Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
18-3-2016
Sir,
I in 1985 created the document ADDRESS TO THE COURT (written submissions) and it may
be noted that in SHAW Plaintiff - and - KEYTE AND ORS (Shaw v Keyte & Ors) HIS HONOUR
JUDGE RAVECH in his reason of judgment (Delivered the 15th day of April 1997) (referring to
Counsel Mr Forrest for the defendant police officers) stated:
Shaw v Keyte & Ors (County Court of Victoria) (Delivered the 15th day of April 1997)
QUOTE
Mr Forrest did not ignore these matters. He said in his address to the Court
END QUOTE
It is for the above therefore well recognised in total separate proceedings that when a person
makes submissions from the Bar Table it is held to be an ADDRESS TO THE COURT.
The fact that I created the written version/concept about 17 years prior to this hearing cannot
deny me my legal rights, yet Registrar Melinda Hampshire appears nevertheless to refuse
placing my ADDRESS TO THE COURT (and any supplements) on court file. While His
Honour Mullaly J referred to EX PARTE proceedings at the Magistrates Court of Victoria at
St Arnaud, as the appeal documentation was so marked, in reality where there was then also an
ADDRESS TIO THE COURT then clearly it cannot be deemed an EX PARTE hearing. Do
keep in mind that the matter before the court is an uncontested Appeal subject to an uncontested
OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION, as no valid Notice of Appearance was filed, neither any
application for Leave to file and serve out of time was sought by Buloke Shire Council.
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.