Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
In this research we focus on contrast and edge enhancement
issues [1][2]. Contrast enhancement, in general, is achieved by
1.
2.
LITERATURE REVIEWS
111 - 397
3. PROPOSED WORK
The proposed enhancement method [a] consists of two parts.
One part is to enhance the image contrast, which i s achieved by
histogram equalizing the wavelet approximation-coefficients.
The other part i s to enhance the image details at a desired
resolution level, which is achieved by high-boost filtering the
wavelet detail-coefficients. Fig. I shows the framework of the
proposed scheme.
It is worth mentioning that the implementation of the HEQ
method in the wavelet domain is a little hit different from that in
the spatial domain. This i s because wavelet transformed
coefficients are floating point numbers. Moreover, some of them
are possibly negative. Choosing an appropriate range o f
coefficient values and setting of bins thresholds for HEQ in the
wavelet domain is not an easy task.
We suggest a new way to implement HEQ in the wavelet
domain. First, all coeficients are casted into integer values. The
histogram is then built based on those integer values.just like in
the spatial domain. Second, to equalize this wavelet domain
histogram, a procedure which is simillar to the spatial domain
HEQ is used. Finally, after calculating the difference of each
casted integer value' before and aAer equalization, the final
mapped value of each original coefficient is obtained by adding
the difference to each original coefficient.
Note that, if the original image does not use most of the
available dynamic range, the transformed coefficients will not
use most o f their dynamic range either. Therefore the coefficient
value range over which the HEQ is performed in the wavelet
doamin could he expanded beyond the current range to achieve
a better contrast enhancement result. But the expanded range
should not exceed the boundary values of this component,
otherwise, some artifacts may he introduced to the resulting
image.
4. EXPERIMENT RESULTS
In the proposed method, there are various parameters in each of
the three major functions (wavelet transform, HEQ and HBF in
the wavelet domain functions) that need to he adjusted.
Different parameter selections will affect the enhancement
result. The final parameter selections are based on the following
research results.
4.1. Experimental setup
In this research, the proposed method is tested on many images,
which have various characteristics. In order to accommodate the
size constraints o f this paper, the Lenna image has been chosen
to demonstrate our results. The Lenna image contains a nice
4.4. H B F Function
The purpose o f HBF i s l o enhance high frequency information
of a given image. The proposed method treats each detail
coefficient hand as a two-dimensional image (called imagehand) and applies HBF on these image-hands in the wavelet
domain (by subtracting the low-pass filtered image-hand from
the scaled original image-hand, where the scaling factorA is not
less than I):
Highboost= ( A ) Original Lowpass
The factor A determines the degree of high frequency emphasis.
During the course of this research, a 7 x 7 Gaussian filter with a
standard deviation equal 1.0 is used as the low-pass filter in the
~
111 - 398
N levels inverse
WaYelet trmsfom
Detail-coefficients
::p,
U
........
"........
..................
...................
.......
10
8
4
0
...... ......
-D
.."..
IO
20
30
40
-20
IO
..................
20
30
40
0'
10
20
30
40
Fig.2. A: the original ID signal, B: the signal A after HEQ in the spatial domain, C: the detailed-coefficients of A in the Haar wavelet
domain, D: the approximated-coefficients of A in the Haar wavelet domain. E: the approximated-coefficients of A after HEQ in the
Haar wavelet domain, F: the original signal A,after performing HEQ in the wavelet domain (reconstructed from C and E).
3
m
300
I8oc
2 a -
200
1 2oc
loo(.
100
600
I
50
'Io0 150
200
2%
50
100
150
200
250
50
100
150
200
250
value, the enhanced pixel values may jump outside the allowed
boundary range. In this case, these coefficient values will be
cast lo the nearby boundary (a saturation issue) The casting
process may introduce artifacts.
111 - 399
[5]
[6]
3.
CONCLUSIONS
6.
171
[SI
191
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
[I]
(21
[3]
[41
7. REFERENCES
R. Gonzalez, %nage Enhancement and Restoration,
Handbook of Parrern Recognition and Image Processing,
Academic Press,New York, pp. 191-213, 1986.
R. Gonzalez and R. Woods, Digifal Image Processing,
Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1992.
J. Fu, H. Lien and S. Wong, Wavelet-based HEQ of
gastric sonogram images, Computerized Medical
Imaging and Graphics, Vo1.24; pp. 5p-68, 2000.
T. Reeves and M. Jemigan, Multiscale-based Image
enhancement. Canadian Conference on E/ectrica/ and
Computer Engineering. Vol. 2. pp.50&505, 1997.
111 - 400