Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Chemico-Biological Interactions
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chembioint
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 29 June 2015
Received in revised form
23 November 2015
Accepted 30 November 2015
Available online 8 December 2015
Obesity is one of several factors implicated in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Thymol, a monoterpene
phenolic compound found in the oils of thyme with multiple biological properties especially antidiabetic
activity. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the thymol against diabetic nephropathy by high
fat diet (HFD)-induced diabetic C57BL/6J mice. After 10 weeks of continuous dietary intervention, HFD
(fat- 35.2%) to mice presented characteristic features of progressive nephropathy by signicant increased
in kidney weight, blood, and urinary parameters, glomerulosclerosis, oxidative stress, hyperlipidemia
and subsequent renal injuries. After intragastric administration of thymol (40 mg/kg BW) daily for the
subsequent 5 weeks signicantly decreased the blood, urinary parameters and kidney weight. Thymol
inhibited the activation of transforming growth factor-b1 (TGF-b1) and vascular endothelial growth
factor (VEGF). Also, signicantly increased the antioxidants and suppresses the lipid peroxidation
markers in erythrocytes and kidney tissue compared to the diabetic mice. Thymol downregulated the
expression level of sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) and reduced the lipid
accumulation in renal. Histopathological study of kidney tissues showed that extracellular mesangial
matrix expansion, glomerulosclerosis in diabetic mice were suppressed by thymol. Further, our results
indicate that administration of thymol afforded remarkable protection against HFD-induced diabetic
nephropathy.
2015 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Keywords:
Thymol
High fat diet
Diabetic nephropathy
Glomerulosclerosis
Lipids
1. Introduction
Diabetes mellitus is a major health problem affecting people
worldwide. Obesity is all most an important risk factor for diabetes
mellitus, hypertension, metabolic disease and chronic renal disease. Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a serious and progressive
complication of diabetes and occurs in 30%e40% of diabetic patients [1]. For a long time, the renal diseases have been considered a
victim of metabolic syndrome, abnormalities of glucose and lipid
metabolism related to insulin resistance [2]. Excess consumption of
fat induces hypersecretion of insulin leads to insulin resistance,
increases nutrient uptake and subsequently increases the electron
ow in the mitochondrial respiratory chain, resulting in an amplied reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, thereby establishing
oxidative stress [3]. This may induce lipotoxicity, morphological
changes and tissue injury in the kidney of high fat diet (HFD)induced mice. Under these conditions, the activation of
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: jayampari@gmail.com (L. Pari).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2015.11.033
0009-2797/ 2015 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
of DN. Along with the control of blood glucose other factors such as
inammation, hypoxia, and hyperlipidemia may all play important
roles. However, each of these factors is initially triggered by higher
glucose levels [8].
Mice are vital to biomedical research due to almost unlimited
changes that can be made to their genome. Mouse and human
kidneys were similar in physiology, structure and cell types [9,10].
In our study, C57BL/6J mice are provoked by high-fat diet and it is
associated with obesity, hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia
which results in type 2 diabetes along with DN [11]. HFD-induced
hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia initiates loss of kidney function and injury, which stimulates mesangial and tubulointerstitial
cells that produce cytokines and chemokines. The production of
cytokines and chemokines cause mesangial cell proliferation via an
increased production of transforming growth factor-b1 (TGF-b1)
and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) which promotes
deposition of extracellular matrix components in the mesangium
and the tubulointerstitium, thereby causing renal failure. Diabetic
renal diseases also supported by upregulated renal expression of
transcriptional factor sterol regulatory element binding protein
(SREBP)-1c, that causes increased synthesis and accumulation of
triglycerides and this is correlated with renal sclerosis and proteinuria [12]. However, a full understanding of the mechanisms
involved in progressive renal disease is not yet evaluated. Thus, we
investigated the renal alterations and accompanying systemic abnormalities in experimental C57BL/6 mice. We demonstrated that
HFD-induced mice developed the core features of metabolic syndrome and subsequently developed albuminuria. In addition, we
attempted to investigate several pathophysiological alterations
occurring in the kidney, which may be potent therapeutic targets
for the prevention of renal diseases.
While a number of oral medicines are available for treating
diabetes mellitus, these drugs have several side effects, including
weight gain and gastrointestinal distress [13]. So investigating
potential natural products to prevent the DN induced by HFD has
increasingly attracted the interest of the academic community.
Thymol is a dietary monoterpene phenol, which is found in the oils
of thyme and plants such as Thymus vulgaris, Thymbra spicata,
Thymus ciliates, Trachyspermum ammi, Monarda stulosa and Nigella
sativa seeds. It exhibits multiple biological activities such as antibacterial [14], anti-fungal [15], anti-inammatory [16], radioprotective [17], antioxidant and anti-myocardial infarction [18]. US
Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) have reported thymol as a
food additive in generally recognized as safe (GRAS) and it is
nontoxic [19]. Previously we reported the antidiabetic effects of
thymol on HFD-induced diabetic mice. In continuation of our
research work on thymol, we made an attempt to evaluate the
protective effects of thymol on the pathophysiological and histological alterations in the kidney of HFD-induced diabetic C57BL/6J
mice.
Glucose was estimated by the method of Trinder [21]. The insulin in the plasma was measured by the method of Burgi [22].
Nephropathy was evaluated by estimating blood urea nitrogen
(BUN) and urinary protein. Further creatinine clearance was also
determined as a measure of glomerular ltration rate (GFR) [23].
Creatinine clearance was assessed from the urinary and serum
creatinine. Blood and urinary urea were estimated by the diacetyl
monooxime method of Netlson [24], serum and urinary creatinine
were measured by the alkaline picrate method of Jaffe [25]. Urinary
protein was quantied by Lowry's method of Lowry [26].
Table 1
Effect of thymol supplementation on glucose, insulin, BUN, serum creatinine and serum protein in normal and experimental mice.
Groups
Normal
Glucose (mg/dL)
Insulin (mU/l)
BUN (mg/dl)
Serum creatinine (mg/dl)
Serum protein (mg/dl)
94.45
22.42
20.23
0.35
9.56
93.44
22.25
20.21
0.34
9.57
7.74a
1.70a
1.55a
0.03a
0.73a
HFD
245.55
153.62
62.56
2.22
5.32
21.13b
13.87b
4.76b
0.17b
0.41b
135.51
39.68
26.63
0.47
8.22
11.72c
2.74c
2.04c
0.04 ac
0.63c
Values were means SD for six samples from six mice in each group. Values not sharing a common superscript differ signicantly at p < 0.05. Duncan's multiple range test
(DMRT). BUN e blood urea nitrogen; ap < 0.05 vs HFD thymol, bp < 0.05 vs normal, cp < 0.05 vs HFD.
Kidney weight
b
a
(mg)
200
150
100
50
0
NC
NC+THY 40
mg/kg
HFD
250
HFD+THY 40
mg/kg
Groups
Fig. 1. Effect of thymol on kidney weight of normal and experimental mice. Values
were means SD for six samples from six mice in each group. Values not sharing a
common superscript differ signicantly at p < 0.05. Duncan's multiple range test
(DMRT). THY e Thymol; NCeNormal control; HFD e High fat diet. ap < 0.05 vs HFD,
b
p < 0.05 vs NC.
Fig. 2. Effects of thymol on urine biochemistry in normal and experimental mice. (a) Urinary glucose, (b) urinary urea, (c) urinary creatinine, (d) urinary protein, (e) creatinine
clearance. Values were means SD for six samples from six mice in each group. Values not sharing a common superscript differ signicantly at p < 0.05. Duncan's multiple range
test (DMRT). THY - Thymol; NCeNormal control; HFD e High fat diet. ap < 0.05 vs HFD THY, bp < 0.05 vs normal, cp < 0.05 vs HFD.
Table 2
Effect of thymol on the levels of TBARS and LOOH in the plasma and kidney tissues.
Groups
Plasma
TBARS (mmol/dL)
Normal
Normal Thymol (40 mg/kg)
HFD
HFD Thymol (40 mg/kg)
0.96
0.94
4.23
1.50
0.07a
0.07a
0.39b
0.09c
Kidney
LOOH (mmol/dL)
10.34
10.93
36.32
14.43
0.95a
0.91a
2.36b
0.95c
TBARS (mmol/100 g
wet tissue)
0.63
0.61
2.13
0.96
0.05a
0.05a
0.18b
0.08c
LOOH (mmol/100 g
wet tissue)
66.00
67.03
146.35
83.66
4.79a
5.39a
13.65b
7.53c
Values were means SD for six samples from six mice in each group. Values not sharing a common superscript differ signicantly at p < 0.05. Duncan's multiple range test
(DMRT).
a
p < 0.05 vs HFD thymol, bp < 0.05 vs normal, cp < 0.05 vs HFD.
interstitial inammation suggest mechanisms that would exacerbate or potentiate progressive renal functional decline after injury.
In this study, elevation of uric acid together with the histological
alterations clearly indicate the induction of renal dysfunction in
HFD-induced diabetic mice. The therapeutic property of thymol
Table 3
Effect of thymol on the activity of enzymatic antioxidant in the erythrocyte of normal and experimental mice.
Groups
Normal
7.65
133.24
21.62
2.18
28.65
0.71a
10.66a
1.83a
0.17a
2.18a
7.21
134.63
22.06
2.17
28.64
0.68a
11.53a
1.96a
0.17a
2.19a
HFD
2.64
65.52
8.36
1.02
17.66
0.17b
5.90b
0.72b
0.08b
1.34b
6.11
118.73
19.42
1.58
24.45
0.35c
11.1c
1.73c
0.12c
1.87c
Values were means SD for six samples from six mice in each group. Values not sharing a common superscript differ signicantly at p < 0.05. Duncan's multiple range test
(DMRT).
U1Enzyme concentration required for 50% inhibition of NBT reduction/min.
U2 mmole of hydrogen peroxide consumed/min.
U3 mmole of reduced glutathione consumed/min.
U4 mg of CDNB conjugate formed/min.
U5 mg of reduced glutathione formed/min.
a
p < 0.05 vs HFD thymol, bp < 0.05 vs normal, cp < 0.05 vs HFD.
Table 4
Effect of thymol on the activity of non enzymatic antioxidant in the erythrocyte of normal and experimental mice.
Groups
GSH (mg/dL)
Vitamin C (mg/dL)
Vitamin E (mg/dL)
Normal
a
47.21 4.04
3.03 0.21a
2.93 0.17a
47.03 3.55
3.12 0.21a
2.87 0.16a
HFD
b
21.72 1.96
0.93 0.06b
0.77 0.06b
41.87 3.80c
2.97 0.18c
2.55 0.17c
Values were means SD for six samples from six mice in each group. Values not sharing a common superscript differ signicantly at p < 0.05. Duncan's multiple range test
(DMRT).
a
p < 0.05 vs HFD thymol, bp < 0.05 vs normal, cp < 0.05 vs HFD.
Table 5
Effect of thymol on the activity of enzymatic antioxidant in the kidney of normal and experimental mice.
Groups
Normal
19.78
39.74
16.03
1.81
11.45
19.01
40.50
16.78
1.80
11.43
1.60a
3.94a
1.55a
0.14a
0.88a
HFD
9.36
19.40
9.52
1.17
6.87
0.84b
1.36b
0.75b
0.09b
0.52b
17.73
34.67
13.63
1.58
9.66
1.42 ac
3.44c
1.24c
0.12c
0.74c
Values were means SD for six samples from six mice in each group. Values not sharing a common superscript differ signicantly at p < 0.05. Duncan's multiple range test
(DMRT).
U1Enzyme concentration required for 50% inhibition of NBT reduction/min.
U2 mmole of hydrogen peroxide consumed/min.
U3 mmole of reduced glutathione consumed/min.
U4 mg of CDNB conjugate formed/min.
U5 mg of reduced glutathione formed/min.
a
p < 0.05 vs HFD thymol, bp < 0.05 vs normal, cp < 0.05 vs HFD.
Table 6
Effect of thymol on the activity of non enzymatic antioxidant in the kidney of normal and experimental mice.
Groups
Normal
HFD
21.64 1.85a
1.06 0.09a
4.76 0.35a
22.10 1.94a
1.11 0.09a
4.75 0.39a
9.60 0.86b
0.54 0.04b
1.99 0.11b
18.43 1.34c
0.89 0.07c
3.78 0.32c
Values were means SD for six samples from six mice in each group. Values not sharing a common superscript differ signicantly at p < 0.05. Duncan's multiple range test
(DMRT).
a
p < 0.05 vs HFD thymol, bp < 0.05 vs normal, cp < 0.05 vs HFD.
Table 7
Effect of thymol on the concentration of lipids in the kidney of normal and experimental mice.
Groups
Normal
TC (mg/g tissue)
TGs (mg/g tissue)
FFAs (mg/g tissue)
PLs (mg/g tissue)
4.34
5.64
20.22
3.21
4.31
5.21
19.45
3.11
0.38a
0.46a
1.78a
0.25a
HFD
14.63
12.27
48.52
9.64
1.23b
1.11b
4.65b
0.85b
5.34
7.42
25.74
4.01
0.48c
0.69c
2.34c
0.35c
Values were means SD for six samples from six mice in each group. Values not sharing a common superscript differ signicantly at p < 0.05. Duncan's multiple range test
(DMRT).
a
p < 0.05 vs HFD thymol, bp < 0.05 vs normal, cp < 0.05 vs HFD.
Fig. 3. (A) Effect of thymol on SREBP-1c, TGF-b1 and VEGF protein expression in the kidney of normal and experimental mice by western blot. THY e Thymol; NCeNormal control;
HFD e High fat diet; Lane 1. Normal control, Lane 2. Normal THY (40 mg/kg b/w), Lane 3. HFD, Lane 4. HFD THY (40 mg/kg b/w). (B) Effect of thymol on SREBP-1c, (C) Effect of
thymol on TGF-b1 and (D) Effect of thymol on VEGF protein band intensities scanned by densitometer histogram depicts quantization of three independent experiments
(means S.D.), with data normalized by dening the normal group, with SREBP-1c, TGF-b1and VEGF protein, as 1 unit. TGF-b1- Transforming growth factor-b1; VEGF e Vascular
endothelial growth factor; SREBP-1c- Sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c. ap < 0.05 vs HFD THY, bp < 0.05 vs normal, cp < 0.05 vs HFD.
Fig. 4. Illustrates H&E stain on the kidney tissues section. (A) Normal: Normal renal tubular architecture and glomeruli, (B) Normal thymol: showing normal architecture and
glomeruli, (C) HFD: renal parenchyma showing signicant vacuolar degeneration of renal tubular, (/) shows severe degeneration along with necrosis of tubular vacuolization and
dilation of cells, (D) HFD thymol: normal renal glomeruli maintaining structure similar to the observed normal (/) and mild fatty inltration. (G) Indicates normal glomeruli.
Fig. 5. Illustrates Masson's trichrome stain on the kidney tissue section. (A) Normal: Normal mice kidney showing normal distribution of collagen with normal architecture and
glomeruli, (B) Normal thymol: Showing with normal architecture and glomeruli, (C) HFD: showing degeneration of renal tubular and glomeruli with deposition of collagen (blue
color), (/) demonstrates acellular nodular sclerosis as well as periglomerular and interstitialbrosis, (D) HFD thymol: shows normal glomeruli with moderate reduction in
collagen. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this gure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 6. Histopathological changes in kidney Oil RedO'staining. (A) Normal: showing the vacuoles are negative for Oil Red O Staining, (B) Normal thymol: showing the vacuoles are
negative for Oil Red O Staining, (C) HFD: (/) showing increase the red droplet lipid accumulation, (D) HFD thymol: (/) showing moderate lipid droplet accumulation.
10
[20] S. Muthulakshmi, R. Saravanan, Efcacy of azelaic acid on hepatic key enzymes of carbohydrate metabolism in high fat diet induced type 2 diabetic
mice, Biochimie 95 (2013) 1239e1244.
[21] P. Trinder, Determination of blood glucose using an oxidase peroxidase system with a non carcinogenic chromogen, J. Clin. Pathol. 22 (1969) 158e161.
[22] W. Burgi, M. Briner, N. Franken, A.C. Kessler, One-step sandwich enzyme
immunoassay for insulin using monoclonal antibodies, Clin. Biochem. 21
(1998) 311e314.
[23] D.W. Cockcroft, M.H. Gault, Prediction of creatinine from serum creatinine,
Nephron 16 (1976) 31e41.
[24] S. Netlson, M.L. Scott, C. Beffa, A rapid method for the estimation of urea in
biologic uids, Am. J. Pathol. 21 (1951) 275e281.
[25] M. Jaffe, Concerning the precipitate produced in normal urine by picric acid
and a new reaction of creatinine, Physio. Chem. 10 (1886) 91e400.
[26] O.H. Lowry, N.J. Rosebrough, A.L. Farr, R.J. Randall, Protein measurement with
the Folin phenol reagent, J. Biol. Chem. 193 (1951) 265e275.
[27] W.G. Niehaus, B. Samuelsson, Formation of malondialdehyde from phospholipid arachidonate during microsomal lipid peroxidation, Eur. J. Biochem. 6
(1968) 126e130.
[28] Z.Y. Jiang, J.V. Hunt, S.P. Wolff, Ferrous ion oxidation in the presence of xylenol
orange for detection of lipid hydroperoxides in low density lipoprotein, Anal.
Biochem. 202 (1992) 384e389.
[29] H.P. Misra, I. Fridovich, The role of superoxide anion in the autoxidation of
epinephrine and a simple assay for superoxide dismutase, J. Biol. Chem. 247
(1972) 70e75.
[30] H. Aebi, Catalase in Vitro, in: Methods in Enzymology, third ed., vol. 105,
Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, 1984, pp. 121e126.
[31] G.L. Ellman, Tissue sulfhydryl groups, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 82 (1959)
70e77.
[32] W.H. Habig, M.J. Pabst, W.B. Jakoby, Glutathione S-transferases. The rst
enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation, J. Biol. Chem. 249 (1974)
7130e7139.
[33] J.T. Rotruck, A.L. Pope, H.E. Ganther, A.B. Swanson, D.G. Hafeman,
W.G. Hoekstra, Selenium: biochemical role as a component of glutathione
peroxidise, Science 179 (1973) 588e590.
[34] R.E. Pinto, W. Bartley, The effect of age and sex on glutathione reductase and
glutathione peroxidase activities on aerobic glutathione oxidation in rat liver
homogenate, Biochem. J. 12 (1969) 109e115.
[35] J.H. Roe, C.A. Kuether, The determination of ascorbic acid in whole blood and
urine through the 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazine derivative of dehydroascorbic
acid, J. Biol. Chem. 11 (1943) 145e164.
[36] H. Baker, O. Frank, B. DeAngelis, S. Feingold, Plasma tocopherol in man at
various times after ingesting free or acetylated tocopherol, Nutr. Res. 21
(1980) 531e536.
[37] J. Folch, M. Lees, S.G.H. Solane, A simple method for isolation and purication
of total lipids from animal tissues, J. Biol. Chem. 226 (1957) 497e509.
[38] U.K. Laemmli, Cleavge of structural proteins during the assembly of the head
of bacteriophage T4, Nature 227 (1970) 680e685.
[39] Y.S. Kang, J.J. Cha, Y.Y. Hyun, D.R. Cha, Novel CeC: chemokine receptor 2
antagonists in metabolic disease: a review of recent developments, Expert
Opin. Investig. Drugs 20 (2011) 745e756.
[40] J.A. Jefferson, S.J. Shankland, R.H. Pichler, Proteinuria in diabetic kidney disease: a mechanistic viewpoint, Kidney Int. 74 (2008) 22e36.
[41] M.J. Soler, M. Riera, D. Batlle, New experimental models of diabetic nephropathy in mice models of type 2 diabetes: efforts to replicate human
nephropathy, Exp. Diabetes Res. 2012 (2012) 616313.
[42] S. Saravanan, L. Pari, Role of thymol on hyperglycaemia and hyperlipidemia in
High fat diet-induced type 2 diabetic C57BL/6J mice, Eur. J. Pharmacol. 761
(2015) 279e287.
[43] P. Pasupathi, V. Chandrasekar, U. Senthil Kumar, Evaluation of oxidative stress,
enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants and metabolic thyroid hormone
status in patients with diabetes mellitus, Diabetes Metabol. Syn. Clin. Res. Rev.
3 (2009) 160e165.
[44] W. Xue, J. Lei, X. Li, R. Zhang, Trigonella foenum graecum seed extract protects
kidney function and morphology in diabetic rats viaits antioxidant activity,
Nutr. Res. 31 (2011) 555e562.
[45] H. Birn, E.I. Christensen, Renal albumin absorption in physiology and pathology, Kidney Int. 69 (2006) 440e449.
[46] D.I. Feig, M. Mazzali, D.H. Kang, T. Nakagawa, K. Price, J. Kannelis, et al., Serum
uric acid: a risk factor and a target for treatment? J. Amer. Soc. Nephrol. 17
(2006) 69e73.
[47] K. Jandeleit-Dahm, Z. Cao, A.J. Cox, D.J. Kelly, R.E. Gilbert, M.E. Cooper, Role of
hyperlipidemia in progressive renal disease: focus on diabetic nephropathy,
Kidney Int. Suppl. 71 (1999) 31e36.
[48] X. Ruan, F. Zheng, Y. Guan, PPARs and the kidney in metabolic syndrome, Am.
J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 294 (2008) 1032e1047.
[49] H. Ha, K.H. Kim, Pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy: The role of oxidative
stress and protein kinase C, Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 45 (1999) 147e151.
[50] R.L. Auten, J.M. Davis, Oxygen toxicity and reactive oxygen species: the devil is
in the details, Pediatr. Res. 66 (2009) 121e127.
[51] P. Gangadhara, V. Achari, V. Elangovan, Benecial effects of aminoguanidine
against streptozotocin-induced pathological changes in diabetic mice kidney,
Biomed. Pre. Nutr. 3 (2013) 221e226.
[52] H. Ha, H.B. Lee, Oxidative stress in diabetic nephropathy: basic and clinical
information, Curr. Diab. Rep. 1 (2001) 282e287.
11