Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 20 January 2015
Received in revised form 28 September 2015
Accepted 29 September 2015
Available online 9 November 2015
The dynamics of phosphorus (P) in soils is strongly inuenced by organic and inorganic solid phases,
biological activity and environmental factors. Highly weathered soils naturally contain low levels of P
available to plants and have high adsorption capacity. The maximum adsorption capacity of P (Smax) has
been widely used to evaluate the adsorption capacity of soil P. The P sorption index (PSI) is also used for
evaluating the P adsorption capacity of soil from a single concentration of P and is an effective alternative
in the estimation of maximum adsorption. We obtained the maximum capacity of P adsorption (Smax) and
the P sorption index (PSI) of 29 Brazilian soils with different chemical, physical and mineralogical
attributes. The use of the PSI to estimate the adsorption of P in a long-term experiment was also
evaluated. For Smax, rates of 10, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 260 mg L1 of P in 24 h of contact were used. For the
PSI, soils were divided into groups because of the variation in their capacity to adsorb P, and each group
received an optimal P rate: 200, 500, 1000, 1500 or 3000 mg L1 of P. The periods of reaction assessed
were 1, 3, 7, 21, 42, and 84 d. Smax was affected by amounts of clay, Fe and Al oxides and organic carbon
(OC), which ranged from 61.7 (Typic Haploxeralf) to 5459.5 mg kg1 (Mollic Fluvaquent). In the PSI, the
average percentage of P adsorbed at the end of the contact period (84 d) ranged from 23% to 49% of P that
was mixed initially and was, on average, four times higher than their values after 1 d of contact. Oxisols,
Alsols and Gleysols had the highest values of PSI. On the other hand, Ultisols and Entisols had the lowest
ones. The PSI behaved similarly to the Smax, and the highest values were found in soils with high contents
of clay, C, crystalline and poorly crystallized Fe and Al oxides. Furthermore, the PSI was higher in the 84th
day, highlighting the inuence of the period of contact on P adsorption.
2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Maximum P adsorption
P sorption index
Humid tropical soils
1. Introduction
The dynamics of phosphorus (P) is controlled by the organic and
the mineralogical constitution of the soil, by the pH and the ionic
strength of the soil solution, as well as by environmental factors
such as moisture content and temperature (Pierzynski et al., 2005).
Highly weathered soils naturally contain low levels of P
available to plants and have a high P adsorption capacity. An
example of these soils are the Oxisols, which cover immense areas
of humid tropical and subtropical regions in Brazil and account for
about 60% of the areas of agricultural importance (Tiessen, 2005;
Soares and Alleoni, 2008). In these soils, due to the advanced
process of weathering, the clay fraction is dominated by 1:1 silicate
minerals, oxides, hydroxides and oxihydroxides of Fe, Al and Mn,
which have a high afnity to adsorb P. This adsorption, at rst, is
rapid, and is followed by a period of specic adsorption (Sposito,
1989).
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: alleoni@usp.br (L.R.F. Alleoni).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.09.020
0167-1987/ 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
111
Table 1
Chemical, physical and minerological properties of the soils.
Soils
Geographical coordinates
Clay
Feox
Alox
FeDCB
AlDCB
Qualitative
mineralogy
8
14
8
10
24
50
14
24
14
24
4
4
20
9
19
23
4
22
6
13
8
29
29
33
103
16
12
4
28
181
221
202
201
530
684
716
222
342
470
60
100
247
202
366
246
100
427
80
142
101
345
658
532
476
243
204
40
543
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
1.2
2.1
2.7
1.0
0.6
1.3
0.1
0.1
0.8
0.7
1.5
1.3
0.2
2.5
0.2
1.1
0.4
0.8
1.9
6.5
1.4
0.6
1.6
0.2
6.9
0.4
0.7
0.6
0.6
2.0
2.4
2.0
0.9
0.9
2.4
0.1
0.1
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.2
0.7
0.2
0.3
0.2
1.5
2.2
1.3
9.4
1.1
0.5
0.1
2.0
19.0
13.2
20.8
52.5
85.4
183.1
205.5
18.7
41.6
111.8
3.4
5.2
32.1
8.0
44.2
31.5
8.3
48.8
2.8
6.4
10.7
83.7
190.3
21.1
3.5
18.7
17.0
8.0
106.4
3.6
3.2
4.7
7.4
10.9
8.4
25.4
7.0
8.4
15.3
1.5
1.1
5.5
2.0
1.6
5.5
1.6
5.8
2.3
1.3
1.2
20.7
10.2
40.2
20.4
6.9
1.5
0.9
7.6
Kt, Gt, Hm
Kt, Gt, Hm
Kt, Gt, Hm
Kt, Gb, Gt, Hm
Kt, Gt, Hm
Kt, Gb, Hm
Kt, Gb, Gt, Hm
Kt
Kt, Gb, Gt
Kt, Gb, Gt, Hm
Kt
Kt, Il
Kt, Gt, Hm
Kt, Il
Kt, Il, HIV
Kt, Gt, Hm
Kt, Il
Kt, Gt, Hm
Kt
Il, HIV
Kt, Il
Kt, Gb
Kt, Gb, Hm
Kt, Gt, Hm
Kt
Kt
Kt, Il
Kt, Il, HIV
Kt, Gt, Hm
1
g kg
Arenic Hapludox
Typic Hapludox-1
Typic Hapludox-2
Rhodic Hapludox-1
Rhodic Hapludox-2
Rhodic Eutrudox
Rhodic Acrudox
Xanthic Hapludox-1
Xanthic Hapludox-2
Xanthic Acrudox
Arenic Hapludult-1
Arenic Hapludult-2
Typic Hapludult-1
Typic Hapludult-2
Typic Hapludult-3
Typic Hapludult-4
Rhodic Hapludult-1
Rhodic Hapludult-2
Typic Quartzipsamment
Typic Udorthent
Typic Psammaquent
Typic Rhodudalf
Rhodic Eutrudalf
Typic Fluvaquent
Mollic Fluvaquent
Typic Haplustept
Typic Albaqualf
Typic Haploxeralf
Typic Argiudoll
Kt = Kaolinite; Gt = Goethite; Hm = Hematite; Gb = Gibbsite; Il = Illite e HIV = hydroxy-interlayered vermiculite; Feox e Alox = Fe e Al content extracted by ammonium oxalate;
FeDCB e AlDCB = Fe and Al content extracted by sodium citratebicarbonatedithionite solution.
112
;
m
1 K L C e
in which x/m = the amount of P adsorbed to the soil in mg kg1;
KL = the constant related to the energy used in the adsorption of P
to the soil in L mg 1; Smax = the Smax of the soil in mg kg1; and
Ce = the nal concentration of P in the equilibrium solution in
mg L1. For estimation of the constants KL and Smax, the Langmuir
equation was linearized as (Graetz and Nair, 2009):
C
1
1 Smax C e ;
x=m K L Smax
2.1.2. Phosphorus saturation index (PSI)
The PSI was calculated from a single point isotherm (Bache and
Williams, 1971). For this calculation, 2.5 g of soil, sifted through a
2 mm sieve, were mixed to 25 ml of a solution containing
0.01 mol L1 CaCl2 as supporting electrolyte. Rates of P (KH2PO4)
were calculated from the Smax of previous experiment for every soil
type, since one single concentration would not be effectively with
all the soils over a determined time. Accordingly, the samples were
divided into ve groups, each receiving the optimal concentration
of P in relation to its adsorption capacity. The groups were divided
as follows: IMollic Fluvaquent, Rhodic Acrudox, Xanthic Acrudox
and Rhodic Eutrudox (Very High adsorption capacity with Smax >
2000 mg kg1); IIRhodic Eutrudalf, Typic Argiudoll, Rhodic
Hapludox-2 and Xanthic Hapludox-2 (High adsorption capacity
with Smax between 1000 and 2000 mg kg1); IIITypic Fluvaquent,
Typic Rhodudalf, Xanthic Hapludox-1, Typic Haplustept, Rhodic
Hapludult-2, Rhodic Hapludox-1 and Typic Hapludox-3 (Medium
Adsorption Capacity with Smax between 500 and 1000 mg kg1);
IVTypic Hapludult-4, Arenic Hapludox, Typic Hapludult-3, Typic
Hapludult-3, Typic Hapludox-1 and Typic Albaqualf (Low adsorption capacity with Smax between 200 and 500 mg kg1); and V
Typic Hapludult-2, Typic Quartzipsamment, Typic Udorthent,
Arenic Hapludult-1, Rhodic Hapludult-1, Arenic Hapludult-2, Typic
Psammaquent and Typic Haploxeralf (Very Low adsorption
capacity with Smax < 200 mg kg1).
In order to determine the rates, the values of Smax (mg kg1)
were rst converted to mg L1, which thereby gave the content
level of P in the solution required to attain maximum adsorption in
one day. Freese et al. (1995) and Indiati and Diana (2005) observed
that adsorption in 90 d is approximately three times higher than
that attained in one day. Consequently, the content obtained
(mg L1) in one day was multiplied by 3 to achieve a concentration
of P sufcient to attain P adsorption. Freese et al. (1995, 1992)
suggested that the rates applied should be decreased by
PSImgkg
X
;
logC
113
Table 2
Maximum P adsorption capacity (Smax), calculated rates and added to the P sorption index (PSI) for soil groups.
Soil
Smax
Mollic Fluvaquent
Rhodic Acrudox
Xanthic Acrudox
Rhodic Eutrudox
Rhodic Eutrudalf
Typic Argiudoll
Rhodic Hapludox-2
Xanthic Hapludox-2
Typic Fluvaquent
Typic Rhodudalf
Xanthic Hapludox-1
Typic Haplustept
Rhodic Hapludult-2
Rhodic Hapludox-1
Typic Hapludox-3
Typic Hapludult-4
Arenic Hapludox
Typic Hapludult-1
Typic Hapludult-3
Typic Hapludox-1
Typic Albaqualf
Typic Hapludult-2
T. Quartzipsamment
Typic Udorthent
Arenic Hapludult-1
Rhodic Hapludult-1
Arenic Hapludult-2
Typic Psammaquent
Typic Haploxeralf
a
b
c
d
P solution
(90 d)b
mg kg1
P solution
(1 d)a
mg L1
5.459.56
4.487.29
2.909.17
2.717.33
2.129.22
1.462.28
1,757.73
1,354.01
1,042.57
978.90
922.36
892.81
576.62
565.99
538.97
460.49
425.61
303.03
310.93
305.14
285.43
213.57
213.55
180.86
181.62
140.19
121.83
103.31
61.70
545.96
448.73
290.92
271.73
212.92
146.23
175.77
135.40
104.26
97.89
92.24
89.28
57.66
56.60
53.90
46.05
42.56
30.30
31.09
30.51
28.54
21.36
21.35
18.09
18.16
14.02
12.18
10.33
6.17
1.637.87
1.346.19
872.75
815.20
638.77
438.68
527.32
406.20
312.77
293.67
276.71
267.84
172.99
169.80
161.69
138.15
127.68
90.91
93.28
91.54
85.63
64.07
64.06
54.26
54.49
42.06
36.55
30.99
18.51
Calculated ratec
Added
rated
Groups
mg kg1
5.404.96
4.442.42
2.880.08
2.690.16
2.107.93
1.447.66
1,740.15
1,340.47
1,032.14
969.11
913.14
883.88
570.85
560.33
533.58
455.89
421.35
300.00
307.82
302.09
282.57
211.43
211.41
179.05
179.80
138.79
120.61
102.27
61.08
3.000
3.000
3.000
3.000
1.500
1.500
1,500
1,500
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
500
500
500
500
500
500
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
> 2000
> 2000
>2.000
>2.000
1.0002.000
1.000 - 2000
1,000 - 2000
1,000 - 2000
500 - 1000
500 - 1000
500 - 1000
500 - 1000
500 - 1000
500 - 1000
500 -1,000
200 - 500
200 - 500
200 - 500
200 - 500
200 - 500
200 - 500
< 200
< 200
< 200
< 200
< 200
< 200
< 200
< 200
Table 3
Correlations among soil properties, Smax and PSI (1, 3, 7, 21, 42 and 84 days).
Properties
PSI1d
PSI3d
PSI7d
PSI21d
PSI42d
PSI84d
0.75a
0.77b
0.77
0.71
0.76
0.81
0.74
0.78
0.71
0.81
0.76
0.81
0.74
0.79
Clay
0.75
0.86
0.71
0.81
0.79
0.88
0.78
0.80
0.84
0.86
0.82
0.85
0.85
0.87
Feox
0.29
0.53
0.33
0.50
0.38
0.57
0.35
0.53
0.45
0.56
0.44
0.55
0.44
0.53
Alox
0.86
0.96
0.88
0.91
0.85
0.97
0.81
0.91
0.77
0.95
0.81
0.93
0.80
0.95
FeDCB
0.59
0.88
0.52
0.83
0.64
0.91
0.66
0.85
0.69
0.89
0.65
0.90
0.68
0.89
AlDCB
0.61
0.72
0.61
0.66
0.62
0.76
0.60
0.67
0.71
0.73
0.70
0.70
0.71
0.75
a
First line for each soil property represents the correlation coefcients for all
soils.
b
Second line for each soil property represents the correlation coefcients for all
soils except Rhodic Acrudox, Typic Fluvaquent, Mollic Fluvaquent and Typic
Argiudoll, which deviate from the norm (outliers).
114
Fig. 1. Percentage of P adsorbed at rates of 200 (Smax < 200), 500 (Smax 200500), 1000 (Smax 5001,000), 1500 (Smax 10002,000) and 3000 mg L1 (Smax > 2,000) versus
contact time (Tukey test, P < 0.01). The bars represent the mean standard deviation.
applied rates. The PSI values varied in a similar way to Smax, since
they were affected by the same attributes in the soil.
In Oxisols, the PSI84d ranged from 480 in Typic Hapludox-1 to
4975.8 mg kg1 in Rhodic Acrudox. Together with the Oxisols, the
Entisols, the Alsols, the Typic Argiudoll and the Typic Haplustept
showed the highest values of ISP84d (Fig. 2). The Ultisols and the
Entisols recorded low PSI84d values. Likewise, Typic Haploxeralf
and Typic Albaqualf had low values of PSI84d. The low adsorption
capacity in these soils, as evidenced by Smax, was inuenced,
115
mainly, by the sandy texture and the low levels of oxides and C
(Bolland et al., 2003).
Over the course of the evaluations, the PSI (Fig. 2) did not
always increase. In Typic Psammaquent, Arenic Hapludult-1, and
Arenic Hapludult-2 soils PSI values differed only after 42 d of
contact (p < 0.01). Unlike all other soils, Mollic Fluvaquent, Rhodic
Acrudox, Rhodic Eutrudox, and Typic Hapludult-4 did not differ in
ratings between 42 and 84 d, thus characterizing maximum
adsorption.
Fig. 2. P sorption index (PSI) at rates of 200 (Group V), 500 (group IV), 1000 (Group III), 1500 (Group II) and 3000 mg L1 (Group I) according to contact time (Tukey test;
P < 0.01). The bars represent the mean standard deviation.
116
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
-1
Smax (mg kg )
95% confidence
Fig. 3. Linear regression between the Smax and the PSI84d in tropical soils.
1,0
Fe ox
0,5
F actor 2 : 2. 65%
AlDCB Clay
CEC
pH
Fe DCB
PSI
C
Alox
0,0
S max
-0,5
-1,0
-1,0
-0,5
0,0
Factor 1 : 97.35%
0,5
1,0
1. Arenic Hapludox
2. Ty pic Hapludox
3. Ty pic Hapludox
4. Rhodic Hapludox
5. Rhodic Hapludox
6. Rhodic Eutrudox
7. Rhodic Acrudox
8. Xanthic Hapludox
9. Xanthic Hapludox
10. Xanthic Acrudox
11. Arenic Hapludult
12. Arenic Hapludult
13. Ty pic Hapludult
14. Ty pic Hapludult
15. Ty pic Hapludult
16. Ty pic Hapludult
17. Rhodic Hapludult
18. Rhodic Hapludult
19. Ty pic Quartzipsamm ent
20. Ty pic Udorthent
21. Ty pic Psamm aquent
22. Ty pic Rhodudalf
23. Rhodic Eutrudalf
24. Ty pic Fluvaquent
25. Mollic Fluvaquent
26. Ty pic Haplustept
27. Ty pic Albaqualf
28. Ty pic Haploxeralf
29. Ty pic Argiudoll
Active
Suppl.
1,0
0,8
24
0,6
6
0,4
22 9
F actor 2: 2. 65%
0,2
10
5 23
1
131618
27
21
2
28
19
26
17
12
14
20
15 3 8
11
0,0
29
-0,2
25
-0,4
7
-0,6
-0,8
b
-1,0
-3
-2
-1
Factor 1: 97.35%
Fig. 4. Projection of variables (a) and cases (b) subjected to PCA with a number of the soil attributes.
117
Table 4
Results of principal components analysis.
N
Eigenvalue
% Total variance
Cumulative eigenvalues
Cumulative
%
1
2
1.95
0.05
Eigenvectors
Fator 1
0.70
0.70
Correlations between soil properties
97.35
2.65
Correlations
Fator 2
0.70
-0.70
1.95
2.00
97.35
100.00
Fator 1
0.98
0.98
Fator 2
0.16
-0.16
PSI
Smax
Fator 1
0.37
0.81
0.81
-0.01
0.60
0.73
0.65
0.66
Feox
Alox
Clay
pH
CEC
C
FeDCB
AlDCB
(1)
Correlations |0.70| are signicant (Manly, 1994).
(1)
Acknowledgment
To CAPES (Brazilian Coordination for the Improving of Higher
Education Personnel) for nancial support of this research.
References
Allen, B.L., Mallarino, A.P., Klatt, J.G., Baker, J.L., Camara, M., 2006. Soil and surface
runoff phosphorus relationships for ve typical USA Midwest soils. J. Environ.
Qual. 35, 599610.
Alvarez, V.V.H., Novais, R.F., Dias, L.E., Oliveira, J.A., 2000. Determination and use of
the remaining phosphorus. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo 25, 2732.
Bache, B.W., Williams, E.G., 1971. A phosphate sorption index for soils. J. Soil Sci. 22,
289301.
Barrow, N.J., Shaw, T.C., 1975. The slow reactions between soil and anions: effect of
time and temperature on the decrease in phosphate concentration in the soil
solution. J. Soil Sci. 119, 167177.
Bolland, M.D.A., Allen, D.G., Barrow, N.J., 2003. Sorption of phosphorus by soils how
it is measured in Western Australia. Bulletin 4591 (Depart. Agric. Food: South
Perth).
Canteri, M.G., Althaus, R.A., Virgens Filho, J.S., Giglioti, E.A., Godoy, C.V., 2001. SASM
Agri: system for analyzing and separating means in the agricultural
experiments methods Scoft - Knott, Tukey and Duncan. Rev. Bras. Agrocomp. 1,
1824.
Casson, J.P., Bennett, D.R., Nolan, S.C., Olson, B.M., Ontkean, G.R., 2006. Degree of
phosphorus saturation thresholds in manure-amended soils of Alberta. J.
Environ. Qual. Madison 35, 22122221.
Eberhardt, D.N., Vendrame, P.R.S., Becquer, T., Guimares, M.F., 2008. Inuence of
particle size and mineralogy on phosphorus retention in Oxisols under pasture
in the cerrado. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo 32, 10091016 (in Portuguese).
Freese, D., Van Der Zee, S.E.A.T.M., Van Riemsdijk, W.H., 1992. Comparison of
different models for phosphate sorption as a function of the iron and aluminium
oxides of soils. J. Soil Sci. 43, 729738.
Freese, D., Van Riemsdijk, W.H., Van Der Zee, S.E.A.T.M., 1995. Modelling phosphatesorption kinetics in acid soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 46, 239245.
Fontes, M.P.F., Weed, S.B., 1996. Phosphate adsorption by clays from Brazilian
Oxisols: relationships with specic surface area and mineralogy. Geoderma 72,
3751.
Gee, G.W., Or, D., 2002. Particle-size analysis. In: Dane, J.H., Toop, G.C. (Eds.),
Methods of Soil Analysis: Physical Methods. Soil Science Society of America, pp.
255293 (Book Series no 5).
Graetz, D.A., Nair, V.A., 2009. Phosphorus Sorption Isotherm Determination. In:
Kovar, J.L., Pierzynski, G.M. (Eds.), Methods of Phosphorus Analysis for Soils,
Sediments, Residuals, and Waters. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, pp.
3338.
Guardini, R., Comin, J.J., Rheinheimer, D.S., Gatiboni, L.C., Tiecher, T., Schmitt, D.E.,
Bender, M.A., Belli Filho, P., Oliveira, P.A.V., Brunetto, G., 2012. Phosphorus
accumulation and pollution potential in a Hapludult fertilized with pig manure.
Rev. Bra. Cienc. Solo 36, 13331342.
Guppy, C.N., Menzies, N.W., Moody, P.W., Blamey, F.P.C., 2005. Competitive sorption
reactions between phosphorus and organic matter in soil: a review. Aust. J. Soil
Res. 43, 189202.
Hooda, P.S., Rendell, A.R., Edwards, A.C., Withers, P.J.A., Aitken, M.N., Truesdale, V.W.,
2000. Relating soil phosphorus indices to potential phosphorus release to water.
J. Environ. Qual. Madison 29, 11661171.
118
Hughes, J.C., Titshall, L.W., Buyeye, M., Johnston, M.A., Moodley, M., Pecku, S., 2005.
Effects of Land Application of Water Treatment Residue. Water Research
Commission, Pretoria, pp. 41 (WRC Report, 1148/1/04).
Indiati, R., Diana, G., 2005. Evaluating phosphorus sorption capacity of acidic soils by
short-term and long-term equilibration procedures. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant
Anal. 35, 22692282.
Kaiser, H.F., 1958. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis.
Psychometrika 23, 187200.
Langmuir, I., 1918. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and
platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 40, 13611403.
Maguire, R.O., Foy, R.H., Bailey, J.S., Sims, J.T., 2001. Estimation of the phosphorus
sorption capacity of acidic soils in Ireland. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 52, 479487.
Maguire, R.O., Sims, J.T., 2002. Measuring agronomic and environmental soil
phosphorus saturation and predicting phosphorus leaching with Mehlich 3. Soil
Sci. Soc. Am. J. Madison 66, 20332039.
Manly, B.F.J., 1994. Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer, 2nd ed. Chapman &
Hall, New York, pp. 215.
Mehra, J.A., Jackson, M.L., 1960. Iron oxides removal from soils and clays by
dithionitecitrate system buffered with sodium bicarbonate. Clays Clay Miner.
5, 317327.
Mesquita Filho, M.V., Torrent, J., 1993. Phosphate sorption as related to mineralogy
of a hydrosequence of soils from cerrado region (Brazil). Geoderma 58, 107123.
Mozaffari, P.M., Sims, J.T., 1994. Phosphorus availability and sorption in an Atlantic
Coastal Plain watershed dominated by intensive, animal-based agriculture. J.
Soil Sci. 157, 97107.
Murphy, J., Riley, J.R., 1962. A modied single solution method for the determination
of phosphate in natural waters. Anal. Chim. Acta 27, 3136.
Nelson, D.W., Sommer, L.E., 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter.
In: Page, A.L. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy,
Madison, pp. 539579.
Nwoke, O.C., Vanlauwe, B., Diels, J., Sanginga, N., Osonubi, O., Merckx, R., 2003.
Assessment of labile phosphorus fractions and adsorption characteristics in
relation to soil properties of West African savanna soils. Agric. Ecos. Environ.
100, 285294.
Olsen, E.R., Watanabe, F.S., 1957. A method to determine a phosphorus adsorption
maximum of soil as measured by the Langmuir isotherm. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 21,
144149.
Paulter, M.C., Sims, J.T., 2000. Relationships between soil test phosphorus, soluble
phosphorus, and phosphorus saturation in Delaware soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
64, 765773.
Pierzynski, G.M., Mcdowell, R.W., Sims, J.T., 2005. Chemistry, cycling, and potential
movement of inorganic phosphorus in soils. In: Sims, J.T., Sharpley, A.N.,
Pierzynski, G.M., Westermann, D.T., Cabrera, M.L., Powell, J.M., Daniel, T.C. (Eds.),
Phosphorus, Agriculture and the Environment. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, pp.
5386.
Pinto, F.A., Souza, E.D., Paulino, H.B., Curi, N., Carneiro, M.A.C., 2013. P-sorption and
desorption in Savanna Brazilian soils as a support for phosphorus fertilizer
management. Cienc. Agrotec. 37, 521530.
Sanyal, S.K., De Datta, S.K., 1991. Chemistry of phosphorus transformations in soil.
Adv. Soil Sci. 16, 1120.
Schoumans, O.F., 2009. Determination of the degree of phosphorus saturation in
non calcareous soils. In: Kovar, J.L., Pierzynski, G.M. (Eds.), Methods of
Phosphorus Analysis for Soils, Sediments, Residuals and Waters. Blacksburg,
Virginia Tech University, pp. 2933 (Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin, 408).
Sims, J.T., 2009. A phosphorus sorption index. In: Kovar, J.L., Pierzynski, G.M. (Eds.),
Methods of Phosphorus Analysis for Soils, Sediments, Residuals, and Waters.
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, pp. 2022.
Sims, J.T., Simard, R.R., Joern, B.C., 1998. Phosphorus loss in agricultural
drainage: historical perspective and current research. J. Environ. Qual. 27,
277293.
Soares, M.R., Alleoni, L.R.F., 2008. Contribution of soil organic carbon to the ion
exchange capacity of tropical soils. J. Sust. Agric. 32, 439462.
Soil Survey Staff, United States Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources
Conservation Service. 1999. Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classication
for making and interpreting soil surveys. Agriculture Handbook No 436, U.S.
Government Printing Ofce, Washington, DC.
Sposito, G., 1989. The Chemistry of Soils. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 345.
Statsoft, 2005. Statistica 7.0 software. Tucksa.
Tiessen, H., 2005. Phosphorus dynamics in tropical soils. In: Sims, J.T., Sharpley, A.N.
(Eds.), Phosphorus, Agriculture and the Environment. American Society of
Agronomy, Madison, pp. 253262.
Torrent, J., Schwertmann, U., Barrn, V., 1994. Phosphate sorption by natural
hematites. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 45, 4551.
Townsend, A.R., Porder, S., 2012. Agricultural legacies, food production and its
environmental consequences. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109,
59175918.
Xue, Q., Lu, L., Zhou, Y., Qi, L., Dai, P., Liu, X., Sun, C., Lin, X., 2014. Deriving sorption
indices for the prediction of potential phosphorus loss from calcareous soils.
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21, 15641571.