Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
My files in this case were tampered with by the Judges. I was denied all by rights under the law to protect one
of your own and the Judges who have acted to Cover up the Criminal acts of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier
Heckman.
1:13 cv 01152 UNA This case was pushed to the Virginia Courts and the Defendants did not respond to
the Complaint given over 2 extra weeks and e-mails stating they were going to I finally filed for a Default
Motion The Default was put against me. I can not get a fair trial in Virginia You can review the corruption
on this case under Case No. 1:14 cv 827 LMB/TCB
What all these cases have in common in your court house no Judge was ever assigned No Judge allowed me
an open court room hearing all orders, all tampering with my files by the Judges was done from Chambers
with the hopes they could torture me enough to go away silently and allow the injustice. I am not going away
just the opposite. .
The law and our United States Constitution is very clear of the rights of American Citizens and the rights to a
fair hearing in an open court room with a Judge that has Jurisdiction and is not Bias, not ruling by Retribution,
Retaliation, For Favoritism, Cronyism or personal gain.
I would like to give you the opportunity to right the wrongs of the practice and pattern of abuse in your Court
House that has gone unchecked by all appearances for several years, and which will continue to happen if not
stopped immediately. The Judges who have schemed, have shown a pattern and practice with
knowledgeable intent to prevent Due Process under color of law for favor or personal
financial gain, as well as members or family members of the Judiciary, the Government
and Elected Officials, also for personal financial gain. . There is little or no oversight for this
pattern and practice, which is a violation of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States Constitution
and laid out clearly in the Bill of Rights:
The Bill of Rights (Amendments 1-10)
Amendment 1 Freedom of Religion, Speech, and the Press
Amendment 2 The Right to Bear Arms
Amendment 3 The Housing of Soldiers
2
practiced before or is friend / or wishes to cover up the injustices will do so. If this does not happen I will
consider you to be a party to the scheme and supporting the Criminal acts of the court house you oversee as
being the Chief Judge.
That Justice Douglas wrote: In 1967, Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas posed the following inquiry:
What about the judge who conspires with local law enforcement officers to railroad a dissenter? What
about the judge who knowingly turns a trial into a kangaroo court? Or one who knowingly flouts the
Constitution in order to obtain a conviction? [Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 566-67 (1967)].
Those very
issues raised by Justice Douglas over 40 years ago are now surfacing by way of this lawsuit, exposing the two
original Plaintiffs and others such actors while serving as an example to others who might be intentionally
abusing the protected rights of self-represented litigants.
Warmly,
Janice Wolk Grenadier
cc:
The Honorable Donald W. Lemons, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia
The Honorable John Glover Roberts Jr.of the Supreme Court of the United States of America
The Honorable Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the United States
Director James B. Comey, Federal Bureau of Investigation
The Honorable Terry McAuliffe
Senator Chuck Grassley
Attorney General Mark Herring