
OF
THE
MAMLK
ADDITIONS
COINAGE
SULTAN
AND
BAYBARS
I:
CORRECTIONS
Michael L. Bates
(Plate 23)
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
162
Michael L. Bates
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
163
Date
658H.
39A
658H.
659H.
69
70
3. al-Sultn
al-Malik 659H.
withal-Mustansir 660H.
46
1. Ayybid
style
2. Mamlkstyle,
titleal-Malik
4. al-Sultnal-Malik
withreligious
legend 660-76H.
35-36 72-92
27(?)
28
37
38
30-33
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
164
Michael L. Bates
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
165
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
166
Michael Lu Bates
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
167
Issue
Date
withBaybars
1. Ayybid
style,
anda localgovernor
withtitle
2. Mamlk
style,
al-Malik
only
with
al-Malik
3. al-Sultn
al-Mustansir
lacuna?
658-59H.
39
659 H.
71, 71A
659-60H.
47
660-66H.
no Syriancoins?
with
4. al-Sultn
al-Malik
al-Hkim
a) 666-69H.
b) 670-76H.
56-63(withmonth)
51-54(without
month)
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
168
Michael L. Bates
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
169
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
170
Michael L. Bates
to the Mongol occupation of the city in 658 are as yet known; coins
were struckthere under the Mongols,but no coins are known of the
periodimmediatelyafteral-Mansrwas restoredto the city by Qutuz.
One cannot, therefore,say whetheral-Mansrplaced his name on the
coinage beforehis issue withBaybars's name. Similarly,it is not possible to say with certaintywhen this latter issue came to an end, for
the next known issue of Hamh, an ordinaryMamlk dirham with
Baybars and al-Mustansironly,is dated 660. The historianssay nothing
about the impositionofBaybars's authorityin Hamh, suggestingthat
al-Mansr at some point accepted the situation without resistance.
In late 659 he paid homagein personto Baybars in Damascus and was
confirmedin his position,which he retained until his death in 68S.24
One can thereforeonly say that the issue in question began almost
certainlyin 658 and possibly continuedinto 659. It perhapsended at
about the same time that Baybars's authoritywas establishedin Damascus.25
With the installation of Baybars's authority,the Damascus mint
began strikinghis new Mamlk coinage, with the title al-Malik and
religiouslegends in the reversefield. Then, sometimein the seventh
month of 659, the Damascus mint respondedto the accession of alMustansirand the investitureof Baybars as sultan, by strikingcoins
is a copperfais,BMCOriental
Mansr
Muhammad
4, Suppl.468c,p. 230,bearing
is probably
al-Mansr
which
andontheotheral-Malik
ononesideal-Malik
al-Nsir,
Illustrata
Numismata
Orientalia
thesamecoinillustrated
, 1 (LonbyW. Marsden,
I. Stephen
Muhammad
don,1823),pl. 13,no.237,attributed
byhimto al-Mansr
of twoothercopper
Albumhasrecently
pointedout to the authortheexistence
thenamesal-Malikal-Manr
on oneside
issues,apparently
unpublished,
bearing
andal-Malikal-lihon the other.On one issue,the namesare enclosedin a
thenamesarewithina
beadedcircle;ontheother,
a tangent
beadedsquarewithin
these
ofthefamiliar
style.As Albumsuggests,
AleppoAyybid
triplehexagram
in Hamh,
to be regarded
as issuesofal-Mansr
coppersalso are mostprobably
One
oftheAyybid
thesovereignty
al-SlihAyyb(d. 647/1249).
acknowledging
to theANS byAlbum.
ofeachissuehasbeendonated
example
24Ibn'Abdal-Zhir,
text,p. 45; trans.,
p. 138;Maqrizi,
pp.460,462.
25Berman
thattheissuewasprobably
thedate659tohisspecimen,
arguing
assigns
ofHamhbytheMongols
at theveryendof658and
struck
a briefreconquest
after
of659. However,
theMongols
did nottakeHamhat thistime;they
beginning
before
it(Maqrizi,
p. 442). In anycase,thecoincouldhavebeenstruck
onlybeseiged
as wellas afterward.
theMongols
arrived
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
171
like those of the third Egyptian issue. The unique example of this
issue with the mintDimashq bears no legible date and may have been
struckin 659 or earlyin 660; a dirhamof Hamh (MSES 48) confirms
that such dirhamswere still being struckin Syria in the firstsix weeks
of the latter year.
Since al-Mustansirwas killed in early 660, leaving the caliphate
vacant for about a year, one would expect Damascus to have issued
coins like the fourthEgyptian issue, with the title al-Sul^n al-Malik
combinedwith the reversereligiouslegend; but no Syrian dirhamsof
this type are recorded.26Indeed, no Syrian dirhamsare recordedfor
nearlyseven years,fromearly660 (the latest possibledate forthe third
issue, with al-Mustansir)to late in 666 (the earliestknown coin of the
fourthSyrian issue is dated Dhu'l-Qa'da, the eleventh month,666).
Thereis no obviousexplanationforthislacuna in the series,whichseems
unlikelyto be the resultof chance.
When mintingof dirhamswas resumedin Damascus, the type issued
theredifferedfromthat standardin Egypt in having the name of the
caliph al-Hkim on the reverse. Why al-Hkim was recognizedon
the coinageof Syria and not that of Egypt is perplexing.At Damascus,
this fourthSyrian issue is divided into two subseries. The first,with
dates from 666 to 669,27 has the honorifical-marsafollowingthe
mint-name,and is dated by month as well as by year. Coins of this
subseriesare not rare,but few are fullylegible,so that therehas been
recorded at present only one example of each of eight month-year
combinations. Future discoveriesmay help to clarifywhetherwe can
expect eventuallyto recordeverymonthin each year, or whethermint
activity was intermittent.
26Thereis, however,
andthe
issueofDamascuswiththetitleal-sultan
a copper
shahdaonthereverse,
datedxxl (MSES 100;MSES 98-99arenotfrom
Damascus,
as Balognotedin MSESAdd, p. 130). Therearealsocopperissues,MSES 96 and
totheperiod
toassigntheselatter
97,withthecaliphal-Hkim.It seemsreasonable
thatis, 666-76,on whichassumption
whendirhams
withal-Hkimwerestruck,
MSES 100wouldmoreprobably
be 661,not671. If so,it wouldappearthatalonthecoinageofSyria,justas in Egypt;forhe
Hkimwasat firstnotrecognized
wascaliphduring
all butthefirsttwodaysof661.
27Thedate674assigned
thecoin
to a coinofthisvariety
(MSES 63)is incorrect;
is dated667. See catalogue
below,no. 58M.
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
172
Michael L. Bates
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
173
legends on the coin is atypical of Hamh and similarto that of Damascus; but the mint name is definitelynot Dimashq.
DIRHAMS WITHOUT MINT OR DATE
Anothergroup of issues which are most probablyto be assigned to
Syria are the dirhamsand half-dirhamswhich bear no mint name or
date. These coins may be arrangedin the followingchronologicalorder:
1. MSES 68, a unique half-dirham
withoutthe titleal-Sul^n and with
the religiouslegend in the reverse field. Note that the lion is fullface, a featurewhich Bacharach29has observed as a characteristicof
Damascus but which is also found on Hamh issues; it is at any rate
typically Syrian rather than Egyptian. There is no corresponding
dirhamissue with no mint name and with religiouslegends. Therefore
this half-dirhammightequally well be assigned to a later period, for
the absence ofthetitleal-Sul^nis no guideto the datingofhalf-dirhams,
as shownby MSES 43 and 50 (of issues 2 and 4 below).
2. MSES 42, dirhamswithoutthe title al-Sultn but with the caliph
al-Mustansirin the reversefield,and a corresponding
half-dirham
issue,
MSES 43 and 43A. One ofthe latterhas the lion facingright,a feature
otherwiseknown only on a dirham attributedto Hamh (MSESAdd
66A).
3. MSES 44, dirhams with the titulature "al-Sultn... Qasm Amir
al-Mu'minin" and on the reversethe caliph al-Mustansir;one of these
(see catalogue below) has, clearly,the lion full-face.MSES 45 is the
correspondinghalf-dirhamissue.
4. MSESAdd 49A, a dirham with the same titulatureas MSES 44
but withthe caliph al-Hkim; the lion is full-face.The analogous halfdirhamtype is MSES 50, which, however, lacks the title al-Sultn.
Issues 1, 3, and 4 withoutmintmay be regardedas the analogues of
Damascene issues2, 3, and 4 respectively.Issue 2, whichanachronistically has Baybars with the title al-Malik only, but with the caliph al29Bacharach,
p. 167.
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
174
Michael L. Bates
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
175
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
176
Michael L. Bates
Obv.:ytlkJI 1)11
LjjJI Sj
j i^JI picj?**
i/jnj
margin:
L
d|AI
R
j*P
margin:
T
B
^ J/1 JI Vj/
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
177
of dots; usually the dots are outside. The Ashmolean and Jerusalem
obverse and reversedies.
specimenswere struckfromdifferent
The two dirhams mentionedby Mayer which are cited under this
numberin MSES and MSESAdd ought ratherto be assigned to the
number39A (that is, to Cairo); forMayer says that the reverseof his
coins bore the "ApostolicMission."
39M. The coin published by Berman with the names of al-Mansr
Muhammadand Baybars (see note 21; 2.85 g; 20 mm) has legends as
follows:
Obv.: ytlkJIJill
Rev.:
margin:
RBLT
margin:
RBLT
UjJI jSj
3b~j/
/..../
I... J
/<0)1V/1 -01 V/
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
178
Michael L. Bates
Whetherthe dies forthe two sides of the coin were struckby two differentengraversis not evident,althoughpossible; Berman must have
had in mind the fact that the letteringof the obverse is ratherthick
in comparisonto that of the reverse. Otherwise,the epigraphyof both
sides is the usual mid-thirteenth-century
SyrianAyybidstyle. As for
the inscriptionof the top reversemarginalsegment,it is not defective;
ratherit is engravedin a fashionfrequentlyencounteredon thirteenthcenturySyriandirhams:the letterh of ilh is formedas an undulating
curve,with a break at the highestpoint of the curve which causes the
end of the letterto appear to be a separate letter,somethinglike r'
Whetheror not the die was reused froma hypotheticalearlierissue,
thereis no evidencethat it was reut.
43. Withoutmintname or date. The ANS example of this half-dirham
issue varies slightlyfromthe two examples illustratedin MSES , pl. 3,
in havingthe alif of al-Zhirat the end of the firstline,like MSES 68.
The lion to leftwas inadvertentlyomittedfromthe descriptionof this
issue in MSES .
*44. Withoutmintname or date. A new ANS example of this dirham
(2.75 g; 22 mm) shows the lion clearly full-face,a characteristicof
Syrian issues.
46. AL-QHIRA, 660. Two specimens in the ANS have the word
amir below, not at the end of,the last line of the reverse,and have no
marginallegend at the bottomof the field;on both,the mintname alQhira is visible. It should be noted that several of the specimens
cited in MSES under this numberhave no legible date and could as
well be 659 as 660.
*47. DIMASHQ, 659 or 660. The unique Paris dirham cited under
this numberin MSES has the word amir below the reversefield,like
certainCairo dirhamsjust described. An ANS dirham(2.73 g; 23 mm)
also has this feature,and in additionhas the mintformulabeginningon
the rightside, not the left. The mintis not visible,but the full-facelion
on the obverse suggestsDamascus. In sum, the dirhamis probablya
duplicate of the Paris coin, for the original catalogue descriptionof
the latterdoes not say, as Balog does, that the mintformulabeginson
the left.
*49. HALAB, date missing. The only example of this issue cited by
Balog, an ANS dirham,has no trace of marginallegends,but a second
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
179
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
180
Michael Lu Bates
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
181
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
23
Coinage of Baybars I
This content downloaded from 83.85.149.119 on Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:40:14 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions