Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Session
Coffee break
Session
The course draws on a range of texts: Howarth, Discourse, (Open University Press, 2000);
Glynos and Howarth, Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory (Routledge,
2007); Stavrakakis, Lacan & the Political (Routledge 1999); Laclau, On Populist Reason
(Verso, 2005). It will also discuss material from recent and forthcoming publications, including
Stavrakakis, Yannis, Populism, Anti-Populism and Crisis: The Populist Scandal, Palgrave,
forthcoming.
No specialised background knowledge is presupposed in this course but it would be
helpful if participants have some familiarity with basic social science theory. Participants will be
expected to have read the assigned texts for each days sessions, and in order to facilitate this
process, a course reader will be provided that contains the key readings for each day.
Participants are encouraged to submit a short 1,500 word outlines of their own research
interests and projects, and the sorts of challenges being faced, methodological or otherwise.
These outlines should be emailed to both the course instructors Jason Glynos
(ljglyn@essex.ac.uk) and Yannis Stavrakakis (yanstavr@yahoo.co.uk) at least one week
before the start of the course, so that we can build them into the programme. Time is allocated
at the end of each week for collective discussion of participant research topics and proposals.
Course Outline
WEEK 1
(Jason Glynos)
DAY 1, SESSIONS 1 & 2
Poststructuralist Discourse Theory:
An introduction to key concepts in postmarxism and psychoanalysis
The first days sessions will provide some background on the development of poststructuralist
discourse theory (PDT), paying special attention to the post-foundationalist and anti-essentialist
impulses emphasized by many scholars inspired by deconstruction, postmarxism and
psychoanalysis. We situate PDT in relation to a range of other discourse-oriented approaches
to empirical research, considering too the challenges and tasks confronting it today in political
theory and the social sciences. We also set out several core concepts and logics of
poststructuralist discourse theory, such as discourse, contingency, dislocation, subjectivity,
identity, and hegemony, at least as they have been developed by Laclau & Mouffe, as well as
others who have engaged with their work. We will be revisiting these categories and logics
throughout the course, in order to refine our understanding of them and probe the limits of their
application. PDT also draws inspiration from psychoanalysis, appealing to key concepts such
as split subjectivity and fantasy to supplement the focus on discourse and its post-marxist
satellite concepts. Many scholars have drawn attention to the power symbols exert in social
and political life. Like discourse, fantasy is a concept that, like rhetoric, myth, metaphor, and
utopia, have generated many illuminating explanatory and interpretive insights with which to
better understand the operation of this power. No doubt it is tempting to dismiss the fantasmatic
aspects of social and political life as merely false representations of reality, but the normative
and ideological significance of fantasy can be grasped differently. We close the day by offering
a taster perspective on how the concept of fantasy can be operationalised for purposes of
critical empirical research, suggesting ways to meet methodological challenges associated with
this task, and illustrating this process with reference to a case study.
Seminar Readings
Howarth, D. and Y. Stavrakakis (2000) Introduction, in Howarth, D., A.J. Norval and Y.
Stavrakakis, Discourse Theory and Political Analysis, Ch.1.
Laclau, E., & C. Mouffe, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy (London: Verso, 1985, 2001 2nd
Edition), Ch. 3.
Howarth, D., Discourse, Ch. 6.
Laclau, E., Discourse in Goodin, Robert A., and Philip Pettit, eds., A Companion to
Contemporary Political Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993) pp. 431-437.
Glynos, J., Howarth, D., Norval, A., and Speed, E. (2009) Discourse Analysis: Varieties and
Methods, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, NCRM/014,
http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/796/1/discourse_analysis_NCRM_014.pdf
Laclau, E. Philosophical roots of discourse theory, available online:
http://naqdy.org/docs/2008/Philosophical_roots_of_discourse_theory.Ernesto_Laclau.sp.
2008_2.pdf
iek, S. (1990) Beyond Discourse-analysis, in E. Laclau, New Reflections on the Revolution
of Our Time, London: Verso.
Chang, W.-Y. and Glynos, J. (2011) Ideology and Politics in the Popular Press, in Dahlberg, L.
and Phelan, S. (eds) Discourse Theory and Critical Media Politics, London: PalgraveMacmillan
Background Readings
O. Marchart, Post-foundational Political Thought (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press,
2007), Introduction, Chapters 1, 2, 6, 7.
Laclau, E. (2006) Ideology and Post-Marxism, Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2): 103-114.
Laclau, E., C. Mouffe (1985): Hegemony & Socialist Strategy, London: Verso.
2
Howarth, D. Discourse (Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000), Introduction & Chapters 37.
D. Howarth, Discourse Theory and Political Analysis in E. Scarborough and E. Tanenbaum
(eds), Research Strategies in the Social Sciences (Oxford: OUP. 1998), Chapter 12.
Stavrakakis, Y. (1999) Lacan and the Political, London: Routledge.
iek, S. (1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology, London: Verso.
Introduction, in Critchley, S., Marchart, O. (eds.) (2004), Laclau. A Critical Reader,
London/New York: Routledge., pp.1-14
Torfing, J. (1999), New Theories of Discourse (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 10-77; 81-100; 101-131.
Laclau, Ernesto, ed., The Making of Political Identities (London: Verso, 1994), especially the
Introduction.
C. Mouffe, On the Political (London: Routledge, 2005).
Wetherell, M. (1998) Positioning and Interpreting Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Poststructuralism in Dialogue, Discourse and Society 9(3): 387-412.
Fairclough, N. (2000), New Labour, New Language?, 21-50.
Critchley, S., Is there a Normative Deficit in the Theory of Hegemony? in S. Critchley and O.
Marchart (eds) Laclau: A Critical Reader (London: Palgrave, 2004).
Townshend, J. (2003) Laclaus and Mouffes Hegemonic Project - The Story so Far , British
Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5 (1), pp 129-142.
Simon, R. (1991), Gramscis Political Thought: An Introduction, pp.11-42, 59-77, 91-99.
Saussure, F. (1983), Course in General Linguistics, Chicago: Open Court, pp. 65-69, pp.110129.
Derrida, J. Structure, Sign and Play in the Human Sciences, in Writing and Difference
(London: Routledge).
Derrida, J. Positions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981).
Derrida, J. Of Grammatology (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1974), Part 1.
Glynos, J. (2001) The Grip of Ideology, Journal of Political Ideologies, 6(2): 191-214.
Glynos, J. (2014) Hating Government and Voting Against Ones Interests: Self-Transgression,
Enjoyment, Critique, Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 19(2): 179-189.
Glynos, J. (2014) Neoliberalism, Markets, Fantasy: The Case of Health and Social Care,
Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 19(1): 5-12.
Culler, J. On Deconstruction, Chapter 2.
Gasch, R. The Tain of the Mirror, Chapter 8.
Critchley, S. The Ethics of Deconstruction (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
Mouffe, C. (2000), The Democratic Paradox, pp.108-128.
Laclau, E. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time (London: Verso, 1990), pp. 3-59.
Laclau, Ernesto, Why Do Empty Signifiers Matter to Politics? in his Emancipation(s) (London:
Verso, 1996), pp. 36-46.
Laclau E. and C. Mouffe, Post-Marxism without Apologies, New Left Review, 1987, no. 166,
pp. 79-106. (Reproduced in Laclau, E. New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time).
Laclau, Ernesto, 'Universalism, Particularism, and the Question of Identity' in his
Emancipation(s) (London: Verso, 1996), pp. 20-36.
Seminar Readings
Glynos, J. and Howarth, D. (2007) Logics of Critical Explanation, Introduction, Chapters 4 & 5.
Laclau, Ernesto, The Impossibility of Society (1991) 15(1/3) Canadian Journal of Political and
Social Theory 24, reproduced in Laclau, E. New Reflections on the Revolution of our
Time.
Laclau, Ernesto, Why Do Empty Signifiers Matter to Politics? in his Emancipation(s) (London:
Verso, 1996), pp. 36-46.
Glynos, J., Klimecki, R., and Willmott, H. (2012) Cooling Out the Marks: The Ideology and
Politics of the Financial Crisis, Journal of Cultural Economy, 5(3): 297-320.
Background Readings
Glynos, J. and Howarth, D. (2008) Critical Explanation in Social Science: A Logics Approach,
Swiss Journal of Sociology, 34(1): 5-35.
J. Glynos, and Howarth, D. (2008) Structure, Agency and Power in Political Analysis: Beyond
Contextualized Self-Interpretations, Political Studies Review, 6: 155-169.
C. Taylor, Self-interpreting Animals, in C. Taylor, Human Agency and Language: Philosophical
Papers 1 (Cambridge: CUP, 1985), Chapter 2.
C. Taylor, Interpretation and the Sciences of Man, Review of Metaphysics, Volume 25, no 1
(Sept 1971), 3-51. (Reprinted in C. Taylor, Philosophy and the Human Sciences 2,
Chapter 1.)
J. Elster, A Plea for Mechanisms, in his Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions
(Cambridge: CUP, 1999).
Laclau, E. and C. Mouffe Post-Marxism without Apologies, New Left Review, 166
(November/December 1987). (Reprinted in Laclau, E. New Reflections on the
Revolution of Our Time (London: Verso, 1990), Chapter 4.)
DAY 3, SESSIONS 5 & 6
Applying Discourse Theory:
Problematization, Articulation, Critique;
Rhetorical and Ethnographic Dimensions of Critical Empirical Research
In these sessions we use the category of logics introduced the previous day to reflect on the
way we should understand the process by which we link together different elements (theoretical
concepts and empirical features) into concrete accounts of problematized phenomena,
emphasizing the role played by the researchers judgement in processes of articulation as a
particular mode of explanation, and foregrounding thereby the critical dimension of the research
process. We will also explore the rhetorical dimension of political analysis, especially in relation
to political speeches, with the aim of linking such analyses to the logics approach. We thus start
engaging in the messy processes of problematization, articulation, and critique by deploying
logics in the context of concrete speeches, such as Obamas famous race speech. We
conclude with an exploration of how the ethnographic dimension of research can be situated
within a PDT framework.
Seminar Readings
J. Glynos and D. Howarth, Logics of Critical Explanation (Abingdon: Routledge, 2007), Chapter
6.
Bacchi, C. (2012). "Why Study Problematizations? Making Politics Visible." Open Journal of
Political Science 2(1): 1-8.
Finlayson, A. (2007) From Beliefs to Arguments: Interpretive Methodology and Rhetorical
Political Analysis, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9(4): 545-563;
focusing especially on 554ff.
Obama speech on race (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/18/us/politics/18text-obama.html)
Miller, C., Hoggett, P., and Mayo, M. (2008) Psycho-social Perspectives in Policy and
Professional Practice Research, in Cox, P., Gersen, T. and Green, R. (eds) Qualitative
Research & Social Change: UK and Other European Contexts, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
J. Glynos and D. Howarth, Logics of Critical Explanation (Abingdon: Routledge, 2007), Chapter
1.
J. R. Feagin, A. M. Orum, and G. Sjoberg, A Case for the Case Study (Chapel Hill: Univ. of N.
Carolina, 1991), Chapter 1.
B. Flyvbjerg, Making Social Science Matter (CUP, 2001), Chapter 6.
J. Glynos and D. Howarth, Logics of Critical Explanation (Abingdon: Routledge, 2007), pp. 187191, 201-207.
Glynos, J., Klimecki, R., and Willmott, H. (2015) Logics in Policy and Practice: A Critical
Nodal Analysis of the UK Banking Reform Process, Critical Policy Studies, 9(4):
393-415.
Glynos, J., Speed, E. and West, K. (2015) Logics of Marginalisation in Health and Social Care
Reform: Integration, Choice and Provider-blind Provision Critical Social Policy, 35(1):
45-68
Glynos, J. and Speed, E. (2012) Varieties of Co-production in Public Services: Timebanks in a
UK Health Policy Context, Critical Policy Studies, 6(4): 402-433.
Background Readings
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006) Postcapitalist Politics (London: University of Minnesota Press,
Chapter 3.
Ozselcuk, Ceren, Mourning, Melancholy, and the Politics of Class Transformation Rethinking
Marxism (2006) 18(2): 225-240.
Hollway, W., and Jefferson, T. (2013) Doing Qualitative Research Differently, 2nd Edition,
London: Sage, New Developments since 2000.
Healy, S. (2010) Traversing Fantasies, Activating Desires, The Professional Geographer,
62(4): 496-506.
Frosh, S. (2010) Psychoanalysis Outside the Clinic, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Branney, P. (2008) Subjectivity, Not Personality: Combining Discourse Analysis and
Psychoanalysis, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2): 574-90.
Lapping, C. (2013) Which Subject, Whose Desire? The Constitution of Subjectivity and the
Articulation of Desire in the Research Process, Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 18(4):
368-385.
Lapping, C. (2011) Psychoanalysis in Social Research, London: Routledge.
Walkerdine, V., Lucey, H. and Melody, J. (2002) Subjectivity and Qualitative Method, in May,
T. (ed.) Qualitative Research in Action, London: Sage.
I. Shapiro, Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or: Whats Wrong with
Political Science and What to do About it, in I. Shapiro, R. M. Smith, and T. E. Masoud
(eds) (2004) Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics (Cambridge: CUP, 2004).
W. Connolly, Method, Problem, Faith in I. Shapiro, R. M. Smith, and T. E. Masoud (eds)
(2004) Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics (Cambridge: CUP, 2004).
C. Ragin, Turning the Tables: How Case-Oriented Research Challenges Variable-Oriented
Research, in Brady, H. and Collier, D. (eds) (2004) Rethinking Social Inquiry, Lanham
MD: Rowman & Littlefield, Chapter 8.
A. O. Hirshman, The Search for Paradigms as a Hindrance to Understanding in P. Rabinow
and William M. Sullivan, Interpretive Social Science (Berkeley: University of California
Press, 1987), pp. 177-194.
Bevir, M. and Kedar, A. (2008) Concept Formation in Political Science: An Anti-Naturalist
Critique of Qualitative Methodology, Perspectives on Politics, 6(3): 503-517.
Hajer, M. A. (2009) Authoritative Governance: Policy-Making in the Age of Mediatization,
Oxford: OUP.
Schram, S. F., and Caterino, B. (eds) (2006) Making Political Science Matter, New York:
NYUP.
6
Griggs, S. and D. Howarth (2011) Phronesis, Logics, and Critical Policy Analysis: Heathrows
Third Runway and the Politics of Sustainable Aviation in the UK, in T. Landman and S.
Schram (eds) Real Social Science, Cambridge: CUP.
WEEK 2
(Yannis Stavrakakis)
DAY 6, SESSIONS 11 & 12
Discourse and Affect: Discourse Theory Embraces Psychoanalysis
As we have seen, already from its inception, discourse theory has been marked, among other
influences and sources of inspiration, by the psychoanalytic theories of Freud and Lacan. In its
paradigmatic formulation in Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, Laclau and Mouffe draw on the
psychoanalytic conceptual apparatus enlisting, among others, Freuds understanding of
overdetermination as well as Lacans theory of the point de capiton, which will be recast as the
nodal point instituting a discursive articulation, one of the most central concepts of an Essex
School type of discourse analysis. This influence will gradually increase as Laclau will
progressively engage in a serious dialogue with psychoanalytic political theory. We purport to
follow and reconstruct the way in which, through this exchange, discourse theory has managed
to shift its attention from a narrow focus on representation to an understanding of hegemony
that takes fully into account the affective dimension, the dimension of enjoyment (jouissance).
Finally we discuss recent critiques of discourse theory developed under the rubric of posthegemony in order to show how they disavow this radical embrace of psychoanalysis and
affectivity.
Seminar Readings
Glynos, Jason & Stavrakakis, Yannis (2003) Encounters of the Real Kind: Sussing Out the
Limits of Laclaus Embrace of Lacan, Journal for Lacanian Studies, 1(1), pp. 11028.
Glynos, Jason & Stavrakakis, Yannis (2010) Politics and the Unconscious An Interview with
Ernesto Laclau, Subjectivity, 3, pp. 231-244.
Laclau, Ernesto (2003) Discourse and jouissance: A reply to Glynos and Stavrakakis, Journal
for Lacanian Studies, 1(2), pp. 27885.
Laclau, Ernesto (2004) Glimpsing the Future: A Reply, in Critchley, Simon & Marchart, Oliver
(eds) Laclau: A Critical Reader, London: Routledge, pp. 279328.
Lash, Scott (2007) Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation?, Theory, Culture and
Society, 24(3), pp. 55-78.
Stavrakakis, Yannis (2007) Laclau with Lacan on Jouissance: Negotiating the Affective Limits
of Discourse, in Stavrakakis, Yannis, The Lacanian Left, Albany: SUNY Press, chapter
2, pp. 66-108.
Stavrakakis, Yannis (2014) Hegemony or Post-hegemony?: Discourse, Representation and
the Revenge(s) of the Real, in Alexandros Kioupkiolis & Giorgos Katsambekis (eds)
Radical Democracy and Collective Movements Today: The Biopolitics of the
Multitude Versus the Hegemony of the People, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 111-132.
Background Readings
Althusser, Louis (1999) Writings on Psychoanalysis: Freud and Lacan, New York: Columbia
University Press.
Beasley-Murray, Jon (2010) Posthegemony, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Biglieri, Paula and Perello, Gloria (2011) The Names of the Real in Laclaus Theory:
Antagonism, Dislocation and Heterogeneity, Folosofski Vestnik, XXXII(2), pp. 47-64.
Day, Richard (2005) Gramsci is Dead, London: Pluto Press.
Evans, Dylan (1996) An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis, London:
Routledge.
Gordillo,
Gaston
(2011)
Affective
Hegemonies,
http://posthegemony.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/gordillo_hegemonies.pdf
Johnson, Richard (2007) Post-hegemony? I Dont Think So, Theory, Culture and Society,
24(3), pp. 95-110.
Laclau, Ernesto (1990) New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time, London: Verso.
Laclau, Ernesto (2005) On Populist Reason, London: Verso.
Laclau, Ernesto & Mouffe, Chantal (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, London: Verso,
ch. 3.
8
Howarth, David and Stavrakakis, Yannis (2000) Introducing Discourse Theory and Political
Analysis, in D. Howarth, A. J. Norval and Y. Stavrakakis, Discourse Theory and Political
Analysis (Manchester: Manchester University Press. Several chapters in this book deploy
Laclaus conceptualization of political frontiers in the analysis of concrete cases.
Laclau, Ernesto (2005) On Populist Reason, London: Verso.
Mudde, C. (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Norval, Aletta (2012) Writing a name in the sky: Rancire, Cavell and the possibility of
egalitarian inscription, American Political Science Review, pp. 1-17.
Panizza, F. (2005) Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, London: Verso.
POPULISMUS (2014) Methodological Orientation, http://www.populismus.gr/wpcontent/uploads/2014/09/workshop-report-final-upload.pdf
Rancire, Jacques (1999) Disagreement, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota
Press, especially chapters 1-3.
Rancire, Jacques (2007) The Hatred of Democracy, London: Verso.
Taggart, P. (2000) Populism, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Stavrakakis, Yannis (2014) The European Populist Challenge, Annals of the Croatian
Political Science Association, 10(1), pp. 25-39.
Relevant material is also accessible through the POPULISMUS Observatory:
http://www.populismus.gr
http://observatory.populismus.gr
Breaugh, Martin (2013) The Plebeian Experience, New York: Columbia University Press.
Caiani, Manuela & Della Porta, Donatella (2011) The Elitist Populism of the Extreme Right,
Acta Politica, 46, pp. 180-202.
Critchley, Simon (2015) The European Union has a deficit of populism. An interview with
Professor
Simon
Critchley,
POPULISMUS
Interventions,
no.
1,
http://www.populismus.gr/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/interventions1-critchley.pdf.
Crouch, Colin (2004) Post-Democracy, Cambridge: Polity.
De la Torre Carlos (ed.) (2015) The Promise and Perils of Populism, Lexington: Kentucky
University Press.
De Vos, Patrick (2002) The Sacralisation of Consensus and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism
in Flanders, Studies in Social and Political Thought, 7, pp. 3-29.
Hawkins, Kirk (2010) Venezuelas Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moffitt, Benjamin & Tormey, Simon (2014) Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and
Political Style, Political Studies, 64: 381-397.
Mudde, Cas and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristobal (2012) Populism and (Liberal) Democracy: A
Framework for Analysis, in C. Mudde and C. Rovira Kaltwasser (Eds) Populism in
Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy?, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Panniza, Francisco (2009) Contemporary Latin America: Development and Democracy Beyond
the Washington Consesus. The Rise of the Left, London: Zed Books.
Pappas, Takis (2014) Populism and Crisis Politics in Greece, Abingdon: Palgrave Macmillan.
POPULISMUS (2015) Background Paper, Populism and Democracy international conference,
Thessaloniki, 26-28 June, http://www.populismus.gr/wpcontent/uploads/2015/06/POPULISMUS-background-paper.pdf
Prentoulis, Marina & Thomassen, Lasse (2014) Autonomy and Hegemony in the Squares: The
2011 Protests in Greece and Spain, in Alexandros Kioupkiolis and Giorgos Katsambekis
(eds.), Radical Democracy and Collective Movements Today: The Biopolitics of the
Multitude versus the Hegemony of the People, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 213-234.
Roberts, Kenneth M. (2015) Populism, Political Mobilisations, and Crises of Political
Representation, in De la Torre, Carlos (ed.) The Promise and Perils of Populism. Global
Perspectives, Kentucky: Kentucky University Press, pp. 140-158.
Stavrakakis, Yannis (2003) Religious Populism and Political Culture: The Greek Case, South
European Society and Politics, 7, pp. 29-52.
Stavrakakis, Yannis (2004) Antinomies of Formalism: Laclaus Theory of Populism and the
Lessons from Religious Populism in Greece, Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), pp.
253-267.
Stavrakakis, Yannis (2005) Religion and Populism in Contemporary Greece, in Panizza,
Francisco (ed.) Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, London: Verso, pp. 224-249.
Voerman, Gerrit (2015) Left-wing populism and the Dutch Socialist Party. An interview with
Professor
Gerrit
Voerman,
POPULISMUS
Interventions,
no.
2,
http://www.populismus.gr/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/interventions2-voerman.pdf.
Relevant material is also accessible through the POPULISMUS Observatory:
http://www.populismus.gr
http://observatory.populismus.gr
DAY 10, SESSIONS 19 & 20
Applying Discourse Theory: Participant Case Studies & Conclusion
Day 10 is the second and final of the two days devoted to a discussion of participants
research. As before, these sessions also act as a forum to raise and discuss general issues
and questions arising out of earlier sessions in the week.
12