Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
FEATURE
Quantumphysicsfortheterminallyconfused|Cosmos
PHYSICAL SCIENCES
29 FEB 2016
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physicalsciences/quantumphysicsterminallyconfused
1/10
2/29/2016
Quantumphysicsfortheterminallyconfused|Cosmos
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physicalsciences/quantumphysicsterminallyconfused
2/10
2/29/2016
Quantumphysicsfortheterminallyconfused|Cosmos
Does quantum physics melt your brain? First, dont panic. Youre not alone in your
confuddlement. As legendary physicist Richard Feynman said: I think I can safely say
that nobody understands quantum mechanics.
Nevertheless, quantum theory is vital for describing how our world is screwed together.
So weve broken down the ideas of quantum theory to the level where even a five-(or 55)
year-old can get the gist.
To describe the way this tiny world operates, scientists use a collection of ideas called
quantum theory.
The theory makes weird predictions (for example, that particles can be in two places at
once), yet it is also the most precisely validated theory in physics.
It underpins much of the technology around us, including the chip that makes your
smartphone so smart.
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physicalsciences/quantumphysicsterminallyconfused
3/10
2/29/2016
Quantumphysicsfortheterminallyconfused|Cosmos
In physics-speak youd say the shelves of your kitchen are quantised. It just means they
come in levels.
In the quantum world, everything is split into levels. For example, an electron in an atom
can sit in one of a few set energy levels just like shelves in your kitchen. But the
quantum world is weird. Give an electron a kick of energy and it will jump instantly from
one level to another.
Heres another analogy. If you drove a quantum car, you might be able to travel at 5
km/h, 20 km/h or 80 km/h, but at no speed in between. Shift gears and youd suddenly
jump from 5 to 20 km/h. The change in speed would be instantaneous, so you wouldnt
even feel the acceleration.
Classical is a physicists word for common sense when something behaves the way
you might expect it to from everyday experience.
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physicalsciences/quantumphysicsterminallyconfused
4/10
2/29/2016
Quantumphysicsfortheterminallyconfused|Cosmos
A billiard ball is a classical object (it rolls along the table in a straightforward way) but a
single atom within it follows quantum laws (liable to disappear through the green felt at
any moment).
Somewhere between the scale of the atom and the billiard ball there is a crossover point
in the laws of physics a bit like a jurisdictional handover between state and federal
police.
Stick enough atoms together and weird quantum effects fade away, the behaviour
becomes classical. This is called the correspondence principle.
The reason for this comes down to the smallness of the electron to find out where it is,
you need to detect it with something (for example a photon of light) but this probing,
however gentle, will knock the electron off its original course.
The electron tells you where it is, but forgets where it was going.
Particle/wave duality
Quantum objects (like photons and electrons) have split personalities sometimes they
behave like waves, and sometimes like particles. The way they behave depends on the
kinds of questions you ask them (see the two-slit experiment below).
Wave-function
A bit of maths that describes what a wave looks like.
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physicalsciences/quantumphysicsterminallyconfused
5/10
2/29/2016
Quantumphysicsfortheterminallyconfused|Cosmos
Crucially, quantum wave-functions can have many possible solutions each with a
distinct probability of being true.
Amazingly, the different possible answers seem to interact with one another in a sort of
limbo of states called superposition as if conspiring together to give us the reality of
our universe (see "two-slits" below).
This is the thought experiment dreamed up by Erwin Schrdinger to try to convey the
idea of superposition.
The atomic decay follows quantum laws, and so its wave-function has two solutions:
decayed or not decayed.
According to quantum theory, until you make a measurement these two possibilities are
equally valid. In fact you can consider the atom as both decayed and not decayed at the
same time.
Because the cats fate is intimately connected to the atom of uranium, until you take a
peek, the cat is both alive and dead at the same time.
What is entanglement?
Entanglement is when two particles (for example photons) are intimately connected so
that measurement on one instantly affects the other, no matter how far away it is.
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physicalsciences/quantumphysicsterminallyconfused
6/10
2/29/2016
Quantumphysicsfortheterminallyconfused|Cosmos
Its like when you were a kid and your uncle showed you a coloured ball in each hand,
then mixed them up behind his back. From your point of view, the two balls were
entangled if the red ball is in his left hand, it means the blue ball is in his right.
But the quantum situation is more mysterious because the balls dont have defined
colours, they are colour shifting at any instant they can turn out red or blue with equal
chance. Its totally random.
The weird thing is, looking at one ball kills the randomness (freezes the colour shifting)
not just for the one you look at, but for both.If you see a red ball, you know the colour of
the other is fixed as blue.
In this way, one entangled particle can seem to affect the other instantly, and no matter
how far apart they are. Albert Einstein felt this violated the cosmic speed limit (aka the
speed of light) imposed by his relativity theory, and so he gave entanglement the label
spooky action at a distance.
Another way is to pass the two photons through a maze of mirrors so that you cannot
possibly know which direction each travelled. This unknowability creates
theentanglement.
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physicalsciences/quantumphysicsterminallyconfused
7/10
2/29/2016
Quantumphysicsfortheterminallyconfused|Cosmos
electrons or photons) are fired at two slits before being detected on a screen.
The experiment hinges on the different behaviour of waves vs particles for the same set
up.
For example, you can set up a barrier with two slits in it in a pool of water and then dip
your finger in and out to generate waves. The ripples will pass through the two slits, and
interfere with on the other side, making a pattern.
But if you take the barrier out of the water and fire a bunch of marbles at the two slits,
they fly straight through in two direct lines, without making an interference pattern.
If you fire electrons at the slits, even one at a time, they form an interference pattern on
the screen as if each electron passes through both slits at the same time, and interferes
with itself. This seems to tell us electrons are waves.
Because the electron is a quantum object, we cant know its location (Heisenberg
uncertainty principle). The electron has some chance of going through one slit, some
chance of going through the other because both are possible, it actually goes through
both (superposition of states).
Now, the observation is when the electron hits the detector, showing a bright flash
(wave-function collapse).
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physicalsciences/quantumphysicsterminallyconfused
8/10
2/29/2016
Quantumphysicsfortheterminallyconfused|Cosmos
But say you try to trick the electron by putting a mechanism at the slits which tells you
which one the electron goes through. Suddenly the interference pattern disappears.
Because you know which slit the electron went through, it is no longer in a superposition
of states, and so only travels through one of the slits. The electrons wave-like behavior
evaporates, and it behaves just like a marble.
If your head is hurting, be consoled that physicists also struggle to explain this apparent
RECEIVE
DAILY
paradox (see interpretations
below).
SIGN UP
Though as Feynman noted in his Lectures on Physics, the paradox is only a conflict
between reality and your feeling of what reality ought to be.
The Many worlds interpretation those physicists who maintain that every quantum
measurement sparks the creation of an infinite number of parallel universes, one for
each possible solution to the wave-function. The solution it just happens to be the one
that appears in our Universe.
The Copenhagen interpretation reality does not exist until we measure it. The act of
observing causes the wave-function to collapse.
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physicalsciences/quantumphysicsterminallyconfused
9/10
2/29/2016
Quantumphysicsfortheterminallyconfused|Cosmos
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physicalsciences/quantumphysicsterminallyconfused
10/10