Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Ground
Improvements on
Liquefiable Soils
A Partial Fulfilment of the Course
CE 263 Soil and Rock Dynamics
Rodora C. Cadiz
2012-79606
I.
II.
Objectives of Mitigation
a. Reduce void ratio
Smaller void ratio means that the soil mass is denser and sand grains wont be able to
move during shearing.
b. Reduce degree of saturation
Should the soil mass be compressed, a small degree of saturation means the void is
composed mostly of compressible air and will not produce excess pore water pressure.
Volume change is allowed.
c. Increase permeability
Excess pore water pressure will not be able to develop if the fluid will be drained quicker
than the applied load.
Page 1 of 9
RCCadiz 2012-79606
III.
Page 2 of 9
RCCadiz 2012-79606
Page 3 of 9
RCCadiz 2012-79606
b. Dynamic Consolidation
Dynamic Consolidation is a method proposed by Menard, a ground improvement
specialist. It is done by having a weight, made of concrete or steel, of 50-300 kN free fall
from a height of 20-30 meters. The impact on the ground releases an energy that
compacts the soil particle. The procedure is repeated until specified energy is transferred
to the ground.
The effects of compaction is maximum near the surface and addresses only the increase
of density and effective stress and to lessen the void ratio.
Towhata discussed the summary of the design procedure.
1. Determine the depth of effective compaction, D
Page 4 of 9
RCCadiz 2012-79606
c. Compaction Grouting
Compaction grouting pushes highly pressurized grout into the soft ground and
compresses the surrounding soil in the lateral direction. This procedure is ideal for
retrofitting as the equipment is manageable for use in the basement and the vibration
and noise is minimum. Existing and adjacent structures are not affected by the ground
improvement.
A steel pipe, 5 inches in diameter, is bored into the ground. Grout is injected at a
maximum pressure of 6 MPa. While the grout design mix can reach 3 MPa at 28 days.
d. Gravel Drains
A less expensive method that uses gravel instead of sand to improve the hydraulic
conductivity of soil and dissipates the excess pore water pressure. Typical installation of
500mm diameter gravel drains is spaced at 1.5 meter.
Page 5 of 9
RCCadiz 2012-79606
Gravel drains differ from SCP as it does not increase the density of the soil, the soil is
removed in place of the gravel drain. It only uses the mechanism of hydraulic conductivity
instead of addressing also the increase in density. This procedure does not produce
harmful vibration to nearby structures hence it is safe to use in populated areas.
Gravel drains cannot always maintain the excess pore water pressure less than 100%
during a level 2 design earthquake (return period of 500 years) so it has become less
popular in Japan.
e. Grouting and Deep Mixing
For a larger scale ground improvement, grouting is combined with deep mixing. Used in
new developments, where there are no existing structures. Grouting develops stiff
bonding among the sand drains. Deep mixing is carried out by mixing soil with a cementlike material. Deep jet mixing or DJM mixes cement powder with soil and ground water is
used to start solidification in saturated soil while cement deep mixing or CDM mixes
cement slurry on dry soil.
Page 6 of 9
RCCadiz 2012-79606
.
f.
Blasting
Compaction by blasting is found to be economical and time saving. The energy released
by the explosion is similar to an earthquake, producing cyclic straining of the soil therefore
inducing liquefaction and forces the soil grains to rearrange themselves until pore water
pressure is completely dissipated. This results in denser soil.
Dynamites are installed and ignited from one side of a site towards the opposite side.
Although, the order of blasting is not yet well investigated.
Page 7 of 9
RCCadiz 2012-79606
Its applicable to isolated sites where existing structures could not be affected by the
ground vibration and noise produced by blasting. A work around to isolate the site was
tested by Sato Kogyo Company in Tokyo where they installed sheet piles to close off the
site. This effectively reduced the ground vibration transferred to nearby structures.
IV.
Page 8 of 9
RCCadiz 2012-79606
V.
VI.
References
Duzceer, R., Gokalp A. Improvement of foundations of oil tanks with stone columns, 9th
National Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 2002.
Kramer, S., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. 1996.
Mavituna, O., Teymur, B., Effect of Improving Soil as a Countermeasure for Liquefaction, 14th
World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 2008
Towhata, I., Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering. 2007.
Page 9 of 9
RCCadiz 2012-79606