Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A. Material
While a Belgian vessel was docked in the port of Jersey City, New Jersey [in 1886], a Belgian crew
member [fought and] killed another
Belgian crew member on board the vessel. [The Jersey City police boarded the steamer and
arrested Wildenhus. They then committed him
to jail in New Jersey, pending trial for murder.]
B. Legal
The Belgian consul sought a [writ of] habeas corpus to obtain the release of the Belgian national.
The consul relied upon a March 9, 1880 treaty between the United States and Belgium. Article IX
provided that consular officials
"shall alone take cognizance of all differences which may arise, either at sea or in port, between the
captains, officers, and crews,
without exception .... The local authorities shall not interfere, except when the disorder that has
arisen is of such a nature as to
disturb the tranquility and public order on shore, or in the port, or when a person of the country or
not belonging to the crew, shall
be concerned therein."
The U.S. Circuit Court refused to deliver the prisoners to the consul and remanded them to jail.
This case is an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
LEGAL ISSUES
A. Specific
1. In this case, which state has rightful jurisdiction? The United States or Belgium?
2. In this case, on what legal basis is jurisdiction to be determined?
3. How is the language of the U.S.-Belgian Treaty to be interpreted? What is specifically meant by
a "disorder" that "disturb[s] the tranquility and public order on shore, or in port?"
B. General
1. In cases involving disturbances of the tranquility of the port, how is jurisdiction to be determined?
2. What "disorders" so "disturb the tranquility and public order on shore, or in port" as to give the
local state jurisdiction?
THE HOLDING
"The judgment of the [U.S.] Circuit Court [was] affirmed." The Supreme Court ruled that the Belgian
crew members would remain in
American custody for trial. The consul's petition for habeas corpus was denied.
LEGAL RATIONALE
RULE: "It is not alone the publicity of the act, or the clamor which attends it, that affixes the
nature of the crime, but the
act itself. If it is of a character to awaken public interest when it becomes known, it is a 'disorder' the
nature of which
is to affect the community at large, and consequently to invoke the power of the local
government."