Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 10

DEBATE ENGLISH

The House Would Carry On HIV Test To All Foreign Tourist.

WRITTEN BY
A. AFFIRMATIVE TEAM
1. I Gusti Ayu Cintya Adianti
2. Ni Putu Novia Indah Lestari
3. Luh Suci Novi Ariani
4. Made Wahyu Riantini
B. NEGATIVE TEAM
1. Kadek Poni Marjayanti
2. I Gede Suyadnya Putra
3. Ni Putu Soniya Darmayanti

(P07120214012)
(P07120214016)
(P07120214021)
(P07120214024)
(P07120214026)
(P07120214023)
(P07120214040)

POLYTECHNIC OF HEALTH DENPASAR


NURSING DEPARTMENT
D-IV PROGRAMME
3 RD SEMESTER
DEBATE ENGLISH
The House Would Carry On HIV Test To All Foreign Tourist.

A. AFFIRMATIVE TEAM
1. FIRST AFFIRMATIVE
Good morning ladies and gentlemen the honorable ajustdicators and all of the members of
this house, I would like to introduce my self, my name is I Gusti Ayu Cintya Adianti. I am so
grateful standing here as first speaker of the affirmative team. Now I will deliver my speech
about our motion today. The motion today is The House Would Carry On HIV Test To All
Foreign Tourist. I would like to present the definition of this motion and the reason why we
agree with this motion from health and social. And my lovely second speaker Novia Indah
Lestari would present the reason from social and culture side.

Ladies and Gentlemen, let me now to deliver my speech


The House Would Carry On HIV Test To All Foreign Tourist.
The government will legalize HIV test for all tourist arrivals in Indonesia. Government here
refers to Indoneisa Government. Why we have plan to legalize HIV test for all tourist ? this
thing we do because of the high cases of HIV in Indonesia, and is increasingly rises. HIV
case like an iceberg phenomenon, thats mean which have been shown to suffer from HIV,
there are still many who have not been proven to suffer from HIV. So we have to do the HIV
test for all the tourist who come to Indonesia. Its purpose is none other than to suppress HIV
cases in Indonesia and improve the health of population Indonesia, so that tourist can not
transmit the virus to locals Indonesia. Because if we look at the customs and ways of
socially western population is more inclined to promiscuity and free sex so that they have a
greater chance of suffering from HIV and it will hurt our own people. We know that HIV is a
disease that can not be treated so that the program will prevent an increase in cases of HIV
in Indonesia. Government programs that would do to tourist in the aim of suppressing HIV
in Indonesia is the first to hold counseling on tourists, Has he/she ever had sexual
intercourse or not ? It was to determine the effectiveness of HIV test. Those who have been
sexually obliged to do test HIV. Second, providing free HIV testing in airports clinic to

simplify the result. The third is, if tourists tested positive for HIV, he/she would be sent
directly to their home country. The fourth, in order to realize the third program, government
will hold bilateral relationship to make an agreement regarding the population that will be
sent home for contracted HIV.
That is all about my argument.

Ladies and Gentlemen, now I want to tell u about the health point of view.
Imunodifisiensi human virus. These viruses infect humans and attacks the immune system
(immunity) of the body, so the body becomes weak in the fight against infection. Without
treatment, a person with HIV can survive for 9-11 years after infection, depending on the
type. In other words, the presence of this virus in the body will cause a deficiency (lack) of
the immune system. The distribution of the HIV virus could be through channeling Cement
(reproduction), blood, vaginal fluid, and breast milk. HIV works by killing cells of the
essentials needed by humans, one of which is the helper T cells, macrophages, dendritic
cells. This causes a decrease in the number of CD4 T Cells.
By knowing these, highly sought government efforts to deppress cases of HIV in Indonesia.
so that the program would help curb the spread of the virus from one person with HIV
positive reply to people who have not contracted HIV. Because, In 2014, the Joint United
Nations Programme on HIV / AIDS (UNAIDS) gives bad performance to Indonesia in
relation to HIV / AIDS. New patients increased by 47 percent since 2005. Deaths from AIDS
in Indonesia is still high, since only 8 percent of people living with HIV AIDS (PLWHA)
who received antiretroviral treatment (ARV). Indonesia is the third country in the world
which has the highest HIV sufferers as many as 640,000 people, after China and India,
because these three countries have a population that much. Only the prevalence in Indonesia
is only 0.43 percent, still below the epidemic level by one percent. The score of that program
legalize HIV test for tourists is a very important program that I am sure will make a
difference for the health of the population Indonesia.

2. SECOND AFFIRMATIVE
Ladies and gentlemen Im Novia as the second speaker of the affirmative team.
First of all Id like rebut the argument of first speaker negative team.
She said that windows can prevent transmission of HIV. But I disagree, because based on the
research of condoms have pores whose size in no greater than the sperm so condoms only
have a go person accuracy rate, so there is still 10 persen fail and cause the virus to enter the
body. There are several reasons why the level of protection in these studies may not reflect
how effective condoms can be at reducing the risk of HIV transmission:

Although couples reported using the condoms consistently, they may not have been
using the condoms correctly.

Couples who reported using condoms consistently may have had trouble remembering
their condom use or did not feel comfortable telling the complete truth. It may be that
they did not use a condom for every sex act.

Couples who used condoms may have engaged in behaviors that put them at higher
risk of HIV transmission compared to those who were not using condoms. For
example, people who chose to use condoms consistently may have been having sex
more often or having sex with a higher number of casual partners.
So I think the use of condoms are not effective in preventing transmission of HIV.

Okay,thats all my rebuttals. Now lets move to my arguments.


Social consequences caused by an outbreak of HIV Aids have a direct impact on the field of
security and public order crime in all aspects, declining quality of service, the occurrence of
discrimination in society and the moral decline will have an impact in the field of security
HIV Aids the negative impact on social conditions and culture is vital joints of the life of a
country would undermine the national security state it will certainly hamper the pace we
must reduce the number of HIV cases in Indonesia to reduce discrimination in people with
HIV, the way is to run government programs to legalize HIV test on tourists.
3. THIRD AFFIRMATIVE

4. REPLAY

Ladies and Gentlemen Ladies and gentlemen Im Wahyu as the replay of the affirmative
team.
First, I want to repeating what has been discussed by my team
Our group have been denied all their opinions, and they have not been able to rebute well.
Such as the issue of condom use. We explained that the use of condoms has not been 100
percent effective in preventing HIV transmission through sexual intercourse. And the
negative team could not rebute. The next in the economic side, tourists return no impact is
too significant for Indonesian economy because there are many sectors that will boost the
economy of Indonesia. Discrimination in terms of our group also said it can be overcome
with the holding of inter-patient counseling with a counselor. I am very confident that this
progra more advantages than disadvantages, so the program is worth to realized.
Ladies and Gentlemen..
Now I will explain why my team deserves to be a winner so here I already gave proof that
the program legalize HIV testing was extremely important in Indonesia as based on data
already mentioned that Indonesia was ranked third after China and India in a number of the
largest population living with HIV. So tourists who come from abroad to Indonesia would
have a greater chance in suffer from HIV so that they are required to perform the test HIV. In
addition to reduce the number of HIV cases in Indonesia, this program also have an impact
on the social and cultural fields, which include reducing discrimination in people with HIV.
For the sake of launch of this program, the government will also conduct bilateral relations
to make an agreement that anyone would suffer HIV positive reply would be sent directly to
their home country so that citizens of Indonesia will not be infected with HIV by tourists
foreign. Therefore we deserved to win this debate.
That is all about my argument, thank you for your attention.
B. NEGATIVE TEAM

1. FIRST SPEAKER FROM NEGATIVE GROUP


Good Afternoon ladies and gentlemen, I am Kadek Poni Marjayanti dan I am so proud
standing here to be the first speaker. I will rebut the argument from affirmative group. When
viewed from the point of health, of course nobody wants to contract HIV virus, but to
prevent it, HIV test is not the way. HIV virus source not from the outside, but sourced from
Indonesian citizens themselves if they do free sex. So what we needs to be done not test for
tourists. Ok, thats all my rebuttal.
And my points are : If we want to reduce HIV patients in Indonesia, we have to do preventive
measures by change lifestyle or habits of Indonesian society, health promotion on the dangers
of free sex and use of condoms to prevent the exchange of fluids so as to minimize
displacement HIV virus from one person to another.
Let me tell you more detail about condom.
Condoms are physical barriers that can reduce the risk of a sexual exposure to HIV and
sexually transmitted infections (STIs). They are made of materials that do not allow HIV or
STIs to pass through them. Condoms can be highly effective against HIV and STI
transmission when used consistently and correctly. They are much less protective if used
inconsistently and/or incorrectly.
What types of condoms are available to prevent HIV transmission?
Two types of condoms are available to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV and other
STIs:

The male condom, also known as the external condom, is a sheath made from
polyurethane, latex, or polyisoprene that covers the penis during sexual intercourse.
There are many types and brands of male condoms available. They vary in shape,
colour, size, texture and flavour.

The female condom, also known as the internal or insertive condom, is a pouch made
of polyurethane or a synthetic latex material called nitrile. The pouch is open at one
end and closed at the other end. It has a flexible ring at both ends. The ring at the
closed end is used to insert the condom into the vagina and hold it in place. The ring at

the open end of the pouch remains outside of the vagina and covers the external parts
of the female genitalia. There are only two types of female condoms available. The
difference is in the material used. The FC1 condom is made of polyurethane, and a
cheaper version, called the FC2, is made of nitrile.
How do condoms prevent the sexual transmission of HIV?
Condoms prevent transmission by reducing the risk that an exposure to HIV occurs
during sex. Laboratory studies show that the materials used to make most condoms (such
as nitrile, latex, polyurethane and polyisoprene) do not allow bacteria, viruses or other
germs to pass through them. Therefore condoms act as a barrier to HIV infection by
preventing the mouth, vagina, penis and rectum from being exposed to:

bodily fluids (such as semen, vaginal fluid and rectal fluid) that can contain HIV

skin infected by an STI (such as herpes and syphilis sores or genital warts).
Some condoms are made from a thin membrane of sheep intestine, also known as
lambskin condoms. These condoms are not effective at reducing the risk of HIV
transmission because bacteria, viruses and other germs can pass through this membrane.
How important is it to use condoms correctly and in what ways can they be used
incorrectly?
Incorrect use of condoms can compromise their effectiveness, thereby increasing the risk
of HIV transmission, even when they are used consistently. There are many ways
condoms can be used incorrectly and research shows incorrect condom use is common.
Some types of incorrect use can cause condoms to break, slip or leak, thereby increasing
the risk of HIV transmission. This type of incorrect use includes using condoms that are
too small or too large; using damaged or expired condoms; unrolling male condoms
before putting them on; reusing condoms; not pinching the tip of the male condom when
putting it on; using sharp objects to open condom packages; not using enough lubrication
in combination with condoms; using oil-based lubrication with latex or polyisoprene

condoms (oil-based lubrication is safe to use with nitrile and polyurethane condoms); or
not holding the rim of the male condom when pulling out.
Other types of incorrect condom use can increase the risk of HIV or STI transmission
even though the condom does not break, slip or leak. For example, some people may put
a condom on late (after intercourse has started), remove the condom early (before
ejaculation has occurred), or put the condom on inside out and then flip it over to use.
These types of incorrect use can increase the risk of exposure to HIV.
Female condoms can fail in other ways that may increase the risk of HIV transmission.
For example, the erect penis can miss the outer ring and enter between the vaginal wall
and the condom. It is also possible for the outer ring to be pushed, either partially or fully,
into the vagina. These can all increase the risk of exposure to HIV.
How effective are condoms at preventing the sexual transmission of HIV?
HIV is transmitted through contact with fluids that contain HIV, including semen, vaginal
fluid and rectal fluid. Research shows that male condoms can reduce the risk of HIV
transmission when used for oral, vaginal and anal sex. The effectiveness offemale condoms
at reducing HIV transmission has not been directly studied.
Observational studies have investigated the effectiveness of male condoms in reducing the
risk of HIV transmission between heterosexual serodiscordant couples (where one partner
is HIV positive and the other is HIV negative). An analysis of these studies found that the
rate of HIV transmission was 80% lower among couples who said theyalways used
condoms compared to couples who said they never used condoms. Other studies suggest
consistent use of male condoms provides a similar level of protection for gay men and
other men who have sex with men.
For these reasons, the effectiveness of condoms at reducing the risk of HIV transmission
through oral, anal and vaginal sex is likely much higher than 80% when used consistently
and correctly. So, Condom promotion therefore remains an important international priority
in the fight against AIDS.

Thats all my points and my explanation about condom. Thank you.

2. SECOND SPEAKER FROM NEGATIVE TEAM


Good Afternoon ladies and gentlemen, let me introduce my self first, I am Soniya
Darmayanti and I am standing here as second speaker. I will rebut the argument from
affirmative group. Every person has a right whether he wants to be tested or not. Because if
they feel never had sex or between couples no pain, they would feel offended. In addition,
you said that the impact of HIV is discrimination, it is precisely the presence of the HIV test
would lead to discrimination that the difference in treatment between the positive and
negative HIV. This discrimination would interfere with social relationships for people. Tests
are very vulnerable and sensitive to the privacy of a person. The test results would disrupt
his privacy and interfere with his relationship with others. In addition, At the airport of
course there are many immigrants who are going on holiday in Indonesia, are sure to be
effective? With so many newcomers, while it must be tested one by one, it will interfere with
the comfort of tourists going on holiday. The discomfort will reduce the interest of visitors.
And my point about economy is : We know that foreign tourists in the tourism sector is the
largest source of foreign exchange for our country. And if it is reduced it will reduce state
revenues as well.
Thats all my arguments. Thank you.

3. THIRD SPEAKER FROM NEGATIVE GROUP


Good Afternoon ladies and gentlemen, let me introduce my self first, I am I Gede Suyadnya
Putra and I am standing here as third speaker. The first speaker had said it would repatriate
foreign nationals who tested positive for HIV, we do not agree with this because it makes
foreign citizens insulted and no longer interested in coming to our country. You also said it
would create a free HIV test program, we know that HIV tests are not cheap, is not it will
increase state expenditures? The program became state losses.
I think, thats all my rebuttal, thank you.

4. REPLAY
Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen. The honorable adjudicators and all of members of this
house. We are from negative group has represented you about the argument. Affirmative
group said that HIV test aims to reduce HIV patients in Indonesia. It has disclaimed that
HIV can be prevented by healthy living behavior, not having free sex and using condoms to
prevent the exchange of body fluids.
And preventive measures are the most important thing to do. Your group also said it would
make HIV test program for all visitors. In our opinion, it is ineffective and even detrimental
to Indonesia in terms of economics and lead to discrimination. In addition, there are some of
our points that you were not able to deny again. First, every person has the right to decide to
perform a test HIV or not. Second, positive group could not give a solution to the problem of
program implementation HIV test for all visitors who are so much at the airport. And lastly,
HIV test would prejudice the state because the cost is not cheap and it is free of charge for
visitors tested.
We think, all the arguments and the points from our group had already proved that our
opinion can still be enforced until now due to the positive group has not been able to refute.
Thank you.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi