Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
is
urban
planning?
What
do
urban
planners
do?
How
do
urban
planners
spend
their
days?
In
what
sorts
of
settings
do
urban
planners
work?
What impacts do planners have on the communities in which they work?
What
is
the
job
outlook
or
placement
rate
for
planners?
What
career
progression
is
possible
in
urban
planning?
What do professionals say about the field of urban planning?
How
much
do
planners
earn?
Who
are
some
famous
planners?
Return
to
Frequently
Asked
Questions
(FAQ)
What
is
urban
planning?
Urban planning or city planning (the terms are interchangeable) is hard to define
because it can mean so many different things. Urban planning is the profession that
concerns itself with the health and quality of life in urban places-cities and their suburbs,
small towns and rural villages. Just as veterinarians care for animals as different as
dogs are from iguanas, urban planners care for cities as different as New York City is
from Boscobel, Wisconsin. And just as a veterinarian needs to be able to work with the
circulation, digestion, respiration, the skeleton, and nervous system of an animal to
diagnose and prescribe an appropriate treatment to maintain or restore health, urban
planners need to work with the transportation system, the economy, the environment,
urban design and physical facilities, and the culture and politics of a city to maintain (or
restore) the quality of life in a city. Finally, to carry this analogy one step further, just as a
veterinarian or physician monitors a patient's health and lifecycle changes on a regular
basis, anticipating problems and prescribing diet, exercise or other changes to protect
the patient's future health, urban planning is future-oriented. Planners look five, twenty,
and even fifty years into the future to anticipate the future consequences of current
trends and activities. Urban planning is about considering the consequences of present
actions
on
the
future
quality
of
life
in
the
city.
What
do
urban
planners
do?
Given the diversity of our profession, urban planners do a great variety of things. "The
most important role for the planner is to work with the public to identify a community's
attempt to make connections between individual elements and a bigger whole. Without
planning, for example, economic development may harm the environment, roads may
not lead to where housing and shopping are going to be located, and buildings for the
rich may proceed without considering dislocations of the poor. Planners link knowledge
to action. Planners apply what they know to specific issues and problems. They are
problem solvers. Planners attempt to foresee the future, emphasizing to others how
present
actions
can
be
used
to
build
a
better
future.
Finally, planners communicate. Professional planners have no legal authority to put their
plans into effect. Everything a planner proposes will get done only if the planner
persuades others that it is the right thing to do. Planners need to communicate in
language understandable to many different types of people with different values and
experiences, and planners need to get all these different people communicating with
one
another.
How
do
urban
planners
spend
their
days?
The day to day activities of a planner take them from their offices to the "field" and to
meetings of many types. At the office, the planner reviews maps and drawings, makes
calculations using tools like spreadsheets, writes memoranda and reports, and
responds to inquiries from citizens, developers, and public officials. Planners also spend
time in the field, taking surveys, talking with citizens, and observing physical situations.
Planners also spend their time preparing for meetings and presentations. Planners meet
with planning commissioners (citizens who are appointed to the planning board in the
community). Planners also meet with neighborhood groups. During major planning
projects, such as revising a comprehensive plan, the planner will coordinate public
meetings.
In
what
sorts
of
settings
do
urban
planners
work?
As one might expect from the terms "urban planner" and "city planner," that the majority
of planners work for municipalities, and that alone covers a lot of ground. Planners work
in the central cities of metropolitan area cities such as New York, Boston, Sacramento,
New Orleans, and Indianapolis; they work in suburbs large and small within
metropolitan areas. They also work in medium-sized and smaller cities that serve as the
hub of activity for a larger rural area. And planners also work in county government, for
regional
planning
agencies,
and
in
state
government.
A significant number of planners work in the private sector as well. Some work for
planning consulting firms whose clients are primarily cities and counties that need
additional professional assistance with special planning projects or problems. Here are
some additional examples of the settings where one may find planners working:
Architecture firms hire planners to help them design more functional neighborhoods.
Banks hire planners to assist them in making community investment decisions.
Economic development agencies hire planners to help them better understand the
linkages between public policies and employment and to better communicate with
employers about the competitive advantages of specific locations.
Non-profit community organizations hire planners to operate housing, mortgage
assistance, or economic development programs.
Real estate developers hire planers to help them negotiate development terms that
meet the developers needs while addressing the concerns of neighborhoods and
city councils.
School districts hire planners to help with resource allocation decisions or initiatives
dealing with new approaches to service delivery.
Transportation agencies (such as state highway departments and local transit agencies)
need urban planners to help them better integrate proposed transportation
improvements with new residential and commercial development.
A planners' skills, gained through a professional planning degree and work experience,
create many professional opportunities. Their approach and preparation give them skills
that
are
sought
by
many
types
of
employers.
What impacts do planners have on the communities in which they work?
Because of the work planners do, a city functions more smoothly. Housing is more
affordable and of higher quality. Commercial areas have more vitality. Jobs are more
plentiful and pay better. People waste less time in traffic congestion. Taxes are lower.
Parks are greener and more spacious. Residents and visitors enjoy better lives. Life is
beautiful!
OK, maybe this is an exaggeration, but it serves to suggest the kinds of impacts that
planners have. Of course, planners can accomplish none of these positive impacts on
their own. Planners almost always work in coordination with other professionals and
with residents and local businesses to plan and implement policies and programs that
are expected to lead to the kinds of positive impacts described above.
Sometimes the impact of a planner's work is immediate and obvious. For example,
planners in the city of Milwaukee worked with planners and engineers in the state
department of transportation to propose the demolition of an underused section of
freeway that cut through the north side of Milwaukee's downtown. After the legislature
and the governor agreed to tear down the freeway, property values in the adjacent
areas rose immediately in anticipation of new development opportunities. When the new
development is complete property values will increase, the city's tax base will increase,
and more people will have reasons to go downtown to work, to shop, to play, or to live.
Planners across southeastern Wisconsin have been working with developers and
businesses to clean up and redevelop former industrial sites that had been abandoned
by companies that either went bankrupt or left the area during the "deindustrialization"
period intensifying in the 1980s. Every time a new business opens its doors and hires
new employees on a site that just a few years earlier stood as an eyesores in the
community,
the
impact
is
immediately
apparent.
Planners need to be patient. Often, planners need to wait for decades to see the
impacts of their work. Because planners are often working behind the scenes as part of
a team, and because they are working to prevent bad things from happening, the impact
of the planner is often unknown when things go well for a city.
Marjorie Macris, former planning director for the City of Berkeley, notes that planners
often work "quietly and inconspicuously" and often planners never know whether their
recommendation
was
the
"right"
one.
What
is
the
job
outlook
or
placement
rate
for
planners?
The U.S. Department of Labor predicts jobs in planning will grow 10-20 percent
between 1998 and 2008. The number of positions in private consulting firms will
probably
grow
more
quickly
than
public
sector
jobs
in
planning.
Several factors are leading to a strong market for planners in the future. Growing
concern, even discontent, with the quality of life in rapidly growing suburban areas has
resulted in a renewed interest in city planning. Policy makers and the public are taking
planning more seriously. A large number of states have created new mandates for local
planning and are providing funding for local planning activity. While the booming
development cycle of the 1990s has abated during the first decade of the 21st century,
the recognition of planning as critical to the long-term health of urban areas is unlikely to
be forgotten soon. The U.S. Department of Labor predicts that most new jobs will be
located in affluent, rapidly growing urban and suburban communities.
U.S. News Cites Urban Planning as Top Career
Urban
What
planning
career
as
progression
one
is
of
the
possible
in
top
careers
urban
planning?
do
professionals
say
about
the
field
of
urban
planning?
An excellent resource for learning about planners from planners is the book by
McClendon and Catanese entitled, Planners on Planning. Here are a few excerpts.
Norman Whitaker: "Successful planners are pragmatic but visionary, assertive but
sensitive, focused on the big picture but also the fine details, self-confident but humble,
action-oriented
but
reflective."
The median entry-level salary for planners in Wisconsin (those with less than 5 years
experience) was $33,400 in 1998. In interpreting these figures, keep in mind that entrylevel planners who possess a masters degree typically earn between $2000-4000 more
than planners who lack the masters degree. This salary premium for the masters
degree
continues
even
among
planners
with
more
experience.
Who
are
some
famous
urban
planners?
(Sources: Except as noted otherwise, excerpts about famous urban planners are quoted
from
the
American
Planning
Association.)
Daniel Burnham: Director of Works for the Columbian Exposition, Chicago (1893);
chairman of the McMillan Commission Plan for Washington (1902); chairman of the
committee that produced the Cleveland Group Plan, the first "civic center" plan in the
United States (1903); producer, with Edward H. Bennett, of the Plan of San Francisco
(1906) and the Plan of Chicago (1909), America's first metropolitan regional plan;
commonly referred to as "The Father of American City Planning."
John Nolen: Many Wisconsin residents recall hearing the name "John Nolen" because a
graceful parkway in Madison, Wisconsin, bears his name. A graduate of the University
of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, John Nolen came to planning late. Like Frederick
Law Olmstead, Nolen came to the planning field through his work as a landscape
architect. He was 34 when he entered Harvard to study landscape architecture in 1903.
In 1904, a year before he graduated, he opened an office on the Square in Cambridge,
Massachusetts. Rapidly expanding his scope beyond the landscaping of individual
properties, Nolen promoted city-wide plans emphasizing the physical environment.
Between 1906 and 1926, he produced 35 city plans, more than any other American
planner, including plans for San Diego, La Crosse, Montclair, Madison, Roanoke, and
Reading. Nolen may well be best known for his new towns: Kingsport, Tennessee
(1915), Venice, Florida (1926), and Mariemont, Ohio (1926). He was undoubtedly the
most
productive
city
planner
of
his
time.
Catherine Bauer: After receiving a degree from Vassar (1926) and European travel,
Catherine Bauer took a job with a publisher where association with Lewis Mumford led
her to study housing and to free-lance writing on housing and architecture. Additional
research in Europe resulted in publication of Modern Housing (1934) in which she
suggested a national housing policy. In the mid-30s she worked as a researcher for
Clarence Stein, assisted in founding the National Association of Housing Officials, and
promoted support for a federal housing program. Modern Housing became a foundation
for the Wagner-Steagall Act (1937), the first federal legislative commitment to a housing
program for America. Bauer served the USHA as director of research and information
(1938-40), and then lectured at the University of California-Berkeley and at Harvard.
She rejoined the University of California faculty in 1950. Catherine Bauer advised three
American presidents on housing policy. Her promotion of city planning inspired the
creation of many public planning authorities, particularly on the West Coast.
Rexford Guy Tugwell: Rexford Guy Tugwell was president Franklin Delano Roosevelt's
chief advisor on public works. His views on national economic planning, focused on
raising workers' wages, reducing hours, and increasing recreational opportunities,
became the directional undercurrent for progressive government in mid-twentieth
century America. His farsighted plan to resettle the poor in the suburbs in homes of
quality with proximity to new jobs and superior educational opportunities was embodied
in the work of the Resettlement Administration of the Department of Agriculture, which
he directed, resulting in construction of Greenbelt (Maryland), Greenhills (Ohio), and
Greendale (Wisconsin). Following a brief period as chairman and head of the New York
City Planning Department, Tugwell became governor of Puerto Rico, where he drafted
innovative planning laws that guided the island's postwar development. In 1946 he
founded the Institute of Planning at the University of Chicago that became an incubator
for a generation of influential planning educators and other leaders of the profession.
Frustrated by the politics of democracy, which built 3 Greenbelt Towns when he believed
3,000 were needed, and by the perversion of democratic control in the assumption of
regulatory authority by those intended to be regulated, Tugwell devoted his final years to
reconsideration of the U.S. Constitution which he believed was about to be fatally
abused
in
the
interests
of
private
wealth
and
power.
Jane Jacobs: Jane Jacobs has no professional training in the field of city planning, nor
does she hold the title of urban planner anywhere. However, she has used her own
observations about cities to formulate her philosophy about them. Though some of her
views go against the traditional views on planning, her work is well respected by
practicing planners and planning students alike. Born in 1916 in the coal mining town of
Scranton, PA, Jacobs has never been afraid to stand on her own. After graduating high
school, where she claims she "didn't listen much in class. I would try to, but I would just
get bored with it. . . . I just did enough to get by, really" (Feeney, 10), she took an unpaid
position as the assistant to the women's page editor at the local newspaper. Shortly
after that, and in the middle of the Depression, she left Scranton for New York City. After
residing in New York City for thirty years, Jacobs moved with her family to Toronto in
1968, where she still lives and writes. She has written a variety of books over the years,
including The Death and Life of Great American Cities, her first published work, Cities
and the Wealth of Nations, and Systems of Survival, her most recent effort. It is through
these writings that she expresses her ideas about cities. She advocates "mixed-use" in
the urban fabric, meaning no separation of the different types of buildings, whether
residence or business oriented, old or new. She also sees cities as being "organic,
spontaneous, and untidy," (Trueheart, C2), and that diversity and activity are crucial to
their survival over the centuries. (Source: Lauren Rawlins, Biography of Jane
Jacobs, produced in conjunction with a course about Jane Jacobs work at the
University of Virginia.)
Ian McHarg: Ian McHarg, received Bachelor's and Master's degrees in landscape
architecture, and the Master of City Planning degree, from Harvard. In 1954, he initiated
a long-term association with Philadelphia, rising to the chairmanship of the department
of landscape architecture at the University of Pennsylvania and establishing a
professional practice in landscape architecture, architecture, and planning (1962).
McHarg became the primary successor to Rachel Carson as leader of the American
ecology movement and as a nationally recognized proponent of the primacy of natural
systems over the man-made. His book, Design with Nature (1969), became both a call
to action and a seminal text on environmentally conscious design. The inventor of
ecological planning approaches and environmental impact analyses, McHarg's graphic
analysis techniques created the foundations for the geographic information systems
(GIS) concept that became an integral part of professional planning practice.
Norman Krumholz: Norman Krumholz earned his Master of Urban Planning degree at
Cornell University and has served as a planner in Ithaca, New York; Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania; and Cleveland, Ohio, where he was planning director from 1969 to 1979.
Krumholz is the "father of equity planning," a movement during the 1960s that greatly
influenced the way planners approached their work in the late 20th century and to the
present day. Krumholz argues that planners, in pursuing the "public interest," have a
special responsibility to promote policies that will address the needs of the poor and
working-class city residents. His book, Making Equity Planning Work, written with John
Forester, won the Paul Davidoff Award from the Association of Collegiate Schools of
Planning. Since 1985, he has been professor of urban planning at Cleveland State
University. (Source: Planners on Planning, McClendon and Catanese)
What
knowledge
and
skills
do
urban
planners
need?
Urban planners are trained as problem solvers. In order to find a solution to a specific
problem, a planner may draw upon tools derived from economics, statistics,
engineering,
and
architecture-among
other
fields.
Perhaps the key skill that planners bring to their work is the ability to see the interconnections between different facets of urban living. For example, if a suburban
community restricts development of low-cost housing, allowing on only expensive
housing to be built, how will the community provide enough workers to fill a range of
jobs that will be needed by employers in the future? What will be the cost to attract
employees-affordable housing, public transportation, private buses for employers? Or
will a community fail to take action and pay the price by losing employers? What may
initially appear to be separate problems-housing, land use, and economic developmentplanners
see
as
closely
linked.
Planners learn to take a step back, to take a broader view of any subject. Planners are
trained to deal with complexity and uncertainty as well as interpersonal and group
dynamics
needed
to
resolve
disagreements.
A related skill is a planners' ability to persuade others through strong communication
skills, both oral and written. Planners need to be effective in communicating with many
different
kinds
of
people
in
a
range
of
contexts.
A recent analysis by C.A. Keithley, reported in Florida Planning (March 2001), of
planning jobs advertised in the American Planning Association's Job Mart suggests the
skills areas that employers look for when hiring planners at the entry level and at more
advanced levels. At the entry level, four sets of skills were most highly sought: (1)
administration and enforcement of codes, (2) verbal and written communication skills,
(3) computer applications, public presentation skills, and GIS applications, and (4) plan
preparation,
data
collection,
and
land
use
knowledge.
If
I'm
good
at
SimCity,
will
make
good
urban
planner?
SimCity deserves a lot of credit for increasing non-planners' awareness of how cities
grow and change over time. Anyone who plays SimCity becomes aware of the many
interconnections that planners need to understand to be effective. A poor transportation
system will mean that parts of the city decline. Excessive taxation will make some
residents move away. Too little land available for industrial development, and the city will
not be able to provide jobs for all its residents. Too little investment in maintaining and
upgrading infrastructure, like the electricity supply, will result in a decline in the city's
health. SimCity teaches players to understand some of the trade-offs between future
investment
and
present-day
consumption.
One limitation of SimCity is that it does not allow solutions to problems that go beyond
what the designers of the game included as options. In addition, a SimCity champion
may have mastered the technical details of managing a city within the constraints of
SimCity, but still lack the crucial interpersonal communication skills that make real
planning
successful.
Do I need a masters degree in urban planning to be an urban planner?
A masters degree is required for about half the entry-level jobs in planning and more
than half of the more advanced positions. Even when the degree is not required, job
candidates holding a masters degree profit from a number of competitive advantages.
In C.A. Keithley's review of jobs published in the American Planning Association's Job
Mart (reported in Florida Planning, March 2001), 46 percent of the entry-level positions
required a masters degree, 60 percent of the Planner 2 positions required a masters
degree, and 65 percent of the senior planning positions required masters degree.
In addition, employers often allow job candidates who hold the masters degree to
substitute the degree for required work experience. For example, while entry-level
positions required an average of 2- 2.5 years of experience, for those jobs for which the
masters degree was not required, the degree probably could be substituted for some or
all
of
the
required
experience.
Another advantage of the masters degree is that job candidates who hold the degree
may have a competitive advantage in securing the better jobs in planning. Salary data
from the American Planning Association shows that planners who hold the masters
degree generally earn higher salaries than planners without the degree. Entry-level
planners who possess a masters degree typically earn between $2000-4000 more than
planners who lack the masters degree. This salary premium for the masters degree
continues
even
among
planners
with
more
experience.
.
What sorts of courses should I take as an undergraduate that would be good
preparation for studying urban planning as a graduate student?
Take courses that will give you a broad education rather than focusing too narrowly on a