Psychotherapy
T I
--
Volume 3l!Summer 1994/Number 2
The Socratic method is often included as part of cognitive therapy (Beck et al., 1979; Beck & Emery, 1985), rational-emotive therapy (Ellis, 1962), and psychodynamic therapy (Rychlak, 1968; Stein, 1991). However, few authors have described the Socratic method in a thorough manner. The Socratic method includes three main elements: systematic questioning, inductive reasoning, and universal definitions. Systematic questioning (Ove
Titre original
Elements of the Socratic Method - III - Universal definitions
Psychotherapy
T I
--
Volume 3l!Summer 1994/Number 2
The Socratic method is often included as part of cognitive therapy (Beck et al., 1979; Beck & Emery, 1985), rational-emotive therapy (Ellis, 1962), and psychodynamic therapy (Rychlak, 1968; Stein, 1991). However, few authors have described the Socratic method in a thorough manner. The Socratic method includes three main elements: systematic questioning, inductive reasoning, and universal definitions. Systematic questioning (Ove
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Psychotherapy
T I
--
Volume 3l!Summer 1994/Number 2
The Socratic method is often included as part of cognitive therapy (Beck et al., 1979; Beck & Emery, 1985), rational-emotive therapy (Ellis, 1962), and psychodynamic therapy (Rychlak, 1968; Stein, 1991). However, few authors have described the Socratic method in a thorough manner. The Socratic method includes three main elements: systematic questioning, inductive reasoning, and universal definitions. Systematic questioning (Ove
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Psychotherapy
Volume 31/Summer 1994/Number 2
ELEMENTS OF THE SOCRATIC METHOD:
II. UNIVERSAL DEFINITIONS
JAMES C. OVERHOLSER
Case Western Reserve University
In the Socratic method, systematic
questioning and inductive reasoning are
used jointly 1o derive a universal
definition. Definitions play a role in the
client's perception, description, and
understanding of common problems, This
article focuses on the content, process,
and functions of universal definitions as
used in psychotherapy. The content of
universal definitions focuses on behavior
labels (e.g., aggressive), evaluative
standards (e.g., success), and abstract
qualities (¢.g., love). The process of
using universal definitions in
psychotherapy follows refutation,
collection, and division to identify the
essence of the concept. The functions of
universal definitions include clarifying
category membership, identifying
potential causes, building new
knowledge, broadening the client's
perspective, limiting overgeneralizations,
and guiding behavior change. Clients
learn a general process that helps them
evaluate the appropriateness of the
generalizations they make. Clinical
‘applications are discussed and
psychotherapy examples are provided.
Tem indeed to Mark Fine, Kim Letoert, Sue Wotan,
Dave Brisk Stacy Fret, Dali Adams, and Pe Wale
‘cw for thought comments radeon ear versions of
‘tis muse
‘Curespendence reguding this aise shoud be ated
1 Jamer €. Overoler, Deparment of Prychology. Case
‘Weiter Reverve Unverty. 10800 Facid Avene, Cleve-
and, OF 48106-7123,
286
‘The Socratic method is often included as part
‘of cognitive therapy (Beck et al., 1979; Beck
‘& Emery, 1985), rational-ermotive therapy (Ellis,
1962), and psychodynamic therapy (Rychlak,
1968; Stein, 1991). However, few authors have
described the Socratic method ina thorough man-
ner. The Socratic method includes three main ele-
‘ments: systematic questioning, inductive reason-
ing. and universal definitions. Systematic ques-
tioning (Overholser, 19930) is used to guide the
interview process and encourage clients to sock
answers independently. Inductive reasoning (Ov-
cetholser, 19934) helps clients generate broad,
logical conclusions based on limited experience.
In the Socratic method, the therapist often uses
systematic questioning and inductive reasoning to
cexamige a series of relevant life experiences. This
helps therapist and client construct a universal
definition pertining to issues that are central to
‘the client's problems (Nelson, 1949).
Universal definitions describe the properties
tha are suficient to capture the essence of a con
cept (Saunders, 1987). A term must be deseribed
in such 2 way that the concept remains unchanged
even when specific instances vary (Overholser,
1987). For example, independence can be defined
Drosdly as being free from contol by others, and
therefore applies to an adolescent struggling for
‘autonomy fom parents, and also pertains to many
‘ssues facing an adult deciding to relocate to a
new state (Overtiolse, 1988). The process of for-
‘malating universal definitions in therspy can help
clients evaluate the appropriateness of the terms
they use and the generalizations they make
‘Universal definitions are important because lane
‘guage and definitions influence our perceptions, de-
sexi and undentnng of the wri (Eta,
etal, 1990; Gergen, 1985). In poychotherapy, the
definition of key terms can be constructed collabora-
tively (Keeney, 1987). Clarifying definitions can
reduce ambiguities and biases in the client's inter-
‘pretation and description of life events. Universal
‘definitions can help clients shift their perspective 10
sir et
eas mss
wound
sie
afaieas
re
Jn psychotherapy. i
three areas of content
sine
7
ee
oer
cea
Samy
Foes
ieee
‘parents can be helped b
Sere!
Siac
Sore
‘responses beceuse they
being “polite.” Confre
es
maces
—
ancl
a
iat
ah
Enacetes
cea?
dards. Clients need tc
aria
ssanec
sania
zr
coe
damaged her spinal ¢
sree
ie rs
pumas
Saat
Ehes
soeete
eee
a
ioe
‘one day she reluctantly
janaae
elle sing bsBOP eS FERN aa S TERME RETR SPT aT eS
ae Se eee
1 broader and more balanced view of life events.
Rebinson (1950) distinguished berween the process
‘nd the functions of universal definitions. This arti-
cle describes the content, process, and functions of
sing universal definitions in psychotherapy.
L. Content of Universal Definitions
In psychotherapy, it cam be useful to clarify
three areas of content used in universal defini-
tions: Behavior labels, evaluative standards, and
‘abstract qualities, Behavior labels attempt to de
scribe common problematic behaviors. For exam-
pile, “aggressive” can be used to deseribe numer
‘us types of responses (Benjamin, 1985). It can
be useful to help cients clarify the emotional state
of anger as contrasted with the personality trait
of aggressiveness. Likewise, many distraught
pans can be helped by clarifying when a child's
behavior constiwies a “tantrum” and when it is
best viewed asa normal emotional reaction, Also,
shy and timid clients often inhibit their social
responses because they view assertiveness a8 not
being “polite.” Contronting and modifying these
‘diosynchratic behavior labels can have important
use (orate their performance in certain situa
For example, phrases like “a horrible job,’
‘good marrage,” or “success” often capiure the
Client's connotation in an idiosyncratic manner.
Eraluative terms may be biased by the client's
unrealistically high gouls or perfectionstc stan-
dards. Clienis need to avoid defining evaluative
terms based on a narrow perspective anda limited
range of experiences. Aiso, many clients dichoto-
‘mize evaluative terms into bipolar extremes (¢ 2.
success versus failure) while ignoring the various
intermediate gredations,
For example, an adult female had recently
damaged ter spinal cord in a car accident and
had become paralyzed. While sill recovering in
the hospital, she became severely depressed over
her injury, especially because of the effect her
injury would have on her sexuality. Therapeutic
discussions were unable to help improve her de-
pression because she viewed che changes inher
life as “catastrophic.” She defined catastrophe as
‘aterible event that left a person wortless, totaly
‘destroyed, with no reason leftto lve. Fortunately,
‘one day she reluctantly attended her physical ther=
apy session during which they played wheelchair
volleyball using a beachbell and a low net. In
filly, she thought it was stupid and didn’t want
Universal Definitions
to paticipste. However she did play and soon
found herself enjoying the game. Afterwar, in
therapy, we discussed how voleyball_ would
"never be the same again, but stil could be fun,
Now, she had to work harder, it coud be quite
Tumorous a times, andi certainly was diferent
than before her accident. More imporundy, the
same deseripion applied 10. cenuality now.
Slowly, sbe begun to Vew her accident and boc
quent paraplegia as a problem, sometimes a8 u
Challenge. but no longer as acatstophe
‘Abstract qualities inciode numerous concepts
relevant to psychotherapy. For example, issies
Fertuning to courage, love, friendship, end
teauty can be the source of a cients problems.
Ciarfyng these abstract terms cam hive much
therapeutic potential. For example, an aul fe-
male clint became extremely upset when sbe
scovered her ex-boyfriend Was dating anther
woman. Although they hadn't dated in months,
the client sil fet possessive of im. She began
focusing sch of her energy on planning ways
she could injure ber exchoyiriend or the other
woman. She often made thestening of obscene
‘hone cals, and frequently fantasized aout in-
ficting physical harm upon them. When erat
tas were discussed in therapy, she described it
25 justice " When asked to define josie in gen
eral tera, she stated that asics involved people
getting what they deserve. Because the ¢x-boy-
friend ad hurt her feligs, the cient felt she
had ight to hur him back pysicaly or emo-
tionally. She felt she had aright o fel angry and
express itany way she choso She wes asked how
her definition of justice difered from revenge
She fet this distinction did not matter. The these
Dist asked her to separate her feclngs of anger
from is betaviorl expression. She needed to see
that she was dveling on ber ange and using it
estuctively. The therapist discussed how anger
is amature, acceptable emorion but needs to'be
expressed in @ mature and constrctive manner.
‘She novded to see that justice and revenge differ
in tes ofthe emotions behind the actions.
IL, Process of Using Universal Definitions
‘The process of using universal definitions in
psychotherapy involves helping clients to iden-
{ify their definitions, evaluate the limitations of
their initial definition, and then therapist and
client jointly create a new definition. Whenever
a general term (e.g., courage) was mentioned,
Socrates requested & definition, When the per-
287
CBT+ DBT+ACT & Beyond: A Comprehensive Collection on Modern Therapies Including PTSD Healing, Vagus Nerve Insights, Polyvagal Dynamics, EMDR Techniques, and Somatic Approaches