Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Composites: Part B
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compositesb
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 27 December 2011
Received in revised form 1 May 2012
Accepted 5 May 2012
Available online 14 May 2012
Keywords:
A. Carbon ber
B. Debonding
C. Damage mechanics
D. Mechanical testing
a b s t r a c t
The purpose of this study was to investigate the hysteretic behavior of shear decient reinforced concrete
(RC) walls that were strengthened with carbon ber reinforced polymer (CFRP) strips. Totally, scale ve
specimens with 1.5 aspect ratio walls were constructed. One of them was tested without any retrotting
as a reference specimen and four of them were retrotted specimens with CFRP strips. All of the specimens were tested under cyclic lateral loading. CFRP strips with different congurations were tested like
X-shaped, horizontal and parallel strips or combinations of them. All of the CFRP congurations were
symmetrically bonded to both sides of the shear wall and were anchoraged to the wall. The research
focuses on the effect of using CFRP strips for enhancing strength and increasing ductility of the non-seismic detailed shear walls. Test results shows that all of the CFRP strip congurations signicantly
improves the lateral strength, energy dissipation and deformation capacity of the shear decient RC
walls. The specimen that was strengthened with X-shaped CFRP strips was failed with premature shear
failure. The specimen that was strengthened with horizontal strips was showed exural hysteretic behavior and plastic hinge was developed at the wall base. CFRP strips were controlled shear crack propagation
and resulted in improvement of displacement capacity.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
In earthquake resistant design, shear walls are common lateral
load resisting systems found in many reinforced concrete (RC)
structures. Limited numbers of RC shear walls are in use at older
buildings. A number of buildings were found with walls having
cross sections with relatively small aspect ratios (h/l, h = wall
height, l = wall length), which in some cases resembled like elongated rectangular columns. These buildings survive from the earthquake with minor damages at structural framing system, but major
damages at the masonry walls [1]. Poorly designed and detailed
shear walls in these buildings that are damaged with diagonal
shear cracks, survived from the earthquake, and saved the structure. These shear crack that are observed at the shear walls are
wide enough to suggest some yielding of the reinforcements. In
addition, there are older buildings with signicantly lower quality
concrete. Although the concrete in these walls is damaged extensively, the shear walls are saved the structures and prevented collapsing. A signicant number of existing buildings are designed
such that shear walls are carried only gravity loads, and not lateral
loads. The shear walls of the numerous existing buildings have
number of design and construction detailing deciencies such as
poor or no connement of boundary element with enough rein Corresponding author. Tel.: +90 312 582 32 15; fax: +90 312 230 84 34.
E-mail address: oanil@gazi.edu.tr (. Anil).
1359-8368/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.009
322
Nomenclature
Section A-A
25
250
1000
250
250
50
50
50
1500
1000
25
Section B-B
250
300
300
250
50
8/12
10/100
150
100
316
216
316
400
1500
6/400
400
16/50
6/250
400
10/100
150
16/16
B
450
1000
450
500
1900
Fig. 1. Reinforcement details of test specimens (dimensions in mm).
2200
qv
qh
400
rf
b
300
2. Experimental study
1500
behavior. The main focus of the present research is the experimental analysis of the proper CFRP strip congurations for improving
the hysteretic behavior of shear decient reinforced walls under
lateral loading. The goal of the retrotting is to improve the shear
strength, ductility and energy dissipation of the poor detailed RC
walls. In the study, shear decient RC walls are strengthened by
four different congurations of CFRP strips and are tested under
cyclic lateral loading. The different congurations of CFRP strips
are cited as follows; the lateral strips, X-shaped strips, combination
of X-shaped and lateral strip, and combination X-shaped and parallel strips. The main experimental parameter studied in this research is the conguration of CFRP strips. The study focuses on
the lateral loaddisplacement behavior, strength and ductility as
well as failure modes of the RC walls strengthened using CFRP
strips.
VR
VC
VW
Vf
w
400
100
df
Ef
fC
ffu
fsy
fsu
h
l
n
tf
323
1
2
3
4
5
a
b
(Reference)
(Strengthening)
(Strengthening)
(Strengthening)
(Strengthening)
Concrete strength
fc (MPa)
h/la ratio
15.5
15.7
15.0
15.9
15.6
1.5
Dia./Spacing
(mm)
Ratio
Dia./Spacing
(mm)
Ratio
Exterior
(number/dia.)
Interior
(number/dia.)
6/400
0.0015
6/250
0.0183
3/16
2/16
50 300
300
300 50
SG-8
200
SG-7
200
SG-6
50
900
50
50
75
225
0
20
225
SG-3
SG-4
SG-5
225
100
100
27
0
SG-4
SG-3
SG-2
SG-1
SG-2
SG-1
75
50
50 300
300
300 50
50 300
300
300 50
SG-6
100
200
200
250
0
20
225
SG-5
225
SG-8
SG-9
SG-6
SG-7
27
225
SG-4
27
225
SG-2
SG-3
10
SG-1
SG-4
SG-5
200
SG-1
SG-2
SG-3
100
Notes:
w: cfrp strip width.
This sign shows cfrp anchorage.
This sign shows strain gauge (SG).
Fig. 2. Strengthening schemes of test specimens (dimensions in mm).
diameters were drilled and the wall surfaces at which CFRP strips
will be bonded were roughened for obtaining good bonding surface
for CFRP strips. Four corners of the wall were rounded to 15 mm.
Surfaces and anchorage holes were cleaned from dust by air-blowing and then epoxy was applied to the surfaces with a thickness of
1.5 mm, and injected into anchorages holes. After bonding of CFRP
strips onto walls, previously prepared fan anchorages were passed
through the holes with the help of the wires. The ends of the
anchorages were opened in the form of the fan (fan diameter
100 mm) and were bonded to both sides of the wall. All specimens
324
cfrp strip
Hinge
50
1500
200
Rigid
Wall
100
Specimen
Rigid Floor
50
RC Wall
400
80
Fig. 4. Test setup and instrumentation of specimen (dimensions in mm).
Table 2
Properties of reinforcements.
Reinforcement
diameter (mm)
Type
6
10
12
16
325
430
428
425
420
522
515
520
Plain
Deformed
Deformed
Deformed
Table 3
Properties of CFRP Sikawrap 160-C (unidirectional) and resin sikadur 330.
Properties of CFRP
Remarks of CFRP
Thickness (mm)
Tensile strength (MPa)
Elastic modulus (MPa)
Ultimate tensile strain (%)
0.12
4100
231,000
1.7%
Properties of resin
Remarks of resin
30
3800
ward cycles. Load control was applied until reaching the exural
capacity at the rst part and then displacement control was applied. In the load controlled part, every loading cycle was repeated
three times. Tests were started by a lateral loading of 50 kN and
load was increased with loading such that it causes 50 kN shear
force increments in successive cycles. In the displacement controlled part, tests were done by 0.2% lateral drift increments. The
tests were stopped when the specimens lost their lateral load carrying capacities. During the test, the top displacements and the lateral loads applied to specimen were monitored. At the peak load
level of each half cycle, cracks were marked on the specimens. In
the instrumentation of the specimens, strain gauge based linear
variable differential transformers (LVDTs) were used for displacement measurements. Additionally, strains in the CFRP strips were
measured using strain gauge. Strain gauge locations were given
in Fig. 2.
3. Experimental results
3.1. Observed behavior of specimens
Shear force-lateral drift hysteresis curves for the test specimens
are shown in Fig. 5. As can be seen from these gures lateral displacement, lateral load carrying and energy dissipation capacities
were signicantly increased. For the strengthened specimens, the
rst exural and shear crack was observed at 2530 kN and 42
54 kN lateral loading level, respectively. The exural capacity
was reached at Specimens 2, 4, and 5 and maximum base shear
was controlled by the exure. Fan anchorages were prevented
the premature debonding of CFRP strips from the wall surfaces.
Hence, CFRP strips were controlled the widening of the shear
cracks and lateral displacement signicantly increased. Shear sliding deformation was not observed during the tests. Test results are
summarized in Table 4.
Reference Specimen 1 was failed due to premature shear failure
due to concentrated shear cracks along both of the diagonals of the
wall. The photograph of the specimen after the failure is given in
Fig. 6. Specimen 1 ultimate lateral strength was measured 149 kn
and the lateral drift was 0.65% under this loading.
Specimen 2 was reached its exural capacity and showed a ductile exural behavior. Vertical reinforcements on the wall sides of
Specimen 2 were yielded when lateral displacements reached to
0.78% and 0.86% drifts during forward and backward loading,
respectively. Measured lateral loads for these displacements were
249 kN and 242 kN during forward and backward loading, respectively. There was no decrease in the lateral load carrying capacity
during forward and backward loading up to 1.60% and 1.80% lateral
325
300
Specimen-1
Shear Force (kN)
200
100
0
-100
-200
-300
-3
-2
-1
300
Specimen-2
200
200
100
0
-100
100
0
-100
-200
-200
-300
-3
Specimen-3
-2
-1
-300
-3
-2
300
Specimen-5
Specimen-4
200
200
300
100
0
-100
-200
-300
-3
-1
100
0
-100
-200
-2
-1
-300
-3
-2
-1
the increase in lateral drift. The concrete was crushed at the bottom corners of the wall under the compressive stresses caused
fan anchorages to be damaged. Specimen was failed due to premature shear. The photograph of the specimen after the failure is presented in Fig. 8.
Specimen 4 was reached its exural capacity. The vertical reinforcement at the wall sides were yielded when 0.82% and 0.90% lateral drift ratios were reached during forward and backward
loading, respectively. Measured lateral loads for these displacements were 247 kN and 245 kN during forward and backward
loading, respectively. Diagonal CFRP strips were debonded from
the wall surface between the anchorages with the increased lateral
drift cycles. Shear cracks were concentrated through the diagonals
of the wall. Flexural shear capacity of the specimen was decreased
in the forward and backward cycles after 1.83% and 1.71% lateral
drift ratios, respectively. The lateral CFRP strip that were conned
the wall at the base were ruptured when the drift ratio was
reached to 2.21% in the backward cycle and the specimen was lost
326
Table 4
Experimental results.
Spec. no.
1
2
3
4
5
149
249
230
247
249
Ductility ratio
Ultimate
Failure
0.65
0.78
0.86
0.82
0.82
1.05
2.71
1.32
2.21
2.50
3.47
2.70
3.05
Stiffness (kN/mm)
Initial
Ultimate
47.6
57.7
56.9
55.8
56.2
18.2
19.2
15.5
18.2
18.3
Failure mechanism
Shear
Flexure
Shear
FlexureShear
FlexureShear
its lateral load carrying capacity. Then Specimen 4 was failed with
shear failure. The photograph of the specimen after failure is given
in Fig. 9.
Specimen 5 was reached its exural capacity. The vertical reinforcement at the wall sides were yielded when 0.82% and 0.84% lateral drift ratios were reached in the forward and backward cycles,
respectively. Measured lateral loads for these displacements were
249 kN and 246 kN during forward and backward loading, respectively. No decrease was observed in the exural shear strength in
327
the forward and backward cycle up to 1.24% and 1.51% lateral drift
ratio, respectively. CFRP strips were debonded from the wall surface. Decrease in the lateral load carrying capacity of the Specimen
was very small up to lateral displacement ratio of 2.0%. In the cycle
after this lateral drift ratio, the bers of CFRP strips were torn off
and the lateral strength of the specimen was decreased almost
15%. The CFRP strips were ruptured at the lateral drift ratio of
2.5%, and the lateral load carrying capacity suddenly decreased.
Specimen was collapsed with the shear failure. The photograph
of specimen after failure is presented in Fig. 10.
The typical examples of strain measurements taken from the
CFRP strips during the tests are given in Fig. 11. The mean of the
maximum strains that were measured from lateral strips was
0.0090 mm/mm for the Specimen 2. The measured maximum
strains from the diagonal CFRP strips were 0.00748 mm/mm and
0.00840 mm/mm for the Specimens 3 and 4, respectively. The
measured maximum strain was 0.00813 mm/mm for the Specimen
5. Deformations and shear cracks that were developed on the wall
were caused debonding of CFRP from the wall surface. The debonded CFRP bers were remained under the inuence of combined
stresses along with the tensile stresses and therefore this combined stress were caused ber ruptures before reaching the ultimate strain.
4. Discussion of test results
4.1. Strength and stiffness of the specimens
VR VC VW Vf
1
2
V f 2 n t f rf df 1 cot b sin b kN
rf 0:004 Ef 6 0:75 ffu
2
3
328
Strain (mm/mm)
0
300
0.002
0.004
0.006
Strain (mm/mm)
0.008
0.01
0
300
0.002
0
-100
-200
-300
0
-100
-200
Specimen-2
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
-300
10000
Specimen-3
2000
0.002
0.004
4000
6000
8000
10000
0.008
0.01
Strain (mv)
Strain (mm/mm)
0.006
Strain (mm/mm)
0.008
0.01
300
SG-1
0.002
0.004
0.006
SG-2
200
200
100
0
-100
100
0
-100
-200
-200
Specimen-4
-300
0.01
100
Strain (mv)
0.008
200
100
300
0.006
SG-2
SG-1
200
0.004
2000
4000
6000
8000
Specimen-5
10000
2000
Strain (mv)
4000
6000
8000
10000
Strain (mv)
Table 5
Comparison of experimental and analytical results.
300
Spec-2
200
100
Spec-4
Spec-5
Spec-1
0
a
b
-100
Specimen-1
Specimen-2
Specimen-3
Specimen-4
Specimen-5
-200
-300
-3
-2
-1
Experimental capacity
(kN)
Calculated analytical
capacity (kN)a
Ratiob
1
2
3
4
5
149
249
230
247
249
152.00
328.68
289.80
308.75
313.74
0.98
0.76
0.79
0.80
0.79
14000
Spec-3
Specimen
no.
12000
10000
8000
6000
Specimen-1
4000
Specimen-2
Specimen-3
2000
Specimen-4
Specimen-5
10
15
20
329
Acknowledgments
This study was conducted at the Structural Mechanics Laboratory of Gazi University. The research supported by the Scientic
and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) through Research Grand 109M397 is gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] Saatcioglu M, Mitchell D, Tinawi R, Gardner J, Gillies AG, Ghobarah A, et al. The
August 17, 1999, Kocaeli (Turkey) earthquakedamage to structures. Can J
Civil Eng 2001;28(4):71537.
[2] Sezen H, Whittaker AS, Elwood KJ, Mosalam KM. Performance of reinforced
concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and
seismic design and construction practice in Turkey. Eng Struct
2003;25:10314.
[3] Triantallou TC. Strengthening of structures with advanced frps. Progr Struct
Eng Mater 1998;1(2):12634.
[4] Priestley MJN, Seible F, Calvi GM. Seismic design and retrot of bridges. New
York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1996. p. 686.
[5] Ehsani MR, Saadatmanesh H. Fiber composites: an economical alternative for
retrotting earthquake-damaged precast concrete walls. Earthquake Spectra
1997;13(2):22541.
[6] Lombard J, Lau D, Humar, J, Foo S, Cheung M. Seismic Strengthening and Repair
of Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls. In: Paper No. 2032, Proceeding of the 12th
world conference on earthquake engineering. New Zealand; 2000 (CD-ROM).
[7] Neale KW, Demers M, DeVino B, Ho, NY. Strengthening of wall-type reinforced
concrete columns with bre-reinforced composite sheets. In: Lau Ong JM,
Paramasivam P, editors. Structural failure, durability, and retrotting, KCG.
Singapore Concrete Institute; 1997. p. 4107.
[8] Iso M, Matsuzaki Y, Sonobe Y, Nakamura H, Watanabe M. Experimental study
on reinforced concrete columns having wing walls retrotted with continuous
ber sheets. In: Paper No. 1865, Proceeding of the 12th world conference on
earthquake engineering. New Zealand; 2000 (CD-ROM).
[9] Sugiyama T. et al. Experimental study on the performance of the RC frame
inlled cast-in-place nonstructural RC walls retrotted by using carbon ber
sheets. In: Paper No. 2153, Proceeding of the 12th world conference on
earthquake engineering. New Zealand; 2000 (CD-ROM).
[10] ACI Committee 440. Guide for the design and construction of externally
bonded FRP systems for strengthening of concrete structures. Farmington Hills
(MI, USA); 2002.