Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
org/
Introduction'to
Seismic Inversion
Methods
Brian Russell
Page 4 -
ntroduction
Downloaded 09/21/14 to 199.6.131.16. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
4.1
B.r.ian Russell
Introduction
( i ) Amp
1i tu de recovery.
(i i) Vertical
resolution
improvement.
Noise elimination.
In
the resolution
improvement
obtained in migration, using a 3-D example.Finally, wewill
consider several approaches
to noiseelimination, especially the elimination
of multi pl es.
Page 4 -
Introduction
to Seismic Inversion
Methods
Brian Russell
Downloaded 09/21/14 to 199.6.131.16. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
DETERMINISTIC
AMPLITUDE
CORRECTIONS
,.
SURFACE-CONSI STENT
AMPt:ITUDE ANAL'YSIS
_m
mlm
SURFACE-CONS ISTENT
DECONVOLUTIO,
NFOLLOWED
BY HI GH RESOIJUTI.ON DECON
i
SURFACE-CONSISTENT
STATI CS ANAIJYSIS
VELOCITY ANAUYSIS
MULTIPLE
ATTENUATION
STACK
MI GRATI ON
,
Fig.
ll
'
Simpl
i fiedi nversi
onprocessing
flow.
4.1.
11
--
,11
Page 4 -
Downloaded 09/21/14 to 199.6.131.16. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
4.2
BrJan Russell
Am.p'l
i tu.de..P,.ecovery
is
econstuctingthe amplJtudes
of the selsmJc
taces as they wouldhavebeenJf
thee
Based on a consideration of
At: AO*
(b
/ t) * exp(-at),
where
anU
Thus, if
data,
formula.
the
= time,
At = recorded
amplitude,
A0 = true ampl
i tude,
a,b
= constants.
to
trace
mean
Aij=
SixRjxG
kxMkX
j,
where A = Total amplitude factor,
M = Offset
component,
S = Shot component,
X = Offset
distance,
R:
i,j
Receiver
component,
= shot,receiver
pos.,
k = CDP position.
Page 4 -
Brian Russell
Downloaded 09/21/14 to 199.6.131.16. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
SURFACE
SUEF'A
AND
CONSIb'TEh[O{
T |tVE :
,RiL-rER
Fig.
4.2.
Part 4 - SeismicProcessing
Considerations
Page 4 -
Introduction
Figure 4.g
Brian Russell
Downloaded 09/21/14 to 199.6.131.16. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
InAij=
InSi +InRj+InGk+lnkMijX.
The
statics
case. Figure 4.3, fromTaner anti Koehler (1981), showsthe effect of doing
surface consistent amplitude and statics corrections.
4.3 Imp.
rov.
ement_
o.[_Ver.
t.i.ca.1..Resoluti
on
Deconvolution
is
remove the
st--wt* r t
where
the
frequency domain
S(f)
The
procedure
reflection
deconvol ution
and consists
coefficients.
W(f) x R(f)
process
of
is
simply the
reverse
of the convolution
reveal
the
rt: st* o
whereOr--operator-- inverseof wt .
Page 4 -
Introduction
to Seismic
Inversion
Methods
Downloaded 09/21/14 to 199.6.131.16. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
ii
Brian
Russell
11
1'
ii
'..,' ,
,"
"
"
d.
Preliminary
stack
bet'ore
surface
consistent
static
andomplilude corrections.
Fig.
4.3.
Stockwith surfaceconsistent
staticand amplitudecorrections.
surface-consi stent
corrections. (TaneranuKoehler,1981).
Page4 - 7
Introduction
Brian Russell
Downloaded 09/21/14 to 199.6.131.16. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
true
wavelet
from the
data?
The
the
reflectivity.
There are
which do not
make restrictive
deconvolution,
Page 4 -
Downloaded 09/21/14 to 199.6.131.16. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
Introduction
Brian Russell
(a)
Fig.
4.4
(b),
Fig. 4.5
'--'-
,t
_ _
,,
Part 4 - .Seismic
Processing
Consioerations
,_
Page4 -
Introduction
Brian Russell
Downloaded 09/21/14 to 199.6.131.16. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
(Hampson
and Galbraith 1981)
(2) Maximum-1ikel ihood aleconvolution.
(Chi et al,
Let
us
illustrate
the
lg84)
effectiveness
surface-consi
stent
aleconvolution.
surface-consi
stent
scheme involves
components.
di recti
ons-
must therefore
We
common
con,non offset
Referring
the
of
one
of.
to Figure 4.,
convolutional
average
source, commonreceiver,
over
four
notice
proauct
different
that
of four
geometry
the methods,
and there
shows an actual surface-consi stent case study which was aone in the following
way'
of each trace,
looking
at
the
interpretability
page.
of the stack.
be comparedare
the
Page 4 -
10
Table
4-1
Downloaded 09/21/14 to 199.6.131.16. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
METHOD
Spiking
Brian Russell
WAVELET ESTIMATION
WAVELETSHAPING
Min.imum
phase assumption
Randomrefl ecti vi ty
assumptions.
phase,higherfrequencyoutput.
Predi cti ve
No assumptions about
Deconvol uti on
wavelet
Removes
short andlong period
Deconvol ution
multiples.
Zero
Phase
Deconvol utton
Zero phaseassumption.
Randomrefl ectt vi ty
Amplitude spectrumi$
assumption.
whi tened.
Deconvolution
assumption.
Phasecharacteri s improved.
trace
methods.
Stratigraphic
No phase assumption.
Deconvol ution
Amplitude
spectrum
not
sei smi c.
whi tened.
Maximum-
No phase assumption.
L ik el i hood
Sparse-spike assumption.
Amp
1i rude spectrumi s
deconvol ution
whi tened.
Page 4
11'
Introduction
Downloaded 09/21/14 to 199.6.131.16. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
4.4
to Seismic
Lateral
Inversion
Methods
Brian
Russell
Resol uti on
Note that
structure.
The first
in
diffractions,
The
is most noticeable by the appearance of energy from the second reef booy which
was not crossed. In the two-dimensional (2-D) migration, we have correctly
removed
the
2-D
out-of-the-plane
problems.
diffraction
diffractions.
The final
patterns,
but
are
The full
3-D
migration
still
bothere
the
accounted for
by
incorrectly
not been intended as a complete summaryof the migration procedure, but rather
as a warning that
structural
(a)
(b)
To remove
diffracted
Although migration
events.
lateral
resolution
interference,
true
one-dimensional
seismic trace,
is impossible to achieve.
Page 4 -
12
Introduction
Brian Russell
71
lol
Downloaded 09/21/14 to 199.6.131.16. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
131
101
131
(a] 3-
108
D MODEL
..................................
LINE
.............................
.........................................
....................................
{hi 880
Fig.
i
4.6.
LAYOU
ml
(Herman
et al, 1982).
mm
Page 4 -
13
Introduction
Downloaded 09/21/14 to 199.6.131.16. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
4.5
Notse
Attenuation
either
Brian Russell
Random noise
is
as
noise
Two of
to eliminate.
One of
major
filtering
the
are
the FK
VeiocityStackingmethod
involvesthe followingsteps:
(1) Correct the data using the proper NMOvelocity,
(2) Model the data as a linear
Notice
that
well on the outside traces, the Inverse Velocity Stacking methodworks best on
comparison
that the result of inverting the section whichhas not had multiple
attenuation
The
,=m__
Page -
14
Downloaded 09/21/14 to 199.6.131.16. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
Brian Russell.
!lilt
tiiti
ll!1111iitt
i)tt
iltli
ii/lit
tttl
ill
IIIIIIll!!1111111111111it
I!1111111
I!11111111111illl
illIiIIIIIIIIIil!111111tllilil!illlllll!111illlll
[1111111111111111111111111
III!!1111
I!111111111111111
IIIIIIIilllllllll!111111111111111111111
?111[i
IIIIIIIII
!1111111111111111
IIII!IIIiillilllllillllllllllliillllllllllllh
.,
}!l!iilll
lllllilllllll
i!iiJ
:illllllllllllilitiilillit!illllll
,o
111lllllllllllllllllllll1111llllll
Iilllllll!ll!llll
I111
illllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllii{lilllllllllllll
"fillllllllll!1111illi!111
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIII1111111111
IIIIIlillilllllll!1111!1!111111111
'
Col LINE 108 - 3-D MIGRATION
Page 4 -
15
Introduction
to Seismic
Inversion
Methods
Brian
AFTER
AFTER
F-K MULTIPLE
INPUT
ATTENUATION
J. '
Downloaded 09/21/14 to 199.6.131.16. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
Russell
"
' ')'%':!!t!'!11!1'1
';.m,:'!:',./--l- r'm--
all
m#l
Fig, 4.8.
Commonoffset
stacks
calculated
attenuation,
after inverse velocity
and after F-K multiple attenuation.
888
Zone d
Interest
1698
-4
Secondreal-dataset conventional
stackwithout
multiple
attenuation.
'", ......
,,t./:,.t.,.
lee
,ii%' .t
---';-'
"" ""
).
;,<,:u(:'J,.J
L,..,!I',,',
,'; ,
,
, ,
.% '.
' "'
"'"t"
1%';J
'
'
,,,,
t,
..'t,..'"'i'
.... -....
; -'".' ,..'....
'. 2>.': '..', ;,%"'1
'" "'
Zone of
,,, .tiill).);l',"P,')'"'".r'"mm"""P"
")r'"
,,..,.,,..,,,_.
,,.,.....,...,..,...,..,...,....,,,.,.,..
gt'
..,,,. ' '" - ..... ,
Interest
.. ,,,
,,p}h?.,.,,
r.,.
.}.U.,..,
,nm,
";'
........
,,,,
../.
,.', .'-%....
,'......._
,,,,.,.,,,,,..,
.l,
), .,
' ,,{.
,,m,l,,
.''
','...r'
....
'.""::"''""""="'"""
Fig. 4.9.
stack
Page 4 -
16