Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
cr
ip
Venkata Narasimha Rao Ganipisetty a,*, Jalandhar Da ,Gnanadev Ga, Manoj Pa ,Venkata Nadh Rb
a
us
*Correspondence to:
Venkata.nr@gmail.com.
an
V. Narasimha Rao G, Mylan Laboraotories Ltd. Bollaram, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India502325, Tel., +919000122344; e-mail: narasimha.ganipisetty@mylan.in;
Abstract
ce
pt
ed
In the present study total twelve impurities of Bisoprolol (BISO) and Hydrochlorothiazide
(HCTZ) were separated simultaneously in a single HPLC method. Out of these 12 impurities,
five are potential degradants, which are validated as per ICH guidelines. As the two active drug
substances BISO and HCTZ have different solubilities and polarities, the most critical
parameters in resolving the components from each other are pH, temperature, and solvents. The
method is precise (RSD<1.0%), accurate, linear (r2>0.999), robust, and stability indicating in the
Ac
Formulations Research and Development Centre, Mylan Laboratories Ltd, Jinnaram, Medak,
502325, India; bGITAM University,Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
range of LOQ to 150%. The HPLC method is then migrated to UPLC to further reduce the, run
time, solvent consumption, and increase the sample through put.
1.
Introduction
cr
ip
hypertension. The dosage form consists of two antihypertensive agents: one is a synthetic beta
selective (cardio selective) adrenoceptor blocking agent (Bisoprolol Fumarate) and another one
amino]-2-propanol
(E)-2-butenedioate
(2:1)
us
Its
empirical
formula
is
an
responsible for most of the -blocking activities. Hydrochlorothiazide is 6-chloro-3, 4-dihydro2H-1,2,4-benzothiadia zine-7-sulfonamide 1,1-dioxide. HCTZ is a white, or practically white,
ce
pt
ed
practically odorless crystalline powder. It is slightly soluble in water, sparingly soluble in dilute
sodium hydroxide solution, freely soluble in n-butylamine and dimethylformamide, sparingly
soluble in methanol, and insoluble in ether, chloroform, and dilute mineral acids. Its empirical
formula is C7H8ClN3O4S2 and it has a molecular weight of 297.73 [1-3]. The structures of
Bisoprolol fumarate and Hydrochlorothiazide are shown in the Fig 1.
Ac
The Bisoprolol fumarate (BISO) and Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) are official in the United
States Pharmacopeia and European Pharmacopeia as a monotherapy and co-therapies [4-5]. The
United States Pharmacopeia (USP) prescribes two chromatographic purity methods for the two
actives and tablets dosage form. One is gradient seperation using L11 packing and other one is
an isocratic using L7 packing.. These chromatographic purity procedures are inadequate to
separate all 12 specified and unspecified impurities of BISO and HCTZ .Also the two methods
monitor only two impurities separations. In the European Pharmacopoeia two separate HPLC
methods are available for BISO impurities and HCTZ impurities . But these methods uses more
cr
ip
than one chromatographic procedure to determine all the impurities of BISO and HCTZ which is
very lengthy, time consuming, expensive, cumbersome and tedious. A thorough literature survey
revealed that one HPLC method was reported for the determination of Bisoprolol and its
us
assay, and its conceivable impurities. This method does not specify all the impurities of
an
bisoprolol as listed in the European Pharmacopoeia. Another RP-HPLC method applicable for
bisoprolol impurities is published by Yu Butao [7]. Several other publications like dissolution
ce
pt
ed
Ac
conceivable impurities [6] which employs a non specific detection mode to determine the total
indicating HPLC method for the determination of five important specified and unspecified
impurities of BISO and HCTZ simultaneously in a tablet formulation; using simple and
inexpensive chemicals, solvents and columns. The possible degradation impurities were also
focused during the stress studies. Further the HPLC method was migrated to UPLC, to reduce
the run time and increase the sample throughput.
The chemical structures of all the impurities of BISO and HCTZ are shown in figure 2 and their
cr
ip
us
an
2.1
Experimental
Samples of Bisoprolol and Hydrochlorothiazide tablets and placebo used were prepared
at Mylan R&D Center (Hyderabad, India). Reference standards and impurity reference standards
of bisoprolol fumarate and hydrochlorothiazide were procured from Unichem laboratories Ltd
ce
pt
ed
(Mumbai, India) and European pharmacopoeia. The analytical reagent grade monobasic
potassium Phosphate used in the preparation of buffer solution was procured from Merck, India.
The HPLC grade acetonitrile and methanol were procured from Merck; India. Ortho-phosphoric
acid used for adjusting the pH of the buffer solution was procured from Qualigens Fine
Chemicals (Mumbai, India). HPLC water was obtained in-house from Milli-Q water Purification
system, Millipore Corp. (Bedford, MA).
Ac
2.
2.2
Integrated HPLC system consists of Waters Alliance 2695 (Waters Corporation, Milford,
USA) equipped with a quaternary pump, an auto sampler, column heater and Waters 2996
photodiode array detector (PDA). Integrated UPLC system consists of Waters acquity ultra
performance LC, with PDA detector, column manager, sample manager, and binary solvent
manager. Data collection and analysis were performed using Empower software 2(Waters
cr
ip
Corporation). pH meter used to measure the pH of the buffer solution was manufactured by
Inolab. Balance used for weighing the reference standards, impurities standards and samples was
us
HPLC separation was achieved on a Zodiacsil-C18 column from Zodiac life science with
dimensions 250 mm x 4.6 mm (I.D) and particle size of 5 m. UPLC method was developed on
an
performed ACQUITY BEH C18 column having dimensions 2.1 x 100 mm (1.7 m particles).
The elution is linear gradient with mobile phase A consisting of a buffer solution (pH 3.60)
ce
pt
ed
mixture of acetonitrile and methanol in the ratio 80:20 (v/v) respectively. The Mobile phase B
composition is ramped with respect to the time as T/%B: 0/5, 12/10, 30/12, 37/28, 55/28, 60/35,
68/35, 70/5, 80/5. The Mobile phase flow rate was maintained at 0.8 ml/min throughout the run
with a column temperature of 29C. The injection volume was 10 L and detection at 226 nm.
Water bath of Thermo constant temperature (Mumbai, India) was used for solution
degradation and dry oven was used for solid state thermal stress study. A walk-in chamber from
Ac
thermo lab(Mumbai, India) was used for stability studies and photostability chamber was
equipped with UV and fluorescent lamps with an overall illumination of not less than 1.2million
lux hours and an integrated UV energy of not than 200Whm-2 in compliance with ICH
guidelines.
2.3
ratio of 80:20v/v respectively was used as a diluent for preparing all the solutions. Standard
cr
ip
us
an
ppm), with sonication for 20 minutes and intermittent shaking in an ice cold bath. The solution is
then filtered through 0.45 m PVDF filter. The sample solution is kept on bench top to attain the
room temperature and injected into chromatographic system. A sample solution spiked with all
impurities is prepared by dissolving appropriate amounts of all impurities and tablet powder
ce
pt
ed
2.4
Ac
of 2.5 gmL-1 and 12.5 gmL-1 respectively. The sample solution was prepared by dissolving the
Forced degradation studies were conducted on samples and on the plain placebo with
individual drugs. Intentional degradation was carried out by exposing 10 mL of test solution to
0.1N hydrochloric acid and 0.01N sodium hydroxide at 60C for1hour and 30 minutes
respectively using a water bath. The solutions were withdrawn, allowed to attain room
temperature and then neutralized with base/acid and injected into the chromatograph. Oxidative
degradation of sample solution and placebo was conducted using 3% hydrogen peroxide in a 20
mL volumetric flask. The solution was allowed to attain ambient temperature, further diluted
cr
ip
upto mark with the diluent and injected into the chromatograph. The tablets and placebo were
exposed to humidity at 25C and 90% RH for 48 hours to study the effect of humidity.
us
hours. Photolytic studies were carried out on solid dosage form. The samples in a Petri dish was
spread as a thin layer (1mm) and exposed to light (1.2 million lux hours) in a photo stability
an
chamber. The methods analytical data were collected at a single wavelength of 226 nm.
Additional PDA detector data was collected for the peak purity evaluation.
The
solution
stability of standard and sample was carried out by leaving both the test solutions of sample and
ce
pt
ed
standard at room temperature for 24 hours. The Mobile phase stability study was also carried out
by keeping the Mobile phase at room temperature for 3 days and by evaluating the system
suitability.
2.6
Filter Validation
Filters used (0.45 PVDF) in the sample preparation was evaluated for its suitability. A spiked
Ac
For thermal stress study, the tablets and placebo were kept in dry oven at 60C for 72
sample was prepared as described above in the specified diluent. A portion of the sample was
filtered through PVDF, and the other portion was centrifuged. These samples were then
chromatographed. The results obtained from the filtered samples were compared with those
obtained with centrifuged sample.
3.1
cr
ip
Bisoprolol fumarate has three specified impurities and seven unspecified impurities.
Hydrochlorothiazide has two specified impurities. Since no single HPLC method was available
us
an
Initially the molecules were studied for the spectrophotometer absorbance in the UV-VIS region
to establish the max. The UV spectra shown in fig 3 show max for both the actives. A
common wavelength at 226nm was chosen based on two reasons. The first reason is that
majority of impurities and actives have significant absorbance at 226nm and secondly a good
ce
pt
ed
signal to noise ratio with no interference from the placebo and diluent was found at the RT of
analyte peaks. The next primary aim was to choose a column and separate all 12 impurities from
each other and from the active peaks without compromising the resolution. An initial attempt
was made using the USP chromatographic purity procedure. The gradient programme given in
the monograph was extended to check separation. The attempt was unsuccessful, as only few
impurities along with bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide were seen. A fresh development was
Ac
the main aim was development of a single, accurate, reproducible, stability indicating RP-HPLC
initiated with long C18 column (250mmx4.6mm, 5) with phosphate buffer (KH2PO4, 0.05M).
Initially an isocratic mode with 20% methanol was used and injected a spiked sample containing
all impurities. Little separation was observed between all the impurities except for Impurities N,
Impurity R, Impurity G, which were observed to be close eluting. As the two actives differ in
polarities, an attempt was made by reducing the pH to 3.5 and introducing a gradient programme.
All impurities were well separated except for impurity G. By slight modification of the pH to
3.60 and introducing acetonitrile in methanol in the ratio 80:20 as a mobile phase B composition,
cr
ip
the desired separation was achieved between these impurities. Figure 4 shows chromatogram of
sample spiked with all impurities.
us
an
precision, accuracy, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), robustness and
system suitability parameters in accordance with the ICH guideline Q2 (R1) [19].
ce
pt
ed
3.3.2
Specificity
Ac
The specificity of the method was determined by analyzing the blank solution, placebo solution
and the spiked sample. The chromatograms of blank, placebo and spiked sample were compared
and found no interference at the retention times of individual impurities and active peaks.
Samples of bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide tablets, placebo were subjected to stress
conditions as discussed in the section 2.4. The results obtained from the forced degradation
studies were tabulated in the table 2.
cr
ip
us
Linearity
an
3.3.4
Linearity of the detector response was established by injecting the potential impurities at
the concentration ranging from LOQ to about 150% (LOQ, 20%, 50%, 80%, 100%, 120% and
150%) of the target concentration A linearity graph was plotted between the detector response
ce
pt
ed
and the concentration. The correlation coefficient obtained was 0.999. The linearity data was
shown in table 3.
3.3.5
Accuracy
Accuracy of the method was evaluated by performing recovery study for the known
impurities of BISO and HCTZ respectively in triplicate by spiking the sample preparation with
Ac
known impurities at 50%, 75%, 100%, 125% and 150%. The average recoveries and %RSD
were calculated. The recovery of six impurities from the excipients ranged from 94.9 to 109.3%
and the %RSD of the individual preparations was between 0.1% and 6.5%. The accuracy data
was shown in table 3.
10
3.3.6 Precision
The system precision was established by injecting the BISO and HCTZ standard
cr
ip
calculated for the areas of BISO and HCTZ peaks. The precision of the proposed method was
us
sample results. Intermediate precision was studied by analyzing the samples by a different
an
analyst on another instrument and different day to evaluate the ruggedness of the method. The
ce
pt
ed
PVDF filters were used to filter the sample matrix containing insoluble placebo powder.
To assess the impact of filters on the absorption of drug during the sample preparation filter
validation study were done. For this samples were filtered through PVDF and compared with
that of centrifuged sample. Table 4 shows the filter validation data.
The above results show that there was no interference of impurities due to the filter at the
retention times suggesting PVDF filters are suitable for filtering the tablets powder in the
Ac
Hydrochlorothiazide tablets of 1.25 mg strength. RSD (%) was calculated from the obtained six
sample preparation.
11
3.3.8 Robustness
No significant effect was observed on the system suitability parameters such as capacity
factor, resolution and theoretical plates of respective components when small but deliberate
cr
ip
changes were made to chromatographic conditions. To study the effect of flow rate on the
resolution, three different flow rates were studied (0.6 mL/min, 1.0 mL/min; 1.2 mL/min,) and
us
and 40C. The effect of variation of organic composition in the mobile phase was also studied.
4.0
an
The impact of the mobile phase pH on the retention times was studied between 0.2 units.
ce
pt
ed
A need was envisioned to develop faster method to reduce the run time, because the
above proposed method though very precise and robust was nevertheless a time consuming
exercise. An attempt was made to improve analyst productivity by taking advantage of smaller
particles column which would improve resolution speed and sensitivity without compromising
accuracy.
Acquity UPLCTM System (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) was used to transfer the
Ac
impact of column temperature on the resolution was studied at 25C, 27C, 30C, 32C, 35C
method from conventional HPLC to UPLCTM. The separation was scaled from a C18, 250 x 4.6
mm (5 m particles) HPLC column to a 2.1 x 100 mm ACQUITY UPLCTM BEH C18 column
(1.7 m particles). The separation was achieved using sodium perchlorate buffer (pH 3.0) and a
mixture of methanol and acetonitrile (20:80) as organic solvent. The gradient profile was
12
tweaked to suit the UPLCTM analysis. The mobile phase flow rate was kept at 0.25 mL/min., the
run time was reduced to 22 minutes as compared to 80 minutes in HPLC. Complete resolution
was observed for all the relevant analytes as seen in chromatogram (Figure 5). An approximately
cr
ip
us
Conclusions
an
The gradient RP-LC method developed for the simultaneous determination of potential
degradant and process impurities of Bisoprolol and Hydrochlorothiazide in a single
chromatographic run is precise, accurate, linear, robust, and selective. The method was validated
showing satisfactory data for all the method validation parameters tested. The developed method
ce
pt
ed
is stability indicating and can be used for assessing the stability of Bisoprolol or
Hydrochlorothiazide or in combination of both in fixed dosage forms. Finally, we succeeded to
transfer the method from RP-HPLC to UPLC to further reduce the run time, solvent consumption
and increase the sample throughput.
Acknowledgements
Ac
The authors wish to thank the management of Mylan Laboratories Ltd for supporting this
work. Authors wish to thank the formulation research group for providing the samples for the
research. We also like to thank colleagues in the Analytical development services for their cooperation in carrying out this work.
13
References
http://www.rxlist.com/ziac-drug.htm.
[2]
http://www.Drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00612.
[3]
http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00999.
[4]
The United States Pharmacopoeia 36 National Formulary, Rockville, MD: The United
us
[5]
European Pharmacopoeia seventh edition, supplement 7.4 page 4321, Directorate for the
[6]
an
for the determination of bisoprolol and potential impurities, J. Chromatogr A, 654, 299.
[8]
Y. Botao, S. Mingxi, Y. Jianhong, Z. (2005), Renjie, Huaxi Yaoxue Zazhi, 20, 550.
ce
pt
ed
[7]
[9]
Ac
cr
ip
[1]
[10]
14
[11]
[10]
analytical error function of two chromatographic methods with fluorimetric detection for the
determination of bisoprolol and metoprolol in human plasma Marino, Biomed. Chromatogr. 16,
[12]
cr
ip
517.
S. J. Joshi, P. A. Karbhari, S. I. Bhoir, K. S. Bindu, C. Das, (2010), RP-HPLC method for
[13]
us
an
[14]
[15]
ce
pt
ed
C. Oniscu, C. V. Vlase, and G.( 2007), Peste, Roumanian Biotech. Lett, 12, 3079.
Ac
A New Liquid
[18]
simple and rapid high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of
15
bisoprolol fumarate and hydrochlorothiazide in a tablet dosage form, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.,
48, 1055.
[19]
t
cr
ip
us
an
M
ce
pt
ed
Ac
16
cr
ip
us
an
M
ce
pt
ed
Ac
Figure 1
17
Figure 2
Chemical
Names
and
structures
of
impurities
of
bisoprolol
and
cr
ip
us
an
M
ce
pt
ed
Ac
hydrochlorothiazide
18
ce
pt
ed
Ac
cr
ip
us
an
Figure 3
Overlaid UV-VIS spectra's of bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide
19
ce
pt
ed
Ac
cr
ip
us
an
Figure 4
Spiked sample chromatogram
20
ce
pt
ed
Ac
cr
ip
us
an
Figure 5
UPLC migrated chromatogram of spiked sample
21
Name of the
Nature of the
Process Related or
Impurity
Impurity
Degradant
Specified
Degradant
Unspecified
Process related
cr
ip
us
an
Specified
Degradant
Specified
Degradant
Unspecified
Process related
Unspecified
Degradant
Unspecified
Process related
Unspecified
Process related
Unspecified
Process related
ce
pt
ed
Bisoprolol Fumarate
Ac
Active
22
Unspecified
Process related
Benzothiadiazine
Specified
Degradant
Chlorothiazide
Specified
t
cr
ip
us
an
M
ce
pt
ed
Ac
Hydrochlorothiazide
23
Degradant
% Impurity levels
Degradation
Conditions
I
II
III
IV
cr
ip
Total
Parameters
VI
60C for 1
1.99
0.01N NaOH
0.40
ce
pt
ed
at 60C for
hour
Base
us
Acid
at
0.42
0.01
2.61
an
0.1NHCl
0.23
0.01
0.78
30 minutes
Peroxide
3% of H2O2
0.27
0.08
0.18
0.02
2.13
0.08
0.12
0.14
0.54
0.05
4.53
0.04
0.05
0.26
60C for 72
Thermal
hours
Ac
impurities
Photolytic
1.2MILLION
LUX
24
HOURS
I=Bisoprolol imp A, II= Bisoprolol imp L, III= Bisoprolol imp G, IV= Bisoprolol imp K,
cr
ip
us
an
M
ce
pt
ed
Ac
V=Benzothiadiazine, VI=Chlorothiazide.
25
109.3
100%
106.5
ne
us
50%
95.8
de
102.6
103.8
98.4
100.9
96.4
101
102.8
102.6
95.2
98.1
105
101.8
100.8
95.4
97.8
0.0196
0.0191
0.0016
0.0019
0.0010
0.0593
0.0577
0.0048
0.0058
0.0030
an
99.5
Benzothiazidi
103.2
ce
pt
ed
LOQ
Chlorothaizi
Impurity
cr
ip
Impurity
Accuracy
150%
LOD(%w/w)
Ac
Parameter
Impurity
LOQ(%w/w)
26
10
10
10
25878.14
49373.85
97
86
12
12
87043.9882
us
40314.2
136461.9018
3043.571
10452.1079
0.999
0.999
0.999
0.70
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.90
0.90
1.00
0.50
0.40
1.9
1.2
4.0
1.1
2.0
0.999
0.60
ce
pt
ed
Precision(%RSD)a
4617.2669
0.999
358.6578
an
Correlation coefficient
367.8611
Intercept
Intermediate
Precision(%RSD)a
Precision at LOQ(%RSD)
Ac
Slope
cr
ip
27
of
peak
PVDF
result
Absolute
Initial
Difference Impurity
Solution
Absolute
stability
difference
us
(%w/w)
level
Centrifuge
after 24 hrs
0.56
0.57
0.01
0.56
0.57
0.01
ce
pt
ed
Bisoprolol A
(%w/w)
(%w/w)
an
(%w/w)
result
Bisoprolol G
0.61
0.61
0.63
0.64
0.01
Bisoprolol L
0.56
0.56
0.55
0.56
0.01
Chlorothiazide
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.34
Benzothiadiazine 1.05
1.05
1.05
1.06
0.01
Ac
Unfiltered
cr
ip
Name
28
ce
pt
ed
Ac
cr
ip
us
an
Bisoprolol E
0.1
0.1
0
0.1
0.1
0
Total Impurities
7.52
7.51
0.01
7.56
7.66
0.1
29
Flow (mL/min)
Buffer(%A)
Organic
Curve Type
Composition
cr
ip
Time
95
0.2
95
0.2
75
25
15
0.2
75
25
16
0.2
80
20
18
0.2
95
0.2
95
ce
pt
ed
22
us
0.2
an
Ac
(%B)
30