Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Sand
0-30
30-61
61-91
91-122
122-152
152-178
12
17
14
17
16
26
66
49
57
53
51
24
0-30
30-61
61-91
91-122
122-152
152-244
18
13
25
19
21
9
38
64
26
32
25
76
Sampling depth
Silt
Textural class
22
34
29
30
33
50
Sandy loam
Loam
Loamy sand/sandy loam
Sandy loam
Loam/sandy loam
Silt loam/loam
44
23
51
49
54
15
Loam
Sandy loam
Silt loam
Silt loarnfloarn
Silt loam
Sandy loam
cm
Site 1
Site 2
Thr Author expresses his appreciation to Mr. C. W, Hayden for the soil texture
analyses.
drilled holes to depths of 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 cm at each
sampling site. When taking samples, approximately 0,7 bar suction
was applied, and water in the soil held at a lower tension was extracted, Not eAery tube yielded a water sample at every sampling.
Usually ihe vacuum was allowed to remain on the tubes for 48
hours, after which the water was pumped into a suction flask,
transferred to a plastic bottle, and taken to the laboratory for refrigerated storage until analyzed. A mixture of reed canary grass
(Phalaris anendinacea) and tall fescue (Fe.sttcca arundinacea) grown
on the fields was sampled at each harvest for chemical analyses.
Yield was estimated from harvest data supplied by the operator for
use in calculating nutrient recovery.
The water samples were analyzed for COD according to standard
methods for the examination of water and waste water (1), NitrateN was determined with a nitrate-specific ion electrode. Total N
was determined by a Kjeldahl procedure, modified by substituting
copper for the mercury catalyst (I). Particle-size analyses of the
soils were obtained from each sampling depth for determining
texture (Table 1).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
72-73
73-7-1
Ill
(1.. r.
N ,,..
i In., .
Ian
/ el,
'11.,r.
\:a.
.11;p.
. 1 uro11.1,.
13
21
'52
72-73
15
111
:21
1(1
29
1,545
I Jul E P
1,6611
1 .'1111
2.05
1,6 E10
1.763
1,07.5.
29
fi
12.
1,347,
X EHI
701
77-7-1
. mgiliier
2'1
III
n i,
16
1!4
IX
'1. 2
'12
Nitrogen
COD
Waier applied
Moo
1 ,320
,2110
;183
,375
1
1
_r_!El
,665
,tiflll
,tI0
11311
72-77
73-74
kg/ha
4.4(13
6,3911
4,3711
4,7111
. ,9!111
2,111111
.7,7711
2,X(I0
3,9'2.Ei
7I15
111.9 I
1,6711
3,715
4.673
3.050
2,593
72-77
73-74
kg/ha
195
275
185
195
1911
65
125
165
195
i 30
1011
2,945
1M
3,745
4.3;
1,01111
--
215
110
11116
2.Ei.
1111
29,2811
1,175
1.11511
1:40
'10
31 an.
1974
cm
15 Feb, 3 May
15 Aug.
ppm
1,310
1.76.5
890
1.221
1,4-08
-47
50
52
-31
93
-52
56
52
24
-25
35
70
30
48
61
38
25
30
..
20
22
13
34
--36
22
32
11
0
11
7
7
4
-21
23
25
17
1,200
Site 1
15
30
60
90
120
150
47
43
--
15
30
60
90
120
150
43
585
43
25
21
--
67
46
42.
..
40
36
30
49
75
66
22
38
38
594
31
17
12
17
8
66
20
9
11
Site 2
n Plant effluent water was collected in the pump house at the waste treatment
field. All waste water was passed through a primary clarifier and the solids
removed by continuous vacuum filtration.
1973
Soil depth
rat
0
15 Feb. 3 May
15 Aug.
Prm
54
67
--
40
60
21
Site 1
15
30
60
90
120
150
0.0
3,5
0.0
0.3
0,8
0.3
--3.8
0.4
0.9
0,0
1.7
0.9
1.3
1.2
1.2
0.8
1.0
0,5
0.2
1.0
-1.1
-0.2
0,4
Site 2
15
30
60
90
120
150
" See
1.1
1.0
0.5
0.5
-
1.5
0.9
1.2
2.7
0.3
-
1.4
1.1
..
1.5
1.2
0.2
3,5
2.6
-2.3
1,7
0.3
Table 3,
Soil depth
1973
1974
cm
ppm
0.5
9.0
0.1
0.2
2.6
Site I
15
(1.3
60
90
120
160
0.5
0.4
0.0
0.7
t1.0
0.0
0.1
-0.0
-0.1
0.!
0.2
3.0
2.0
0.9
1.11
1.1
I .4
0.6
0.2
(1.2
0.0
0,3
0.3
0.1
1.6
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
11.1_1
1.9
1.3
0.2
1.5
(1,e.
0.1
11.7
11 . 1
0.12
(1,0
0.2
0.0
0.4
11 1
0.1
Siie 2
15
30
60
90
130
150
(1. 1
.8
g Ai
1.6
2.4
3.I
'2 :1
0.8
0.1
11.1
(1.1
115